Loading…

Safety of Human Papillomavirus 9-Valent Vaccine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) has been progressively implemented in most developed countries for approximately 10 years. In order to increase the protection of the vaccines, a 9-valent vaccine (HPV9) was developed, which provides protection against nine types of the virus. Studies e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of immunology research 2017-01, Vol.2017 (2017), p.1-6
Main Authors: Giraldo, Paulo César, da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique, da Silva, Janine Medeiros, Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira, Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira, Gonçalves, Ana Katherine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c701t-5ca6073c3f7768c083b8da4cfdadcd85adc0585aff1d7e898d00dd99d0a526d43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c701t-5ca6073c3f7768c083b8da4cfdadcd85adc0585aff1d7e898d00dd99d0a526d43
container_end_page 6
container_issue 2017
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of immunology research
container_volume 2017
creator Giraldo, Paulo César
da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique
da Silva, Janine Medeiros
Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira
Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira
Gonçalves, Ana Katherine
description Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) has been progressively implemented in most developed countries for approximately 10 years. In order to increase the protection of the vaccines, a 9-valent vaccine (HPV9) was developed, which provides protection against nine types of the virus. Studies evaluating its safety are rare. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of three clinical trials assessing adverse effects on women randomly vaccinated with HPV9 or tetravalent vaccine (HPV4), with the objective of analyzing whether the HPV9 is as safe as HPV4. An electronic data search was performed through the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO databases. The studies selected 27,465 women who received one of the two vaccines. Pain (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.62–1.82) and erythema (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.21–1.36) occurred significantly more in the HPV9 group. However, there was no significant difference between the groups for the following adverse effects: headache (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.99–1.15), dizziness (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.93–1.27), and fatigue (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.91–1.30), and the occurrence of serious events related to vaccination was similarly rare among those vaccinated. Therefore, our findings demonstrate that HPV9 in female patients is as safe as the tetravalent vaccine.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2017/3736201
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_765787b0942242d19bee2a3c4552c550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_765787b0942242d19bee2a3c4552c550</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1929897972</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c701t-5ca6073c3f7768c083b8da4cfdadcd85adc0585aff1d7e898d00dd99d0a526d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdRbKnduZYBN4Idm-8PF8KlqC1UFG27DWeSTJsyM7lNZiq3v97c3mu1rtzkhOTJwzl5q-olRu8w5vyQICwPqaSibJ5Uu4Ri1kjMxdPtXimBd6r9nEOLOJKUCiWeVztEKUwQRbvV-Q_o_LSqY1cfzwOM9TdYhr6PA9yGNOdaNxfQ-3GqL8DaMPr39aL-4idoFiP0qxzy-uV3GF0cwp139VkK0OcX1bOuFL-_rXvV-aePZ0fHzenXzydHi9PGSoSnhlsQpSlLOymFskjRVjlgtnPgrFO8rIiX0nXYSa-0cgg5p7VDwIlwjO5VJxuvi3BtlikMkFYmQjD3BzFdGkhTsL03UnCpZIs0I4QRh3XrPQFqGefEco6K68PGtZzbwTtbhk7QP5I-vhnDlbmMt4ZzJhBTRfBmK0jxZvZ5MkPI1vc9jD7O2WBNtNJSS1LQ1_-g13FO5UfvKcEI42otPNhQNsWck-8emsHIrOM36_jNNv6Cv_p7gAf4d9gFeLsBrsLo4Gf4T50vjO_gD40VlozQX_QIv-o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1926424588</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of Human Papillomavirus 9-Valent Vaccine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Giraldo, Paulo César ; da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique ; da Silva, Janine Medeiros ; Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira ; Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira ; Gonçalves, Ana Katherine</creator><contributor>Riemer, Angelika</contributor><creatorcontrib>Giraldo, Paulo César ; da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique ; da Silva, Janine Medeiros ; Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira ; Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira ; Gonçalves, Ana Katherine ; Riemer, Angelika</creatorcontrib><description>Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) has been progressively implemented in most developed countries for approximately 10 years. In order to increase the protection of the vaccines, a 9-valent vaccine (HPV9) was developed, which provides protection against nine types of the virus. Studies evaluating its safety are rare. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of three clinical trials assessing adverse effects on women randomly vaccinated with HPV9 or tetravalent vaccine (HPV4), with the objective of analyzing whether the HPV9 is as safe as HPV4. An electronic data search was performed through the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO databases. The studies selected 27,465 women who received one of the two vaccines. Pain (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.62–1.82) and erythema (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.21–1.36) occurred significantly more in the HPV9 group. However, there was no significant difference between the groups for the following adverse effects: headache (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.99–1.15), dizziness (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.93–1.27), and fatigue (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.91–1.30), and the occurrence of serious events related to vaccination was similarly rare among those vaccinated. Therefore, our findings demonstrate that HPV9 in female patients is as safe as the tetravalent vaccine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-8861</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-7156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2017/3736201</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28812030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Clinical trials ; Data search ; Developed countries ; Erythema ; Erythema - etiology ; Fatigue ; Female ; Headache ; Headache - etiology ; Human papillomavirus ; Humans ; Immunization ; Immunology ; Meta-analysis ; Pain ; Pain - etiology ; Papillomaviridae - immunology ; Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - adverse effects ; Papillomavirus Vaccines - immunology ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Review ; Side effects ; Studies ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Vaccination ; Vaccines ; Viruses ; Womens health ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of immunology research, 2017-01, Vol.2017 (2017), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Ana Paula Ferreira Costa et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Ana Paula Ferreira Costa et al.; This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Ana Paula Ferreira Costa et al. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c701t-5ca6073c3f7768c083b8da4cfdadcd85adc0585aff1d7e898d00dd99d0a526d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c701t-5ca6073c3f7768c083b8da4cfdadcd85adc0585aff1d7e898d00dd99d0a526d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0184-2061</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1926424588/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1926424588?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25734,27905,27906,36993,36994,44571,53772,53774,74875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28812030$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Riemer, Angelika</contributor><creatorcontrib>Giraldo, Paulo César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Janine Medeiros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Ana Katherine</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of Human Papillomavirus 9-Valent Vaccine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials</title><title>Journal of immunology research</title><addtitle>J Immunol Res</addtitle><description>Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) has been progressively implemented in most developed countries for approximately 10 years. In order to increase the protection of the vaccines, a 9-valent vaccine (HPV9) was developed, which provides protection against nine types of the virus. Studies evaluating its safety are rare. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of three clinical trials assessing adverse effects on women randomly vaccinated with HPV9 or tetravalent vaccine (HPV4), with the objective of analyzing whether the HPV9 is as safe as HPV4. An electronic data search was performed through the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO databases. The studies selected 27,465 women who received one of the two vaccines. Pain (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.62–1.82) and erythema (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.21–1.36) occurred significantly more in the HPV9 group. However, there was no significant difference between the groups for the following adverse effects: headache (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.99–1.15), dizziness (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.93–1.27), and fatigue (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.91–1.30), and the occurrence of serious events related to vaccination was similarly rare among those vaccinated. Therefore, our findings demonstrate that HPV9 in female patients is as safe as the tetravalent vaccine.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Data search</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Erythema</subject><subject>Erythema - etiology</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Headache - etiology</subject><subject>Human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Papillomaviridae - immunology</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - adverse effects</subject><subject>Papillomavirus Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Viruses</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2314-8861</issn><issn>2314-7156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhgdRbKnduZYBN4Idm-8PF8KlqC1UFG27DWeSTJsyM7lNZiq3v97c3mu1rtzkhOTJwzl5q-olRu8w5vyQICwPqaSibJ5Uu4Ri1kjMxdPtXimBd6r9nEOLOJKUCiWeVztEKUwQRbvV-Q_o_LSqY1cfzwOM9TdYhr6PA9yGNOdaNxfQ-3GqL8DaMPr39aL-4idoFiP0qxzy-uV3GF0cwp139VkK0OcX1bOuFL-_rXvV-aePZ0fHzenXzydHi9PGSoSnhlsQpSlLOymFskjRVjlgtnPgrFO8rIiX0nXYSa-0cgg5p7VDwIlwjO5VJxuvi3BtlikMkFYmQjD3BzFdGkhTsL03UnCpZIs0I4QRh3XrPQFqGefEco6K68PGtZzbwTtbhk7QP5I-vhnDlbmMt4ZzJhBTRfBmK0jxZvZ5MkPI1vc9jD7O2WBNtNJSS1LQ1_-g13FO5UfvKcEI42otPNhQNsWck-8emsHIrOM36_jNNv6Cv_p7gAf4d9gFeLsBrsLo4Gf4T50vjO_gD40VlozQX_QIv-o</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Giraldo, Paulo César</creator><creator>da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique</creator><creator>da Silva, Janine Medeiros</creator><creator>Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira</creator><creator>Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira</creator><creator>Gonçalves, Ana Katherine</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0184-2061</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Safety of Human Papillomavirus 9-Valent Vaccine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials</title><author>Giraldo, Paulo César ; da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique ; da Silva, Janine Medeiros ; Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira ; Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira ; Gonçalves, Ana Katherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c701t-5ca6073c3f7768c083b8da4cfdadcd85adc0585aff1d7e898d00dd99d0a526d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Data search</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Erythema</topic><topic>Erythema - etiology</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Headache - etiology</topic><topic>Human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Papillomaviridae - immunology</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - adverse effects</topic><topic>Papillomavirus Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Viruses</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giraldo, Paulo César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Janine Medeiros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonçalves, Ana Katherine</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of immunology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giraldo, Paulo César</au><au>da Costa Lima, Paulo Henrique</au><au>da Silva, Janine Medeiros</au><au>Cobucci, Ricardo Ney Oliveira</au><au>Costa, Ana Paula Ferreira</au><au>Gonçalves, Ana Katherine</au><au>Riemer, Angelika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of Human Papillomavirus 9-Valent Vaccine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of immunology research</jtitle><addtitle>J Immunol Res</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>2017</volume><issue>2017</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>2314-8861</issn><eissn>2314-7156</eissn><abstract>Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) has been progressively implemented in most developed countries for approximately 10 years. In order to increase the protection of the vaccines, a 9-valent vaccine (HPV9) was developed, which provides protection against nine types of the virus. Studies evaluating its safety are rare. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of three clinical trials assessing adverse effects on women randomly vaccinated with HPV9 or tetravalent vaccine (HPV4), with the objective of analyzing whether the HPV9 is as safe as HPV4. An electronic data search was performed through the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO databases. The studies selected 27,465 women who received one of the two vaccines. Pain (OR 1.72; 95% CI 1.62–1.82) and erythema (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.21–1.36) occurred significantly more in the HPV9 group. However, there was no significant difference between the groups for the following adverse effects: headache (OR 1.07; 95% CI 0.99–1.15), dizziness (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.93–1.27), and fatigue (OR 1.09; 95% CI 0.91–1.30), and the occurrence of serious events related to vaccination was similarly rare among those vaccinated. Therefore, our findings demonstrate that HPV9 in female patients is as safe as the tetravalent vaccine.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>28812030</pmid><doi>10.1155/2017/3736201</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0184-2061</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2314-8861
ispartof Journal of immunology research, 2017-01, Vol.2017 (2017), p.1-6
issn 2314-8861
2314-7156
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_765787b0942242d19bee2a3c4552c550
source Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Child
Clinical trials
Data search
Developed countries
Erythema
Erythema - etiology
Fatigue
Female
Headache
Headache - etiology
Human papillomavirus
Humans
Immunization
Immunology
Meta-analysis
Pain
Pain - etiology
Papillomaviridae - immunology
Papillomavirus Infections - prevention & control
Papillomavirus Vaccines - administration & dosage
Papillomavirus Vaccines - adverse effects
Papillomavirus Vaccines - immunology
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Review
Side effects
Studies
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - prevention & control
Vaccination
Vaccines
Viruses
Womens health
Young Adult
title Safety of Human Papillomavirus 9-Valent Vaccine: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20Human%20Papillomavirus%209-Valent%20Vaccine:%20A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Randomized%20Trials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20immunology%20research&rft.au=Giraldo,%20Paulo%20C%C3%A9sar&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=2017&rft.issue=2017&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=2314-8861&rft.eissn=2314-7156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2017/3736201&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1929897972%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c701t-5ca6073c3f7768c083b8da4cfdadcd85adc0585aff1d7e898d00dd99d0a526d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1926424588&rft_id=info:pmid/28812030&rfr_iscdi=true