Individualized endoscopic management strategy for impacting jujube pits in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a 3-year single-center experience in northern China

• Published in: BMC surgery 2021-01, Vol.21 (1), p.18-18, Article 18
• Main Authors: Song, Ji-Tao, Chang, Xiao-Hua, Liu, Shan-Shan, Chen, Jing, Liu, Ming-Na, Wen, Ji-Feng, Hu, Ying, Xu, Jun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aquatic reptiles; China; Decompression; Emergency medical care; Endoscopes; Endoscopy; Esophagus; Female; Foreign Bodies - surgery; Foreign body; Gastrointestinal system; Gastrointestinal tract; Humans; Ingestion; Injuries; Injury prevention; Jaw; Jujube pit; Male; Management; Medical instruments; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Mucosa; Nutrition; Patients; Pits; Retrospective Studies; Strategic planning (Business); Suction; Trauma; Upper gastrointestinal tract; Upper Gastrointestinal Tract - surgery; Ziziphus; Ziziphus jujuba
• ISSN: 1471-2482; 1471-2482
• DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-01008-y

Impaction of jujube pits in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a special clinical condition in the northern Chinese population. Endoscopic removal is the preferred therapy, but there is no consensus on the management strategies. We reported our individualized endoscopic strategies on the jujube pits impacted in the upper GI tract. In this retrospective study, we included 191 patients (male: 57; female: 134) who presented to our hospital with ingestion of jujube pits between January 2015 and December 2017. Demographic information, times of hospital visiting, locations of jujube pits, endoscopic procedures, post-extraction endoscopic characteristics were analyzed. Management strategies including sufficient suction, repeated irrigation, jejunal nutrition and gastrointestinal decompression were given based on post-extraction endoscopic characteristics and impacted locations. Peak incidence was in the second quarter of each year (85/191 cases, 44.5%). Among the 191 cases, 169 (88.5%) showed pits impaction in the esophagus, 20 (10.5%) in the prepyloric region and 2 (1.0%) in the duodenal bulb. A total of 185 patients (96.9%) had pits removed with alligator jaw forceps, and 6 (3.1%) underwent suction removal with transparent caps placed over the end of the endoscope to prevent injury on removal of these pits with two sharp painted edges. Post-extraction endoscopic manifestations included mucosal erosion (26.7%), mucosa laceration (24.6%), ulceration with a white coating (18.9%) and penetrating trauma with pus cavity formation (29.8%). All patients received individualized endoscopic and subsequent management strategies and showed good outcomes. Individualized endoscopic management for impacted jujube pits in the upper GI tract based on post-extraction endoscopic characteristics and impacted locations was safe, effective, and minimally invasive.