Occurrence, Ecological and Health Risk Assessment of Phthalate Esters in Surface Water of U-Tapao Canal, Southern, Thailand

• Published in: Toxics (Basel) 2020-08, Vol.8 (3), p.58
• Main Authors: Kingsley, Okpara, Witthayawirasak, Banchong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agriculture; Algae; Aquaculture; Aquatic ecosystems; Aquatic organisms; Canals; Carcinogens; Contamination; Crustaceans; Diisononyl phthalate; Dioctyl phthalate; Ecological effects; Ecological risk assessment; endocrine disruption; Endocrine disruptors; environmental contamination; Environmental protection; Esters; Fish; Gas chromatography; Health risk assessment; Health risks; Ingestion; n-Butyl phthalate; noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risk; Organic chemicals; Organisms; outliers; Phthalate esters; Phthalates; Pollutants; Pollution; Pollution control; Quotients; Risk assessment; risk quotient (RQ); Shellfish; Surface water; Water analysis; Water sampling; Wildlife; Wind
• ISSN: 2305-6304; 2305-6304
• DOI: 10.3390/toxics8030058

Phthalate esters (PAEs) are well known for their environmental contamination and endocrine-disrupting effects on wildlife and humans. In this study, the occurrence of PAEs and ecotoxicological risk assessments were performed in one of the significant canals in southern Thailand, named U-Tapao. Water samples were collected and analyzed for the six most common PAEs by using a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS). Of the 6 PAEs analyzed, only three PAEs, including di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), di (2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), and diisononyl phthalate (DiNP) were detected in water samples. The total concentration of PAEs ranged from 1.44 to 12.08 µg/L, with a mean level of 4.76 µg/L. The total average concentration of PAEs found in the canal was higher than the criteria of 3 µg/L for PAEs recommended for the protection of fish and other aquatic organisms by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The results of the potential ecological risk assessment of the risk quotient (RQ) method revealed that DEHP and DiNP posed a high risk to algae and crustacean and crustacean and fish, respectively, whereas DBP posed a medium risk to the different aquatic species. However, current levels of noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risks via ingestion and dermal exposure in children and adults are within acceptable limits. The baseline data of PAEs in this canal will be beneficial to the strategic and future pollutant control along the canal network.