Loading…

Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?

The economic reality of modern healthcare provides a timely reminder to clinicians of their duty to provide outstanding and cost-effective care. Although multiple guidelines outline investigation, management and surveillance of colorectal cancer, none advocate a particular delivery method. Nurse-led...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Patient experience journal 2019-04, Vol.6 (1), p.81-86
Main Authors: Gilmartin, Marcus, Leaver, Nicholas, Hall, George, Fawdry, Helena, Lee, Seung, Nicholson, James, Kalaiselvan, Ramya, Rajaganeshan, Raj
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1932-b8422600aa6ba4d1f3a4cd9c6df78870d217fdbbea71e039b3a7b65646309cb43
cites
container_end_page 86
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title Patient experience journal
container_volume 6
creator Gilmartin, Marcus
Leaver, Nicholas
Hall, George
Fawdry, Helena
Lee, Seung
Nicholson, James
Kalaiselvan, Ramya
Rajaganeshan, Raj
description The economic reality of modern healthcare provides a timely reminder to clinicians of their duty to provide outstanding and cost-effective care. Although multiple guidelines outline investigation, management and surveillance of colorectal cancer, none advocate a particular delivery method. Nurse-led telephone follow-up in multiple specialties has demonstrated equivalent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction when compared to traditional outpatient department follow-up. This paper aims to compare nurse-led telephone and outpatient follow-up, following surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on patient perceptions. This cross-sectional study distributed adapted patient satisfaction questionnaire (PS-Q 18) to patients undergoing surveillance following CRC resection via either nurse-led telephone clinics (TC) or standard outpatient department appointments (OPD). 161 questionnaires were distributed (100 OPD, 61 TC); the response rate was 70% for the OPD group, and 87% for the TC group (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between patient reported satisfaction or in preference for healthcare delivery system between groups. More patients in the TC group had serum CEA measured than OPD group. This survey demonstrates high patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up. Owing to the financial benefits on both a patient and healthcare provider level, as well as improved screening uptake (CEA) in our study, a role for this innovative specialist nurse-led telephone clinic clearly exists. The benefits of telephone follow-up in terms of health economics, health equity and adherence to screening protocols support its exclusive role in long-term CRC surveillance.
doi_str_mv 10.35680/2372-0247.1282
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_763de862b4364332a0e090df999d1bcf</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_763de862b4364332a0e090df999d1bcf</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_763de862b4364332a0e090df999d1bcf</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1932-b8422600aa6ba4d1f3a4cd9c6df78870d217fdbbea71e039b3a7b65646309cb43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkdtOwzAMhisEEtPYNbd5gW45dGnLDUITh0mT4AKuIzdxWKasqdIMxCPw1nQHTVzZ_vX7s2xn2S2jUzGXFZ1xUfKc8qKcMl7xi2x0Fi7_5dfZpO83lFImJGclG2W_b5Actol0GDV2yYWWBEsSeuzWoUVig_fhO991BGzCSCL2qA82GyLRwYc41OCJhlZjvCPLnrhEktviwQEtAT80tsOcLyQpkLRGEnYp706TtXet0_c32ZUF3-PkFMfZx9Pj--IlX70-LxcPq1yzWvC8qQrOJaUAsoHCMCug0KbW0tiyqkpqhr2saRqEkiEVdSOgbORcFlLQWjeFGGfLI9cE2Kguui3EHxXAqYMQ4qeCmJz2qEopDFaSD12yEIIDRVpTY-u6NqzRdmDNjiwdQ99HtGceo-rwGLW_vdrfXu0fI_4AEVKB6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><creator>Gilmartin, Marcus ; Leaver, Nicholas ; Hall, George ; Fawdry, Helena ; Lee, Seung ; Nicholson, James ; Kalaiselvan, Ramya ; Rajaganeshan, Raj</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilmartin, Marcus ; Leaver, Nicholas ; Hall, George ; Fawdry, Helena ; Lee, Seung ; Nicholson, James ; Kalaiselvan, Ramya ; Rajaganeshan, Raj</creatorcontrib><description>The economic reality of modern healthcare provides a timely reminder to clinicians of their duty to provide outstanding and cost-effective care. Although multiple guidelines outline investigation, management and surveillance of colorectal cancer, none advocate a particular delivery method. Nurse-led telephone follow-up in multiple specialties has demonstrated equivalent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction when compared to traditional outpatient department follow-up. This paper aims to compare nurse-led telephone and outpatient follow-up, following surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on patient perceptions. This cross-sectional study distributed adapted patient satisfaction questionnaire (PS-Q 18) to patients undergoing surveillance following CRC resection via either nurse-led telephone clinics (TC) or standard outpatient department appointments (OPD). 161 questionnaires were distributed (100 OPD, 61 TC); the response rate was 70% for the OPD group, and 87% for the TC group (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between patient reported satisfaction or in preference for healthcare delivery system between groups. More patients in the TC group had serum CEA measured than OPD group. This survey demonstrates high patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up. Owing to the financial benefits on both a patient and healthcare provider level, as well as improved screening uptake (CEA) in our study, a role for this innovative specialist nurse-led telephone clinic clearly exists. The benefits of telephone follow-up in terms of health economics, health equity and adherence to screening protocols support its exclusive role in long-term CRC surveillance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2372-0247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2372-0247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.35680/2372-0247.1282</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Beryl Institute</publisher><subject>colorectal cancer ; health economics ; health equity ; innovation ; national health service ; nurse-led follow-up ; patient perception ; quality of care ; telephone clinic</subject><ispartof>Patient experience journal, 2019-04, Vol.6 (1), p.81-86</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1932-b8422600aa6ba4d1f3a4cd9c6df78870d217fdbbea71e039b3a7b65646309cb43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilmartin, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leaver, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawdry, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalaiselvan, Ramya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajaganeshan, Raj</creatorcontrib><title>Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?</title><title>Patient experience journal</title><description>The economic reality of modern healthcare provides a timely reminder to clinicians of their duty to provide outstanding and cost-effective care. Although multiple guidelines outline investigation, management and surveillance of colorectal cancer, none advocate a particular delivery method. Nurse-led telephone follow-up in multiple specialties has demonstrated equivalent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction when compared to traditional outpatient department follow-up. This paper aims to compare nurse-led telephone and outpatient follow-up, following surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on patient perceptions. This cross-sectional study distributed adapted patient satisfaction questionnaire (PS-Q 18) to patients undergoing surveillance following CRC resection via either nurse-led telephone clinics (TC) or standard outpatient department appointments (OPD). 161 questionnaires were distributed (100 OPD, 61 TC); the response rate was 70% for the OPD group, and 87% for the TC group (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between patient reported satisfaction or in preference for healthcare delivery system between groups. More patients in the TC group had serum CEA measured than OPD group. This survey demonstrates high patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up. Owing to the financial benefits on both a patient and healthcare provider level, as well as improved screening uptake (CEA) in our study, a role for this innovative specialist nurse-led telephone clinic clearly exists. The benefits of telephone follow-up in terms of health economics, health equity and adherence to screening protocols support its exclusive role in long-term CRC surveillance.</description><subject>colorectal cancer</subject><subject>health economics</subject><subject>health equity</subject><subject>innovation</subject><subject>national health service</subject><subject>nurse-led follow-up</subject><subject>patient perception</subject><subject>quality of care</subject><subject>telephone clinic</subject><issn>2372-0247</issn><issn>2372-0247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkdtOwzAMhisEEtPYNbd5gW45dGnLDUITh0mT4AKuIzdxWKasqdIMxCPw1nQHTVzZ_vX7s2xn2S2jUzGXFZ1xUfKc8qKcMl7xi2x0Fi7_5dfZpO83lFImJGclG2W_b5Actol0GDV2yYWWBEsSeuzWoUVig_fhO991BGzCSCL2qA82GyLRwYc41OCJhlZjvCPLnrhEktviwQEtAT80tsOcLyQpkLRGEnYp706TtXet0_c32ZUF3-PkFMfZx9Pj--IlX70-LxcPq1yzWvC8qQrOJaUAsoHCMCug0KbW0tiyqkpqhr2saRqEkiEVdSOgbORcFlLQWjeFGGfLI9cE2Kguui3EHxXAqYMQ4qeCmJz2qEopDFaSD12yEIIDRVpTY-u6NqzRdmDNjiwdQ99HtGceo-rwGLW_vdrfXu0fI_4AEVKB6g</recordid><startdate>20190422</startdate><enddate>20190422</enddate><creator>Gilmartin, Marcus</creator><creator>Leaver, Nicholas</creator><creator>Hall, George</creator><creator>Fawdry, Helena</creator><creator>Lee, Seung</creator><creator>Nicholson, James</creator><creator>Kalaiselvan, Ramya</creator><creator>Rajaganeshan, Raj</creator><general>The Beryl Institute</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190422</creationdate><title>Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?</title><author>Gilmartin, Marcus ; Leaver, Nicholas ; Hall, George ; Fawdry, Helena ; Lee, Seung ; Nicholson, James ; Kalaiselvan, Ramya ; Rajaganeshan, Raj</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1932-b8422600aa6ba4d1f3a4cd9c6df78870d217fdbbea71e039b3a7b65646309cb43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>colorectal cancer</topic><topic>health economics</topic><topic>health equity</topic><topic>innovation</topic><topic>national health service</topic><topic>nurse-led follow-up</topic><topic>patient perception</topic><topic>quality of care</topic><topic>telephone clinic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilmartin, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leaver, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fawdry, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicholson, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalaiselvan, Ramya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajaganeshan, Raj</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Patient experience journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilmartin, Marcus</au><au>Leaver, Nicholas</au><au>Hall, George</au><au>Fawdry, Helena</au><au>Lee, Seung</au><au>Nicholson, James</au><au>Kalaiselvan, Ramya</au><au>Rajaganeshan, Raj</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?</atitle><jtitle>Patient experience journal</jtitle><date>2019-04-22</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>81-86</pages><issn>2372-0247</issn><eissn>2372-0247</eissn><abstract>The economic reality of modern healthcare provides a timely reminder to clinicians of their duty to provide outstanding and cost-effective care. Although multiple guidelines outline investigation, management and surveillance of colorectal cancer, none advocate a particular delivery method. Nurse-led telephone follow-up in multiple specialties has demonstrated equivalent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction when compared to traditional outpatient department follow-up. This paper aims to compare nurse-led telephone and outpatient follow-up, following surgical resection of colorectal cancer (CRC), focusing on patient perceptions. This cross-sectional study distributed adapted patient satisfaction questionnaire (PS-Q 18) to patients undergoing surveillance following CRC resection via either nurse-led telephone clinics (TC) or standard outpatient department appointments (OPD). 161 questionnaires were distributed (100 OPD, 61 TC); the response rate was 70% for the OPD group, and 87% for the TC group (p=0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between patient reported satisfaction or in preference for healthcare delivery system between groups. More patients in the TC group had serum CEA measured than OPD group. This survey demonstrates high patient satisfaction with telephone follow-up. Owing to the financial benefits on both a patient and healthcare provider level, as well as improved screening uptake (CEA) in our study, a role for this innovative specialist nurse-led telephone clinic clearly exists. The benefits of telephone follow-up in terms of health economics, health equity and adherence to screening protocols support its exclusive role in long-term CRC surveillance.</abstract><pub>The Beryl Institute</pub><doi>10.35680/2372-0247.1282</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2372-0247
ispartof Patient experience journal, 2019-04, Vol.6 (1), p.81-86
issn 2372-0247
2372-0247
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_763de862b4364332a0e090df999d1bcf
source Freely Accessible Journals
subjects colorectal cancer
health economics
health equity
innovation
national health service
nurse-led follow-up
patient perception
quality of care
telephone clinic
title Patient perception of telephone follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer: Is it time for an alternative to the out-patient clinic?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A26%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20perception%20of%20telephone%20follow-up%20after%20resection%20for%20colorectal%20cancer:%20Is%20it%20time%20for%20an%20alternative%20to%20the%20out-patient%20clinic?&rft.jtitle=Patient%20experience%20journal&rft.au=Gilmartin,%20Marcus&rft.date=2019-04-22&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=81-86&rft.issn=2372-0247&rft.eissn=2372-0247&rft_id=info:doi/10.35680/2372-0247.1282&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cross%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_763de862b4364332a0e090df999d1bcf%3C/doaj_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1932-b8422600aa6ba4d1f3a4cd9c6df78870d217fdbbea71e039b3a7b65646309cb43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true