Loading…

Neuromuscular Stimulation as an Intervention Tool for Recovery from Upper Limb Paresis after Stroke and the Neural Basis

Neuromodulators at the periphery, such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), have been developed as add-on tools to regain upper extremity (UE) paresis after stroke, but this recovery has often been limited. To overcome these limits, novel strategies to enhance neural reorganization and fu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied sciences 2022-01, Vol.12 (2), p.810
Main Authors: Obayashi, Shigeru, Saito, Hirotaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55c906cd15fa27d667be412326542e4f8cbc02e9d6377d5f85405d12be33e5543
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55c906cd15fa27d667be412326542e4f8cbc02e9d6377d5f85405d12be33e5543
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 810
container_title Applied sciences
container_volume 12
creator Obayashi, Shigeru
Saito, Hirotaka
description Neuromodulators at the periphery, such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), have been developed as add-on tools to regain upper extremity (UE) paresis after stroke, but this recovery has often been limited. To overcome these limits, novel strategies to enhance neural reorganization and functional recovery are needed. This review aims to discuss possible strategies for enhancing the benefits of NMES. To date, NMES studies have involved some therapeutic concerns that have been addressed under various conditions, such as the time of post-stroke and stroke severity and/or with heterogeneous stimulation parameters, such as target muscles, doses or durations of treatment and outcome measures. We began by identifying factors sensitive to NMES benefits among heterogeneous conditions and parameters, based on the “progress rate (PR)”, defined as the gains in UE function scores per intervention duration. Our analysis disclosed that the benefits might be affected by the target muscles, stroke severity and time period after stroke. Likewise, repetitive peripheral neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is expected to facilitate motor recovery, as already demonstrated by a successful study. In parallel, our efforts should be devoted to further understanding the precise neural mechanism of how neuromodulators make UE function recovery occur, thereby leading to overcoming the limits. In this study, we discuss the possible neural mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/app12020810
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_768c49ce329a44afbe131edc90cbf0e7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_768c49ce329a44afbe131edc90cbf0e7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2621272249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55c906cd15fa27d667be412326542e4f8cbc02e9d6377d5f85405d12be33e5543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkVtLAzEQhRdRsGif_AMBH6Wae7qPWrwUioq2zyGbnejW7WZNdov996atSOdlhuGc7wxMll0QfM1Yjm9M2xKKKR4TfJQNKFZyxDhRxwfzaTaMcYlT5YQl3SD7eYY--FUfbV-bgN67apWGrvINMhGZBk2bDsIamt1q7n2NnA_oDaxfQ9ggl8xo0bYQ0KxaFejVBIhVcrpkS7jgvyBhStR9AtpmmRrdmaQ4z06cqSMM__pZtni4n0-eRrOXx-nkdjayTOJuJITNsbQlEc5QVUqpCuCEMioFp8Dd2BYWU8hLyZQqhRsLjkVJaAGMgRCcnWXTPbf0ZqnbUK1M2GhvKr1b-PChTegqW4NWcmx5boHR3HBuXAGEESjTAbZwGFRiXe5ZbfDfPcROL30fmnS-ppISqijleVJd7VU2-BgDuP9UgvX2U_rgU-wXDlaGeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621272249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neuromuscular Stimulation as an Intervention Tool for Recovery from Upper Limb Paresis after Stroke and the Neural Basis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Obayashi, Shigeru ; Saito, Hirotaka</creator><creatorcontrib>Obayashi, Shigeru ; Saito, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><description>Neuromodulators at the periphery, such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), have been developed as add-on tools to regain upper extremity (UE) paresis after stroke, but this recovery has often been limited. To overcome these limits, novel strategies to enhance neural reorganization and functional recovery are needed. This review aims to discuss possible strategies for enhancing the benefits of NMES. To date, NMES studies have involved some therapeutic concerns that have been addressed under various conditions, such as the time of post-stroke and stroke severity and/or with heterogeneous stimulation parameters, such as target muscles, doses or durations of treatment and outcome measures. We began by identifying factors sensitive to NMES benefits among heterogeneous conditions and parameters, based on the “progress rate (PR)”, defined as the gains in UE function scores per intervention duration. Our analysis disclosed that the benefits might be affected by the target muscles, stroke severity and time period after stroke. Likewise, repetitive peripheral neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is expected to facilitate motor recovery, as already demonstrated by a successful study. In parallel, our efforts should be devoted to further understanding the precise neural mechanism of how neuromodulators make UE function recovery occur, thereby leading to overcoming the limits. In this study, we discuss the possible neural mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app12020810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>cortical reorganization ; Disability ; Electrical stimuli ; functional near-infrared spectroscopy ; Magnetic fields ; Muscles ; Neuromodulation ; Neuromuscular electrical stimulation ; neuronal plasticity ; neurorehabilitation ; Parameter sensitivity ; Paresis ; Recovery of function ; Stimulation ; Stroke ; upper extremity paresis</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2022-01, Vol.12 (2), p.810</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55c906cd15fa27d667be412326542e4f8cbc02e9d6377d5f85405d12be33e5543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55c906cd15fa27d667be412326542e4f8cbc02e9d6377d5f85405d12be33e5543</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3575-8818 ; 0000-0002-1678-6656</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621272249/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621272249?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Obayashi, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><title>Neuromuscular Stimulation as an Intervention Tool for Recovery from Upper Limb Paresis after Stroke and the Neural Basis</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>Neuromodulators at the periphery, such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), have been developed as add-on tools to regain upper extremity (UE) paresis after stroke, but this recovery has often been limited. To overcome these limits, novel strategies to enhance neural reorganization and functional recovery are needed. This review aims to discuss possible strategies for enhancing the benefits of NMES. To date, NMES studies have involved some therapeutic concerns that have been addressed under various conditions, such as the time of post-stroke and stroke severity and/or with heterogeneous stimulation parameters, such as target muscles, doses or durations of treatment and outcome measures. We began by identifying factors sensitive to NMES benefits among heterogeneous conditions and parameters, based on the “progress rate (PR)”, defined as the gains in UE function scores per intervention duration. Our analysis disclosed that the benefits might be affected by the target muscles, stroke severity and time period after stroke. Likewise, repetitive peripheral neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is expected to facilitate motor recovery, as already demonstrated by a successful study. In parallel, our efforts should be devoted to further understanding the precise neural mechanism of how neuromodulators make UE function recovery occur, thereby leading to overcoming the limits. In this study, we discuss the possible neural mechanisms.</description><subject>cortical reorganization</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Electrical stimuli</subject><subject>functional near-infrared spectroscopy</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neuromodulation</subject><subject>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation</subject><subject>neuronal plasticity</subject><subject>neurorehabilitation</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Paresis</subject><subject>Recovery of function</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>upper extremity paresis</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkVtLAzEQhRdRsGif_AMBH6Wae7qPWrwUioq2zyGbnejW7WZNdov996atSOdlhuGc7wxMll0QfM1Yjm9M2xKKKR4TfJQNKFZyxDhRxwfzaTaMcYlT5YQl3SD7eYY--FUfbV-bgN67apWGrvINMhGZBk2bDsIamt1q7n2NnA_oDaxfQ9ggl8xo0bYQ0KxaFejVBIhVcrpkS7jgvyBhStR9AtpmmRrdmaQ4z06cqSMM__pZtni4n0-eRrOXx-nkdjayTOJuJITNsbQlEc5QVUqpCuCEMioFp8Dd2BYWU8hLyZQqhRsLjkVJaAGMgRCcnWXTPbf0ZqnbUK1M2GhvKr1b-PChTegqW4NWcmx5boHR3HBuXAGEESjTAbZwGFRiXe5ZbfDfPcROL30fmnS-ppISqijleVJd7VU2-BgDuP9UgvX2U_rgU-wXDlaGeg</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Obayashi, Shigeru</creator><creator>Saito, Hirotaka</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3575-8818</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-6656</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Neuromuscular Stimulation as an Intervention Tool for Recovery from Upper Limb Paresis after Stroke and the Neural Basis</title><author>Obayashi, Shigeru ; Saito, Hirotaka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55c906cd15fa27d667be412326542e4f8cbc02e9d6377d5f85405d12be33e5543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>cortical reorganization</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Electrical stimuli</topic><topic>functional near-infrared spectroscopy</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neuromodulation</topic><topic>Neuromuscular electrical stimulation</topic><topic>neuronal plasticity</topic><topic>neurorehabilitation</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Paresis</topic><topic>Recovery of function</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>upper extremity paresis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Obayashi, Shigeru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Hirotaka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Obayashi, Shigeru</au><au>Saito, Hirotaka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neuromuscular Stimulation as an Intervention Tool for Recovery from Upper Limb Paresis after Stroke and the Neural Basis</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>810</spage><pages>810-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>Neuromodulators at the periphery, such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), have been developed as add-on tools to regain upper extremity (UE) paresis after stroke, but this recovery has often been limited. To overcome these limits, novel strategies to enhance neural reorganization and functional recovery are needed. This review aims to discuss possible strategies for enhancing the benefits of NMES. To date, NMES studies have involved some therapeutic concerns that have been addressed under various conditions, such as the time of post-stroke and stroke severity and/or with heterogeneous stimulation parameters, such as target muscles, doses or durations of treatment and outcome measures. We began by identifying factors sensitive to NMES benefits among heterogeneous conditions and parameters, based on the “progress rate (PR)”, defined as the gains in UE function scores per intervention duration. Our analysis disclosed that the benefits might be affected by the target muscles, stroke severity and time period after stroke. Likewise, repetitive peripheral neuromuscular magnetic stimulation (rPMS) is expected to facilitate motor recovery, as already demonstrated by a successful study. In parallel, our efforts should be devoted to further understanding the precise neural mechanism of how neuromodulators make UE function recovery occur, thereby leading to overcoming the limits. In this study, we discuss the possible neural mechanisms.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app12020810</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3575-8818</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1678-6656</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-3417
ispartof Applied sciences, 2022-01, Vol.12 (2), p.810
issn 2076-3417
2076-3417
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_768c49ce329a44afbe131edc90cbf0e7
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects cortical reorganization
Disability
Electrical stimuli
functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Magnetic fields
Muscles
Neuromodulation
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
neuronal plasticity
neurorehabilitation
Parameter sensitivity
Paresis
Recovery of function
Stimulation
Stroke
upper extremity paresis
title Neuromuscular Stimulation as an Intervention Tool for Recovery from Upper Limb Paresis after Stroke and the Neural Basis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A18%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neuromuscular%20Stimulation%20as%20an%20Intervention%20Tool%20for%20Recovery%20from%20Upper%20Limb%20Paresis%20after%20Stroke%20and%20the%20Neural%20Basis&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Obayashi,%20Shigeru&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=810&rft.pages=810-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app12020810&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2621272249%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-55c906cd15fa27d667be412326542e4f8cbc02e9d6377d5f85405d12be33e5543%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621272249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true