Challenging Vaginal Discharge, Lactobacillosis and Cytolytic Vaginitis

In women’s health, clinicians are often faced with diagnosing and administering treatment to patients who present with an increased vaginal discharge without much other information to work with. It’s only once a patient’s background is reviewed and lab work is completed that two common reasons behin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of family & reproductive health 2022-06, Vol.16 (2), p.102-105
Main Authors: Ventolini, Gary, Gandhi, Kushal, Manales, Nathan Joshua, Garza, John, Sanchez, Asley, Martinez, Brianna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Health sciences
Laboratories
Lactobacillosis
Microbiota
Microscopy
Patients
Reproductive health
Review
Vagina
Vaginal Discharge
Vaginitis
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In women’s health, clinicians are often faced with diagnosing and administering treatment to patients who present with an increased vaginal discharge without much other information to work with. It’s only once a patient’s background is reviewed and lab work is completed that two common reasons behind vaginal discharge with similar symptoms, Lactobacillosis and Cytolytic Vaginitis, can be differentiated and a proper diagnosis can be reached. Now, we understand that Lactobacillosis and Cytolytic Vaginitis are symptomatically confused by patients as well as inexperienced clinicians. Lactobacillosis involves the presence of abnormal, extremely long Lactobacilli, a keystone species for vaginal health, while Cytolytic Vaginitis mainly involves, increased Lactobacilli, pH between 3.5 and 4.5, presence of cytolysis, and a lowered white blood cell count. Both present with similar discharge, leading to their conflation. A microscopic examination of the discharge using a wet mount with normal saline can provide 80% diagnostic sensitivity until further testing can be completed.
ISSN:1735-8949
1735-9392
DOI:10.18502/jfrh.v16i2.9477