Loading…

Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use

Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Discourse and writing/rédactologie 2022-07, Vol.32 (1), p.262-280
Main Authors: Badenhorst, Cecile, Arif, Abu, Quintyne, Kelvin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3
cites
container_end_page 280
container_issue 1
container_start_page 262
container_title Discourse and writing/rédactologie
container_volume 32
creator Badenhorst, Cecile
Arif, Abu
Quintyne, Kelvin
description Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventions of citing is part of developing an identity around scholarship, research and writing. In this paper, we examine our own experiences of the politics of citations to understand our socialization processes and resistances. We use an autoethnographic narrative approach to frame this qualitative study. Our findings show how citation use abounds with the contradictions and paradoxes in our doctoral writing journeys where the pressure to succeed can compromise identity-building as ethical scholars. Each of us has many needs and multiple positionalities and resisting the naturalizing grammar of citations can be complicated. Yet, once aware of the politics of citations, one cannot go back to being unaware.
doi_str_mv 10.31468/dwr.969
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>erudit_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7825639259ed4583aafb80875c11b894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1091125ar</eruid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7825639259ed4583aafb80875c11b894</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1091125ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGrBf2CWbqbmMUkmS6mvQsGNrsOdPGrK2JRkSvHfG1qRru7hcPi45yB0S8mc01Z2D-6Q51rqCzRhQvJGcUYuz_Q1mpWyIYQw1TFG2QTRp2THlGHAhxzHuF1j2Do8fnm8S0M1bMEpYBtHGGPa4n3xN-gqwFD87O9O0efL88firVm9vy4Xj6vGUslyo6gPBGRoRascsw6AuM4GC461NhDpvQzKW7BScku5V1Ipx53QvNdaEsunaHniugQbs8vxG_KPSRDN0Uh5bSDXBwdvapnaUDOhvWtFxwFC35FOCUtp3-m2su5PLJtTKdmHfx4l5ricqcuZulyN3p2iPu9dHM-CmlImIPNf2OlqrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use</title><source>CRKN Open Access Journals List</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Badenhorst, Cecile ; Arif, Abu ; Quintyne, Kelvin</creator><creatorcontrib>Badenhorst, Cecile ; Arif, Abu ; Quintyne, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><description>Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventions of citing is part of developing an identity around scholarship, research and writing. In this paper, we examine our own experiences of the politics of citations to understand our socialization processes and resistances. We use an autoethnographic narrative approach to frame this qualitative study. Our findings show how citation use abounds with the contradictions and paradoxes in our doctoral writing journeys where the pressure to succeed can compromise identity-building as ethical scholars. Each of us has many needs and multiple positionalities and resisting the naturalizing grammar of citations can be complicated. Yet, once aware of the politics of citations, one cannot go back to being unaware.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2563-7320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2563-7320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31468/dwr.969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing</publisher><subject>citation practices ; citation use ; doctoral writing ; politics of citations</subject><ispartof>Discourse and writing/rédactologie, 2022-07, Vol.32 (1), p.262-280</ispartof><rights>2022CecileBadenhorst, AbuArif, KelvinQuintyne</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-8089-155X ; 0000-0002-1106-9762</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2101,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badenhorst, Cecile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arif, Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintyne, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><title>Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use</title><title>Discourse and writing/rédactologie</title><description>Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventions of citing is part of developing an identity around scholarship, research and writing. In this paper, we examine our own experiences of the politics of citations to understand our socialization processes and resistances. We use an autoethnographic narrative approach to frame this qualitative study. Our findings show how citation use abounds with the contradictions and paradoxes in our doctoral writing journeys where the pressure to succeed can compromise identity-building as ethical scholars. Each of us has many needs and multiple positionalities and resisting the naturalizing grammar of citations can be complicated. Yet, once aware of the politics of citations, one cannot go back to being unaware.</description><subject>citation practices</subject><subject>citation use</subject><subject>doctoral writing</subject><subject>politics of citations</subject><issn>2563-7320</issn><issn>2563-7320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtLAzEUhYMoWGrBf2CWbqbmMUkmS6mvQsGNrsOdPGrK2JRkSvHfG1qRru7hcPi45yB0S8mc01Z2D-6Q51rqCzRhQvJGcUYuz_Q1mpWyIYQw1TFG2QTRp2THlGHAhxzHuF1j2Do8fnm8S0M1bMEpYBtHGGPa4n3xN-gqwFD87O9O0efL88firVm9vy4Xj6vGUslyo6gPBGRoRascsw6AuM4GC461NhDpvQzKW7BScku5V1Ipx53QvNdaEsunaHniugQbs8vxG_KPSRDN0Uh5bSDXBwdvapnaUDOhvWtFxwFC35FOCUtp3-m2su5PLJtTKdmHfx4l5ricqcuZulyN3p2iPu9dHM-CmlImIPNf2OlqrA</recordid><startdate>20220704</startdate><enddate>20220704</enddate><creator>Badenhorst, Cecile</creator><creator>Arif, Abu</creator><creator>Quintyne, Kelvin</creator><general>Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-155X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-9762</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220704</creationdate><title>Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use</title><author>Badenhorst, Cecile ; Arif, Abu ; Quintyne, Kelvin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>citation practices</topic><topic>citation use</topic><topic>doctoral writing</topic><topic>politics of citations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badenhorst, Cecile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arif, Abu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintyne, Kelvin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Discourse and writing/rédactologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badenhorst, Cecile</au><au>Arif, Abu</au><au>Quintyne, Kelvin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use</atitle><jtitle>Discourse and writing/rédactologie</jtitle><date>2022-07-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>262</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>262-280</pages><issn>2563-7320</issn><eissn>2563-7320</eissn><abstract>Conventions shape scholarly writing and citations practices are one set of conventions that dominate how and what we write. Yet, many of these practices naturalize exclusion and discrimination in a way that becomes normalized and, consequently, invisible. For doctoral students, learning the conventions of citing is part of developing an identity around scholarship, research and writing. In this paper, we examine our own experiences of the politics of citations to understand our socialization processes and resistances. We use an autoethnographic narrative approach to frame this qualitative study. Our findings show how citation use abounds with the contradictions and paradoxes in our doctoral writing journeys where the pressure to succeed can compromise identity-building as ethical scholars. Each of us has many needs and multiple positionalities and resisting the naturalizing grammar of citations can be complicated. Yet, once aware of the politics of citations, one cannot go back to being unaware.</abstract><pub>Canadian Association for the Study of Discourse and Writing</pub><doi>10.31468/dwr.969</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8089-155X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-9762</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2563-7320
ispartof Discourse and writing/rédactologie, 2022-07, Vol.32 (1), p.262-280
issn 2563-7320
2563-7320
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7825639259ed4583aafb80875c11b894
source CRKN Open Access Journals List; Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects citation practices
citation use
doctoral writing
politics of citations
title Doctoral writing and the politics of citation use
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A40%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Doctoral%20writing%20and%20the%20politics%20of%20citation%20use&rft.jtitle=Discourse%20and%20writing/r%C3%A9dactologie&rft.au=Badenhorst,%20Cecile&rft.date=2022-07-04&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=262-280&rft.issn=2563-7320&rft.eissn=2563-7320&rft_id=info:doi/10.31468/dwr.969&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_doaj_%3E1091125ar%3C/erudit_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c162r-71ef0a6f4547d2cdaa0d8cfcad24cf06ee6f7ecac663c13e7677d3d593b9960c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_eruid=1091125ar&rfr_iscdi=true