Loading…

Crop Rotation and Straw Application Impact Microbial Communities in Italian and Philippine Soils and the Rhizosphere of Zea mays

Rice is one of the most important nourishments and its cultivation binds large agricultural areas in the world. Its cultivation leads to huge water consumption and high methane emissions. To diminish these problems, crop rotation between paddy rice and maize is introduced in Asia, but can lead to lo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in microbiology 2018-06, Vol.9, p.1295-1295
Main Authors: Maarastawi, Sarah A, Frindte, Katharina, Linnartz, Marius, Knief, Claudia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cdfc946cf02df973e4eb622ff1c4f6845f7dec58279f88f481849397292561ee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cdfc946cf02df973e4eb622ff1c4f6845f7dec58279f88f481849397292561ee3
container_end_page 1295
container_issue
container_start_page 1295
container_title Frontiers in microbiology
container_volume 9
creator Maarastawi, Sarah A
Frindte, Katharina
Linnartz, Marius
Knief, Claudia
description Rice is one of the most important nourishments and its cultivation binds large agricultural areas in the world. Its cultivation leads to huge water consumption and high methane emissions. To diminish these problems, crop rotation between paddy rice and maize is introduced in Asia, but can lead to losses of carbon and water by the formation of desiccation cracks. To counteract these problems rice straw can be applied. We analyzed soil microbial responses to different crop rotation systems [rice-rice (RR), maize-maize (MM), maize-rice (MR)] and to rice straw application in the soil and rhizosphere of maize. was grown in microcosms using soils from different field locations, each including different crop rotation regimes. The bacterial and fungal community composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene and ITS based amplicon sequencing in the bulk soil and rhizosphere. The microbiota was clearly different in soils from the different field locations (analysis of similarity, ANOSIM: R = 0.516 for the bacterial community; = 0.817 for the fungal community). Within the field locations, crop rotation contributed differently to the variation in microbial community composition. Strong differences were observed in communities inhabiting soils under monosuccession (RR vs. MM) (ANOSIM: R = 0.923 for the bacterial and = 0.714 for the fungal community), while the communities in soils undergoing MR crop rotation were more similar to those of the corresponding RR soils (ANOSIM: R = 0.111-0.175). The observed differences could be explained by altered oxygen availabilities in RR and MR soils, resulting in an enrichment of anaerobic bacteria in the soils, and the presence of the different crops, leading to the enrichment of host-plant specific microbial communities. The responses of the microbial communities to the application of rice straw in the microcosms were rather weak compared to the other factors. The taxa responding in bulk soil and rhizosphere were mostly distinct. In conclusion, this study revealed that the different agricultural management practices affect microbial community composition to different extent, not only in the bulk soil but also in the rhizosphere, and that the microbial responses in bulk soil and rhizosphere are distinct.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01295
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7d0ee188de414eafab94fc791e7aceaa</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7d0ee188de414eafab94fc791e7aceaa</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2063709500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cdfc946cf02df973e4eb622ff1c4f6845f7dec58279f88f481849397292561ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUjBCIVqV3TshHLrv1Vxz7glSt-FipCNSChLhYjvPcuHLiYHtB5dSfTnZTqtYH-2nezNh6nqp6TfCaManO3OBtu6aYyDUmVNXPqmMiBF8xTH88f1QfVac53-B5cUzn_WV1RJUSDDN2XN1tUpzQZSym-DgiM3boqiTzB51PU_B2QbfDZGxBn71NsfUmoE0cht3oi4eM_NwvJnizqL_2Pvhp8iOgq-hDPoClB3TZ-78xTz0kQNGhn2DQYG7zq-qFMyHD6f15Un3_8P7b5tPq4svH7eb8YmW5oGVlO2cVF9Zh2jnVMODQCkqdI5Y7IXntmg5sLWmjnJSOSyK5YqqhitaCALCTarv4dtHc6Cn5waRbHY3XByCma21S8TaAbjoMQKTsgBMOxplWcWcbRaAxFoyZvd4tXtOuHaCzMM4jC09Mn3ZG3-vr-FsLTFiD1Wzw9t4gxV87yEUPPlsIwYwQd1lTLPa8GuOZihfqPPucE7iHawjW-xzoQw70Pgf6kINZ8ubx8x4E_3-d_QMhHbJi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2063709500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop Rotation and Straw Application Impact Microbial Communities in Italian and Philippine Soils and the Rhizosphere of Zea mays</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><creator>Maarastawi, Sarah A ; Frindte, Katharina ; Linnartz, Marius ; Knief, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Maarastawi, Sarah A ; Frindte, Katharina ; Linnartz, Marius ; Knief, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>Rice is one of the most important nourishments and its cultivation binds large agricultural areas in the world. Its cultivation leads to huge water consumption and high methane emissions. To diminish these problems, crop rotation between paddy rice and maize is introduced in Asia, but can lead to losses of carbon and water by the formation of desiccation cracks. To counteract these problems rice straw can be applied. We analyzed soil microbial responses to different crop rotation systems [rice-rice (RR), maize-maize (MM), maize-rice (MR)] and to rice straw application in the soil and rhizosphere of maize. was grown in microcosms using soils from different field locations, each including different crop rotation regimes. The bacterial and fungal community composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene and ITS based amplicon sequencing in the bulk soil and rhizosphere. The microbiota was clearly different in soils from the different field locations (analysis of similarity, ANOSIM: R = 0.516 for the bacterial community; = 0.817 for the fungal community). Within the field locations, crop rotation contributed differently to the variation in microbial community composition. Strong differences were observed in communities inhabiting soils under monosuccession (RR vs. MM) (ANOSIM: R = 0.923 for the bacterial and = 0.714 for the fungal community), while the communities in soils undergoing MR crop rotation were more similar to those of the corresponding RR soils (ANOSIM: R = 0.111-0.175). The observed differences could be explained by altered oxygen availabilities in RR and MR soils, resulting in an enrichment of anaerobic bacteria in the soils, and the presence of the different crops, leading to the enrichment of host-plant specific microbial communities. The responses of the microbial communities to the application of rice straw in the microcosms were rather weak compared to the other factors. The taxa responding in bulk soil and rhizosphere were mostly distinct. In conclusion, this study revealed that the different agricultural management practices affect microbial community composition to different extent, not only in the bulk soil but also in the rhizosphere, and that the microbial responses in bulk soil and rhizosphere are distinct.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-302X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-302X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01295</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29963033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>bacterial community ; crop rotation ; fungal community ; Microbiology ; rhizosphere ; rice straw ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in microbiology, 2018-06, Vol.9, p.1295-1295</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 Maarastawi, Frindte, Linnartz and Knief. 2018 Maarastawi, Frindte, Linnartz and Knief</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cdfc946cf02df973e4eb622ff1c4f6845f7dec58279f88f481849397292561ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cdfc946cf02df973e4eb622ff1c4f6845f7dec58279f88f481849397292561ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013709/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013709/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29963033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maarastawi, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frindte, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnartz, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knief, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>Crop Rotation and Straw Application Impact Microbial Communities in Italian and Philippine Soils and the Rhizosphere of Zea mays</title><title>Frontiers in microbiology</title><addtitle>Front Microbiol</addtitle><description>Rice is one of the most important nourishments and its cultivation binds large agricultural areas in the world. Its cultivation leads to huge water consumption and high methane emissions. To diminish these problems, crop rotation between paddy rice and maize is introduced in Asia, but can lead to losses of carbon and water by the formation of desiccation cracks. To counteract these problems rice straw can be applied. We analyzed soil microbial responses to different crop rotation systems [rice-rice (RR), maize-maize (MM), maize-rice (MR)] and to rice straw application in the soil and rhizosphere of maize. was grown in microcosms using soils from different field locations, each including different crop rotation regimes. The bacterial and fungal community composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene and ITS based amplicon sequencing in the bulk soil and rhizosphere. The microbiota was clearly different in soils from the different field locations (analysis of similarity, ANOSIM: R = 0.516 for the bacterial community; = 0.817 for the fungal community). Within the field locations, crop rotation contributed differently to the variation in microbial community composition. Strong differences were observed in communities inhabiting soils under monosuccession (RR vs. MM) (ANOSIM: R = 0.923 for the bacterial and = 0.714 for the fungal community), while the communities in soils undergoing MR crop rotation were more similar to those of the corresponding RR soils (ANOSIM: R = 0.111-0.175). The observed differences could be explained by altered oxygen availabilities in RR and MR soils, resulting in an enrichment of anaerobic bacteria in the soils, and the presence of the different crops, leading to the enrichment of host-plant specific microbial communities. The responses of the microbial communities to the application of rice straw in the microcosms were rather weak compared to the other factors. The taxa responding in bulk soil and rhizosphere were mostly distinct. In conclusion, this study revealed that the different agricultural management practices affect microbial community composition to different extent, not only in the bulk soil but also in the rhizosphere, and that the microbial responses in bulk soil and rhizosphere are distinct.</description><subject>bacterial community</subject><subject>crop rotation</subject><subject>fungal community</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>rhizosphere</subject><subject>rice straw</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>1664-302X</issn><issn>1664-302X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUjBCIVqV3TshHLrv1Vxz7glSt-FipCNSChLhYjvPcuHLiYHtB5dSfTnZTqtYH-2nezNh6nqp6TfCaManO3OBtu6aYyDUmVNXPqmMiBF8xTH88f1QfVac53-B5cUzn_WV1RJUSDDN2XN1tUpzQZSym-DgiM3boqiTzB51PU_B2QbfDZGxBn71NsfUmoE0cht3oi4eM_NwvJnizqL_2Pvhp8iOgq-hDPoClB3TZ-78xTz0kQNGhn2DQYG7zq-qFMyHD6f15Un3_8P7b5tPq4svH7eb8YmW5oGVlO2cVF9Zh2jnVMODQCkqdI5Y7IXntmg5sLWmjnJSOSyK5YqqhitaCALCTarv4dtHc6Cn5waRbHY3XByCma21S8TaAbjoMQKTsgBMOxplWcWcbRaAxFoyZvd4tXtOuHaCzMM4jC09Mn3ZG3-vr-FsLTFiD1Wzw9t4gxV87yEUPPlsIwYwQd1lTLPa8GuOZihfqPPucE7iHawjW-xzoQw70Pgf6kINZ8ubx8x4E_3-d_QMhHbJi</recordid><startdate>20180615</startdate><enddate>20180615</enddate><creator>Maarastawi, Sarah A</creator><creator>Frindte, Katharina</creator><creator>Linnartz, Marius</creator><creator>Knief, Claudia</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180615</creationdate><title>Crop Rotation and Straw Application Impact Microbial Communities in Italian and Philippine Soils and the Rhizosphere of Zea mays</title><author>Maarastawi, Sarah A ; Frindte, Katharina ; Linnartz, Marius ; Knief, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cdfc946cf02df973e4eb622ff1c4f6845f7dec58279f88f481849397292561ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>bacterial community</topic><topic>crop rotation</topic><topic>fungal community</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>rhizosphere</topic><topic>rice straw</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maarastawi, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frindte, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linnartz, Marius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knief, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maarastawi, Sarah A</au><au>Frindte, Katharina</au><au>Linnartz, Marius</au><au>Knief, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop Rotation and Straw Application Impact Microbial Communities in Italian and Philippine Soils and the Rhizosphere of Zea mays</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Microbiol</addtitle><date>2018-06-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>1295</spage><epage>1295</epage><pages>1295-1295</pages><issn>1664-302X</issn><eissn>1664-302X</eissn><abstract>Rice is one of the most important nourishments and its cultivation binds large agricultural areas in the world. Its cultivation leads to huge water consumption and high methane emissions. To diminish these problems, crop rotation between paddy rice and maize is introduced in Asia, but can lead to losses of carbon and water by the formation of desiccation cracks. To counteract these problems rice straw can be applied. We analyzed soil microbial responses to different crop rotation systems [rice-rice (RR), maize-maize (MM), maize-rice (MR)] and to rice straw application in the soil and rhizosphere of maize. was grown in microcosms using soils from different field locations, each including different crop rotation regimes. The bacterial and fungal community composition was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene and ITS based amplicon sequencing in the bulk soil and rhizosphere. The microbiota was clearly different in soils from the different field locations (analysis of similarity, ANOSIM: R = 0.516 for the bacterial community; = 0.817 for the fungal community). Within the field locations, crop rotation contributed differently to the variation in microbial community composition. Strong differences were observed in communities inhabiting soils under monosuccession (RR vs. MM) (ANOSIM: R = 0.923 for the bacterial and = 0.714 for the fungal community), while the communities in soils undergoing MR crop rotation were more similar to those of the corresponding RR soils (ANOSIM: R = 0.111-0.175). The observed differences could be explained by altered oxygen availabilities in RR and MR soils, resulting in an enrichment of anaerobic bacteria in the soils, and the presence of the different crops, leading to the enrichment of host-plant specific microbial communities. The responses of the microbial communities to the application of rice straw in the microcosms were rather weak compared to the other factors. The taxa responding in bulk soil and rhizosphere were mostly distinct. In conclusion, this study revealed that the different agricultural management practices affect microbial community composition to different extent, not only in the bulk soil but also in the rhizosphere, and that the microbial responses in bulk soil and rhizosphere are distinct.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>29963033</pmid><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2018.01295</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-302X
ispartof Frontiers in microbiology, 2018-06, Vol.9, p.1295-1295
issn 1664-302X
1664-302X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7d0ee188de414eafab94fc791e7aceaa
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)
subjects bacterial community
crop rotation
fungal community
Microbiology
rhizosphere
rice straw
Zea mays
title Crop Rotation and Straw Application Impact Microbial Communities in Italian and Philippine Soils and the Rhizosphere of Zea mays
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A05%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%20Rotation%20and%20Straw%20Application%20Impact%20Microbial%20Communities%20in%20Italian%20and%20Philippine%20Soils%20and%20the%20Rhizosphere%20of%20Zea%20mays&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20microbiology&rft.au=Maarastawi,%20Sarah%20A&rft.date=2018-06-15&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=1295&rft.epage=1295&rft.pages=1295-1295&rft.issn=1664-302X&rft.eissn=1664-302X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2063709500%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-cdfc946cf02df973e4eb622ff1c4f6845f7dec58279f88f481849397292561ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2063709500&rft_id=info:pmid/29963033&rfr_iscdi=true