Loading…
Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use
Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Discourse and writing/rédactologie 2022-07, Vol.32 (1), p.262-280 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 280 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 262 |
container_title | Discourse and writing/rédactologie |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Badenhorst, Cecile Arif, Abu Quintyne, Kelvin |
description | Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventions of citing is part of developing an identity around scholarship, research and writing. In this paper, we examine our own experiences of the politics of citations to understand our socialization processes and resistances. We use an autoethnographic narrative approach to frame this qualitative study. Our findings show how citation use abounds with the contradictions and paradoxes in our doctoral writing journeys where the pressure to succeed can compromise identity-building as ethical scholars. Each of us has many needs and multiple positionalities and resisting the naturalizing grammar of citations can be complicated. Yet, once aware of the politics of citations, one cannot go back to being unaware. |
doi_str_mv | 10.31468/dwr.969 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>erudit_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7825639259ed4583aafb80875c11b894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1091125ar</eruid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7825639259ed4583aafb80875c11b894</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1091125ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGrBf2CWbqbmMUkmS6mvQsGNrsOdPGrK2JRkSvHfG1qRru7hcPi45yB0S8mc01Z2D-6Q51rqCzRhQvJGcUYuz_Q1mpWyIYQw1TFG2QTRp2THlGHAhxzHuF1j2Do8fnm8S0M1bMEpYBtHGGPa4n3xN-gqwFD87O9O0efL88firVm9vy4Xj6vGUslyo6gPBGRoRascsw6AuM4GC461NhDpvQzKW7BScku5V1Ipx53QvNdaEsunaHniugQbs8vxG_KPSRDN0Uh5bSDXBwdvapnaUDOhvWtFxwFC35FOCUtp3-m2su5PLJtTKdmHfx4l5ricqcuZulyN3p2iPu9dHM-CmlImIPNf2OlqrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use</title><source>CRKN Open Access Journals List</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Badenhorst, Cecile ; Arif, Abu ; Quintyne, Kelvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Badenhorst, Cecile ; Arif, Abu ; Quintyne, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><description>Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventions of citing is part of developing an identity around scholarship, research and writing. In this paper, we examine our own experiences of the politics of citations to understand our socialization processes and resistances. We use an autoethnographic narrative approach to frame this qualitative study. Our findings show how citation use abounds with the contradictions and paradoxes in our doctoral writing journeys where the pressure to succeed can compromise identity-building as ethical scholars. Each of us has many needs and multiple positionalities and resisting the naturalizing grammar of citations can be complicated. Yet, once aware of the politics of citations, one cannot go back to being unaware.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2563-7320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2563-7320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31468/dwr.969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing</publisher><subject>citation practices ; citation use ; doctoral writing ; politics of citations</subject><ispartof>Discourse and writing/rédactologie, 2022-07, Vol.32 (1), p.262-280</ispartof><rights>2022CecileBadenhorst, AbuArif, KelvinQuintyne</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8089-155X ; 0000-0002-1106-9762</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2101,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badenhorst, Cecile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arif, Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintyne, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><title>Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use</title><title>Discourse and writing/rédactologie</title><description>Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventions of citing is part of developing an identity around scholarship, research and writing. In this paper, we examine our own experiences of the politics of citations to understand our socialization processes and resistances. We use an autoethnographic narrative approach to frame this qualitative study. Our findings show how citation use abounds with the contradictions and paradoxes in our doctoral writing journeys where the pressure to succeed can compromise identity-building as ethical scholars. Each of us has many needs and multiple positionalities and resisting the naturalizing grammar of citations can be complicated. Yet, once aware of the politics of citations, one cannot go back to being unaware.</description><subject>citation practices</subject><subject>citation use</subject><subject>doctoral writing</subject><subject>politics of citations</subject><issn>2563-7320</issn><issn>2563-7320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGrBf2CWbqbmMUkmS6mvQsGNrsOdPGrK2JRkSvHfG1qRru7hcPi45yB0S8mc01Z2D-6Q51rqCzRhQvJGcUYuz_Q1mpWyIYQw1TFG2QTRp2THlGHAhxzHuF1j2Do8fnm8S0M1bMEpYBtHGGPa4n3xN-gqwFD87O9O0efL88firVm9vy4Xj6vGUslyo6gPBGRoRascsw6AuM4GC461NhDpvQzKW7BScku5V1Ipx53QvNdaEsunaHniugQbs8vxG_KPSRDN0Uh5bSDXBwdvapnaUDOhvWtFxwFC35FOCUtp3-m2su5PLJtTKdmHfx4l5ricqcuZulyN3p2iPu9dHM-CmlImIPNf2OlqrA</recordid><startdate>20220704</startdate><enddate>20220704</enddate><creator>Badenhorst, Cecile</creator><creator>Arif, Abu</creator><creator>Quintyne, Kelvin</creator><general>Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-155X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-9762</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220704</creationdate><title>Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use</title><author>Badenhorst, Cecile ; Arif, Abu ; Quintyne, Kelvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>citation practices</topic><topic>citation use</topic><topic>doctoral writing</topic><topic>politics of citations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badenhorst, Cecile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arif, Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintyne, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Discourse and writing/rédactologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badenhorst, Cecile</au><au>Arif, Abu</au><au>Quintyne, Kelvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use</atitle><jtitle>Discourse and writing/rédactologie</jtitle><date>2022-07-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>262-280</pages><issn>2563-7320</issn><eissn>2563-7320</eissn><abstract>Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventions of citing is part of developing an identity around scholarship, research and writing. In this paper, we examine our own experiences of the politics of citations to understand our socialization processes and resistances. We use an autoethnographic narrative approach to frame this qualitative study. Our findings show how citation use abounds with the contradictions and paradoxes in our doctoral writing journeys where the pressure to succeed can compromise identity-building as ethical scholars. Each of us has many needs and multiple positionalities and resisting the naturalizing grammar of citations can be complicated. Yet, once aware of the politics of citations, one cannot go back to being unaware.</abstract><pub>Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing</pub><doi>10.31468/dwr.969</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-155X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-9762</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2563-7320 |
ispartof | Discourse and writing/rédactologie, 2022-07, Vol.32 (1), p.262-280 |
issn | 2563-7320 2563-7320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7825639259ed4583aafb80875c11b894 |
source | CRKN Open Access Journals List; Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | citation practices citation use doctoral writing politics of citations |
title | Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A40%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doctoral%20writing%20and%20the%20politics%20of%20citation%20use&rft.jtitle=Discourse%20and%20writing/r%C3%A9dactologie&rft.au=Badenhorst,%20Cecile&rft.date=2022-07-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=262-280&rft.issn=2563-7320&rft.eissn=2563-7320&rft_id=info:doi/10.31468/dwr.969&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_doaj_%3E1091125ar%3C/erudit_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_eruid=1091125ar&rfr_iscdi=true |