Loading…

The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International indigenous policy journal 2017-07, Vol.8 (3), p.1-10
Main Authors: Boese, Greg D. B., Neufeld, Katelin H. S., Starzyk, Katherine B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3
container_end_page 10
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title International indigenous policy journal
container_volume 8
creator Boese, Greg D. B.
Neufeld, Katelin H. S.
Starzyk, Katherine B.
description The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study, and Canadian Public Opinion on Aboriginal Peoples Report are three existing surveys that provide such a baseline, though each use only self-report measures. We measured residential school knowledge of 2,250 non-Indigenous Canadian undergraduate students through self-report (subjective) and multiple-choice (objective) measures. Analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between self-reported and objective knowledge of residential schools.
doi_str_mv 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.3.3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_73f5ea556e3046ad8ffdb4add028003e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48767254</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_73f5ea556e3046ad8ffdb4add028003e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>48767254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1Lw0AQDaJgqb17EQKeE3eznzmWYm2xImj1umz2o26I2bibIv33po2Ic5lhePPem5ck1xDkkBOO75zr6rwAkOU8Rzk6SyawhDQjjMPzf_NlMouxBkNxACiHk2S5_TDpu2ycdv0h9TZ9NY3NXkznQ58-GRn3wcTUtek8RhOja3fpysXeB6dkkz62_rsxemeukgsrm2hmv32avC3vt4tVtnl-WC_mm0whUvZZxZjWFSFYWQhUWVSMIGoHKxJza2UJNJOMVJQYQEsNSoBspZDCWmFICdVomqxHXu1lLbrgPmU4CC-dOC182AkZeqcaIxiyxEhCqEEAU6kHAV1hqTUohueRGbhuR64u-K-9ib2o_T60g30BS0RoATDiAwqMKBV8jMHYP1UIxCl8cQxfHMMXXCCBhpOb8aQ-BvWHx5xRVhCMfgCTooEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1935620438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>CRKN Open Access Journals List</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Boese, Greg D. B. ; Neufeld, Katelin H. S. ; Starzyk, Katherine B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boese, Greg D. B. ; Neufeld, Katelin H. S. ; Starzyk, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><description>The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study, and Canadian Public Opinion on Aboriginal Peoples Report are three existing surveys that provide such a baseline, though each use only self-report measures. We measured residential school knowledge of 2,250 non-Indigenous Canadian undergraduate students through self-report (subjective) and multiple-choice (objective) measures. Analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between self-reported and objective knowledge of residential schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-5781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-5781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.3.3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Western University</publisher><subject>American Indians ; Boarding schools ; historical knowledge ; History ; Indigenous peoples ; Knowledge ; Multiple choice ; Native North Americans ; Public opinion ; Public schools ; residential schools ; Schools ; Self report ; self-report measures ; Truth and reconciliation commissions ; Undergraduate students ; Validity</subject><ispartof>International indigenous policy journal, 2017-07, Vol.8 (3), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Western Ontario 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1935620438?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21387,21394,21395,25753,27344,27866,27924,27925,33611,33774,33985,34530,37012,43733,43948,44115,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boese, Greg D. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neufeld, Katelin H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starzyk, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><title>The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools</title><title>International indigenous policy journal</title><description>The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study, and Canadian Public Opinion on Aboriginal Peoples Report are three existing surveys that provide such a baseline, though each use only self-report measures. We measured residential school knowledge of 2,250 non-Indigenous Canadian undergraduate students through self-report (subjective) and multiple-choice (objective) measures. Analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between self-reported and objective knowledge of residential schools.</description><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>Boarding schools</subject><subject>historical knowledge</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>residential schools</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>self-report measures</subject><subject>Truth and reconciliation commissions</subject><subject>Undergraduate students</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1916-5781</issn><issn>1916-5781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1Lw0AQDaJgqb17EQKeE3eznzmWYm2xImj1umz2o26I2bibIv33po2Ic5lhePPem5ck1xDkkBOO75zr6rwAkOU8Rzk6SyawhDQjjMPzf_NlMouxBkNxACiHk2S5_TDpu2ycdv0h9TZ9NY3NXkznQ58-GRn3wcTUtek8RhOja3fpysXeB6dkkz62_rsxemeukgsrm2hmv32avC3vt4tVtnl-WC_mm0whUvZZxZjWFSFYWQhUWVSMIGoHKxJza2UJNJOMVJQYQEsNSoBspZDCWmFICdVomqxHXu1lLbrgPmU4CC-dOC182AkZeqcaIxiyxEhCqEEAU6kHAV1hqTUohueRGbhuR64u-K-9ib2o_T60g30BS0RoATDiAwqMKBV8jMHYP1UIxCl8cQxfHMMXXCCBhpOb8aQ-BvWHx5xRVhCMfgCTooEo</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Boese, Greg D. B.</creator><creator>Neufeld, Katelin H. S.</creator><creator>Starzyk, Katherine B.</creator><general>Western University</general><general>University of Western Ontario</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge</title><author>Boese, Greg D. B. ; Neufeld, Katelin H. S. ; Starzyk, Katherine B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>Boarding schools</topic><topic>historical knowledge</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>residential schools</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>self-report measures</topic><topic>Truth and reconciliation commissions</topic><topic>Undergraduate students</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boese, Greg D. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neufeld, Katelin H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starzyk, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International indigenous policy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boese, Greg D. B.</au><au>Neufeld, Katelin H. S.</au><au>Starzyk, Katherine B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools</atitle><jtitle>International indigenous policy journal</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>1916-5781</issn><eissn>1916-5781</eissn><abstract>The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study, and Canadian Public Opinion on Aboriginal Peoples Report are three existing surveys that provide such a baseline, though each use only self-report measures. We measured residential school knowledge of 2,250 non-Indigenous Canadian undergraduate students through self-report (subjective) and multiple-choice (objective) measures. Analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between self-reported and objective knowledge of residential schools.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Western University</pub><doi>10.18584/iipj.2017.8.3.3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1916-5781
ispartof International indigenous policy journal, 2017-07, Vol.8 (3), p.1-10
issn 1916-5781
1916-5781
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_73f5ea556e3046ad8ffdb4add028003e
source Publicly Available Content Database; Politics Collection; CRKN Open Access Journals List; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection
subjects American Indians
Boarding schools
historical knowledge
History
Indigenous peoples
Knowledge
Multiple choice
Native North Americans
Public opinion
Public schools
residential schools
Schools
Self report
self-report measures
Truth and reconciliation commissions
Undergraduate students
Validity
title The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Validity%20of%20Self-Report%20Measures%20in%20Assessing%20Historical%20Knowledge:%20The%20Case%20of%20Canada%E2%80%99s%20Residential%20Schools&rft.jtitle=International%20indigenous%20policy%20journal&rft.au=Boese,%20Greg%20D.%20B.&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=1916-5781&rft.eissn=1916-5781&rft_id=info:doi/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.3.3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E48767254%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1935620438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48767254&rfr_iscdi=true