Multiculturalism on the Back Seat? Culture, Religion, and Justice

Alan Patten’s Equal Recognition is a major contribution to the normative literature on minority rights. I nonetheless suggest that liberal culturalism as a normative theory, even in Patten’s sophisticated version, is ill suited to deal with the challenges related to the status of religion in the pub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Les ateliers de l'éthique 2015-06, Vol.10 (2), p.141-146
Main Author: Maclure, Jocelyn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
multiculturalism
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-6824ac9d3ce5c70a7bc1f155fdec47c2d57f896e3473c402797466dc2b27bd833
cites
container_end_page 146
container_issue 2
container_start_page 141
container_title Les ateliers de l'éthique
container_volume 10
creator Maclure, Jocelyn
description Alan Patten’s Equal Recognition is a major contribution to the normative literature on minority rights. I nonetheless suggest that liberal culturalism as a normative theory, even in Patten’s sophisticated version, is ill suited to deal with the challenges related to the status of religion in the public sphere that are so prevalent in contemporary democracies. In addition, I submit that Patten did not supply a fully convincing answer to the argument that liberal egalitarianism, well understood, is capacious enough to secure fair terms of social cooperation for members of cultural minorities, making the (allegedly burdensome) language of “cultural rights” and “cultural recognition” superfluous.
doi_str_mv 10.7202/1035333ar
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>erudit_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7ca209dfc9da4e44bcfc5e89a9d45574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1035333ar</eruid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7ca209dfc9da4e44bcfc5e89a9d45574</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1035333ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-6824ac9d3ce5c70a7bc1f155fdec47c2d57f896e3473c402797466dc2b27bd833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN1Kw0AQhRdRsFYvfAL3ARrd30z2SmqpWqkI_lyHyeympqaNbJIL397QSvFmznAO880wjF1KcQ1KqBsptNVaYzxiIwkyS5wDOP7Xn7Kztl0LkTqp9YhNn_u6q2gofcS6aje82fLuM_A7pC_-FrC75bNdGib8NdTVqmq2E45bz5_6dpgM5-ykxLoNF386Zh_38_fZY7J8eVjMpsuElLRdkmbKIDmvKVgCgVCQLKW1pQ9kgJS3UGYuDdqAJiMUODBp6kkVCgqfaT1miz3XN7jOv2O1wfiTN1jlO6OJqxzjcFAdciBUwvlyWIcmGFNQSTZkDp031oIZWFd7Voi9r7oD7fA9_QtMvmHm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiculturalism on the Back Seat? Culture, Religion, and Justice</title><source>CRKN Open Access Journals List</source><creator>Maclure, Jocelyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Maclure, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><description>Alan Patten’s Equal Recognition is a major contribution to the normative literature on minority rights. I nonetheless suggest that liberal culturalism as a normative theory, even in Patten’s sophisticated version, is ill suited to deal with the challenges related to the status of religion in the public sphere that are so prevalent in contemporary democracies. In addition, I submit that Patten did not supply a fully convincing answer to the argument that liberal egalitarianism, well understood, is capacious enough to secure fair terms of social cooperation for members of cultural minorities, making the (allegedly burdensome) language of “cultural rights” and “cultural recognition” superfluous.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1718-9977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1718-9977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7202/1035333ar</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ)</publisher><subject>multiculturalism</subject><ispartof>Les ateliers de l'éthique, 2015-06, Vol.10 (2), p.141-146</ispartof><rights>Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ), 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-6824ac9d3ce5c70a7bc1f155fdec47c2d57f896e3473c402797466dc2b27bd833</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maclure, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><title>Multiculturalism on the Back Seat? Culture, Religion, and Justice</title><title>Les ateliers de l'éthique</title><description>Alan Patten’s Equal Recognition is a major contribution to the normative literature on minority rights. I nonetheless suggest that liberal culturalism as a normative theory, even in Patten’s sophisticated version, is ill suited to deal with the challenges related to the status of religion in the public sphere that are so prevalent in contemporary democracies. In addition, I submit that Patten did not supply a fully convincing answer to the argument that liberal egalitarianism, well understood, is capacious enough to secure fair terms of social cooperation for members of cultural minorities, making the (allegedly burdensome) language of “cultural rights” and “cultural recognition” superfluous.</description><subject>multiculturalism</subject><issn>1718-9977</issn><issn>1718-9977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN1Kw0AQhRdRsFYvfAL3ARrd30z2SmqpWqkI_lyHyeympqaNbJIL397QSvFmznAO880wjF1KcQ1KqBsptNVaYzxiIwkyS5wDOP7Xn7Kztl0LkTqp9YhNn_u6q2gofcS6aje82fLuM_A7pC_-FrC75bNdGib8NdTVqmq2E45bz5_6dpgM5-ykxLoNF386Zh_38_fZY7J8eVjMpsuElLRdkmbKIDmvKVgCgVCQLKW1pQ9kgJS3UGYuDdqAJiMUODBp6kkVCgqfaT1miz3XN7jOv2O1wfiTN1jlO6OJqxzjcFAdciBUwvlyWIcmGFNQSTZkDp031oIZWFd7Voi9r7oD7fA9_QtMvmHm</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Maclure, Jocelyn</creator><general>Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ)</general><general>Université de Montréal</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Multiculturalism on the Back Seat? Culture, Religion, and Justice</title><author>Maclure, Jocelyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-6824ac9d3ce5c70a7bc1f155fdec47c2d57f896e3473c402797466dc2b27bd833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>multiculturalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maclure, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Les ateliers de l'éthique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maclure, Jocelyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiculturalism on the Back Seat? Culture, Religion, and Justice</atitle><jtitle>Les ateliers de l'éthique</jtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>141-146</pages><issn>1718-9977</issn><eissn>1718-9977</eissn><abstract>Alan Patten’s Equal Recognition is a major contribution to the normative literature on minority rights. I nonetheless suggest that liberal culturalism as a normative theory, even in Patten’s sophisticated version, is ill suited to deal with the challenges related to the status of religion in the public sphere that are so prevalent in contemporary democracies. In addition, I submit that Patten did not supply a fully convincing answer to the argument that liberal egalitarianism, well understood, is capacious enough to secure fair terms of social cooperation for members of cultural minorities, making the (allegedly burdensome) language of “cultural rights” and “cultural recognition” superfluous.</abstract><pub>Centre de recherche en éthique (CRÉ)</pub><doi>10.7202/1035333ar</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1718-9977
ispartof Les ateliers de l'éthique, 2015-06, Vol.10 (2), p.141-146
issn 1718-9977
1718-9977
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7ca209dfc9da4e44bcfc5e89a9d45574
source CRKN Open Access Journals List
subjects multiculturalism
title Multiculturalism on the Back Seat? Culture, Religion, and Justice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T06%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiculturalism%20on%20the%20Back%20Seat?%20Culture,%20Religion,%20and%20Justice&rft.jtitle=Les%20ateliers%20de%20l'e%CC%81thique&rft.au=Maclure,%20Jocelyn&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=141-146&rft.issn=1718-9977&rft.eissn=1718-9977&rft_id=info:doi/10.7202/1035333ar&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_doaj_%3E1035333ar%3C/erudit_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-6824ac9d3ce5c70a7bc1f155fdec47c2d57f896e3473c402797466dc2b27bd833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_eruid=1035333ar&rfr_iscdi=true