Loading…
K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation
Purpose: This study compared the clinical outcome of K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation. Methods: This retrospective study included 34 patients with L4-L5 single-segment lumbar disc herniation who underwe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) 2017-09, Vol.25 (3), p.2309499017742740-2309499017742740 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-267f6de4ff5114b016b605990ebb39cf37a60b089bb424ec426749c29627e73b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-267f6de4ff5114b016b605990ebb39cf37a60b089bb424ec426749c29627e73b3 |
container_end_page | 2309499017742740 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 2309499017742740 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong) |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Qu, Yang Cheng, Meng Dong, Rongpeng Kang, Mingyang Zhou, Haohan Zhao, Jianwu |
description | Purpose:
This study compared the clinical outcome of K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 34 patients with L4-L5 single-segment lumbar disc herniation who underwent K-rod dynamic internal fixation (n = 18) or MED (n = 16). The pain was evaluated by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). The neurological function was assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. The height of intervertebral space was calculated using X-ray images, and the disc degeneration was evaluated based on Pfirrmann scores. The mean follow-up time was 31 months (range, 18–46 months).
Results:
In both groups, the ODI scores, VAS scores and JOA scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of ODI, VAS and JOA scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). The height of intervertebral space in the surgical segments, proximal segments and distal segments, was significantly greater in the K-rod group than in the MED group. The disc degeneration occurred more in the MED group than in the K-rod group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
K-rod internal fixation and MED produce satisfactory outcomes in the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation. K-rod internal fixation is superior to MED in preventing adjacent segment degeneration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/2309499017742740 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7635e0d1ca5c4ba2bbada22fe2d95eef</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2309499017742740</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7635e0d1ca5c4ba2bbada22fe2d95eef</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1974014353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-267f6de4ff5114b016b605990ebb39cf37a60b089bb424ec426749c29627e73b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UUuLFDEYDKK46-rdkwS8eGnNqzuToyw-Fhe86Dnk8WU2Q3dnTNKyA_540zPrKgue8lGpqi-pQuglJW8plfId40QJpUibBZOCPELnK9St2ON_5jP0rJQdIVSxzfAUnTHFKBNcnqNfX7qcPPaH2UzR4ThXyLMZcYi3psY045-Qy1Jwu8wJZp-KS_tG9LE4cDVNBxxSxvUGcM1g6gRzxSngEuftCF2B7REZl8mafFThm7YhHs2foyfBjAVe3J0X6PvHD98uP3fXXz9dXb6_7pyQvHZskGHwIELoKRWW0MEOpG_fAmu5coFLMxBLNspawQQ40QRCOaYGJkFyyy_Q1cnXJ7PT-xwnkw86maiPQMpbbXKNbgQtB94D8dSZ3glrmLXGG8YCMK96gNC83py89jn9WKBUPa1RjKOZIS1FU9V6oIL3vFFfP6Du0rKmWzSjrTBB-YY1FjmxWsClZAj3D6REry3rhy03yas748VO4O8Ff2pthO5EKGYLf7f-1_A3qOCwlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2174241382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Qu, Yang ; Cheng, Meng ; Dong, Rongpeng ; Kang, Mingyang ; Zhou, Haohan ; Zhao, Jianwu</creator><creatorcontrib>Qu, Yang ; Cheng, Meng ; Dong, Rongpeng ; Kang, Mingyang ; Zhou, Haohan ; Zhao, Jianwu</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose:
This study compared the clinical outcome of K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 34 patients with L4-L5 single-segment lumbar disc herniation who underwent K-rod dynamic internal fixation (n = 18) or MED (n = 16). The pain was evaluated by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). The neurological function was assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. The height of intervertebral space was calculated using X-ray images, and the disc degeneration was evaluated based on Pfirrmann scores. The mean follow-up time was 31 months (range, 18–46 months).
Results:
In both groups, the ODI scores, VAS scores and JOA scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of ODI, VAS and JOA scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). The height of intervertebral space in the surgical segments, proximal segments and distal segments, was significantly greater in the K-rod group than in the MED group. The disc degeneration occurred more in the MED group than in the K-rod group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
K-rod internal fixation and MED produce satisfactory outcomes in the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation. K-rod internal fixation is superior to MED in preventing adjacent segment degeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2309-4990</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1022-5536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2309-4990</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2309499017742740</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29212437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Authorship ; Back pain ; Diskectomy - methods ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy - methods ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Internal Fixators ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Male ; Microsurgery - methods ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Titanium alloys ; Trauma ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong), 2017-09, Vol.25 (3), p.2309499017742740-2309499017742740</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-267f6de4ff5114b016b605990ebb39cf37a60b089bb424ec426749c29627e73b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-267f6de4ff5114b016b605990ebb39cf37a60b089bb424ec426749c29627e73b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2174241382/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2174241382?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21945,25731,27830,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,44921,45309,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29212437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Rongpeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Mingyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Haohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jianwu</creatorcontrib><title>K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)</title><addtitle>J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)</addtitle><description>Purpose:
This study compared the clinical outcome of K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 34 patients with L4-L5 single-segment lumbar disc herniation who underwent K-rod dynamic internal fixation (n = 18) or MED (n = 16). The pain was evaluated by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). The neurological function was assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. The height of intervertebral space was calculated using X-ray images, and the disc degeneration was evaluated based on Pfirrmann scores. The mean follow-up time was 31 months (range, 18–46 months).
Results:
In both groups, the ODI scores, VAS scores and JOA scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of ODI, VAS and JOA scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). The height of intervertebral space in the surgical segments, proximal segments and distal segments, was significantly greater in the K-rod group than in the MED group. The disc degeneration occurred more in the MED group than in the K-rod group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
K-rod internal fixation and MED produce satisfactory outcomes in the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation. K-rod internal fixation is superior to MED in preventing adjacent segment degeneration.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Authorship</subject><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Diskectomy - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Fixators</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microsurgery - methods</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Titanium alloys</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>2309-4990</issn><issn>1022-5536</issn><issn>2309-4990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UUuLFDEYDKK46-rdkwS8eGnNqzuToyw-Fhe86Dnk8WU2Q3dnTNKyA_540zPrKgue8lGpqi-pQuglJW8plfId40QJpUibBZOCPELnK9St2ON_5jP0rJQdIVSxzfAUnTHFKBNcnqNfX7qcPPaH2UzR4ThXyLMZcYi3psY045-Qy1Jwu8wJZp-KS_tG9LE4cDVNBxxSxvUGcM1g6gRzxSngEuftCF2B7REZl8mafFThm7YhHs2foyfBjAVe3J0X6PvHD98uP3fXXz9dXb6_7pyQvHZskGHwIELoKRWW0MEOpG_fAmu5coFLMxBLNspawQQ40QRCOaYGJkFyyy_Q1cnXJ7PT-xwnkw86maiPQMpbbXKNbgQtB94D8dSZ3glrmLXGG8YCMK96gNC83py89jn9WKBUPa1RjKOZIS1FU9V6oIL3vFFfP6Du0rKmWzSjrTBB-YY1FjmxWsClZAj3D6REry3rhy03yas748VO4O8Ff2pthO5EKGYLf7f-1_A3qOCwlQ</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Qu, Yang</creator><creator>Cheng, Meng</creator><creator>Dong, Rongpeng</creator><creator>Kang, Mingyang</creator><creator>Zhou, Haohan</creator><creator>Zhao, Jianwu</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation</title><author>Qu, Yang ; Cheng, Meng ; Dong, Rongpeng ; Kang, Mingyang ; Zhou, Haohan ; Zhao, Jianwu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-267f6de4ff5114b016b605990ebb39cf37a60b089bb424ec426749c29627e73b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Authorship</topic><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Diskectomy - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Fixators</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microsurgery - methods</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Titanium alloys</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qu, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Meng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Rongpeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Mingyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Haohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jianwu</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qu, Yang</au><au>Cheng, Meng</au><au>Dong, Rongpeng</au><au>Kang, Mingyang</au><au>Zhou, Haohan</au><au>Zhao, Jianwu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2309499017742740</spage><epage>2309499017742740</epage><pages>2309499017742740-2309499017742740</pages><issn>2309-4990</issn><issn>1022-5536</issn><eissn>2309-4990</eissn><abstract>Purpose:
This study compared the clinical outcome of K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy (MED) for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 34 patients with L4-L5 single-segment lumbar disc herniation who underwent K-rod dynamic internal fixation (n = 18) or MED (n = 16). The pain was evaluated by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale (VAS). The neurological function was assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. The height of intervertebral space was calculated using X-ray images, and the disc degeneration was evaluated based on Pfirrmann scores. The mean follow-up time was 31 months (range, 18–46 months).
Results:
In both groups, the ODI scores, VAS scores and JOA scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up compared with the preoperative values (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the improvement of ODI, VAS and JOA scores between the two groups (p > 0.05). The height of intervertebral space in the surgical segments, proximal segments and distal segments, was significantly greater in the K-rod group than in the MED group. The disc degeneration occurred more in the MED group than in the K-rod group (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
K-rod internal fixation and MED produce satisfactory outcomes in the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation. K-rod internal fixation is superior to MED in preventing adjacent segment degeneration.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29212437</pmid><doi>10.1177/2309499017742740</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2309-4990 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong), 2017-09, Vol.25 (3), p.2309499017742740-2309499017742740 |
issn | 2309-4990 1022-5536 2309-4990 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7635e0d1ca5c4ba2bbada22fe2d95eef |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
subjects | Adult Authorship Back pain Diskectomy - methods Endoscopy Endoscopy - methods Female Hospitals Humans Internal Fixators Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery Male Microsurgery - methods NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Retrospective Studies Surgery Titanium alloys Trauma Vertebrae |
title | K-rod dynamic internal fixation versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of single-segment lumbar disc herniation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A55%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=K-rod%20dynamic%20internal%20fixation%20versus%20microendoscopic%20discectomy%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20single-segment%20lumbar%20disc%20herniation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20(Hong%20Kong)&rft.au=Qu,%20Yang&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2309499017742740&rft.epage=2309499017742740&rft.pages=2309499017742740-2309499017742740&rft.issn=2309-4990&rft.eissn=2309-4990&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2309499017742740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1974014353%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-267f6de4ff5114b016b605990ebb39cf37a60b089bb424ec426749c29627e73b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2174241382&rft_id=info:pmid/29212437&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2309499017742740&rfr_iscdi=true |