Real de-escalation or escalation in disguise?

• Published in: Breast (Edinburgh) 2023-06, Vol.69, p.249-257
• Main Authors: Banys-Paluchowski, Maggie, Rubio, Isabel T., Ditsch, Nina, Krug, David, Gentilini, Oreste Davide, Kühn, Thorsten
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: (s) from the Special Issue on: De-escalation of loco-regional treatment; Edited by Oreste Gentilini, Philip Poortmans, Maria João Cardoso, Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka; Axilla - surgery; Breast Neoplasms - etiology; Breast Neoplasms - surgery; Breast surgery; Contralateral mastectomy; de-escalation; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - etiology; Quality of Life; Sentinel lymph node biopsy; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods; Targeted axillary dissection
• ISSN: 0960-9776; 1532-3080
• DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.03.001

The past two decades have seen an unprecedented trend towards de-escalation of surgical therapy in the setting of early BC, the most prominent examples being the reduction of re-excision rates for close surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery and replacing axillary lymph node dissection by less radical procedures such as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Numerous studies confirmed that reducing the extent of surgery in the upfront surgery setting does not impact locoregional recurrences and overall outcome. In the setting of primary systemic treatment, there is an increased use of less invasive staging strategies reaching from SLNB and targeted lymph node biopsy (TLNB) to targeted axillary dissection (TAD). Omission of any axillary surgery in the presence of pathological complete response in the breast is currently being investigated in clinical trials. On the other hand, concerns have been raised that surgical de-escalation might induce an escalation of other treatment modalities such as radiation therapy. Since most trials on surgical de-escalation did not include standardized protocols for adjuvant radiotherapy, it remains unclear, whether the effect of surgical de-escalation was valid in itself or if radiotherapy compensated for the decreased surgical extent. Uncertainties in scientific evidence may therefore lead to escalation of radiotherapy in some settings of surgical de-escalation. Further, the increasing rate of mastectomies including contralateral procedures in patients without genetic risk is alarming. Future studies of locoregional treatment strategies need to include an interdisciplinary approach to integrate de-escalation approaches combining surgery and radiotherapy in a way that promotes optimal quality of life and shared decision-making.