The development of the fear of earthquake scale: validity and reliability study in Türkiye after the 2023 earthquake

• Published in: BMC Psychology 2023-12, Vol.11 (1), p.433-433, Article 433
• Main Authors: Sarı, Tuğba, Taşdelen-Karçkay, Arzu, Tarcan, Şule
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptation; Adult; Analysis; Anxiety; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Disasters; Earthquake-related fears; Earthquakes; Fear - psychology; Fear of Earthquake Scale; Female; Humans; Low income groups; Male; Morocco; Post traumatic stress disorder; Psychometric properties; Psychometrics; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Resilience; Seismology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Turkey; Validity
• ISSN: 2050-7283; 2050-7283
• DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01477-9

In 2023, Türkiye experienced a significant earthquake disaster that profoundly impacted 11 provinces. The enduring consequences of these earthquakes on daily life triggered widespread fears and anxieties in society, leading to scholarly investigations in this field. The primary objective of this study was to create and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Fear of Earthquake Scale (FES), a modified adaptation of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19 S), tailored to measure earthquake-related experiences in Türkiye. A total of 315 Turkish adult participants (106 men, 209 women), with a mean age of 37.71 years, completed the FES, along with the Brief Psychological Resilience Scale (BPRS). Psychometric analyses included confirmatory factor analysis as well as the evaluation of alternative factor structures, internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity with respect to resilience. The findings indicate that the Turkish version of the Fear of Earthquake Scale has strong psychometric properties in terms of validity and reliability. After assessing various factor structures, it was observed that the two-factor model which represents the emotional and somatic response to fear, exhibited the best-fit values The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were calculated as 0.89 for the overall FES, 0.84 for the emotional subscale and 0.86 for the somatic subscale, indicating high internal consistency. Additionally, the negative correlation between resilience and the FES supports the criterion validity of the scale, and multi-group confirmatory factor analyses proved that measurement invariance held across genders and whether they experienced an earthquake or not for all groups. Furthermore, the results of the study revealed that women and individuals with prior earthquake experience reported higher levels of fear of earthquakes. The FES emerged as a reliable and valid tool for assessing earthquake-related fears among the Turkish population.