Novel characteristics for immunophenotype, FISH pattern and molecular cytogenetics in synovial sarcoma

• Published in: Scientific reports 2023-05, Vol.13 (1), p.7954-7954, Article 7954
• Main Authors: Zhong, Ling ling, Huang, Gao xiang, Xian, Li ying, Wei, Zong chen, Tang, Zhi ping, Chen, Qiu yue, Chen, Hao, Tang, Fang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 692/4017; 692/4028/546; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics; Chromosome translocations; Cytogenetic Analysis; Cytogenetics; Fish; Fusion protein; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; multidisciplinary; Nkx3.1 protein; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion - genetics; Retrospective Studies; Sarcoma; Sarcoma, Synovial - pathology; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Soft tissue sarcoma; Synovial sarcoma; Translocation; Translocation, Genetic
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34983-2

As a rare and highly aggressive soft tissue sarcoma, the new immunophenotype, atypical FISH pattern and relevant molecular cytogenetics of synovial sarcoma (SS) remain less known, although it is characteristically represented by a pathognomonic chromosomal translocation t (X; 18) (p11.2; q11.2). Methodologically, the morphology was retrospectively analysed by using H&E staining, and immunohistochemical features were investigated by using markers that have been recently applied in other soft tissue tumors. Moreover, FISH signals for SS18 and EWSR-1 break-apart probes were examined. Finally, cytogenetic characteristics were analysed via RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing. Consequently, nine out of thirteen cases that were histologically highly suspected as SS were finally identified as SS via molecular analysis. Histologically, nine SS cases were divided into monophasic fibrous SS (4/9), biphasic SS (4/9) and poorly differentiated SS (1/9). Immunohistochemically, SOX-2 immunostaining was positive in eight cases (8/9) and PAX-7 immunostaining was diffusely positive in the epithelial component of biphasic SS (4/4). Nine cases showed negative immunostaining for NKX3.1 and reduced or absent immunostaining for INI-1. Eight cases showed typically positive FISH signalling for the SS18 break-apart probe, whereas one case exhibited an atypical FISH pattern (complete loss of green signalling, case 2). Furthermore, the SS18-SSX1 and SS18-SSX2 fusion genes were identified in seven cases and two cases, respectively. The fusion site in 8 out of 9 cases was common in the literature, whereas the fusion site in case 2 was involved in exon 10 codon 404 in SS18 and exon 7 codon 119 in SSX1 (which has not been previously reported), which notably corresponded to the complete loss of green signalling in the FISH pattern. Additionally, FISH analysis of the EWSR-1 gene in nine SS cases demonstrated aberrant signalling in three cases that were recognized as a monoallelic loss of EWSR-1 (1/9), an amplification of EWSR-1 (1/9) and a translocation of EWSR-1 (1/9). In conclusion, SS18-SSX fusion gene sequencing is obligatory for a precise diagnosis of SS when dealing with a confusing immunophenotype and atypical or aberrant FISH signalling for SS18 and EWSR-1 detection.