The PHOSPHATE1 genes participate in salt and Pi signaling pathways and play adaptive roles during soybean evolution

• Published in: BMC plant biology 2019-08, Vol.19 (1), p.353-353, Article 353
• Main Authors: Wang, Yan, Gao, Huihui, He, Lingli, Zhu, Weiwei, Yan, Lixin, Chen, Qingshan, He, Chaoying
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abiotic stress; Adaptation, Physiological; Adaptive evolution; Amino acids; Arabidopsis; Arabidopsis - genetics; Arabidopsis thaliana; Cellular signal transduction; Evolution, Molecular; Functional diversification; Gene expression; Genes; Genetic aspects; Genetic engineering; Glycine max - genetics; Glycine max - metabolism; Orthologous gene; PHO1 gene family; Phosphate Transport Proteins - genetics; Phosphate Transport Proteins - metabolism; Phosphate Transport Proteins - physiology; Phosphates; Physiological aspects; Plant development; Plant Proteins - genetics; Plant Proteins - metabolism; Plant Proteins - physiology; Plants, Genetically Modified; Salinity; Salt Stress - genetics; Signal Transduction - genetics; Soybeans
• ISSN: 1471-2229; 1471-2229
• DOI: 10.1186/s12870-019-1959-8

The PHOSPHATE1 (PHO1) gene family plays diverse roles in inorganic phosphate (Pi) transfer and signal transduction, and plant development. However, the functions and diversification of soybean PHO1 family are poorly understood. Cultivated soybean (Glycine max) was domesticated from wild soybean (Glycine soja). To illuminate their roles in this evolutionary process, we comparatively investigated the G. max PHO1 genes (GmPHO1) in Suinong 14 (SN14) and G. soja PHO1 genes (GsPHO1) in ZYD00006 (ZYD6). The sequences of the orthologous Gm-GsPHO1 pairs were grouped into two Classes. The expression of Class I in both SN14 and ZYD6 was widely but relatively high in developing fruits, whereas Class II was predominantly expressed in the roots. The whole family displayed diverse response patterns to salt stresses and Pi-starvation in roots. Between SN14 and ZYD6, most PHO1 genes responded similarly to salinity stresses, and half had sharp contrasts in response to Pi-starvation, which corroborated the differential response capacities to salinity and low-Pi stress between SN14 and ZYD6. Furthermore, in transgenic Arabidopsis plants, most Class II members and GmPHO1;H9 from Class I could enhance salt tolerance, while only two Class II genes (GmPHO1;H4 and GmPHO1;H8) differently altered sensitivity to Pi-starvation. The expression of critical genes was accordingly altered in either salt or Pi signaling pathways in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Our work identifies some PHO1 genes as promising genetic materials for soybean improvement, and suggests that expression variation is decisive to functional divergence of the orthologous Gm-GsPHO1 pairs, which plays an adaptive role during soybean evolution.