Loading…
Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines
Prototyping is interwoven with nearly all product, service, and systems development efforts. A prototype is a pre-production representation of some aspect of a concept or final design. Prototyping often predetermines a large portion of resource deployment in development and influences design project...
Saved in:
Published in: | Design Science 2017, Vol.3, Article e13 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e1912f0b89db3d788b65975b129c60d7b7cf9c6b8c43d86a97ac1cee7f16a73a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e1912f0b89db3d788b65975b129c60d7b7cf9c6b8c43d86a97ac1cee7f16a73a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Design Science |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Camburn, Bradley Viswanathan, Vimal Linsey, Julie Anderson, David Jensen, Daniel Crawford, Richard Otto, Kevin Wood, Kristin |
description | Prototyping is interwoven with nearly all product, service, and systems development efforts. A prototype is a pre-production representation of some aspect of a concept or final design. Prototyping often predetermines a large portion of resource deployment in development and influences design project success. This review surveys literature sources in engineering, management, design science, and architecture. The study is focused around design prototyping for early stage design. Insights are synthesized from critical review of the literature: key objectives of prototyping, critical review of major techniques, relationships between techniques, and a strategy matrix to connect objectives to techniques. The review is supported with exemplar prototypes provided from industrial design efforts. Techniques are roughly categorized into those that improve the outcomes of prototyping directly, and those that enable prototyping through lowering of cost and time. Compact descriptions of each technique provide a foundation to compare the potential benefits and drawbacks of each. The review concludes with a summary of key observations, highlighted opportunities in the research, and a vision of the future of prototyping. This review aims to provide a resource for designers as well as set a trajectory for continuing innovation in the scientific research of design prototyping. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/dsj.2017.10 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7933fe348d664603b25c2bd0b93c649f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7933fe348d664603b25c2bd0b93c649f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1991077114</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e1912f0b89db3d788b65975b129c60d7b7cf9c6b8c43d86a97ac1cee7f16a73a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQDaJg0Z78AwGPujXZ7CYbb1K_CgUv6jXkc5vSbmqSHvrvzVoRT_PmMbx5Mw-AK4xmGGF2Z9J6VhdQuhMwqVFLqoYhfPoPn4NpSmuEEKaUt5RMwOejTb4f4C6GHPJh54cebm1eBZPuYcoyWxgczCsLZczQD4WLhey9TbcwW70a_Nd-xHIwsN97Yzd-sOkSnDm5SXb6Wy_Ax_PT-_y1Wr69LOYPy0oT2uTKYo5rh1THjSKGdZ2iLWetwjXXFBmmmHYFqU43xHRUciY11tYyh6lkRJILsDjqmiDXYhf9VsaDCNKLHyLEXhTfXm-sYJwQZ0nTGUobioiqW10rgxQnmjbcFa3ro1b5xXhTFuuwj0OxLzDnGDGGcVOmbo5TOoaUonV_WzESYw6i5CDGHEpHvgGuinp7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1991077114</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Camburn, Bradley ; Viswanathan, Vimal ; Linsey, Julie ; Anderson, David ; Jensen, Daniel ; Crawford, Richard ; Otto, Kevin ; Wood, Kristin</creator><creatorcontrib>Camburn, Bradley ; Viswanathan, Vimal ; Linsey, Julie ; Anderson, David ; Jensen, Daniel ; Crawford, Richard ; Otto, Kevin ; Wood, Kristin</creatorcontrib><description>Prototyping is interwoven with nearly all product, service, and systems development efforts. A prototype is a pre-production representation of some aspect of a concept or final design. Prototyping often predetermines a large portion of resource deployment in development and influences design project success. This review surveys literature sources in engineering, management, design science, and architecture. The study is focused around design prototyping for early stage design. Insights are synthesized from critical review of the literature: key objectives of prototyping, critical review of major techniques, relationships between techniques, and a strategy matrix to connect objectives to techniques. The review is supported with exemplar prototypes provided from industrial design efforts. Techniques are roughly categorized into those that improve the outcomes of prototyping directly, and those that enable prototyping through lowering of cost and time. Compact descriptions of each technique provide a foundation to compare the potential benefits and drawbacks of each. The review concludes with a summary of key observations, highlighted opportunities in the research, and a vision of the future of prototyping. This review aims to provide a resource for designers as well as set a trajectory for continuing innovation in the scientific research of design prototyping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-4701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-4701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/dsj.2017.10</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Architectural engineering ; Construction ; Design ; Design engineering ; design prototyping ; Designers ; Innovations ; Literature reviews ; Mechanical engineering ; methods ; Objectives ; product ; Prototyping ; service ; Simulation ; Studies ; systems ; Usability</subject><ispartof>Design Science, 2017, Vol.3, Article e13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s) 2017 Distributed as Open Access under a CC-BY 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e1912f0b89db3d788b65975b129c60d7b7cf9c6b8c43d86a97ac1cee7f16a73a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e1912f0b89db3d788b65975b129c60d7b7cf9c6b8c43d86a97ac1cee7f16a73a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1991077114/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1991077114?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,25751,27921,27922,27923,37010,44588,74896</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Camburn, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Vimal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linsey, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otto, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Kristin</creatorcontrib><title>Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines</title><title>Design Science</title><description>Prototyping is interwoven with nearly all product, service, and systems development efforts. A prototype is a pre-production representation of some aspect of a concept or final design. Prototyping often predetermines a large portion of resource deployment in development and influences design project success. This review surveys literature sources in engineering, management, design science, and architecture. The study is focused around design prototyping for early stage design. Insights are synthesized from critical review of the literature: key objectives of prototyping, critical review of major techniques, relationships between techniques, and a strategy matrix to connect objectives to techniques. The review is supported with exemplar prototypes provided from industrial design efforts. Techniques are roughly categorized into those that improve the outcomes of prototyping directly, and those that enable prototyping through lowering of cost and time. Compact descriptions of each technique provide a foundation to compare the potential benefits and drawbacks of each. The review concludes with a summary of key observations, highlighted opportunities in the research, and a vision of the future of prototyping. This review aims to provide a resource for designers as well as set a trajectory for continuing innovation in the scientific research of design prototyping.</description><subject>Architectural engineering</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>design prototyping</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering</subject><subject>methods</subject><subject>Objectives</subject><subject>product</subject><subject>Prototyping</subject><subject>service</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>systems</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>2053-4701</issn><issn>2053-4701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQDaJg0Z78AwGPujXZ7CYbb1K_CgUv6jXkc5vSbmqSHvrvzVoRT_PmMbx5Mw-AK4xmGGF2Z9J6VhdQuhMwqVFLqoYhfPoPn4NpSmuEEKaUt5RMwOejTb4f4C6GHPJh54cebm1eBZPuYcoyWxgczCsLZczQD4WLhey9TbcwW70a_Nd-xHIwsN97Yzd-sOkSnDm5SXb6Wy_Ax_PT-_y1Wr69LOYPy0oT2uTKYo5rh1THjSKGdZ2iLWetwjXXFBmmmHYFqU43xHRUciY11tYyh6lkRJILsDjqmiDXYhf9VsaDCNKLHyLEXhTfXm-sYJwQZ0nTGUobioiqW10rgxQnmjbcFa3ro1b5xXhTFuuwj0OxLzDnGDGGcVOmbo5TOoaUonV_WzESYw6i5CDGHEpHvgGuinp7</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Camburn, Bradley</creator><creator>Viswanathan, Vimal</creator><creator>Linsey, Julie</creator><creator>Anderson, David</creator><creator>Jensen, Daniel</creator><creator>Crawford, Richard</creator><creator>Otto, Kevin</creator><creator>Wood, Kristin</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines</title><author>Camburn, Bradley ; Viswanathan, Vimal ; Linsey, Julie ; Anderson, David ; Jensen, Daniel ; Crawford, Richard ; Otto, Kevin ; Wood, Kristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e1912f0b89db3d788b65975b129c60d7b7cf9c6b8c43d86a97ac1cee7f16a73a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Architectural engineering</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>design prototyping</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering</topic><topic>methods</topic><topic>Objectives</topic><topic>product</topic><topic>Prototyping</topic><topic>service</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>systems</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Camburn, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Vimal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linsey, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crawford, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otto, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Kristin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Design Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Camburn, Bradley</au><au>Viswanathan, Vimal</au><au>Linsey, Julie</au><au>Anderson, David</au><au>Jensen, Daniel</au><au>Crawford, Richard</au><au>Otto, Kevin</au><au>Wood, Kristin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Design Science</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>3</volume><artnum>e13</artnum><issn>2053-4701</issn><eissn>2053-4701</eissn><abstract>Prototyping is interwoven with nearly all product, service, and systems development efforts. A prototype is a pre-production representation of some aspect of a concept or final design. Prototyping often predetermines a large portion of resource deployment in development and influences design project success. This review surveys literature sources in engineering, management, design science, and architecture. The study is focused around design prototyping for early stage design. Insights are synthesized from critical review of the literature: key objectives of prototyping, critical review of major techniques, relationships between techniques, and a strategy matrix to connect objectives to techniques. The review is supported with exemplar prototypes provided from industrial design efforts. Techniques are roughly categorized into those that improve the outcomes of prototyping directly, and those that enable prototyping through lowering of cost and time. Compact descriptions of each technique provide a foundation to compare the potential benefits and drawbacks of each. The review concludes with a summary of key observations, highlighted opportunities in the research, and a vision of the future of prototyping. This review aims to provide a resource for designers as well as set a trajectory for continuing innovation in the scientific research of design prototyping.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/dsj.2017.10</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2053-4701 |
ispartof | Design Science, 2017, Vol.3, Article e13 |
issn | 2053-4701 2053-4701 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7933fe348d664603b25c2bd0b93c649f |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Architectural engineering Construction Design Design engineering design prototyping Designers Innovations Literature reviews Mechanical engineering methods Objectives product Prototyping service Simulation Studies systems Usability |
title | Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A33%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20prototyping%20methods:%20state%20of%20the%20art%20in%20strategies,%20techniques,%20and%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=Design%20Science&rft.au=Camburn,%20Bradley&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=3&rft.artnum=e13&rft.issn=2053-4701&rft.eissn=2053-4701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/dsj.2017.10&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1991077114%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-e1912f0b89db3d788b65975b129c60d7b7cf9c6b8c43d86a97ac1cee7f16a73a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1991077114&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |