Loading…

“Local versus Nonlocal” Enterprise Linkages of Global Cities: A Comparison between Beijing and Shanghai, China

Two global cities of China, Beijing and Shanghai, have completely different development statuses with their hinterlands. There is a large economic development gap between Beijing and its hinterland, Hebei Province, while Shanghai has formed a highly integrated region with its hinterland, the Yangtze...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Complexity (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-13
Main Authors: Li, Jiaming, Yu, Jiali, Sun, Dongqi, Lu, Jiayi, Niu, Fangqu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7c4f70e65877f0206f15df51be1e8e6e202354e3ff5c43a0f5d277b7efe93b703
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7c4f70e65877f0206f15df51be1e8e6e202354e3ff5c43a0f5d277b7efe93b703
container_end_page 13
container_issue 2020
container_start_page 1
container_title Complexity (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 2020
creator Li, Jiaming
Yu, Jiali
Sun, Dongqi
Lu, Jiayi
Niu, Fangqu
description Two global cities of China, Beijing and Shanghai, have completely different development statuses with their hinterlands. There is a large economic development gap between Beijing and its hinterland, Hebei Province, while Shanghai has formed a highly integrated region with its hinterland, the Yangtze River Delta. According to the Outline of Collaborative Development of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province, enterprise linkages between Beijing and Hebei should be strengthened in order to narrow the economic gap between the center and the hinterland. On this basis, this paper proposes two hypotheses. (1) The economic gap between Beijing and Hebei has not really changed, because more enterprise linkages of Beijing are nonlocal. (2) The gradual narrowing of the economic gap between Shanghai and Jiangsu as well as Zhejiang is due to the fact that more enterprise linkages of Shanghai are local. We have used enterprise data on business registration from the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of China and have selected two indicators, namely, the number of headquarters-branches offices and the amount of enterprise investment, to examine the enterprise linkages between Beijing/Shanghai and their hinterlands as well as the hinterworld, and have verified these two hypotheses. The results show that nonlocal enterprise linkages based on the hinterworld are the main form in Beijing, while local enterprise linkages based on the hinterland are the main form in Shanghai. In addition, we have analyzed the mechanisms of formation of the enterprises linkages of the two cities and have put forward some policy suggestions.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2020/8918534
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_76f718da31054a52922a489d0b7586a4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A821703310</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_76f718da31054a52922a489d0b7586a4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A821703310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7c4f70e65877f0206f15df51be1e8e6e202354e3ff5c43a0f5d277b7efe93b703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEEqWwY40ssaTT-t8Ou2FUSqURLIB1dJNcZzxk7MHOULHrg8DL9UnwkAqWIC_8o-8c32PfqnrO6DljSl1wyumFrZlVQj6oThit6wVVXD88ro1ecGPN4-pJzltKaa2FOanS3e2PdexgJN8w5UMm72MYj_u725_kMkyY9slnJGsfvsCAmURHrsbYFsHKTx7za7Ikq7jbQ8FiIC1ON4iBvEG_9WEgEHrycQNh2IA_I6uND_C0euRgzPjsfj6tPr-9_LR6t1h_uLpeLdeLTlE5LUwnnaGolTXGlWDaMdU7xVpkaFFjCSuUROGc6qQA6lTPjWkNOqxFa6g4ra5n3z7CtikxdpC-NxF88_sgpqGBNPluxMZoZ5jtQTCqJChecw7S1j1tjbIaZPF6OXvtU_x6wDw123hIoZTfcMmFFIYZW6jzmRqgmPrg4pSgK6PHne9iQOfL-dJyVsord_2vQEtqy39pVgRns6BLMeeE7k8uRptjDzTHHmjue6Dgr2a8vHsPN_5f9IuZxsKgg780k4orLX4BETa5xQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2423437178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Local versus Nonlocal” Enterprise Linkages of Global Cities: A Comparison between Beijing and Shanghai, China</title><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Li, Jiaming ; Yu, Jiali ; Sun, Dongqi ; Lu, Jiayi ; Niu, Fangqu</creator><contributor>Yang, Jun ; Jun Yang</contributor><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiaming ; Yu, Jiali ; Sun, Dongqi ; Lu, Jiayi ; Niu, Fangqu ; Yang, Jun ; Jun Yang</creatorcontrib><description>Two global cities of China, Beijing and Shanghai, have completely different development statuses with their hinterlands. There is a large economic development gap between Beijing and its hinterland, Hebei Province, while Shanghai has formed a highly integrated region with its hinterland, the Yangtze River Delta. According to the Outline of Collaborative Development of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province, enterprise linkages between Beijing and Hebei should be strengthened in order to narrow the economic gap between the center and the hinterland. On this basis, this paper proposes two hypotheses. (1) The economic gap between Beijing and Hebei has not really changed, because more enterprise linkages of Beijing are nonlocal. (2) The gradual narrowing of the economic gap between Shanghai and Jiangsu as well as Zhejiang is due to the fact that more enterprise linkages of Shanghai are local. We have used enterprise data on business registration from the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of China and have selected two indicators, namely, the number of headquarters-branches offices and the amount of enterprise investment, to examine the enterprise linkages between Beijing/Shanghai and their hinterlands as well as the hinterworld, and have verified these two hypotheses. The results show that nonlocal enterprise linkages based on the hinterworld are the main form in Beijing, while local enterprise linkages based on the hinterland are the main form in Shanghai. In addition, we have analyzed the mechanisms of formation of the enterprises linkages of the two cities and have put forward some policy suggestions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-2787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2020/8918534</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Analysis ; China ; Cities ; Economic development ; Economics ; GDP ; Globalization ; Gross Domestic Product ; Hypotheses ; Linkages ; Multinational corporations ; New York ; Social networks ; Studies ; Theory ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Complexity (New York, N.Y.), 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 Jiayi Lu et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Jiayi Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7c4f70e65877f0206f15df51be1e8e6e202354e3ff5c43a0f5d277b7efe93b703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7c4f70e65877f0206f15df51be1e8e6e202354e3ff5c43a0f5d277b7efe93b703</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4301-2071 ; 0000-0003-2290-5700</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4023,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Yang, Jun</contributor><contributor>Jun Yang</contributor><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiaming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jiali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Dongqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jiayi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Fangqu</creatorcontrib><title>“Local versus Nonlocal” Enterprise Linkages of Global Cities: A Comparison between Beijing and Shanghai, China</title><title>Complexity (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>Two global cities of China, Beijing and Shanghai, have completely different development statuses with their hinterlands. There is a large economic development gap between Beijing and its hinterland, Hebei Province, while Shanghai has formed a highly integrated region with its hinterland, the Yangtze River Delta. According to the Outline of Collaborative Development of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province, enterprise linkages between Beijing and Hebei should be strengthened in order to narrow the economic gap between the center and the hinterland. On this basis, this paper proposes two hypotheses. (1) The economic gap between Beijing and Hebei has not really changed, because more enterprise linkages of Beijing are nonlocal. (2) The gradual narrowing of the economic gap between Shanghai and Jiangsu as well as Zhejiang is due to the fact that more enterprise linkages of Shanghai are local. We have used enterprise data on business registration from the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of China and have selected two indicators, namely, the number of headquarters-branches offices and the amount of enterprise investment, to examine the enterprise linkages between Beijing/Shanghai and their hinterlands as well as the hinterworld, and have verified these two hypotheses. The results show that nonlocal enterprise linkages based on the hinterworld are the main form in Beijing, while local enterprise linkages based on the hinterland are the main form in Shanghai. In addition, we have analyzed the mechanisms of formation of the enterprises linkages of the two cities and have put forward some policy suggestions.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Linkages</subject><subject>Multinational corporations</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1076-2787</issn><issn>1099-0526</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1u1DAUhSMEEqWwY40ssaTT-t8Ou2FUSqURLIB1dJNcZzxk7MHOULHrg8DL9UnwkAqWIC_8o-8c32PfqnrO6DljSl1wyumFrZlVQj6oThit6wVVXD88ro1ecGPN4-pJzltKaa2FOanS3e2PdexgJN8w5UMm72MYj_u725_kMkyY9slnJGsfvsCAmURHrsbYFsHKTx7za7Ikq7jbQ8FiIC1ON4iBvEG_9WEgEHrycQNh2IA_I6uND_C0euRgzPjsfj6tPr-9_LR6t1h_uLpeLdeLTlE5LUwnnaGolTXGlWDaMdU7xVpkaFFjCSuUROGc6qQA6lTPjWkNOqxFa6g4ra5n3z7CtikxdpC-NxF88_sgpqGBNPluxMZoZ5jtQTCqJChecw7S1j1tjbIaZPF6OXvtU_x6wDw123hIoZTfcMmFFIYZW6jzmRqgmPrg4pSgK6PHne9iQOfL-dJyVsord_2vQEtqy39pVgRns6BLMeeE7k8uRptjDzTHHmjue6Dgr2a8vHsPN_5f9IuZxsKgg780k4orLX4BETa5xQ</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Li, Jiaming</creator><creator>Yu, Jiali</creator><creator>Sun, Dongqi</creator><creator>Lu, Jiayi</creator><creator>Niu, Fangqu</creator><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>Hindawi-Wiley</general><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>AHMDM</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-2071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2290-5700</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>“Local versus Nonlocal” Enterprise Linkages of Global Cities: A Comparison between Beijing and Shanghai, China</title><author>Li, Jiaming ; Yu, Jiali ; Sun, Dongqi ; Lu, Jiayi ; Niu, Fangqu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7c4f70e65877f0206f15df51be1e8e6e202354e3ff5c43a0f5d277b7efe93b703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Linkages</topic><topic>Multinational corporations</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiaming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jiali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Dongqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Jiayi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Fangqu</creatorcontrib><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>قاعدة العلوم الإنسانية - e-Marefa Humanities</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Complexity (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Jiaming</au><au>Yu, Jiali</au><au>Sun, Dongqi</au><au>Lu, Jiayi</au><au>Niu, Fangqu</au><au>Yang, Jun</au><au>Jun Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Local versus Nonlocal” Enterprise Linkages of Global Cities: A Comparison between Beijing and Shanghai, China</atitle><jtitle>Complexity (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2020</volume><issue>2020</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>1076-2787</issn><eissn>1099-0526</eissn><abstract>Two global cities of China, Beijing and Shanghai, have completely different development statuses with their hinterlands. There is a large economic development gap between Beijing and its hinterland, Hebei Province, while Shanghai has formed a highly integrated region with its hinterland, the Yangtze River Delta. According to the Outline of Collaborative Development of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei Province, enterprise linkages between Beijing and Hebei should be strengthened in order to narrow the economic gap between the center and the hinterland. On this basis, this paper proposes two hypotheses. (1) The economic gap between Beijing and Hebei has not really changed, because more enterprise linkages of Beijing are nonlocal. (2) The gradual narrowing of the economic gap between Shanghai and Jiangsu as well as Zhejiang is due to the fact that more enterprise linkages of Shanghai are local. We have used enterprise data on business registration from the State Administration for Industry and Commerce of China and have selected two indicators, namely, the number of headquarters-branches offices and the amount of enterprise investment, to examine the enterprise linkages between Beijing/Shanghai and their hinterlands as well as the hinterworld, and have verified these two hypotheses. The results show that nonlocal enterprise linkages based on the hinterworld are the main form in Beijing, while local enterprise linkages based on the hinterland are the main form in Shanghai. In addition, we have analyzed the mechanisms of formation of the enterprises linkages of the two cities and have put forward some policy suggestions.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</pub><doi>10.1155/2020/8918534</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-2071</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2290-5700</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-2787
ispartof Complexity (New York, N.Y.), 2020, Vol.2020 (2020), p.1-13
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_76f718da31054a52922a489d0b7586a4
source Wiley Open Access
subjects Analysis
China
Cities
Economic development
Economics
GDP
Globalization
Gross Domestic Product
Hypotheses
Linkages
Multinational corporations
New York
Social networks
Studies
Theory
United Kingdom
title “Local versus Nonlocal” Enterprise Linkages of Global Cities: A Comparison between Beijing and Shanghai, China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A48%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CLocal%20versus%20Nonlocal%E2%80%9D%20Enterprise%20Linkages%20of%20Global%20Cities:%20A%20Comparison%20between%20Beijing%20and%20Shanghai,%20China&rft.jtitle=Complexity%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Li,%20Jiaming&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=2020&rft.issue=2020&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=1076-2787&rft.eissn=1099-0526&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2020/8918534&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA821703310%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-7c4f70e65877f0206f15df51be1e8e6e202354e3ff5c43a0f5d277b7efe93b703%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2423437178&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A821703310&rfr_iscdi=true