Loading…
The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools
The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Stu...
Saved in:
Published in: | International indigenous policy journal 2017-07, Vol.8 (3), p.1-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3 |
container_end_page | 10 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | International indigenous policy journal |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Boese, Greg D. B. Neufeld, Katelin H. S. Starzyk, Katherine B. |
description | The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study, and Canadian Public Opinion on Aboriginal Peoples Report are three existing surveys that provide such a baseline, though each use only self-report measures. We measured residential school knowledge of 2,250 non-Indigenous Canadian undergraduate students through self-report (subjective) and multiple-choice (objective) measures. Analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between self-reported and objective knowledge of residential schools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.3.3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_73f5ea556e3046ad8ffdb4add028003e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48767254</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_73f5ea556e3046ad8ffdb4add028003e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>48767254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1Lw0AQDaJgqb17EQKeE3eznzmWYm2xImj1umz2o26I2bibIv33po2Ic5lhePPem5ck1xDkkBOO75zr6rwAkOU8Rzk6SyawhDQjjMPzf_NlMouxBkNxACiHk2S5_TDpu2ycdv0h9TZ9NY3NXkznQ58-GRn3wcTUtek8RhOja3fpysXeB6dkkz62_rsxemeukgsrm2hmv32avC3vt4tVtnl-WC_mm0whUvZZxZjWFSFYWQhUWVSMIGoHKxJza2UJNJOMVJQYQEsNSoBspZDCWmFICdVomqxHXu1lLbrgPmU4CC-dOC182AkZeqcaIxiyxEhCqEEAU6kHAV1hqTUohueRGbhuR64u-K-9ib2o_T60g30BS0RoATDiAwqMKBV8jMHYP1UIxCl8cQxfHMMXXCCBhpOb8aQ-BvWHx5xRVhCMfgCTooEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1935620438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>CRKN Open Access Journals List</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Boese, Greg D. B. ; Neufeld, Katelin H. S. ; Starzyk, Katherine B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boese, Greg D. B. ; Neufeld, Katelin H. S. ; Starzyk, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><description>The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study, and Canadian Public Opinion on Aboriginal Peoples Report are three existing surveys that provide such a baseline, though each use only self-report measures. We measured residential school knowledge of 2,250 non-Indigenous Canadian undergraduate students through self-report (subjective) and multiple-choice (objective) measures. Analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between self-reported and objective knowledge of residential schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1916-5781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1916-5781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.3.3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Western University</publisher><subject>American Indians ; Boarding schools ; historical knowledge ; History ; Indigenous peoples ; Knowledge ; Multiple choice ; Native North Americans ; Public opinion ; Public schools ; residential schools ; Schools ; Self report ; self-report measures ; Truth and reconciliation commissions ; Undergraduate students ; Validity</subject><ispartof>International indigenous policy journal, 2017-07, Vol.8 (3), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Western Ontario 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1935620438?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,21387,21394,21395,25753,27344,27866,27924,27925,33611,33774,33985,34530,37012,43733,43948,44115,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boese, Greg D. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neufeld, Katelin H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starzyk, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><title>The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools</title><title>International indigenous policy journal</title><description>The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study, and Canadian Public Opinion on Aboriginal Peoples Report are three existing surveys that provide such a baseline, though each use only self-report measures. We measured residential school knowledge of 2,250 non-Indigenous Canadian undergraduate students through self-report (subjective) and multiple-choice (objective) measures. Analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between self-reported and objective knowledge of residential schools.</description><subject>American Indians</subject><subject>Boarding schools</subject><subject>historical knowledge</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Multiple choice</subject><subject>Native North Americans</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Public schools</subject><subject>residential schools</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>self-report measures</subject><subject>Truth and reconciliation commissions</subject><subject>Undergraduate students</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1916-5781</issn><issn>1916-5781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1Lw0AQDaJgqb17EQKeE3eznzmWYm2xImj1umz2o26I2bibIv33po2Ic5lhePPem5ck1xDkkBOO75zr6rwAkOU8Rzk6SyawhDQjjMPzf_NlMouxBkNxACiHk2S5_TDpu2ycdv0h9TZ9NY3NXkznQ58-GRn3wcTUtek8RhOja3fpysXeB6dkkz62_rsxemeukgsrm2hmv32avC3vt4tVtnl-WC_mm0whUvZZxZjWFSFYWQhUWVSMIGoHKxJza2UJNJOMVJQYQEsNSoBspZDCWmFICdVomqxHXu1lLbrgPmU4CC-dOC182AkZeqcaIxiyxEhCqEEAU6kHAV1hqTUohueRGbhuR64u-K-9ib2o_T60g30BS0RoATDiAwqMKBV8jMHYP1UIxCl8cQxfHMMXXCCBhpOb8aQ-BvWHx5xRVhCMfgCTooEo</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Boese, Greg D. B.</creator><creator>Neufeld, Katelin H. S.</creator><creator>Starzyk, Katherine B.</creator><general>Western University</general><general>University of Western Ontario</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge</title><author>Boese, Greg D. B. ; Neufeld, Katelin H. S. ; Starzyk, Katherine B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>American Indians</topic><topic>Boarding schools</topic><topic>historical knowledge</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Multiple choice</topic><topic>Native North Americans</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Public schools</topic><topic>residential schools</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>self-report measures</topic><topic>Truth and reconciliation commissions</topic><topic>Undergraduate students</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boese, Greg D. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neufeld, Katelin H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starzyk, Katherine B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International indigenous policy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boese, Greg D. B.</au><au>Neufeld, Katelin H. S.</au><au>Starzyk, Katherine B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools</atitle><jtitle>International indigenous policy journal</jtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>1916-5781</issn><eissn>1916-5781</eissn><abstract>The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (TRC) strives to increase public education regarding residential schools. A baseline measure of the public’s residential school knowledge could be useful to evaluate the progress of the TRC. The National Benchmark Survey, Urban Aboriginal Peoples Study, and Canadian Public Opinion on Aboriginal Peoples Report are three existing surveys that provide such a baseline, though each use only self-report measures. We measured residential school knowledge of 2,250 non-Indigenous Canadian undergraduate students through self-report (subjective) and multiple-choice (objective) measures. Analyses revealed a statistically significant correlation between self-reported and objective knowledge of residential schools.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Western University</pub><doi>10.18584/iipj.2017.8.3.3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1916-5781 |
ispartof | International indigenous policy journal, 2017-07, Vol.8 (3), p.1-10 |
issn | 1916-5781 1916-5781 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_73f5ea556e3046ad8ffdb4add028003e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Politics Collection; CRKN Open Access Journals List; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection |
subjects | American Indians Boarding schools historical knowledge History Indigenous peoples Knowledge Multiple choice Native North Americans Public opinion Public schools residential schools Schools Self report self-report measures Truth and reconciliation commissions Undergraduate students Validity |
title | The Validity of Self-Report Measures in Assessing Historical Knowledge: The Case of Canada’s Residential Schools |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Validity%20of%20Self-Report%20Measures%20in%20Assessing%20Historical%20Knowledge:%20The%20Case%20of%20Canada%E2%80%99s%20Residential%20Schools&rft.jtitle=International%20indigenous%20policy%20journal&rft.au=Boese,%20Greg%20D.%20B.&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=1916-5781&rft.eissn=1916-5781&rft_id=info:doi/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.3.3&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3E48767254%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b77ddb554cf10c92b7536f006a48ffa90d7a75b65e069d0903fbc3c4dc41656d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1935620438&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48767254&rfr_iscdi=true |