The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis

• Published in: Urology annals 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.1-27
• Main Authors: Kamal, Wissam, Azhar, Raed A, Hamri, Saeed Bin, Alathal, Abdulaziz H, Alamri, Abdulaziz, Alzahrani, Tarek, Abeery, Hussain, Noureldin, Yasser A, Alomar, Mohammad, Al Own, Abdulrahman, Alnazari, Mansour M, Alharthi, Majid, Awad, Mohannad A, Halawani, Abdulghafour, Althubiany, Hatem Hamed, Alruwaily, Abdulrahman, Violette, Phillipe
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Calculi, Urinary; Clinical outcomes; Clinical practice guidelines; Diagnosis; Evidence, Expert; Evidence-based medicine; Guideline; Health risks; Kidney stones; Lithotripsy; Medical diagnosis; Medical personnel; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Risk factors; saudi arabia; shock wave lithotripsy; Terminology; treatment; ureteroscopy; urinary stones; Urinary tract diseases; urolithiasis
• ISSN: 0974-7796; 0974-7834
• DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_120_23

The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines are a set of recommendations for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating urolithiasis in the Saudi population. These guidelines are based on the latest evidence and expert consensus to improve patient outcomes and optimize care delivery. They cover the various aspects of urolithiasis, including risk factors, diagnosis, medical and surgical treatments, and prevention strategies. By following these guidelines, health-care professionals can improve care quality for individuals with urolithiasis in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel consists of urologists specialized in endourology with expertise in urolithiasis and consultation with a guideline methodologist. All panelists involved in this document have submitted statements disclosing any potential conflicts of interest. The Saudi Guidelines on Urolithiasis were developed by relying primarily on established international guidelines to adopt or adapt the most appropriate guidance for the Saudi context. When necessary, the panel modified the phrasing of recommendations from different sources to ensure consistency within the document. To address areas less well covered in existing guidelines, the panel conducted a directed literature search for high quality evidence published in English, including meta analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective nonrandomized comparative studies. The panel also searched for locally relevant studies containing information unique to the Saudi Arabian population. The recommendations are formulated with a direction and strength of recommendation based on GRADE terminology and interpretation while relying on existing summaries of evidence from the existing guidelines.