Loading…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy: A systematic review

Seasonal influenza vaccination is clinically important and reduces hospitalization costs for pregnant women. However, is it also a cost-effective intervention? We conducted a systematic search of Medline (via PUBMED), EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases. We included any economic evaluation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Travel medicine and infectious disease 2023-09, Vol.55, p.102632-102632, Article 102632
Main Authors: Ostad-Ahmadi, Zakieh, Boccalini, Sara, Daemi, Amin, Mahboub-Ahari, Alireza
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Seasonal influenza vaccination is clinically important and reduces hospitalization costs for pregnant women. However, is it also a cost-effective intervention? We conducted a systematic search of Medline (via PUBMED), EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases. We included any economic evaluation studies that reported Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios for vaccinating pregnant women against influenza. Out of 927 potentially eligible articles, only 14 full texts met our inclusion criteria. In almost all studies, vaccinating pregnant women was a cost-effective and cost-saving strategy. In one study, it was not cost-effective when the researchers used costs and probabilities related to other groups (healthy adults) due to the lack of data for pregnant women. The main factors influencing the cost-effectiveness of the studies were vaccine efficacy and vaccination cost. Influenza vaccination of pregnant women is a cost-effective intervention. More studies on the cost-effectiveness of this intervention in underdeveloped countries are needed. pregnancy, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-benefit, influenza vaccine, women, economic evaluation.
ISSN:1477-8939
1873-0442
DOI:10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102632