Efficacy of Mobile Health in Patients With Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

• Published in: JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021-06, Vol.9 (6), p.e26095-e26095
• Main Authors: Chen, Mingrong, Wu, Tingting, Lv, Meina, Chen, Chunmei, Fang, Zongwei, Zeng, Zhiwei, Qian, Jiafen, Jiang, Shaojun, Chen, Wenjun, Zhang, Jinhua
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bias; Cellular telephones; Meta-analysis; Review; Software; Text messaging
• ISSN: 2291-5222; 2291-5222
• DOI: 10.2196/26095

Background: Low back pain is one of the most common health problems and a main cause of disability, which imposes a great burden on patients. Mobile health (mHealth) affects many aspects of people’s lives, and it has progressed rapidly, showing promise as an effective intervention for patients with low back pain. However, the efficacy of mHealth interventions for patients with low back pain remains unclear; thus, further exploration is necessary. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of mHealth interventions in patients with low back pain compared to usual care. Methods: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials designed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) statement standard. We searched for studies published in English before October 2020 in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Two researchers independently scanned the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Bias risks were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We used RevMan 5.4 software to perform the meta-analysis. Results: A total of 9 studies with 792 participants met the inclusion criteria. The simultaneous use of mHealth and usual care showed a better reduction in pain intensity than usual care alone, as measured by the numeric rating scale (mean difference [MD] –0.85, 95% CI –1.29 to –0.40; P