Health care system and patient-related factors affecting low cancer screening participation in Poland

• Published in: Preventive medicine reports 2023-12, Vol.36, p.102442-102442, Article 102442
• Main Authors: Andrzejczak, A., Rucińska, M., Żarłok, E., Osowiecka, K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breast cancer screening; Cancer; Cervical cancer screening; Health care system-related reasons; Patient-related reasons; Regular
• ISSN: 2211-3355; 2211-3355
• DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102442

•Low level of participation in cancer screening in Poland.•More activity by general practitioners to increase cancer screening participation.•Better promotion of screening by central institutions.•Recommended sending personal invitations. The level of participation in cancer screening is low in the Polish population. The aim of this study was to assess the opinions of centers providing cancer screening as to the reasons for the low frequency of cancer screening in Poland and possible methods to increase participation. In July 2020 433 centers in Poland carried out breast and/or cervical cancer screening. Of these, 136 centers decided to participate in the study. The study was conducted using an original questionnaire.The questions were addressed to opinion of centers about: reasons for the low frequency of cancer screening in Poland, methods to increase the frequency of cancer screening, pricing and motivating factors for providing cancer screening. Among opinions as to possible reasons for the low frequency of cancer screening in Poland related to the care-system, lack of encouragement from general practitioners, lack of invitations for cancer screening and lack of proper social advertising were most prevalent; whereas among reasons related to patients, a low awareness of cancer screening and fear of cancer diagnosis. The main methods that could potentially increase screening participation are considered to be the inclusion of cancer screening in mandatory periodic employee examinations, more activity by general practitioners, better promotion of screening by central institutions, and sending personal invitations. In conclude some interventions should be carried out to motivate people to break down barriers.