A gene-tree test of the traditional taxonomy of American deer: the importance of voucher specimens, geographic data, and dense sampling

The taxonomy of American deer has been established almost entirely on the basis of morphological data and without the use of explicit phylogenetic methods; hence, phylogenetic analyses including data for all of the currently recognized species, even if based on a single gene, might improve current u...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ZooKeys 2017-01, Vol.697 (697), p.87-131
Main Authors: Gutiérrez, Eliécer E, Helgen, Kristofer M, McDonough, Molly M, Bauer, Franziska, Hawkins, Melissa T R, Escobedo-Morales, Luis A, Patterson, Bruce D, Maldonado, Jesús E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Capreolinae
Data processing
Genera
Genetic aspects
Identification and classification
Mazama
Mitochondrial DNA
New records
Nucleotide sequence
Odocoileus
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Pudu
Sampling
Species
Taxonomy
Zoology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The taxonomy of American deer has been established almost entirely on the basis of morphological data and without the use of explicit phylogenetic methods; hence, phylogenetic analyses including data for all of the currently recognized species, even if based on a single gene, might improve current understanding of their taxonomy. We tested the monophyly of the morphology-defined genera and species of New World deer (Odocoileini) with phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial DNA sequences. This is the first such test conducted using extensive geographic and taxonomic sampling. Our results do not support the monophyly of , , , , , , and . contains species that belong to other genera. We found a novel sister-taxon relationship between " " and a clade formed by and , and transfer to . The clade formed by and may represent a valid species, whereas the remaining subspecies of appear closer to . ( ) was not found sister to Pudu (Pudella) mephistophiles. If confirmed, this result will prompt the recognition of the monotypic as a distinct genus. We provide evidence for the existence of an undescribed species now confused with , and identify other instances of cryptic, taxonomically unrecognized species-level diversity among populations here regarded as , " " , and . Noteworthy records that substantially extend the known distributions of and " " are provided, and we unveil a surprising ambiguity regarding the distribution of " " , as it is described in the literature. The study of deer of the tribe Odocoileini has been hampered by the paucity of information regarding voucher specimens and the provenance of sequences deposited in GenBank. We pinpoint priorities for future systematic research on the tribe Odocoileini.
ISSN:1313-2989
1313-2970
DOI:10.3897/zookeys.697.15124