Loading…

Nutritional status, cardiovascular health, VO2 max and habits in university students: a comparison between two health promotion careers

Introduction: University students are at a moment of their life cycle that is key for the adoption of different lifestyles. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine and compare VO2 max, fat mass percentage, biochemical profile, and alcohol and tobacco consumption in university students...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 2017-07, Vol.65 (3), p.447-451
Main Authors: Rivera-Torres, Ingrid, Floody-Munita, Melisa, Delgado-Floody, Pedro, Schifferli-Castro, Ingrid, Osorio-Poblete, Aldo, MartĂ­nez-Salazar, Cristian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: University students are at a moment of their life cycle that is key for the adoption of different lifestyles. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine and compare VO2 max, fat mass percentage, biochemical profile, and alcohol and tobacco consumption in university students of two undergraduate programs. Materials and methods: 53 first year students with an average age of 19.25 years were included in this study. 30 were enrolled in the in Physical Education Pedagogy program, and 23 in the Nutrition and Dietetics program offered by Universidad La Frontera, class of 2014. Assessment included weight, size, BMI, waist circumference, fat mass percentage, blood pressure, biochemical profile and VO2 max. Results: 32% of the students were overweight, 50.9% reported altered blood pressure, 28.3% had prehypertension, and 22.6% had high blood pressure. Furthermore, 50.9% had a fat mass level above normal, 18.8% were regular smokers, and 41.5% reported frequent alcohol use. Regarding VO2 max, 48.9% were in the poor to fair range. The comparison by program showed significant differences in the variables height, VO2 max (maximum aerobic capacity) and fat mass percentage (p
ISSN:0120-0011
2357-3848
DOI:10.15446/revfacmed.v65n3.55185