Loading…
Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture technique...
Saved in:
Published in: | Wildlife Society bulletin 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.165-174 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093 |
container_end_page | 174 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 165 |
container_title | Wildlife Society bulletin |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Smith, Joshua B. Walsh, Daniel P. Goldstein, Elise J. Parsons, Zachary D. Karsch, Rebekah C. Stiver, Julie R. Iii, James W. Cain Raedeke, Kenneth J. Jenks, Jonathan A. |
description | Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand-capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand-capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net-gunning, and 4) hand-capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with prepartum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range=80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range=60–78%). We used helicopter net-gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand-captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net-gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/wsb.360 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7aebda216b99449a8afec7eeda75612d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>wildsocibull2011.38.1.165</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7aebda216b99449a8afec7eeda75612d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>wildsocibull2011.38.1.165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1PwjAYhxejiYjGf2E3Dzp8-7F2O4qRj4RoVIRj07UdFAfFFoL8905niBdPfdM8z3P4RdElgg4CwLe7UHQIg6OohXKSJSll5PjPfRqdhbAAAAaIt6KbsVHzlf3YmhCXzsdKrjdbb1ezuLCzufOrOMyNWceVXBbhPDopZRXMxe_bjt56D-P7QTJ66g_v70aJokAhwSlmRiGqU5MTSjJFMFYlyQgvkcLA0oID5bTkIJU2NFdaaZ1mhBSUK4CctKNh09VOLsTa26X0e-GkFT8fzs-E9BurKiO4NIWWGLEizynNZSZLo7gxWvKUIazr1lXTUt6F4E156CEQ34OJejBRD1aT1w25s5XZ_4eJ6Wu3oTsNvQgb5w907erglC22VYUBIUEygQRiaS0kjWDDxnweBOnfBeOEp2L62Bcvk_60O-hNxDP5AsIbins</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Smith, Joshua B. ; Walsh, Daniel P. ; Goldstein, Elise J. ; Parsons, Zachary D. ; Karsch, Rebekah C. ; Stiver, Julie R. ; Iii, James W. Cain ; Raedeke, Kenneth J. ; Jenks, Jonathan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B. ; Walsh, Daniel P. ; Goldstein, Elise J. ; Parsons, Zachary D. ; Karsch, Rebekah C. ; Stiver, Julie R. ; Iii, James W. Cain ; Raedeke, Kenneth J. ; Jenks, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand-capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand-capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net-gunning, and 4) hand-capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with prepartum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range=80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range=60–78%). We used helicopter net-gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand-captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net-gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wsb.360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>bighorn sheep ; capture ; Cost estimates ; Female animals ; helicopter ; Lambing ; Lambs ; Mortality ; neonates ; netgun ; Ovis canadensis ; Parturition ; Reproduction ; Sheep ; Tools and Technology ; Transmitters ; vaginal implant transmitter ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.165-174</ispartof><rights>2014 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/wildsocibull2011.38.1.165$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/wildsocibull2011.38.1.165$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Elise J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Zachary D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karsch, Rebekah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Julie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iii, James W. Cain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raedeke, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenks, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><addtitle>Wildl. Soc. Bull</addtitle><description>Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand-capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand-capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net-gunning, and 4) hand-capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with prepartum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range=80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range=60–78%). We used helicopter net-gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand-captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net-gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture.</description><subject>bighorn sheep</subject><subject>capture</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>helicopter</subject><subject>Lambing</subject><subject>Lambs</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>neonates</subject><subject>netgun</subject><subject>Ovis canadensis</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Tools and Technology</subject><subject>Transmitters</subject><subject>vaginal implant transmitter</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1PwjAYhxejiYjGf2E3Dzp8-7F2O4qRj4RoVIRj07UdFAfFFoL8905niBdPfdM8z3P4RdElgg4CwLe7UHQIg6OohXKSJSll5PjPfRqdhbAAAAaIt6KbsVHzlf3YmhCXzsdKrjdbb1ezuLCzufOrOMyNWceVXBbhPDopZRXMxe_bjt56D-P7QTJ66g_v70aJokAhwSlmRiGqU5MTSjJFMFYlyQgvkcLA0oID5bTkIJU2NFdaaZ1mhBSUK4CctKNh09VOLsTa26X0e-GkFT8fzs-E9BurKiO4NIWWGLEizynNZSZLo7gxWvKUIazr1lXTUt6F4E156CEQ34OJejBRD1aT1w25s5XZ_4eJ6Wu3oTsNvQgb5w907erglC22VYUBIUEygQRiaS0kjWDDxnweBOnfBeOEp2L62Bcvk_60O-hNxDP5AsIbins</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Smith, Joshua B.</creator><creator>Walsh, Daniel P.</creator><creator>Goldstein, Elise J.</creator><creator>Parsons, Zachary D.</creator><creator>Karsch, Rebekah C.</creator><creator>Stiver, Julie R.</creator><creator>Iii, James W. Cain</creator><creator>Raedeke, Kenneth J.</creator><creator>Jenks, Jonathan A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs</title><author>Smith, Joshua B. ; Walsh, Daniel P. ; Goldstein, Elise J. ; Parsons, Zachary D. ; Karsch, Rebekah C. ; Stiver, Julie R. ; Iii, James W. Cain ; Raedeke, Kenneth J. ; Jenks, Jonathan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>bighorn sheep</topic><topic>capture</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>helicopter</topic><topic>Lambing</topic><topic>Lambs</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>neonates</topic><topic>netgun</topic><topic>Ovis canadensis</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Tools and Technology</topic><topic>Transmitters</topic><topic>vaginal implant transmitter</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Elise J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Zachary D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karsch, Rebekah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Julie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iii, James W. Cain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raedeke, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenks, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Joshua B.</au><au>Walsh, Daniel P.</au><au>Goldstein, Elise J.</au><au>Parsons, Zachary D.</au><au>Karsch, Rebekah C.</au><au>Stiver, Julie R.</au><au>Iii, James W. Cain</au><au>Raedeke, Kenneth J.</au><au>Jenks, Jonathan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Wildl. Soc. Bull</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>165-174</pages><issn>1938-5463</issn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><eissn>2328-5540</eissn><abstract>Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand-capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand-capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net-gunning, and 4) hand-capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with prepartum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range=80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range=60–78%). We used helicopter net-gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand-captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net-gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/wsb.360</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1938-5463 |
ispartof | Wildlife Society bulletin, 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.165-174 |
issn | 1938-5463 1938-5463 2328-5540 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7aebda216b99449a8afec7eeda75612d |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals |
subjects | bighorn sheep capture Cost estimates Female animals helicopter Lambing Lambs Mortality neonates netgun Ovis canadensis Parturition Reproduction Sheep Tools and Technology Transmitters vaginal implant transmitter Wildlife management |
title | Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Techniques%20for%20capturing%20bighorn%20sheep%20lambs&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Smith,%20Joshua%20B.&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=165-174&rft.issn=1938-5463&rft.eissn=1938-5463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wsb.360&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3Ewildsocibull2011.38.1.165%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=wildsocibull2011.38.1.165&rfr_iscdi=true |