Loading…
Evaporation over a glacial lake in Antarctica
The study provides estimates of summertime evaporation over a glacial lake located in the Schirmacher oasis, Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica. Lake Zub (alternately named Lake Priyadarshini and referred to throughout as Lake Zub/Priyadarshini) is the second-largest lake in the oasis, and its maxi...
Saved in:
Published in: | The cryosphere 2022-08, Vol.16 (8), p.3101-3121 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The study provides estimates of summertime evaporation
over a glacial lake located in the Schirmacher oasis, Dronning Maud Land,
East Antarctica. Lake Zub (alternately named Lake Priyadarshini and referred to throughout as Lake Zub/Priyadarshini) is the second-largest lake in the
oasis, and its maximum depth is 6 m. The lake is also among the warmest
glacial lakes in the oasis, and it is free of ice during almost 2 summer
months. The summertime evaporation over the ice-free lake was measured using
the eddy covariance method and estimated on the basis of five indirect
methods (bulk-aerodynamic method and four combination equations). We used
meteorological and hydrological measurements collected during a field
experiment carried out in 2018. The eddy covariance method was considered
the most accurate, and the evaporation was estimated to be 114 mm for the
period from 1 January to 7 February 2018 (38 d) on the basis of this
method. The average daily evaporation was 3.0 mm d−1 in January 2018.
During the experiment period, the largest changes in daily evaporation were
driven by synoptic-scale atmospheric processes rather than local katabatic
winds. The bulk-aerodynamic method suggests the average daily evaporation is 2.0 mm d−1, which is 32 % less than the results based on the
eddy covariance method. The bulk-aerodynamic method is much better in
producing the day-to-day variations in evaporation compared to the
combination equations. All selected combination equations underestimated the
evaporation over the lake by 40 %–72 %. The scope of the uncertainties
inherent in the indirect methods does not allow us to apply them to estimate
the daily evaporation over Lake Zub/Priyadarshini. We suggested a new
combination equation to evaluate the summertime evaporation over the lake's
surface using meteorological observations from the nearest site. The
performance of the new equation is better than the performance of the
indirect methods considered. With this equation, the evaporation over the
period of the experiment was 124 mm, which is only 9 % larger than the
result according to the eddy covariance method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1994-0424 1994-0416 1994-0424 1994-0416 |
DOI: | 10.5194/tc-16-3101-2022 |