Diagnostic yield and renal complications after computed tomography pulmonary angiograms performed in a community-based academic hospital

• Published in: Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives 2012-01, Vol.2 (2), p.17722-6
• Main Authors: Reagle, Zacharia, Tringali, Steven, Gill, Narinder, Peterson, Michael W.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: computed tomography pulmonary angiogram; contrast induced nephropathy; pulmonary embolism; venous thromboembolism
• ISSN: 2000-9666; 2000-9666
• DOI: 10.3402/jchimp.v2i2.17722

Background: Venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism (VTE/PE) remain a diagnostic challenge. The computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) has emerged as a popular diagnostic test for PE. However, there is limited data on diagnostic yield and complications in actual clinical settings. Our goal was to determine the diagnostic yield for PE and rate of renal complications following CTPA in a large community hospital setting. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 1,514 Our study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Community Medical Centers, Fresno, CA, USA. patients who underwent CTPA in the emergency department or during the initial 24 hours of admission to a community-based academic hospital. Results: Of 1,514 CTPAs, 125 were positive for VTE/PE yielding a positive diagnosis in 8.2%. Dyspnea was the most common symptom in patients and a normal physical exam was the most common finding. Among the 925 patients with adequate data to calculate the rate of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), 25.8% had an increase of at least 25% in serum creatinine following the CTPA. Pre-existing diabetes and age were the most important predictors of CIN. Conclusions: CTPA has a low diagnostic yield for PE in a community setting, and in some patient populations, the rate of contrast-induced nephropathy may be higher than previously reported in the literature. Due to the retrospective nature of this study we were limited in using pre-test scoring systems and in measuring the impact of alternative CT diagnoses on patient management.