Loading…
A Hybrid vs. On-Grid Photovoltaic System: Multicriteria Analysis of Environmental, Economic, and Technical Aspects in Life Cycle Perspective
Hybrid photovoltaic installations, defined as on-grid PV system in cooperation with battery energy storage system (BESS), are still rare among the typical investors because the investment cost of the hybrid installation is significantly higher than the one of the on-grid system. However, while consi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energies (Basel) 2020-08, Vol.13 (15), p.3978 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cb4692f995024424f1a02aac50dcc9e65a7f23d6d87f3dee681ca59ba7fd73563 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cb4692f995024424f1a02aac50dcc9e65a7f23d6d87f3dee681ca59ba7fd73563 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 3978 |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Żelazna, Agnieszka Gołębiowska, Justyna Zdyb, Agata Pawłowski, Artur |
description | Hybrid photovoltaic installations, defined as on-grid PV system in cooperation with battery energy storage system (BESS), are still rare among the typical investors because the investment cost of the hybrid installation is significantly higher than the one of the on-grid system. However, while considering the broader perspective, such as environmental or technological aspects, the mentioned solution can be competitive with photovoltaic on-grid systems and therefore should be carefully tested in the widest possible context. In this study, the authors compared 3.05 kW of peak power hybrid and on-grid installations operating in temperate climate conditions (Eastern Poland) using economic indicators, such as dynamic generation cost (DGC) and benefit–cost rate (BCR); environmental impact indicators (IMPACT 2002+ and GWP 100a) determined using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); and technological aspects consideration, including the reliability of examined systems. Creating a ranking of the considered solutions based on the equal weighting factors assigned to the appropriate features allows indicating the technological areas where the competitiveness of hybrid systems justifies the increased investment costs. One such area is business, where the economic criterion, the only negatively assessed one in the standard operation, can be radically changed by the possible financial losses due to interruption of energy supply. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en13153978 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7a081ad30c63421c97bc78d0ca325054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7a081ad30c63421c97bc78d0ca325054</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2431015821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cb4692f995024424f1a02aac50dcc9e65a7f23d6d87f3dee681ca59ba7fd73563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUdFqGzEQPEoLDWle-gWCvpVcKmlPd6e-GeMmAZcEmj6L9UrXyJwlV5IN9w_96F7i0mRfdhiGWWanqj4KfgWg-RcXBAgFuuvfVGdC67YWvIO3r_D76iLnLZ8HQADAWfVnwW6mTfKWHfMVuwv19RO-f4wlHuNY0BP7MeXidl_Z98NYPCVfXPLIFgHHKfvM4sBW4ehTDDsXCo6XbEUxxJ2nS4bBsgdHj8ETjmyR945KZj6wtR8cW040Onbv0jPvj-5D9W7AMbuLf_u8-vlt9bC8qdd317fLxbomaEWpadO0Wg5aKy6bRjaDQC4RSXFLpF2rsBsk2Nb23QDWubYXhEpvZtp2oFo4r25Pvjbi1uyT32GaTERvnomYfhlMc9bRmQ55L9ACpxYaKUh3G-p6ywlBKq6a2evTyWuf4u-Dy8Vs4yHNz8lGNiC4UL0Us-rzSUUp5pzc8P-q4OapPPNSHvwF5HWMFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2431015821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Hybrid vs. On-Grid Photovoltaic System: Multicriteria Analysis of Environmental, Economic, and Technical Aspects in Life Cycle Perspective</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Żelazna, Agnieszka ; Gołębiowska, Justyna ; Zdyb, Agata ; Pawłowski, Artur</creator><creatorcontrib>Żelazna, Agnieszka ; Gołębiowska, Justyna ; Zdyb, Agata ; Pawłowski, Artur</creatorcontrib><description>Hybrid photovoltaic installations, defined as on-grid PV system in cooperation with battery energy storage system (BESS), are still rare among the typical investors because the investment cost of the hybrid installation is significantly higher than the one of the on-grid system. However, while considering the broader perspective, such as environmental or technological aspects, the mentioned solution can be competitive with photovoltaic on-grid systems and therefore should be carefully tested in the widest possible context. In this study, the authors compared 3.05 kW of peak power hybrid and on-grid installations operating in temperate climate conditions (Eastern Poland) using economic indicators, such as dynamic generation cost (DGC) and benefit–cost rate (BCR); environmental impact indicators (IMPACT 2002+ and GWP 100a) determined using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); and technological aspects consideration, including the reliability of examined systems. Creating a ranking of the considered solutions based on the equal weighting factors assigned to the appropriate features allows indicating the technological areas where the competitiveness of hybrid systems justifies the increased investment costs. One such area is business, where the economic criterion, the only negatively assessed one in the standard operation, can be radically changed by the possible financial losses due to interruption of energy supply.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en13153978</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acids ; Alternative energy ; Climatic conditions ; Cobalt ; Competitiveness ; Efficiency ; Electricity ; Electricity distribution ; Electrodes ; Electrolytes ; Energy industry ; Energy storage ; greenhouse gas emission ; hybrid PV system ; Indicators ; Industrial plant emissions ; Investment ; LCA ; Lithium ; Multiple criterion ; Nuclear energy ; Photovoltaics ; reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Renewable resources</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2020-08, Vol.13 (15), p.3978</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cb4692f995024424f1a02aac50dcc9e65a7f23d6d87f3dee681ca59ba7fd73563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cb4692f995024424f1a02aac50dcc9e65a7f23d6d87f3dee681ca59ba7fd73563</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2957-8087 ; 0000-0001-9364-2931 ; 0000-0002-8764-1534 ; 0000-0001-6566-5802</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2431015821/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2431015821?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,74897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Żelazna, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gołębiowska, Justyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zdyb, Agata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawłowski, Artur</creatorcontrib><title>A Hybrid vs. On-Grid Photovoltaic System: Multicriteria Analysis of Environmental, Economic, and Technical Aspects in Life Cycle Perspective</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Hybrid photovoltaic installations, defined as on-grid PV system in cooperation with battery energy storage system (BESS), are still rare among the typical investors because the investment cost of the hybrid installation is significantly higher than the one of the on-grid system. However, while considering the broader perspective, such as environmental or technological aspects, the mentioned solution can be competitive with photovoltaic on-grid systems and therefore should be carefully tested in the widest possible context. In this study, the authors compared 3.05 kW of peak power hybrid and on-grid installations operating in temperate climate conditions (Eastern Poland) using economic indicators, such as dynamic generation cost (DGC) and benefit–cost rate (BCR); environmental impact indicators (IMPACT 2002+ and GWP 100a) determined using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); and technological aspects consideration, including the reliability of examined systems. Creating a ranking of the considered solutions based on the equal weighting factors assigned to the appropriate features allows indicating the technological areas where the competitiveness of hybrid systems justifies the increased investment costs. One such area is business, where the economic criterion, the only negatively assessed one in the standard operation, can be radically changed by the possible financial losses due to interruption of energy supply.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Alternative energy</subject><subject>Climatic conditions</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Competitiveness</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>greenhouse gas emission</subject><subject>hybrid PV system</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Industrial plant emissions</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>LCA</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUdFqGzEQPEoLDWle-gWCvpVcKmlPd6e-GeMmAZcEmj6L9UrXyJwlV5IN9w_96F7i0mRfdhiGWWanqj4KfgWg-RcXBAgFuuvfVGdC67YWvIO3r_D76iLnLZ8HQADAWfVnwW6mTfKWHfMVuwv19RO-f4wlHuNY0BP7MeXidl_Z98NYPCVfXPLIFgHHKfvM4sBW4ehTDDsXCo6XbEUxxJ2nS4bBsgdHj8ETjmyR945KZj6wtR8cW040Onbv0jPvj-5D9W7AMbuLf_u8-vlt9bC8qdd317fLxbomaEWpadO0Wg5aKy6bRjaDQC4RSXFLpF2rsBsk2Nb23QDWubYXhEpvZtp2oFo4r25Pvjbi1uyT32GaTERvnomYfhlMc9bRmQ55L9ACpxYaKUh3G-p6ywlBKq6a2evTyWuf4u-Dy8Vs4yHNz8lGNiC4UL0Us-rzSUUp5pzc8P-q4OapPPNSHvwF5HWMFA</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Żelazna, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Gołębiowska, Justyna</creator><creator>Zdyb, Agata</creator><creator>Pawłowski, Artur</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2957-8087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9364-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8764-1534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6566-5802</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>A Hybrid vs. On-Grid Photovoltaic System: Multicriteria Analysis of Environmental, Economic, and Technical Aspects in Life Cycle Perspective</title><author>Żelazna, Agnieszka ; Gołębiowska, Justyna ; Zdyb, Agata ; Pawłowski, Artur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cb4692f995024424f1a02aac50dcc9e65a7f23d6d87f3dee681ca59ba7fd73563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Alternative energy</topic><topic>Climatic conditions</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Competitiveness</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>greenhouse gas emission</topic><topic>hybrid PV system</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Industrial plant emissions</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>LCA</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Żelazna, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gołębiowska, Justyna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zdyb, Agata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pawłowski, Artur</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Żelazna, Agnieszka</au><au>Gołębiowska, Justyna</au><au>Zdyb, Agata</au><au>Pawłowski, Artur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Hybrid vs. On-Grid Photovoltaic System: Multicriteria Analysis of Environmental, Economic, and Technical Aspects in Life Cycle Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>3978</spage><pages>3978-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Hybrid photovoltaic installations, defined as on-grid PV system in cooperation with battery energy storage system (BESS), are still rare among the typical investors because the investment cost of the hybrid installation is significantly higher than the one of the on-grid system. However, while considering the broader perspective, such as environmental or technological aspects, the mentioned solution can be competitive with photovoltaic on-grid systems and therefore should be carefully tested in the widest possible context. In this study, the authors compared 3.05 kW of peak power hybrid and on-grid installations operating in temperate climate conditions (Eastern Poland) using economic indicators, such as dynamic generation cost (DGC) and benefit–cost rate (BCR); environmental impact indicators (IMPACT 2002+ and GWP 100a) determined using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); and technological aspects consideration, including the reliability of examined systems. Creating a ranking of the considered solutions based on the equal weighting factors assigned to the appropriate features allows indicating the technological areas where the competitiveness of hybrid systems justifies the increased investment costs. One such area is business, where the economic criterion, the only negatively assessed one in the standard operation, can be radically changed by the possible financial losses due to interruption of energy supply.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en13153978</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2957-8087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9364-2931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8764-1534</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6566-5802</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2020-08, Vol.13 (15), p.3978 |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7a081ad30c63421c97bc78d0ca325054 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Acids Alternative energy Climatic conditions Cobalt Competitiveness Efficiency Electricity Electricity distribution Electrodes Electrolytes Energy industry Energy storage greenhouse gas emission hybrid PV system Indicators Industrial plant emissions Investment LCA Lithium Multiple criterion Nuclear energy Photovoltaics reliability Reliability analysis Renewable resources |
title | A Hybrid vs. On-Grid Photovoltaic System: Multicriteria Analysis of Environmental, Economic, and Technical Aspects in Life Cycle Perspective |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A04%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Hybrid%20vs.%20On-Grid%20Photovoltaic%20System:%20Multicriteria%20Analysis%20of%20Environmental,%20Economic,%20and%20Technical%20Aspects%20in%20Life%20Cycle%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=%C5%BBelazna,%20Agnieszka&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=3978&rft.pages=3978-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en13153978&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2431015821%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-cb4692f995024424f1a02aac50dcc9e65a7f23d6d87f3dee681ca59ba7fd73563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2431015821&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |