Loading…

Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs

Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture technique...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wildlife Society bulletin 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.165-174
Main Authors: Smith, Joshua B., Walsh, Daniel P., Goldstein, Elise J., Parsons, Zachary D., Karsch, Rebekah C., Stiver, Julie R., Iii, James W. Cain, Raedeke, Kenneth J., Jenks, Jonathan A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093
container_end_page 174
container_issue 1
container_start_page 165
container_title Wildlife Society bulletin
container_volume 38
creator Smith, Joshua B.
Walsh, Daniel P.
Goldstein, Elise J.
Parsons, Zachary D.
Karsch, Rebekah C.
Stiver, Julie R.
Iii, James W. Cain
Raedeke, Kenneth J.
Jenks, Jonathan A.
description Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand-capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand-capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net-gunning, and 4) hand-capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with prepartum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range=80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range=60–78%). We used helicopter net-gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand-captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net-gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/wsb.360
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7aebda216b99449a8afec7eeda75612d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>wildsocibull2011.38.1.165</jstor_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7aebda216b99449a8afec7eeda75612d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>wildsocibull2011.38.1.165</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1PwjAYhxejiYjGf2E3Dzp8-7F2O4qRj4RoVIRj07UdFAfFFoL8905niBdPfdM8z3P4RdElgg4CwLe7UHQIg6OohXKSJSll5PjPfRqdhbAAAAaIt6KbsVHzlf3YmhCXzsdKrjdbb1ezuLCzufOrOMyNWceVXBbhPDopZRXMxe_bjt56D-P7QTJ66g_v70aJokAhwSlmRiGqU5MTSjJFMFYlyQgvkcLA0oID5bTkIJU2NFdaaZ1mhBSUK4CctKNh09VOLsTa26X0e-GkFT8fzs-E9BurKiO4NIWWGLEizynNZSZLo7gxWvKUIazr1lXTUt6F4E156CEQ34OJejBRD1aT1w25s5XZ_4eJ6Wu3oTsNvQgb5w907erglC22VYUBIUEygQRiaS0kjWDDxnweBOnfBeOEp2L62Bcvk_60O-hNxDP5AsIbins</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Smith, Joshua B. ; Walsh, Daniel P. ; Goldstein, Elise J. ; Parsons, Zachary D. ; Karsch, Rebekah C. ; Stiver, Julie R. ; Iii, James W. Cain ; Raedeke, Kenneth J. ; Jenks, Jonathan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B. ; Walsh, Daniel P. ; Goldstein, Elise J. ; Parsons, Zachary D. ; Karsch, Rebekah C. ; Stiver, Julie R. ; Iii, James W. Cain ; Raedeke, Kenneth J. ; Jenks, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand-capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand-capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net-gunning, and 4) hand-capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with prepartum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range=80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range=60–78%). We used helicopter net-gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand-captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net-gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2328-5540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/wsb.360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>bighorn sheep ; capture ; Cost estimates ; Female animals ; helicopter ; Lambing ; Lambs ; Mortality ; neonates ; netgun ; Ovis canadensis ; Parturition ; Reproduction ; Sheep ; Tools and Technology ; Transmitters ; vaginal implant transmitter ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Wildlife Society bulletin, 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.165-174</ispartof><rights>2014 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>The Wildlife Society, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/wildsocibull2011.38.1.165$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/wildsocibull2011.38.1.165$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Elise J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Zachary D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karsch, Rebekah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Julie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iii, James W. Cain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raedeke, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenks, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs</title><title>Wildlife Society bulletin</title><addtitle>Wildl. Soc. Bull</addtitle><description>Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand-capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand-capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net-gunning, and 4) hand-capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with prepartum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range=80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range=60–78%). We used helicopter net-gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand-captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net-gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture.</description><subject>bighorn sheep</subject><subject>capture</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>helicopter</subject><subject>Lambing</subject><subject>Lambs</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>neonates</subject><subject>netgun</subject><subject>Ovis canadensis</subject><subject>Parturition</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Tools and Technology</subject><subject>Transmitters</subject><subject>vaginal implant transmitter</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>1938-5463</issn><issn>2328-5540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1PwjAYhxejiYjGf2E3Dzp8-7F2O4qRj4RoVIRj07UdFAfFFoL8905niBdPfdM8z3P4RdElgg4CwLe7UHQIg6OohXKSJSll5PjPfRqdhbAAAAaIt6KbsVHzlf3YmhCXzsdKrjdbb1ezuLCzufOrOMyNWceVXBbhPDopZRXMxe_bjt56D-P7QTJ66g_v70aJokAhwSlmRiGqU5MTSjJFMFYlyQgvkcLA0oID5bTkIJU2NFdaaZ1mhBSUK4CctKNh09VOLsTa26X0e-GkFT8fzs-E9BurKiO4NIWWGLEizynNZSZLo7gxWvKUIazr1lXTUt6F4E156CEQ34OJejBRD1aT1w25s5XZ_4eJ6Wu3oTsNvQgb5w907erglC22VYUBIUEygQRiaS0kjWDDxnweBOnfBeOEp2L62Bcvk_60O-hNxDP5AsIbins</recordid><startdate>201403</startdate><enddate>201403</enddate><creator>Smith, Joshua B.</creator><creator>Walsh, Daniel P.</creator><creator>Goldstein, Elise J.</creator><creator>Parsons, Zachary D.</creator><creator>Karsch, Rebekah C.</creator><creator>Stiver, Julie R.</creator><creator>Iii, James W. Cain</creator><creator>Raedeke, Kenneth J.</creator><creator>Jenks, Jonathan A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201403</creationdate><title>Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs</title><author>Smith, Joshua B. ; Walsh, Daniel P. ; Goldstein, Elise J. ; Parsons, Zachary D. ; Karsch, Rebekah C. ; Stiver, Julie R. ; Iii, James W. Cain ; Raedeke, Kenneth J. ; Jenks, Jonathan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>bighorn sheep</topic><topic>capture</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>helicopter</topic><topic>Lambing</topic><topic>Lambs</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>neonates</topic><topic>netgun</topic><topic>Ovis canadensis</topic><topic>Parturition</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Tools and Technology</topic><topic>Transmitters</topic><topic>vaginal implant transmitter</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Joshua B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Elise J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Zachary D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karsch, Rebekah C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiver, Julie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iii, James W. Cain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raedeke, Kenneth J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenks, Jonathan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Joshua B.</au><au>Walsh, Daniel P.</au><au>Goldstein, Elise J.</au><au>Parsons, Zachary D.</au><au>Karsch, Rebekah C.</au><au>Stiver, Julie R.</au><au>Iii, James W. Cain</au><au>Raedeke, Kenneth J.</au><au>Jenks, Jonathan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs</atitle><jtitle>Wildlife Society bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Wildl. Soc. Bull</addtitle><date>2014-03</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>165-174</pages><issn>1938-5463</issn><eissn>1938-5463</eissn><eissn>2328-5540</eissn><abstract>Low lamb recruitment is a major challenge facing managers attempting to mitigate the decline of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), and investigations into the underlying mechanisms are limited because of the inability to readily capture and monitor bighorn sheep lambs. We evaluated 4 capture techniques for bighorn sheep lambs: 1) hand-capture of lambs from radiocollared adult females fitted with vaginal implant transmitters (VITs), 2) hand-capture of lambs of intensively monitored radiocollared adult females, 3) helicopter net-gunning, and 4) hand-capture of lambs from helicopters. During 2010–2012, we successfully captured 90% of lambs from females that retained VITs to ≤1 day of parturition, although we noted differences in capture rates between an area of high road density in the Black Hills (92–100%) of South Dakota, USA, and less accessible areas of New Mexico (71%), USA. Retention of VITs was 78% with prepartum expulsion the main cause of failure. We were less likely to capture lambs from females that expelled VITs ≥1 day of parturition (range=80–83%) or females that were collared without VITs (range=60–78%). We used helicopter net-gunning at several sites in 1999, 2001–2002, and 2011, and it proved a useful technique; however, at one site, attempts to capture lambs led to lamb predation by golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos). We attempted helicopter hand-captures at one site in 1999, and they also were successful in certain circumstances and avoided risk of physical trauma from net-gunning; however, application was limited. In areas of low accessibility or if personnel lack the ability to monitor females and/or VITs for extended periods, helicopter capture may provide a viable option for lamb capture.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/wsb.360</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1938-5463
ispartof Wildlife Society bulletin, 2014-03, Vol.38 (1), p.165-174
issn 1938-5463
1938-5463
2328-5540
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7aebda216b99449a8afec7eeda75612d
source JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects bighorn sheep
capture
Cost estimates
Female animals
helicopter
Lambing
Lambs
Mortality
neonates
netgun
Ovis canadensis
Parturition
Reproduction
Sheep
Tools and Technology
Transmitters
vaginal implant transmitter
Wildlife management
title Techniques for capturing bighorn sheep lambs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A03%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Techniques%20for%20capturing%20bighorn%20sheep%20lambs&rft.jtitle=Wildlife%20Society%20bulletin&rft.au=Smith,%20Joshua%20B.&rft.date=2014-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=165-174&rft.issn=1938-5463&rft.eissn=1938-5463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/wsb.360&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_doaj_%3Ewildsocibull2011.38.1.165%3C/jstor_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4040-2526ec14d5e93438c322cf3837f1c2065b70474f70acde49cdcdd5833b47c0093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=wildsocibull2011.38.1.165&rfr_iscdi=true