Loading…
Psychosocial benefits of workplace physical exercise: cluster randomized controlled trial
While benefits of workplace physical exercise on physical health is well known, little is known about the psychosocial effects of such initiatives. This study evaluates the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on psychosocial factors among healthcare workers. A total of 200 female...
Saved in:
| Published in: | BMC public health 2017-10, Vol.17 (1), p.798-798, Article 798 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-d3978b984c05ca88da2ecd69d65c53ee2e0ca56b386e9e3cd1698ab8766a3a423 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-d3978b984c05ca88da2ecd69d65c53ee2e0ca56b386e9e3cd1698ab8766a3a423 |
| container_end_page | 798 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 798 |
| container_title | BMC public health |
| container_volume | 17 |
| creator | Jakobsen, Markus D Sundstrup, Emil Brandt, Mikkel Andersen, Lars L |
| description | While benefits of workplace physical exercise on physical health is well known, little is known about the psychosocial effects of such initiatives. This study evaluates the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on psychosocial factors among healthcare workers.
A total of 200 female healthcare workers (Age: 42.0, BMI: 24.1) from 18 departments at three hospitals were cluster-randomized to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 10 min 5 days per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 10 min 5 days per week and up to 5 group-based coaching sessions on motivation for regular physical exercise. Vitality and mental health (SF-36, scale 0-100), psychosocial work environment (COPSOQ, scale 0-100), work- and leisure disability (DASH, 0-100), control- (Bournemouth, scale 0-10) and concern about pain (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, scale 0-10) were assessed at baseline and at 10-week follow-up.
Vitality as well as control and concern about pain improved more following WORK than HOME (all p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12889-017-4728-3 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_759e7a62ed6b437fb816ee6155c92588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_759e7a62ed6b437fb816ee6155c92588</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2348408863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-d3978b984c05ca88da2ecd69d65c53ee2e0ca56b386e9e3cd1698ab8766a3a423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwAbigSFy4BOL_Yw5IqCpQqRIc4MDJcuxJ14s3XuwEunx6vGypWg6c_OR5_o3Hfk3zlPQvCQH5qhAKoLueqI4rCh271xwTrkhHuYD7t_RR86iUdV-NIOjD5ojqKrnSx83XT2XnVqkkF2xsB5xwDHNp09j-TPnbNlqH7Xa1K8HVMl5hdqHg69bFpcyY22wnnzbhF_rWpWnOKcYq51xhj5sHo40Fn1yvJ82Xd2efTz90Fx_fn5--veicoGTuPNMKBg3c9cJZAG8pOi-1l8IJhkixd1bIgYFEjcx5IjXYAZSUlllO2UlzfuD6ZNdmm8PG5p1JNpg_GylfGpvn4CIaJTQqKyl6OXCmxgGIRJRECKepAKisNwfWdhk26B3WkWy8A71bmcLKXKYfRkgmBJUV8OIakNP3BctsNqE4jNFOmJZiiBb7T2CSVOvzf6zrtOSpPpWhjAPvAST7n6uyQIPiglcXObhcTqVkHG-uTHqzj4o5RMXU5mYfFbMnP7s9682Jv9lgvwH_YLqn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1958987454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychosocial benefits of workplace physical exercise: cluster randomized controlled trial</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Jakobsen, Markus D ; Sundstrup, Emil ; Brandt, Mikkel ; Andersen, Lars L</creator><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Markus D ; Sundstrup, Emil ; Brandt, Mikkel ; Andersen, Lars L</creatorcontrib><description>While benefits of workplace physical exercise on physical health is well known, little is known about the psychosocial effects of such initiatives. This study evaluates the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on psychosocial factors among healthcare workers.
A total of 200 female healthcare workers (Age: 42.0, BMI: 24.1) from 18 departments at three hospitals were cluster-randomized to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 10 min 5 days per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 10 min 5 days per week and up to 5 group-based coaching sessions on motivation for regular physical exercise. Vitality and mental health (SF-36, scale 0-100), psychosocial work environment (COPSOQ, scale 0-100), work- and leisure disability (DASH, 0-100), control- (Bournemouth, scale 0-10) and concern about pain (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, scale 0-10) were assessed at baseline and at 10-week follow-up.
Vitality as well as control and concern about pain improved more following WORK than HOME (all p < 0.05) in spite of increased work pace (p < 0.05). Work- and leisure disability, emotional demands, influence at work, sense of community, social support and mental health remained unchanged. Between-group differences at follow-up (WORK vs. HOME) were 7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3 to 10] for vitality, -0.8 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.3] for control of pain and -0.9 [95% CI -1.4 to -0.5] for concern about pain, respectively.
Performing physical exercise together with colleagues during working hours was more effective than home-based exercise in improving vitality and concern and control of pain among healthcare workers. These benefits occurred in spite of increased work pace.
NCT01921764 at ClinicalTrials.gov . Registered 10 August 2013.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4728-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29017479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biopsychosocial ; Chronic illnesses ; Clinical trials ; Cluster Analysis ; Clusters ; Community health care ; Confidence intervals ; Disability ; Employees ; Exercise ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Female ; Health care ; Home Care Services ; Humans ; Intervention ; Medical personnel ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Motivation ; Musculoskeletal disorders ; Occupational health ; Occupational Health Services ; Pain ; Personnel, Hospital - psychology ; Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Physical exercise ; Physical fitness ; Physiology ; Public health ; Questionnaires ; Randomization ; Social interactions ; Sports training ; Strength training ; Treatment Outcome ; Vitality ; Workers ; Working conditions ; Working hours ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2017-10, Vol.17 (1), p.798-798, Article 798</ispartof><rights>Copyright BioMed Central 2017</rights><rights>2017. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-d3978b984c05ca88da2ecd69d65c53ee2e0ca56b386e9e3cd1698ab8766a3a423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-d3978b984c05ca88da2ecd69d65c53ee2e0ca56b386e9e3cd1698ab8766a3a423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5635526/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2348408863?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29017479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Markus D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundstrup, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, Mikkel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Lars L</creatorcontrib><title>Psychosocial benefits of workplace physical exercise: cluster randomized controlled trial</title><title>BMC public health</title><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><description>While benefits of workplace physical exercise on physical health is well known, little is known about the psychosocial effects of such initiatives. This study evaluates the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on psychosocial factors among healthcare workers.
A total of 200 female healthcare workers (Age: 42.0, BMI: 24.1) from 18 departments at three hospitals were cluster-randomized to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 10 min 5 days per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 10 min 5 days per week and up to 5 group-based coaching sessions on motivation for regular physical exercise. Vitality and mental health (SF-36, scale 0-100), psychosocial work environment (COPSOQ, scale 0-100), work- and leisure disability (DASH, 0-100), control- (Bournemouth, scale 0-10) and concern about pain (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, scale 0-10) were assessed at baseline and at 10-week follow-up.
Vitality as well as control and concern about pain improved more following WORK than HOME (all p < 0.05) in spite of increased work pace (p < 0.05). Work- and leisure disability, emotional demands, influence at work, sense of community, social support and mental health remained unchanged. Between-group differences at follow-up (WORK vs. HOME) were 7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3 to 10] for vitality, -0.8 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.3] for control of pain and -0.9 [95% CI -1.4 to -0.5] for concern about pain, respectively.
Performing physical exercise together with colleagues during working hours was more effective than home-based exercise in improving vitality and concern and control of pain among healthcare workers. These benefits occurred in spite of increased work pace.
NCT01921764 at ClinicalTrials.gov . Registered 10 August 2013.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biopsychosocial</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Community health care</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Home Care Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal disorders</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Health Services</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Personnel, Hospital - psychology</subject><subject>Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Physical exercise</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vitality</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Working hours</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk9v1DAQxSMEoqXwAbigSFy4BOL_Yw5IqCpQqRIc4MDJcuxJ14s3XuwEunx6vGypWg6c_OR5_o3Hfk3zlPQvCQH5qhAKoLueqI4rCh271xwTrkhHuYD7t_RR86iUdV-NIOjD5ojqKrnSx83XT2XnVqkkF2xsB5xwDHNp09j-TPnbNlqH7Xa1K8HVMl5hdqHg69bFpcyY22wnnzbhF_rWpWnOKcYq51xhj5sHo40Fn1yvJ82Xd2efTz90Fx_fn5--veicoGTuPNMKBg3c9cJZAG8pOi-1l8IJhkixd1bIgYFEjcx5IjXYAZSUlllO2UlzfuD6ZNdmm8PG5p1JNpg_GylfGpvn4CIaJTQqKyl6OXCmxgGIRJRECKepAKisNwfWdhk26B3WkWy8A71bmcLKXKYfRkgmBJUV8OIakNP3BctsNqE4jNFOmJZiiBb7T2CSVOvzf6zrtOSpPpWhjAPvAST7n6uyQIPiglcXObhcTqVkHG-uTHqzj4o5RMXU5mYfFbMnP7s9682Jv9lgvwH_YLqn</recordid><startdate>20171010</startdate><enddate>20171010</enddate><creator>Jakobsen, Markus D</creator><creator>Sundstrup, Emil</creator><creator>Brandt, Mikkel</creator><creator>Andersen, Lars L</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171010</creationdate><title>Psychosocial benefits of workplace physical exercise: cluster randomized controlled trial</title><author>Jakobsen, Markus D ; Sundstrup, Emil ; Brandt, Mikkel ; Andersen, Lars L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-d3978b984c05ca88da2ecd69d65c53ee2e0ca56b386e9e3cd1698ab8766a3a423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biopsychosocial</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Community health care</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Home Care Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal disorders</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Health Services</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Personnel, Hospital - psychology</topic><topic>Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Physical exercise</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vitality</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Working hours</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jakobsen, Markus D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundstrup, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandt, Mikkel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, Lars L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jakobsen, Markus D</au><au>Sundstrup, Emil</au><au>Brandt, Mikkel</au><au>Andersen, Lars L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychosocial benefits of workplace physical exercise: cluster randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Public Health</addtitle><date>2017-10-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>798</spage><epage>798</epage><pages>798-798</pages><artnum>798</artnum><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>While benefits of workplace physical exercise on physical health is well known, little is known about the psychosocial effects of such initiatives. This study evaluates the effect of workplace versus home-based physical exercise on psychosocial factors among healthcare workers.
A total of 200 female healthcare workers (Age: 42.0, BMI: 24.1) from 18 departments at three hospitals were cluster-randomized to 10 weeks of: 1) home-based physical exercise (HOME) performed alone during leisure time for 10 min 5 days per week or 2) workplace physical exercise (WORK) performed in groups during working hours for 10 min 5 days per week and up to 5 group-based coaching sessions on motivation for regular physical exercise. Vitality and mental health (SF-36, scale 0-100), psychosocial work environment (COPSOQ, scale 0-100), work- and leisure disability (DASH, 0-100), control- (Bournemouth, scale 0-10) and concern about pain (Pain Catastrophizing Scale, scale 0-10) were assessed at baseline and at 10-week follow-up.
Vitality as well as control and concern about pain improved more following WORK than HOME (all p < 0.05) in spite of increased work pace (p < 0.05). Work- and leisure disability, emotional demands, influence at work, sense of community, social support and mental health remained unchanged. Between-group differences at follow-up (WORK vs. HOME) were 7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3 to 10] for vitality, -0.8 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.3] for control of pain and -0.9 [95% CI -1.4 to -0.5] for concern about pain, respectively.
Performing physical exercise together with colleagues during working hours was more effective than home-based exercise in improving vitality and concern and control of pain among healthcare workers. These benefits occurred in spite of increased work pace.
NCT01921764 at ClinicalTrials.gov . Registered 10 August 2013.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>29017479</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12889-017-4728-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1471-2458 |
| ispartof | BMC public health, 2017-10, Vol.17 (1), p.798-798, Article 798 |
| issn | 1471-2458 1471-2458 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_759e7a62ed6b437fb816ee6155c92588 |
| source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
| subjects | Adult Biopsychosocial Chronic illnesses Clinical trials Cluster Analysis Clusters Community health care Confidence intervals Disability Employees Exercise Exercise Therapy - methods Female Health care Home Care Services Humans Intervention Medical personnel Mental disorders Mental health Motivation Musculoskeletal disorders Occupational health Occupational Health Services Pain Personnel, Hospital - psychology Personnel, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Physical exercise Physical fitness Physiology Public health Questionnaires Randomization Social interactions Sports training Strength training Treatment Outcome Vitality Workers Working conditions Working hours Workplace |
| title | Psychosocial benefits of workplace physical exercise: cluster randomized controlled trial |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A55%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychosocial%20benefits%20of%20workplace%20physical%20exercise:%20cluster%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Jakobsen,%20Markus%20D&rft.date=2017-10-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=798&rft.epage=798&rft.pages=798-798&rft.artnum=798&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-017-4728-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2348408863%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-d3978b984c05ca88da2ecd69d65c53ee2e0ca56b386e9e3cd1698ab8766a3a423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1958987454&rft_id=info:pmid/29017479&rfr_iscdi=true |