Loading…

Impact of radiation therapy on perineal urethrostomy for penile cancer

•Penile cancer impacts numerous quality of life aspects for patients.•Perienal urethrostomy is a reliable mechanism of urinary diversion for many patients with penile cancer.•This study describes that receipt of radiotherapy was not associated with increased risk of stenosis. A lack of demonstrated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical and translational radiation oncology 2021-09, Vol.30, p.84-87
Main Authors: A. S. Johnstone, Peter, de Vries, Hielke M., Chipollini, Juan, Daniel Grass, G., Boyd, Franklin, Korkes, Fernando, Albersen, Maarten, Roussel, Eduard, Zhu, Yao, Ye, Ding-Wei, Master, Viraj, Le, Thien-Linh, Muneer, Asif, Brouwer, Oscar R., Spiess, Philippe E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-77b12b628eff222c0ef737899a2ea3a57083b9392647d684716ff5998050b3c33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-77b12b628eff222c0ef737899a2ea3a57083b9392647d684716ff5998050b3c33
container_end_page 87
container_issue
container_start_page 84
container_title Clinical and translational radiation oncology
container_volume 30
creator A. S. Johnstone, Peter
de Vries, Hielke M.
Chipollini, Juan
Daniel Grass, G.
Boyd, Franklin
Korkes, Fernando
Albersen, Maarten
Roussel, Eduard
Zhu, Yao
Ye, Ding-Wei
Master, Viraj
Le, Thien-Linh
Muneer, Asif
Brouwer, Oscar R.
Spiess, Philippe E.
description •Penile cancer impacts numerous quality of life aspects for patients.•Perienal urethrostomy is a reliable mechanism of urinary diversion for many patients with penile cancer.•This study describes that receipt of radiotherapy was not associated with increased risk of stenosis. A lack of demonstrated clinical benefit precludes radiotherapy (RT) from being recommended for pN1/pN2 penile cancer (PeCa) lesions; but it may be recommended in case of extranodal (pN3) disease or for positive resection margins. Perineal urethrostomy (PU) is a technique of urinary diversion in patients with PeCa requiring total or subtotal penectomy as primary therapy. Prior studies suggest PU failure rates of up to 30%, without specific mention of the potential role of RT. When RT is delivered for PeCa it is usually to the pre-pubic fat, groin and lateral pelvis, and not to the region of the PU. Here we describe the role of perioperative RT in a large, multi-institutional registry of PU for PeCa. In our cohort, 299 patients from seven international, high-volume centers in Belgium, Brazil, China, Netherlands, United Kingdom and the United States underwent PU as urinary diversion for PeCa between 2000 and 2020. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were reviewed. Median patient age was 67 years and median follow-up was 19 months. Seven patients (2.3%) received pre-operative RT; six of them with chemotherapy. 37 received RT post-operatively, 21 (57%) with chemotherapy. Stenosis of the PU occurred in 35 (12%) of the total population. The majority of these patients (74%) required surgical revision at a median of 6.1 months post-operatively. RT delivery was neither significantly related to PU stenosis (p = 0.16) or to subsequent revision (p = 0.75). Receipt of RT was not significantly associated with increased stenosis risk in PeCa patients who underwent PU.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.08.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7bf04c6feb194fef95fb9c4992bd0919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405630821000732</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7bf04c6feb194fef95fb9c4992bd0919</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2564493497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-77b12b628eff222c0ef737899a2ea3a57083b9392647d684716ff5998050b3c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1paUKaP9BD8bGXdUbfEpRCCU2zEOilPQtZHmW12NZW1gb230fbTUNy6UmD5p1HYp6m-UigI0Dk1bbzJaeOAiUd6A5AvGnOKQexkgz02xf1WXO5LFsAIFoZwcT75oxxzkARfd7crKed86VNoc1uiK7ENLdlg9ntDm0td5jjjG5s9xnLJqelpOnQhpRrZ44jtt7NHvOH5l1w44KXT-dF8_vm-6_r29Xdzx_r6293Ky8oKSulekJ7STWGQCn1gEExpY1xFB1zQoFmvWGGSq4GqbkiMgRhjAYBPfOMXTTrE3dIbmt3OU4uH2xy0f69SPneulyiH9GqPgD3MmBPDA8YjAi98dwY2g9giKmsryfWbt9POHicS3bjK-jrzhw39j49WM2kUhIq4PMTIKc_e1yKneLicRzdjGm_WCok54Zxo2qUnqK-rnDJGJ6fIWCPPu3WHn3ao08L2lafdejTyw8-j_yzVwNfTgGsK3-ImO3iI1YfQ8zoS91J_B__EeQWsaU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2564493497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of radiation therapy on perineal urethrostomy for penile cancer</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>A. S. Johnstone, Peter ; de Vries, Hielke M. ; Chipollini, Juan ; Daniel Grass, G. ; Boyd, Franklin ; Korkes, Fernando ; Albersen, Maarten ; Roussel, Eduard ; Zhu, Yao ; Ye, Ding-Wei ; Master, Viraj ; Le, Thien-Linh ; Muneer, Asif ; Brouwer, Oscar R. ; Spiess, Philippe E.</creator><creatorcontrib>A. S. Johnstone, Peter ; de Vries, Hielke M. ; Chipollini, Juan ; Daniel Grass, G. ; Boyd, Franklin ; Korkes, Fernando ; Albersen, Maarten ; Roussel, Eduard ; Zhu, Yao ; Ye, Ding-Wei ; Master, Viraj ; Le, Thien-Linh ; Muneer, Asif ; Brouwer, Oscar R. ; Spiess, Philippe E.</creatorcontrib><description>•Penile cancer impacts numerous quality of life aspects for patients.•Perienal urethrostomy is a reliable mechanism of urinary diversion for many patients with penile cancer.•This study describes that receipt of radiotherapy was not associated with increased risk of stenosis. A lack of demonstrated clinical benefit precludes radiotherapy (RT) from being recommended for pN1/pN2 penile cancer (PeCa) lesions; but it may be recommended in case of extranodal (pN3) disease or for positive resection margins. Perineal urethrostomy (PU) is a technique of urinary diversion in patients with PeCa requiring total or subtotal penectomy as primary therapy. Prior studies suggest PU failure rates of up to 30%, without specific mention of the potential role of RT. When RT is delivered for PeCa it is usually to the pre-pubic fat, groin and lateral pelvis, and not to the region of the PU. Here we describe the role of perioperative RT in a large, multi-institutional registry of PU for PeCa. In our cohort, 299 patients from seven international, high-volume centers in Belgium, Brazil, China, Netherlands, United Kingdom and the United States underwent PU as urinary diversion for PeCa between 2000 and 2020. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were reviewed. Median patient age was 67 years and median follow-up was 19 months. Seven patients (2.3%) received pre-operative RT; six of them with chemotherapy. 37 received RT post-operatively, 21 (57%) with chemotherapy. Stenosis of the PU occurred in 35 (12%) of the total population. The majority of these patients (74%) required surgical revision at a median of 6.1 months post-operatively. RT delivery was neither significantly related to PU stenosis (p = 0.16) or to subsequent revision (p = 0.75). Receipt of RT was not significantly associated with increased stenosis risk in PeCa patients who underwent PU.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-6308</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-6308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.08.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34430718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Penile cancer ; Perineal urethrostomy ; Radiotherapy ; Stenosis</subject><ispartof>Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2021-09, Vol.30, p.84-87</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors</rights><rights>2021 The Authors.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-77b12b628eff222c0ef737899a2ea3a57083b9392647d684716ff5998050b3c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-77b12b628eff222c0ef737899a2ea3a57083b9392647d684716ff5998050b3c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367760/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367760/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34430718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>A. S. Johnstone, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Hielke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipollini, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel Grass, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Franklin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korkes, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albersen, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ding-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Master, Viraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Thien-Linh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muneer, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Oscar R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiess, Philippe E.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of radiation therapy on perineal urethrostomy for penile cancer</title><title>Clinical and translational radiation oncology</title><addtitle>Clin Transl Radiat Oncol</addtitle><description>•Penile cancer impacts numerous quality of life aspects for patients.•Perienal urethrostomy is a reliable mechanism of urinary diversion for many patients with penile cancer.•This study describes that receipt of radiotherapy was not associated with increased risk of stenosis. A lack of demonstrated clinical benefit precludes radiotherapy (RT) from being recommended for pN1/pN2 penile cancer (PeCa) lesions; but it may be recommended in case of extranodal (pN3) disease or for positive resection margins. Perineal urethrostomy (PU) is a technique of urinary diversion in patients with PeCa requiring total or subtotal penectomy as primary therapy. Prior studies suggest PU failure rates of up to 30%, without specific mention of the potential role of RT. When RT is delivered for PeCa it is usually to the pre-pubic fat, groin and lateral pelvis, and not to the region of the PU. Here we describe the role of perioperative RT in a large, multi-institutional registry of PU for PeCa. In our cohort, 299 patients from seven international, high-volume centers in Belgium, Brazil, China, Netherlands, United Kingdom and the United States underwent PU as urinary diversion for PeCa between 2000 and 2020. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were reviewed. Median patient age was 67 years and median follow-up was 19 months. Seven patients (2.3%) received pre-operative RT; six of them with chemotherapy. 37 received RT post-operatively, 21 (57%) with chemotherapy. Stenosis of the PU occurred in 35 (12%) of the total population. The majority of these patients (74%) required surgical revision at a median of 6.1 months post-operatively. RT delivery was neither significantly related to PU stenosis (p = 0.16) or to subsequent revision (p = 0.75). Receipt of RT was not significantly associated with increased stenosis risk in PeCa patients who underwent PU.</description><subject>Penile cancer</subject><subject>Perineal urethrostomy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><issn>2405-6308</issn><issn>2405-6308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1paUKaP9BD8bGXdUbfEpRCCU2zEOilPQtZHmW12NZW1gb230fbTUNy6UmD5p1HYp6m-UigI0Dk1bbzJaeOAiUd6A5AvGnOKQexkgz02xf1WXO5LFsAIFoZwcT75oxxzkARfd7crKed86VNoc1uiK7ENLdlg9ntDm0td5jjjG5s9xnLJqelpOnQhpRrZ44jtt7NHvOH5l1w44KXT-dF8_vm-6_r29Xdzx_r6293Ky8oKSulekJ7STWGQCn1gEExpY1xFB1zQoFmvWGGSq4GqbkiMgRhjAYBPfOMXTTrE3dIbmt3OU4uH2xy0f69SPneulyiH9GqPgD3MmBPDA8YjAi98dwY2g9giKmsryfWbt9POHicS3bjK-jrzhw39j49WM2kUhIq4PMTIKc_e1yKneLicRzdjGm_WCok54Zxo2qUnqK-rnDJGJ6fIWCPPu3WHn3ao08L2lafdejTyw8-j_yzVwNfTgGsK3-ImO3iI1YfQ8zoS91J_B__EeQWsaU</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>A. S. Johnstone, Peter</creator><creator>de Vries, Hielke M.</creator><creator>Chipollini, Juan</creator><creator>Daniel Grass, G.</creator><creator>Boyd, Franklin</creator><creator>Korkes, Fernando</creator><creator>Albersen, Maarten</creator><creator>Roussel, Eduard</creator><creator>Zhu, Yao</creator><creator>Ye, Ding-Wei</creator><creator>Master, Viraj</creator><creator>Le, Thien-Linh</creator><creator>Muneer, Asif</creator><creator>Brouwer, Oscar R.</creator><creator>Spiess, Philippe E.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Impact of radiation therapy on perineal urethrostomy for penile cancer</title><author>A. S. Johnstone, Peter ; de Vries, Hielke M. ; Chipollini, Juan ; Daniel Grass, G. ; Boyd, Franklin ; Korkes, Fernando ; Albersen, Maarten ; Roussel, Eduard ; Zhu, Yao ; Ye, Ding-Wei ; Master, Viraj ; Le, Thien-Linh ; Muneer, Asif ; Brouwer, Oscar R. ; Spiess, Philippe E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-77b12b628eff222c0ef737899a2ea3a57083b9392647d684716ff5998050b3c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Penile cancer</topic><topic>Perineal urethrostomy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>A. S. Johnstone, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vries, Hielke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chipollini, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel Grass, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Franklin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korkes, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albersen, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel, Eduard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Yao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ye, Ding-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Master, Viraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le, Thien-Linh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muneer, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouwer, Oscar R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spiess, Philippe E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Clinical and translational radiation oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>A. S. Johnstone, Peter</au><au>de Vries, Hielke M.</au><au>Chipollini, Juan</au><au>Daniel Grass, G.</au><au>Boyd, Franklin</au><au>Korkes, Fernando</au><au>Albersen, Maarten</au><au>Roussel, Eduard</au><au>Zhu, Yao</au><au>Ye, Ding-Wei</au><au>Master, Viraj</au><au>Le, Thien-Linh</au><au>Muneer, Asif</au><au>Brouwer, Oscar R.</au><au>Spiess, Philippe E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of radiation therapy on perineal urethrostomy for penile cancer</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and translational radiation oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Transl Radiat Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><spage>84</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>84-87</pages><issn>2405-6308</issn><eissn>2405-6308</eissn><abstract>•Penile cancer impacts numerous quality of life aspects for patients.•Perienal urethrostomy is a reliable mechanism of urinary diversion for many patients with penile cancer.•This study describes that receipt of radiotherapy was not associated with increased risk of stenosis. A lack of demonstrated clinical benefit precludes radiotherapy (RT) from being recommended for pN1/pN2 penile cancer (PeCa) lesions; but it may be recommended in case of extranodal (pN3) disease or for positive resection margins. Perineal urethrostomy (PU) is a technique of urinary diversion in patients with PeCa requiring total or subtotal penectomy as primary therapy. Prior studies suggest PU failure rates of up to 30%, without specific mention of the potential role of RT. When RT is delivered for PeCa it is usually to the pre-pubic fat, groin and lateral pelvis, and not to the region of the PU. Here we describe the role of perioperative RT in a large, multi-institutional registry of PU for PeCa. In our cohort, 299 patients from seven international, high-volume centers in Belgium, Brazil, China, Netherlands, United Kingdom and the United States underwent PU as urinary diversion for PeCa between 2000 and 2020. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics were reviewed. Median patient age was 67 years and median follow-up was 19 months. Seven patients (2.3%) received pre-operative RT; six of them with chemotherapy. 37 received RT post-operatively, 21 (57%) with chemotherapy. Stenosis of the PU occurred in 35 (12%) of the total population. The majority of these patients (74%) required surgical revision at a median of 6.1 months post-operatively. RT delivery was neither significantly related to PU stenosis (p = 0.16) or to subsequent revision (p = 0.75). Receipt of RT was not significantly associated with increased stenosis risk in PeCa patients who underwent PU.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>34430718</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ctro.2021.08.005</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-6308
ispartof Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2021-09, Vol.30, p.84-87
issn 2405-6308
2405-6308
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7bf04c6feb194fef95fb9c4992bd0919
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)
subjects Penile cancer
Perineal urethrostomy
Radiotherapy
Stenosis
title Impact of radiation therapy on perineal urethrostomy for penile cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A17%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20radiation%20therapy%20on%20perineal%20urethrostomy%20for%20penile%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20translational%20radiation%20oncology&rft.au=A.%20S.%20Johnstone,%20Peter&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=84-87&rft.issn=2405-6308&rft.eissn=2405-6308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2564493497%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-77b12b628eff222c0ef737899a2ea3a57083b9392647d684716ff5998050b3c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2564493497&rft_id=info:pmid/34430718&rfr_iscdi=true