Reducing dengue fever cases at the lowest budget: a constrained optimization approach applied to Thailand

• Published in: BMC public health 2021-04, Vol.21 (1), p.807-807, Article 807
• Main Authors: Knerer, Gerhart, Currie, Christine S M, Brailsford, Sally C
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Bacteria; Budget; Budgets; Carbon monoxide; Constrained optimization; Constraint modelling; Cost analysis; Cost estimates; Decision making; Dengue; Dengue fever; Disease transmission; Economic analysis; Environmental management; Epidemiology; Fever; Immunization; Infections; Infectious diseases; Investment strategy; Lower bounds; Mortality; Mosquitoes; Optimization; Prevention; Public health; Resource allocation; Tropical diseases; Upper bounds; Vaccination; Vaccination Wolbachia; Vaccine efficacy; Vaccines; Vector-borne diseases; Wolbachia; Zika virus
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10747-3

With the challenges that dengue fever (DF) presents to healthcare systems and societies, public health officials must determine where best to allocate scarce resources and restricted budgets. Constrained optimization (CO) helps to address some of the acknowledged limitations of conventional health economic analyses and has typically been used to identify the optimal allocation of resources across interventions subject to a variety of constraints. A dynamic transmission model was developed to predict the number of dengue cases in Thailand at steady state. A CO was then applied to identify the optimal combination of interventions (release of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes and paediatric vaccination) within the constraints of a fixed budget, set no higher than cost estimates of the current vector control programme, to minimize the number of dengue cases and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost. Epidemiological, cost, and effectiveness data were informed by national data and the research literature. The time horizon was 10 years. Scenario analyses examined different disease management and intervention costs, budget constraints, vaccine efficacy, and optimization time horizon. Under base-case budget constraints, the optimal coverage of the two interventions to minimize dengue incidence was predicted to be nearly equal (Wolbachia 50%; paediatric vaccination 49%) with corresponding coverages under lower bound (Wolbachia 54%; paediatric vaccination 10%) and upper bound (Wolbachia 67%; paediatric vaccination 100%) budget ceilings. Scenario analyses indicated that the most impactful situations related to the costs of Wolbachia and paediatric vaccination with decreases/ increases in costs of interventions demonstrating a direct correlation with coverage (increases/ decreases) of the respective control strategies under examination. Determining the best investment strategy for dengue control requires the identification of the optimal mix of interventions to implement in order to maximize public health outcomes, often under fixed budget constraints. A CO model was developed with the objective of minimizing dengue cases (and DALYs lost) over a 10-year time horizon, within the constraints of the estimated budgets for vector control in the absence of vaccination and Wolbachia. The model provides a tool for developing estimates of optimal coverage of combined dengue control strategies that minimize dengue burden at the lowest budget.