Performance of UAV-to-Ground FSO Communications with APD and Pointing Errors

Recently, a combination of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and free-space optics (FSO) has been investigated as a potential method for high data-rate front-haul communication links. The aim of this work was to address the performance of UAV-to-ground station-based FSO communications in terms of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied system innovation 2021-09, Vol.4 (3), p.65
Main Author: Trung, Ha
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Atmospheric turbulence
Avalanche diodes
Bandwidths
Communications systems
Drones
Errors
Free space optics
free-space optics (FSO)
Ground stations
Noise
pointing errors
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recently, a combination of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and free-space optics (FSO) has been investigated as a potential method for high data-rate front-haul communication links. The aim of this work was to address the performance of UAV-to-ground station-based FSO communications in terms of the symbol error rate (SER). The system proposes utilizing subcarrier intensity modulation and an avalanche photo-diode (APD) to combat the joint effects of atmospheric turbulence conditions and pointing error due to the UAV’s fluctuations. In the proposed system model, the FSO transmitter (Tx) is mounted on the UAV flying over the monitoring area, whereas the FSO receiver (Rx) is placed on either the ground or top of a high building. Unlike previous works related to this topic, we considered combined channel parameters that affect the system performance such as transmitted power, link loss, various atmospheric turbulence conditions, pointing error loss, and the total noise at the APD receiver. Numerical results have shown that, for the best system SER performance, the value of an average APD gain at the Rx can be selected, varying from 18 to 30, whereas the equivalent beam waist radius at the Tx should be in a range from 2 to 2.2 cm in order to decrease the effects from the UAV’s fluctuations.
ISSN:2571-5577
2571-5577
DOI:10.3390/asi4030065