Loading…

Adjunctive use of Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management in Elective Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Randomized Control Trial

Objective: To compare between the efficacy of Ketorolac and Paracetamol in the management of post-operative pain following elective cardiac surgery. Study Design: Randomized (single-blind) Control Trial (RCT NCT05361824.) Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted in the Surgical Intensiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pakistan Armed Forces medical journal 2022-10, Vol.72 (SUPPL-3), p.S585-90
Main Authors: Muzaffar, Maaida, Khuwaja, Amin M., Ahmed, Aftab, Iqtdar, Rabia, Chohan, Haris Tariq, Siddiqi, Rashad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To compare between the efficacy of Ketorolac and Paracetamol in the management of post-operative pain following elective cardiac surgery. Study Design: Randomized (single-blind) Control Trial (RCT NCT05361824.) Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Hospital, Karachi Pakistan, From 1st Jan to 30th Jun 2021. Methodology: Randomization of 60 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery into either Paracetamol (30 control patients) or Ketorolac (30 treatment patients) was done.In addition, to a low dose, short duration background infusion of Nalbuphine, the control group was administered. Injection Paracetamol 1gm every six-hours. Whereas the treatment group was administered injection Ketorolac 30mg every eight-hours. Assessment of pain was done at 6, 12, 18 and 24 hours post-extubation, using a Visual analog scale (VAS). For the purpose of this study, a score of 4 or less was taken as a cut-off for adequate pain control. Results: VAS score was significantly lower in Ketorolac group as compared to the Paracetamol group at all four-time points with an average rating of 3.2±1.9 vs. 5.3±1.7; p
ISSN:0030-9648
2411-8842
DOI:10.51253/pafmj.v72iSUPPL-3.9559