Loading…

Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions

Although web-based interventions for promoting health and health-related behavior can be effective, poor adherence is a common issue that needs to be addressed. Technology as a means to communicate the content in web-based interventions has been neglected in research. Indeed, technology is often see...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical Internet research 2012-11, Vol.14 (6), p.e152-e152
Main Authors: Kelders, Saskia M, Kok, Robin N, Ossebaard, Hans C, Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-d1cb0aa19bf80aef9165ff5c1dfa8065793c66740d8b5c0073c2d592ec2a33193
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-d1cb0aa19bf80aef9165ff5c1dfa8065793c66740d8b5c0073c2d592ec2a33193
container_end_page e152
container_issue 6
container_start_page e152
container_title Journal of medical Internet research
container_volume 14
creator Kelders, Saskia M
Kok, Robin N
Ossebaard, Hans C
Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C
description Although web-based interventions for promoting health and health-related behavior can be effective, poor adherence is a common issue that needs to be addressed. Technology as a means to communicate the content in web-based interventions has been neglected in research. Indeed, technology is often seen as a black-box, a mere tool that has no effect or value and serves only as a vehicle to deliver intervention content. In this paper we examine technology from a holistic perspective. We see it as a vital and inseparable aspect of web-based interventions to help explain and understand adherence. This study aims to review the literature on web-based health interventions to investigate whether intervention characteristics and persuasive design affect adherence to a web-based intervention. We conducted a systematic review of studies into web-based health interventions. Per intervention, intervention characteristics, persuasive technology elements and adherence were coded. We performed a multiple regression analysis to investigate whether these variables could predict adherence. We included 101 articles on 83 interventions. The typical web-based intervention is meant to be used once a week, is modular in set-up, is updated once a week, lasts for 10 weeks, includes interaction with the system and a counselor and peers on the web, includes some persuasive technology elements, and about 50% of the participants adhere to the intervention. Regarding persuasive technology, we see that primary task support elements are most commonly employed (mean 2.9 out of a possible 7.0). Dialogue support and social support are less commonly employed (mean 1.5 and 1.2 out of a possible 7.0, respectively). When comparing the interventions of the different health care areas, we find significant differences in intended usage (p=.004), setup (p
doi_str_mv 10.2196/jmir.2104
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7da6eaf15fa34ca3a36f7fb4ff961345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7da6eaf15fa34ca3a36f7fb4ff961345</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1171877749</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-d1cb0aa19bf80aef9165ff5c1dfa8065793c66740d8b5c0073c2d592ec2a33193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhSMEoqVw4A8gS1zgEPDEsZ1wQEIVlEqV4ABna2KPt14lcbGTrfrvSdht1XKBk0ee50_zxq8oXgJ_V0Gr3m-HkJaK14-KY6hFUzaNhsf36qPiWc5bzitet_C0OKoESGgqflzgd0p5xhx2xPJNnmhgjnLYjMxFymzAaaL0geGhiVOwLNEu0DWLnqG7pESjJTZFdk1d2WEmx8K4PNrROIU45ufFE499pheH86T4-eXzj9Ov5cW3s_PTTxellVpOpQPbcURoO99wJN-Ckt5LC85jw5XUrbBK6Zq7ppOWcy1s5WRbka1QCGjFSXG-57qIW3OVwoDpxkQM5s9FTBuDaRm_J6MdKkIP0qOoLQoUymvf1d63CkQtF9bHPetq7gZydrGSsH8AfdgZw6XZxJ0REpbJ-AJ4cwCk-GumPJkhZEt9jyPFORsQqlat0FL9h7TWDTRKin9LQUOjta7Xbbz-S7qNcxqXDzCVBFHphbf6fLtX2RRzTuTvLAI3a7TMGi2zRmvRvrq_kzvlbZbEbwNVysY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2513276535</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>ProQuest - social science premium collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kelders, Saskia M ; Kok, Robin N ; Ossebaard, Hans C ; Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelders, Saskia M ; Kok, Robin N ; Ossebaard, Hans C ; Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C</creatorcontrib><description>Although web-based interventions for promoting health and health-related behavior can be effective, poor adherence is a common issue that needs to be addressed. Technology as a means to communicate the content in web-based interventions has been neglected in research. Indeed, technology is often seen as a black-box, a mere tool that has no effect or value and serves only as a vehicle to deliver intervention content. In this paper we examine technology from a holistic perspective. We see it as a vital and inseparable aspect of web-based interventions to help explain and understand adherence. This study aims to review the literature on web-based health interventions to investigate whether intervention characteristics and persuasive design affect adherence to a web-based intervention. We conducted a systematic review of studies into web-based health interventions. Per intervention, intervention characteristics, persuasive technology elements and adherence were coded. We performed a multiple regression analysis to investigate whether these variables could predict adherence. We included 101 articles on 83 interventions. The typical web-based intervention is meant to be used once a week, is modular in set-up, is updated once a week, lasts for 10 weeks, includes interaction with the system and a counselor and peers on the web, includes some persuasive technology elements, and about 50% of the participants adhere to the intervention. Regarding persuasive technology, we see that primary task support elements are most commonly employed (mean 2.9 out of a possible 7.0). Dialogue support and social support are less commonly employed (mean 1.5 and 1.2 out of a possible 7.0, respectively). When comparing the interventions of the different health care areas, we find significant differences in intended usage (p=.004), setup (p&lt;.001), updates (p&lt;.001), frequency of interaction with a counselor (p&lt;.001), the system (p=.003) and peers (p=.017), duration (F=6.068, p=.004), adherence (F=4.833, p=.010) and the number of primary task support elements (F=5.631, p=.005). Our final regression model explained 55% of the variance in adherence. In this model, a RCT study as opposed to an observational study, increased interaction with a counselor, more frequent intended usage, more frequent updates and more extensive employment of dialogue support significantly predicted better adherence. Using intervention characteristics and persuasive technology elements, a substantial amount of variance in adherence can be explained. Although there are differences between health care areas on intervention characteristics, health care area per se does not predict adherence. Rather, the differences in technology and interaction predict adherence. The results of this study can be used to make an informed decision about how to design a web-based intervention to which patients are more likely to adhere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1438-8871</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1439-4456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23151820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor</publisher><subject>Adherence ; Computer based ; Computer mediated communication ; Employment ; Feedback ; Guideline Adherence ; Health Behavior ; Health care ; Health promotion ; Human-computer interaction ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Internet ; Intervention ; Interventions ; Literature reviews ; Medicine ; Multimedia ; Original Paper ; Persuasion ; Persuasive Communication ; Regression analysis ; Social support ; Systematic review ; Systems design ; Technology ; User behaviour ; Web site design</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical Internet research, 2012-11, Vol.14 (6), p.e152-e152</ispartof><rights>2012. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Saskia M Kelders, Robin N Kok, Hans C Ossebaard, Julia EWC Van Gemert-Pijnen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.11.2012. 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-d1cb0aa19bf80aef9165ff5c1dfa8065793c66740d8b5c0073c2d592ec2a33193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-d1cb0aa19bf80aef9165ff5c1dfa8065793c66740d8b5c0073c2d592ec2a33193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2513276535/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2513276535?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,12826,21361,21374,25732,27284,27903,27904,30978,30979,33590,33591,33885,33886,34114,34115,36991,36992,43712,43871,44569,73967,74155,74872</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23151820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelders, Saskia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kok, Robin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ossebaard, Hans C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C</creatorcontrib><title>Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions</title><title>Journal of medical Internet research</title><addtitle>J Med Internet Res</addtitle><description>Although web-based interventions for promoting health and health-related behavior can be effective, poor adherence is a common issue that needs to be addressed. Technology as a means to communicate the content in web-based interventions has been neglected in research. Indeed, technology is often seen as a black-box, a mere tool that has no effect or value and serves only as a vehicle to deliver intervention content. In this paper we examine technology from a holistic perspective. We see it as a vital and inseparable aspect of web-based interventions to help explain and understand adherence. This study aims to review the literature on web-based health interventions to investigate whether intervention characteristics and persuasive design affect adherence to a web-based intervention. We conducted a systematic review of studies into web-based health interventions. Per intervention, intervention characteristics, persuasive technology elements and adherence were coded. We performed a multiple regression analysis to investigate whether these variables could predict adherence. We included 101 articles on 83 interventions. The typical web-based intervention is meant to be used once a week, is modular in set-up, is updated once a week, lasts for 10 weeks, includes interaction with the system and a counselor and peers on the web, includes some persuasive technology elements, and about 50% of the participants adhere to the intervention. Regarding persuasive technology, we see that primary task support elements are most commonly employed (mean 2.9 out of a possible 7.0). Dialogue support and social support are less commonly employed (mean 1.5 and 1.2 out of a possible 7.0, respectively). When comparing the interventions of the different health care areas, we find significant differences in intended usage (p=.004), setup (p&lt;.001), updates (p&lt;.001), frequency of interaction with a counselor (p&lt;.001), the system (p=.003) and peers (p=.017), duration (F=6.068, p=.004), adherence (F=4.833, p=.010) and the number of primary task support elements (F=5.631, p=.005). Our final regression model explained 55% of the variance in adherence. In this model, a RCT study as opposed to an observational study, increased interaction with a counselor, more frequent intended usage, more frequent updates and more extensive employment of dialogue support significantly predicted better adherence. Using intervention characteristics and persuasive technology elements, a substantial amount of variance in adherence can be explained. Although there are differences between health care areas on intervention characteristics, health care area per se does not predict adherence. Rather, the differences in technology and interaction predict adherence. The results of this study can be used to make an informed decision about how to design a web-based intervention to which patients are more likely to adhere.</description><subject>Adherence</subject><subject>Computer based</subject><subject>Computer mediated communication</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Human-computer interaction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interventions</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Multimedia</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Persuasion</subject><subject>Persuasive Communication</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>User behaviour</subject><subject>Web site design</subject><issn>1438-8871</issn><issn>1439-4456</issn><issn>1438-8871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhSMEoqVw4A8gS1zgEPDEsZ1wQEIVlEqV4ABna2KPt14lcbGTrfrvSdht1XKBk0ee50_zxq8oXgJ_V0Gr3m-HkJaK14-KY6hFUzaNhsf36qPiWc5bzitet_C0OKoESGgqflzgd0p5xhx2xPJNnmhgjnLYjMxFymzAaaL0geGhiVOwLNEu0DWLnqG7pESjJTZFdk1d2WEmx8K4PNrROIU45ufFE499pheH86T4-eXzj9Ov5cW3s_PTTxellVpOpQPbcURoO99wJN-Ckt5LC85jw5XUrbBK6Zq7ppOWcy1s5WRbka1QCGjFSXG-57qIW3OVwoDpxkQM5s9FTBuDaRm_J6MdKkIP0qOoLQoUymvf1d63CkQtF9bHPetq7gZydrGSsH8AfdgZw6XZxJ0REpbJ-AJ4cwCk-GumPJkhZEt9jyPFORsQqlat0FL9h7TWDTRKin9LQUOjta7Xbbz-S7qNcxqXDzCVBFHphbf6fLtX2RRzTuTvLAI3a7TMGi2zRmvRvrq_kzvlbZbEbwNVysY</recordid><startdate>20121101</startdate><enddate>20121101</enddate><creator>Kelders, Saskia M</creator><creator>Kok, Robin N</creator><creator>Ossebaard, Hans C</creator><creator>Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C</creator><general>Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor</general><general>Gunther Eysenbach</general><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121101</creationdate><title>Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions</title><author>Kelders, Saskia M ; Kok, Robin N ; Ossebaard, Hans C ; Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-d1cb0aa19bf80aef9165ff5c1dfa8065793c66740d8b5c0073c2d592ec2a33193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adherence</topic><topic>Computer based</topic><topic>Computer mediated communication</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Human-computer interaction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interventions</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Multimedia</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Persuasion</topic><topic>Persuasive Communication</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>User behaviour</topic><topic>Web site design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelders, Saskia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kok, Robin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ossebaard, Hans C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest - social science premium collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical Internet research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelders, Saskia M</au><au>Kok, Robin N</au><au>Ossebaard, Hans C</au><au>Van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E W C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical Internet research</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Internet Res</addtitle><date>2012-11-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e152</spage><epage>e152</epage><pages>e152-e152</pages><issn>1438-8871</issn><issn>1439-4456</issn><eissn>1438-8871</eissn><abstract>Although web-based interventions for promoting health and health-related behavior can be effective, poor adherence is a common issue that needs to be addressed. Technology as a means to communicate the content in web-based interventions has been neglected in research. Indeed, technology is often seen as a black-box, a mere tool that has no effect or value and serves only as a vehicle to deliver intervention content. In this paper we examine technology from a holistic perspective. We see it as a vital and inseparable aspect of web-based interventions to help explain and understand adherence. This study aims to review the literature on web-based health interventions to investigate whether intervention characteristics and persuasive design affect adherence to a web-based intervention. We conducted a systematic review of studies into web-based health interventions. Per intervention, intervention characteristics, persuasive technology elements and adherence were coded. We performed a multiple regression analysis to investigate whether these variables could predict adherence. We included 101 articles on 83 interventions. The typical web-based intervention is meant to be used once a week, is modular in set-up, is updated once a week, lasts for 10 weeks, includes interaction with the system and a counselor and peers on the web, includes some persuasive technology elements, and about 50% of the participants adhere to the intervention. Regarding persuasive technology, we see that primary task support elements are most commonly employed (mean 2.9 out of a possible 7.0). Dialogue support and social support are less commonly employed (mean 1.5 and 1.2 out of a possible 7.0, respectively). When comparing the interventions of the different health care areas, we find significant differences in intended usage (p=.004), setup (p&lt;.001), updates (p&lt;.001), frequency of interaction with a counselor (p&lt;.001), the system (p=.003) and peers (p=.017), duration (F=6.068, p=.004), adherence (F=4.833, p=.010) and the number of primary task support elements (F=5.631, p=.005). Our final regression model explained 55% of the variance in adherence. In this model, a RCT study as opposed to an observational study, increased interaction with a counselor, more frequent intended usage, more frequent updates and more extensive employment of dialogue support significantly predicted better adherence. Using intervention characteristics and persuasive technology elements, a substantial amount of variance in adherence can be explained. Although there are differences between health care areas on intervention characteristics, health care area per se does not predict adherence. Rather, the differences in technology and interaction predict adherence. The results of this study can be used to make an informed decision about how to design a web-based intervention to which patients are more likely to adhere.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor</pub><pmid>23151820</pmid><doi>10.2196/jmir.2104</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1438-8871
ispartof Journal of medical Internet research, 2012-11, Vol.14 (6), p.e152-e152
issn 1438-8871
1439-4456
1438-8871
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7da6eaf15fa34ca3a36f7fb4ff961345
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Publicly Available Content Database; Library & Information Science Collection; ProQuest - social science premium collection; PubMed Central
subjects Adherence
Computer based
Computer mediated communication
Employment
Feedback
Guideline Adherence
Health Behavior
Health care
Health promotion
Human-computer interaction
Humans
Information Storage and Retrieval
Internet
Intervention
Interventions
Literature reviews
Medicine
Multimedia
Original Paper
Persuasion
Persuasive Communication
Regression analysis
Social support
Systematic review
Systems design
Technology
User behaviour
Web site design
title Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T10%3A08%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Persuasive%20system%20design%20does%20matter:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20adherence%20to%20web-based%20interventions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20Internet%20research&rft.au=Kelders,%20Saskia%20M&rft.date=2012-11-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e152&rft.epage=e152&rft.pages=e152-e152&rft.issn=1438-8871&rft.eissn=1438-8871&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/jmir.2104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1171877749%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c575t-d1cb0aa19bf80aef9165ff5c1dfa8065793c66740d8b5c0073c2d592ec2a33193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2513276535&rft_id=info:pmid/23151820&rfr_iscdi=true