Loading…

The effects of cow genetic group on the density of raw whole milk

The density of milk is dependent upon various factors including temperature, processing conditions, and animal breed. This study evaluated the effect of different cow genetic groups, Jersey, elite Holstein Friesians (EHF), and national average Holstein Friesians (NAHF) on the compositional and physi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Irish journal of agricultural and food research 2020-01, Vol.59 (1), p.215-223
Main Authors: Parmar, P., Lopez-Villalobos, N., Tobin, J.T., Murphy, E., Buckley, F., McDonagh, A., O’Mahony, J.A., Crowley, S.V., Kelly, A.L., Shalloo, L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f2af831e0cd85d13be4500183731d7d578c884f43d8686618969d1e385bf25fd3
container_end_page 223
container_issue 1
container_start_page 215
container_title Irish journal of agricultural and food research
container_volume 59
creator Parmar, P.
Lopez-Villalobos, N.
Tobin, J.T.
Murphy, E.
Buckley, F.
McDonagh, A.
O’Mahony, J.A.
Crowley, S.V.
Kelly, A.L.
Shalloo, L.
description The density of milk is dependent upon various factors including temperature, processing conditions, and animal breed. This study evaluated the effect of different cow genetic groups, Jersey, elite Holstein Friesians (EHF), and national average Holstein Friesians (NAHF) on the compositional and physicochemical properties of milk. Approximately 1,040 representative (morning and evening) milk samples (~115 per month during 9 mo) were collected once every 2 wk. Milk composition was determined with a Bentley Dairyspec instrument. Data were analysed with a mixed linear model that included the fixed effects of sampling month, genetic group, interaction between month and genetic group and the random effects of cow to account for repeated measures on the same animal. Milk density was determined using three different analytical approaches – a portable and a standard desktop density meter and 100 cm³ calibrated glass pycnometers. Milk density was analysed with the same mixed model as for milk composition but including the analytical method as a fixed effect. Jersey cows had the greatest mean for fat content (5.69 ± 0.13%), followed by EHF (4.81 ± 0.16%) and NAHF (4.30 ± 0.15%). Milk density was significantly higher (1.0313 g/cm³ ± 0.00026, P < 0.05) for the milk of Jersey breed when compared to the EHF (1.0304 ± 0.00026 g/cm³) and NAHF (1.0303 ± 0.00024 g/cm³) genetic groups. The results from this study can be used by farmers and dairy processors alike to enhance accuracy when calculating the quantity and value of milk solids depending upon the genetic merit of the animal/herd, and may also improve milk payment systems through relating milk solids content and density.
doi_str_mv 10.15212/ijafr-2020-0115
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7301e814575845478858057a3f926e1c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27041768</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7301e814575845478858057a3f926e1c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>27041768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f2af831e0cd85d13be4500183731d7d578c884f43d8686618969d1e385bf25fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtrAjEUhUNpodZ2300hf2Dae_OYZJYifYHQjV2HmIfOVI0kU8R_31GLqwuHcz4uHyGPCM8oGbKXtrMxVwwYVIAor8iIATRVA6y5JiNQDVa15vyW3JXSAUghJBuRyXwVaIgxuL7QFKlLe7oM29C3ji5z-t3RtKX90PFhW9r-cOxku6f7VVoHumnXP_fkJtp1CQ__d0y-317n049q9vX-OZ3MKsdZ3VeR2ag5BnBeS498EYQEQM0VR6-8VNppLaLgXte6rlE3deMxcC0Xkcno-Zh8nrk-2c7scrux-WCSbc0pSHlpbB7eXgejOGDQKKSSWkihtJYapLI8NqwO6AYWnFkup1JyiBcegjnpNCed5qjTHHUOk6fzpCt9ypc-UyBQDWL_AAYNb_U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of cow genetic group on the density of raw whole milk</title><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Parmar, P. ; Lopez-Villalobos, N. ; Tobin, J.T. ; Murphy, E. ; Buckley, F. ; McDonagh, A. ; O’Mahony, J.A. ; Crowley, S.V. ; Kelly, A.L. ; Shalloo, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Parmar, P. ; Lopez-Villalobos, N. ; Tobin, J.T. ; Murphy, E. ; Buckley, F. ; McDonagh, A. ; O’Mahony, J.A. ; Crowley, S.V. ; Kelly, A.L. ; Shalloo, L.</creatorcontrib><description>The density of milk is dependent upon various factors including temperature, processing conditions, and animal breed. This study evaluated the effect of different cow genetic groups, Jersey, elite Holstein Friesians (EHF), and national average Holstein Friesians (NAHF) on the compositional and physicochemical properties of milk. Approximately 1,040 representative (morning and evening) milk samples (~115 per month during 9 mo) were collected once every 2 wk. Milk composition was determined with a Bentley Dairyspec instrument. Data were analysed with a mixed linear model that included the fixed effects of sampling month, genetic group, interaction between month and genetic group and the random effects of cow to account for repeated measures on the same animal. Milk density was determined using three different analytical approaches – a portable and a standard desktop density meter and 100 cm³ calibrated glass pycnometers. Milk density was analysed with the same mixed model as for milk composition but including the analytical method as a fixed effect. Jersey cows had the greatest mean for fat content (5.69 ± 0.13%), followed by EHF (4.81 ± 0.16%) and NAHF (4.30 ± 0.15%). Milk density was significantly higher (1.0313 g/cm³ ± 0.00026, P &lt; 0.05) for the milk of Jersey breed when compared to the EHF (1.0304 ± 0.00026 g/cm³) and NAHF (1.0303 ± 0.00024 g/cm³) genetic groups. The results from this study can be used by farmers and dairy processors alike to enhance accuracy when calculating the quantity and value of milk solids depending upon the genetic merit of the animal/herd, and may also improve milk payment systems through relating milk solids content and density.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0791-6833</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2009-9029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2009-9029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15212/ijafr-2020-0115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>TEAGASC-Agriculture and Food Development Authority ("TEAGASC")</publisher><subject>composition ; density ; genetic group ; Original Study ; raw milk ; whole milk</subject><ispartof>Irish journal of agricultural and food research, 2020-01, Vol.59 (1), p.215-223</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f2af831e0cd85d13be4500183731d7d578c884f43d8686618969d1e385bf25fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27041768$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27041768$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parmar, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Villalobos, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobin, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonagh, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Mahony, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, S.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalloo, L.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of cow genetic group on the density of raw whole milk</title><title>Irish journal of agricultural and food research</title><description>The density of milk is dependent upon various factors including temperature, processing conditions, and animal breed. This study evaluated the effect of different cow genetic groups, Jersey, elite Holstein Friesians (EHF), and national average Holstein Friesians (NAHF) on the compositional and physicochemical properties of milk. Approximately 1,040 representative (morning and evening) milk samples (~115 per month during 9 mo) were collected once every 2 wk. Milk composition was determined with a Bentley Dairyspec instrument. Data were analysed with a mixed linear model that included the fixed effects of sampling month, genetic group, interaction between month and genetic group and the random effects of cow to account for repeated measures on the same animal. Milk density was determined using three different analytical approaches – a portable and a standard desktop density meter and 100 cm³ calibrated glass pycnometers. Milk density was analysed with the same mixed model as for milk composition but including the analytical method as a fixed effect. Jersey cows had the greatest mean for fat content (5.69 ± 0.13%), followed by EHF (4.81 ± 0.16%) and NAHF (4.30 ± 0.15%). Milk density was significantly higher (1.0313 g/cm³ ± 0.00026, P &lt; 0.05) for the milk of Jersey breed when compared to the EHF (1.0304 ± 0.00026 g/cm³) and NAHF (1.0303 ± 0.00024 g/cm³) genetic groups. The results from this study can be used by farmers and dairy processors alike to enhance accuracy when calculating the quantity and value of milk solids depending upon the genetic merit of the animal/herd, and may also improve milk payment systems through relating milk solids content and density.</description><subject>composition</subject><subject>density</subject><subject>genetic group</subject><subject>Original Study</subject><subject>raw milk</subject><subject>whole milk</subject><issn>0791-6833</issn><issn>2009-9029</issn><issn>2009-9029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtrAjEUhUNpodZ2300hf2Dae_OYZJYifYHQjV2HmIfOVI0kU8R_31GLqwuHcz4uHyGPCM8oGbKXtrMxVwwYVIAor8iIATRVA6y5JiNQDVa15vyW3JXSAUghJBuRyXwVaIgxuL7QFKlLe7oM29C3ji5z-t3RtKX90PFhW9r-cOxku6f7VVoHumnXP_fkJtp1CQ__d0y-317n049q9vX-OZ3MKsdZ3VeR2ag5BnBeS498EYQEQM0VR6-8VNppLaLgXte6rlE3deMxcC0Xkcno-Zh8nrk-2c7scrux-WCSbc0pSHlpbB7eXgejOGDQKKSSWkihtJYapLI8NqwO6AYWnFkup1JyiBcegjnpNCed5qjTHHUOk6fzpCt9ypc-UyBQDWL_AAYNb_U</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Parmar, P.</creator><creator>Lopez-Villalobos, N.</creator><creator>Tobin, J.T.</creator><creator>Murphy, E.</creator><creator>Buckley, F.</creator><creator>McDonagh, A.</creator><creator>O’Mahony, J.A.</creator><creator>Crowley, S.V.</creator><creator>Kelly, A.L.</creator><creator>Shalloo, L.</creator><general>TEAGASC-Agriculture and Food Development Authority ("TEAGASC")</general><general>Compuscript Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>The effects of cow genetic group on the density of raw whole milk</title><author>Parmar, P. ; Lopez-Villalobos, N. ; Tobin, J.T. ; Murphy, E. ; Buckley, F. ; McDonagh, A. ; O’Mahony, J.A. ; Crowley, S.V. ; Kelly, A.L. ; Shalloo, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f2af831e0cd85d13be4500183731d7d578c884f43d8686618969d1e385bf25fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>composition</topic><topic>density</topic><topic>genetic group</topic><topic>Original Study</topic><topic>raw milk</topic><topic>whole milk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parmar, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez-Villalobos, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tobin, J.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonagh, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Mahony, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, S.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalloo, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Irish journal of agricultural and food research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parmar, P.</au><au>Lopez-Villalobos, N.</au><au>Tobin, J.T.</au><au>Murphy, E.</au><au>Buckley, F.</au><au>McDonagh, A.</au><au>O’Mahony, J.A.</au><au>Crowley, S.V.</au><au>Kelly, A.L.</au><au>Shalloo, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of cow genetic group on the density of raw whole milk</atitle><jtitle>Irish journal of agricultural and food research</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>223</epage><pages>215-223</pages><issn>0791-6833</issn><issn>2009-9029</issn><eissn>2009-9029</eissn><abstract>The density of milk is dependent upon various factors including temperature, processing conditions, and animal breed. This study evaluated the effect of different cow genetic groups, Jersey, elite Holstein Friesians (EHF), and national average Holstein Friesians (NAHF) on the compositional and physicochemical properties of milk. Approximately 1,040 representative (morning and evening) milk samples (~115 per month during 9 mo) were collected once every 2 wk. Milk composition was determined with a Bentley Dairyspec instrument. Data were analysed with a mixed linear model that included the fixed effects of sampling month, genetic group, interaction between month and genetic group and the random effects of cow to account for repeated measures on the same animal. Milk density was determined using three different analytical approaches – a portable and a standard desktop density meter and 100 cm³ calibrated glass pycnometers. Milk density was analysed with the same mixed model as for milk composition but including the analytical method as a fixed effect. Jersey cows had the greatest mean for fat content (5.69 ± 0.13%), followed by EHF (4.81 ± 0.16%) and NAHF (4.30 ± 0.15%). Milk density was significantly higher (1.0313 g/cm³ ± 0.00026, P &lt; 0.05) for the milk of Jersey breed when compared to the EHF (1.0304 ± 0.00026 g/cm³) and NAHF (1.0303 ± 0.00024 g/cm³) genetic groups. The results from this study can be used by farmers and dairy processors alike to enhance accuracy when calculating the quantity and value of milk solids depending upon the genetic merit of the animal/herd, and may also improve milk payment systems through relating milk solids content and density.</abstract><pub>TEAGASC-Agriculture and Food Development Authority ("TEAGASC")</pub><doi>10.15212/ijafr-2020-0115</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0791-6833
ispartof Irish journal of agricultural and food research, 2020-01, Vol.59 (1), p.215-223
issn 0791-6833
2009-9029
2009-9029
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7301e814575845478858057a3f926e1c
source Directory of Open Access Journals; JSTOR
subjects composition
density
genetic group
Original Study
raw milk
whole milk
title The effects of cow genetic group on the density of raw whole milk
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A48%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20cow%20genetic%20group%20on%20the%20density%20of%20raw%20whole%20milk&rft.jtitle=Irish%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20food%20research&rft.au=Parmar,%20P.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=223&rft.pages=215-223&rft.issn=0791-6833&rft.eissn=2009-9029&rft_id=info:doi/10.15212/ijafr-2020-0115&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E27041768%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-f2af831e0cd85d13be4500183731d7d578c884f43d8686618969d1e385bf25fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27041768&rfr_iscdi=true