Loading…

To evaluate the effect of anodized dental implant surface on cumulative implant survival and success. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: There have been certain apprehensions regarding the use of surface-modified dental implants due to peri-implant infection and crestal bone loss over the years. Thus, this review aims to evaluate the long-term effect of anodized implant surface on cumulative implant survival (CSR) and suc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 2022-11, Vol.26 (6), p.525-532
Main Authors: Husain, Firasat, Gupta, Shipra, Sood, Shaveta, Bhaskar, Nandini, Jain, Ashish
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523e-767734a044e28c2712aba5ef1c2a3a21f012a9f0c9fb02c2e5d2344d9326488b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523e-767734a044e28c2712aba5ef1c2a3a21f012a9f0c9fb02c2e5d2344d9326488b3
container_end_page 532
container_issue 6
container_start_page 525
container_title Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
container_volume 26
creator Husain, Firasat
Gupta, Shipra
Sood, Shaveta
Bhaskar, Nandini
Jain, Ashish
description Background: There have been certain apprehensions regarding the use of surface-modified dental implants due to peri-implant infection and crestal bone loss over the years. Thus, this review aims to evaluate the long-term effect of anodized implant surface on cumulative implant survival (CSR) and success rates in relation to marginal bone loss (MBL). Materials and Methods: Systematic electronic search was done using two databases, PubMed and Embase to assess the potentially relevant records from January 2008 to October 2019. Publications reporting cumulative survival and success rates with anodized dental implants were identified. Screening for duplicate articles and extraction of data was carried out to formulate evidence tables. Meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Results: Out of 217 observational clinical studies, 8 studies were selected based on predefined selection criteria. The summary estimate for the included studies for CSR was reported as 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96; 0.99). The heterogeneity (I2 = 37.3%) among these studies was found to be statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.1314). The mean values of MBL after the implant insertion were 0.84 mm at 0-1 year and 1.05mm by the end of follow-up period. This data were provided by five studies only. The mean difference of the analyzed studies came out to be 0.49 mm with a 95% CI (−0.22; 1.19). The heterogeneity (I2 = 97%) for these studies was statistically significant with P < 0.01. Conclusion: The anodized dental implants have demonstrated long-term survival and success rates in terms of clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/jisp.jisp_797_20
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f15cc93272b49f1a807159365c0d366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A728923926</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7f15cc93272b49f1a807159365c0d366</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A728923926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523e-767734a044e28c2712aba5ef1c2a3a21f012a9f0c9fb02c2e5d2344d9326488b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9k11v0zAUhiMEYmNwzxWyhIS4afFHXMc3SNU0YNIkbobEneU6x607Jy5x0qr8Bf40p-02tQhQpHwcP--b4zcnRfGa0XHJqPiwDHk13p2M0spw-qQ4p1rJEZMVfbq_5yPGy-9nxYucl5ROykpMnhdnYiIrriU_L37dJgJrGwfbA-kXQMB7cD1Jntg21eEn1KSGtreRhGYVbduTPHTeOiCpJW5ohmj7sIbj1XVAQ5TX-OAc5DwmU5K3uYcGWUc6WAfY7IEGejuyrY3bHPLL4pm3McOr--tF8e3T1e3ll9HN18_Xl9ObkZNcwEhNlBKlpWUJvHJcMW5nVoJnjlthOfMUK9pTp_2McsdB1lyUZa0Fx_1XM3FRXB9862SXZtWFxnZbk2ww-0Lq5sZ22GgEozyTzqFS8VmpPbMVVUxqzM_RWkwm6PXx4LUaZg3UDqPqbDwxPV1pw8LM09popYXmDA3e3xt06ccAuTdNyA4ihglpyIYrqbXE71Uh-vYPdJmGDsPLRjBRCkEZJvMfiqtSKkT1kdfc4jZD6xN253avNlPFK82xud3uxn-h8KihCS614APWTwTvjgQLsLFf5BSHPqQ2n4L0ALou5dyBf4yMUbObbbMf66PZRsmb46gfBQ_DjMDVAdik2EOX7-Kwgc4ge9emzT-NjeTS3Cbz8BuI3yoKDyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2745731398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To evaluate the effect of anodized dental implant surface on cumulative implant survival and success. A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Husain, Firasat ; Gupta, Shipra ; Sood, Shaveta ; Bhaskar, Nandini ; Jain, Ashish</creator><creatorcontrib>Husain, Firasat ; Gupta, Shipra ; Sood, Shaveta ; Bhaskar, Nandini ; Jain, Ashish</creatorcontrib><description>Background: There have been certain apprehensions regarding the use of surface-modified dental implants due to peri-implant infection and crestal bone loss over the years. Thus, this review aims to evaluate the long-term effect of anodized implant surface on cumulative implant survival (CSR) and success rates in relation to marginal bone loss (MBL). Materials and Methods: Systematic electronic search was done using two databases, PubMed and Embase to assess the potentially relevant records from January 2008 to October 2019. Publications reporting cumulative survival and success rates with anodized dental implants were identified. Screening for duplicate articles and extraction of data was carried out to formulate evidence tables. Meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Results: Out of 217 observational clinical studies, 8 studies were selected based on predefined selection criteria. The summary estimate for the included studies for CSR was reported as 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96; 0.99). The heterogeneity (I2 = 37.3%) among these studies was found to be statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.1314). The mean values of MBL after the implant insertion were 0.84 mm at 0-1 year and 1.05mm by the end of follow-up period. This data were provided by five studies only. The mean difference of the analyzed studies came out to be 0.49 mm with a 95% CI (−0.22; 1.19). The heterogeneity (I2 = 97%) for these studies was statistically significant with P &lt; 0.01. Conclusion: The anodized dental implants have demonstrated long-term survival and success rates in terms of clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-124X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-1580</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_797_20</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36582952</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bone implants ; Bone loss ; Database searching ; Dental implants ; Dental prosthetics ; immediate loading ; Implant dentures ; Internet/Web search services ; Long bone ; long term ; marginal bone level ; Meta-analysis ; Online searching ; oxidized surface ; Review ; Statistical analysis ; Success ; survival rate</subject><ispartof>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 2022-11, Vol.26 (6), p.525-532</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Indian Society of Periodontology.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2022 Indian Society of Periodontology 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523e-767734a044e28c2712aba5ef1c2a3a21f012a9f0c9fb02c2e5d2344d9326488b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523e-767734a044e28c2712aba5ef1c2a3a21f012a9f0c9fb02c2e5d2344d9326488b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793921/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2745731398?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36582952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Husain, Firasat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Shipra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sood, Shaveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhaskar, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Ashish</creatorcontrib><title>To evaluate the effect of anodized dental implant surface on cumulative implant survival and success. A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology</title><addtitle>J Indian Soc Periodontol</addtitle><description>Background: There have been certain apprehensions regarding the use of surface-modified dental implants due to peri-implant infection and crestal bone loss over the years. Thus, this review aims to evaluate the long-term effect of anodized implant surface on cumulative implant survival (CSR) and success rates in relation to marginal bone loss (MBL). Materials and Methods: Systematic electronic search was done using two databases, PubMed and Embase to assess the potentially relevant records from January 2008 to October 2019. Publications reporting cumulative survival and success rates with anodized dental implants were identified. Screening for duplicate articles and extraction of data was carried out to formulate evidence tables. Meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Results: Out of 217 observational clinical studies, 8 studies were selected based on predefined selection criteria. The summary estimate for the included studies for CSR was reported as 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96; 0.99). The heterogeneity (I2 = 37.3%) among these studies was found to be statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.1314). The mean values of MBL after the implant insertion were 0.84 mm at 0-1 year and 1.05mm by the end of follow-up period. This data were provided by five studies only. The mean difference of the analyzed studies came out to be 0.49 mm with a 95% CI (−0.22; 1.19). The heterogeneity (I2 = 97%) for these studies was statistically significant with P &lt; 0.01. Conclusion: The anodized dental implants have demonstrated long-term survival and success rates in terms of clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>Bone loss</subject><subject>Database searching</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>immediate loading</subject><subject>Implant dentures</subject><subject>Internet/Web search services</subject><subject>Long bone</subject><subject>long term</subject><subject>marginal bone level</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Online searching</subject><subject>oxidized surface</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>survival rate</subject><issn>0972-124X</issn><issn>0975-1580</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9k11v0zAUhiMEYmNwzxWyhIS4afFHXMc3SNU0YNIkbobEneU6x607Jy5x0qr8Bf40p-02tQhQpHwcP--b4zcnRfGa0XHJqPiwDHk13p2M0spw-qQ4p1rJEZMVfbq_5yPGy-9nxYucl5ROykpMnhdnYiIrriU_L37dJgJrGwfbA-kXQMB7cD1Jntg21eEn1KSGtreRhGYVbduTPHTeOiCpJW5ohmj7sIbj1XVAQ5TX-OAc5DwmU5K3uYcGWUc6WAfY7IEGejuyrY3bHPLL4pm3McOr--tF8e3T1e3ll9HN18_Xl9ObkZNcwEhNlBKlpWUJvHJcMW5nVoJnjlthOfMUK9pTp_2McsdB1lyUZa0Fx_1XM3FRXB9862SXZtWFxnZbk2ww-0Lq5sZ22GgEozyTzqFS8VmpPbMVVUxqzM_RWkwm6PXx4LUaZg3UDqPqbDwxPV1pw8LM09popYXmDA3e3xt06ccAuTdNyA4ihglpyIYrqbXE71Uh-vYPdJmGDsPLRjBRCkEZJvMfiqtSKkT1kdfc4jZD6xN253avNlPFK82xud3uxn-h8KihCS614APWTwTvjgQLsLFf5BSHPqQ2n4L0ALou5dyBf4yMUbObbbMf66PZRsmb46gfBQ_DjMDVAdik2EOX7-Kwgc4ge9emzT-NjeTS3Cbz8BuI3yoKDyQ</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Husain, Firasat</creator><creator>Gupta, Shipra</creator><creator>Sood, Shaveta</creator><creator>Bhaskar, Nandini</creator><creator>Jain, Ashish</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>To evaluate the effect of anodized dental implant surface on cumulative implant survival and success. A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Husain, Firasat ; Gupta, Shipra ; Sood, Shaveta ; Bhaskar, Nandini ; Jain, Ashish</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523e-767734a044e28c2712aba5ef1c2a3a21f012a9f0c9fb02c2e5d2344d9326488b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>Bone loss</topic><topic>Database searching</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>immediate loading</topic><topic>Implant dentures</topic><topic>Internet/Web search services</topic><topic>Long bone</topic><topic>long term</topic><topic>marginal bone level</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Online searching</topic><topic>oxidized surface</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>survival rate</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Husain, Firasat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Shipra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sood, Shaveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhaskar, Nandini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Ashish</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Husain, Firasat</au><au>Gupta, Shipra</au><au>Sood, Shaveta</au><au>Bhaskar, Nandini</au><au>Jain, Ashish</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To evaluate the effect of anodized dental implant surface on cumulative implant survival and success. A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology</jtitle><addtitle>J Indian Soc Periodontol</addtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>525</spage><epage>532</epage><pages>525-532</pages><issn>0972-124X</issn><eissn>0975-1580</eissn><abstract>Background: There have been certain apprehensions regarding the use of surface-modified dental implants due to peri-implant infection and crestal bone loss over the years. Thus, this review aims to evaluate the long-term effect of anodized implant surface on cumulative implant survival (CSR) and success rates in relation to marginal bone loss (MBL). Materials and Methods: Systematic electronic search was done using two databases, PubMed and Embase to assess the potentially relevant records from January 2008 to October 2019. Publications reporting cumulative survival and success rates with anodized dental implants were identified. Screening for duplicate articles and extraction of data was carried out to formulate evidence tables. Meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Results: Out of 217 observational clinical studies, 8 studies were selected based on predefined selection criteria. The summary estimate for the included studies for CSR was reported as 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96; 0.99). The heterogeneity (I2 = 37.3%) among these studies was found to be statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.1314). The mean values of MBL after the implant insertion were 0.84 mm at 0-1 year and 1.05mm by the end of follow-up period. This data were provided by five studies only. The mean difference of the analyzed studies came out to be 0.49 mm with a 95% CI (−0.22; 1.19). The heterogeneity (I2 = 97%) for these studies was statistically significant with P &lt; 0.01. Conclusion: The anodized dental implants have demonstrated long-term survival and success rates in terms of clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>36582952</pmid><doi>10.4103/jisp.jisp_797_20</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-124X
ispartof Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 2022-11, Vol.26 (6), p.525-532
issn 0972-124X
0975-1580
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f15cc93272b49f1a807159365c0d366
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Bone implants
Bone loss
Database searching
Dental implants
Dental prosthetics
immediate loading
Implant dentures
Internet/Web search services
Long bone
long term
marginal bone level
Meta-analysis
Online searching
oxidized surface
Review
Statistical analysis
Success
survival rate
title To evaluate the effect of anodized dental implant surface on cumulative implant survival and success. A systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A47%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20evaluate%20the%20effect%20of%20anodized%20dental%20implant%20surface%20on%20cumulative%20implant%20survival%20and%20success.%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Indian%20Society%20of%20Periodontology&rft.au=Husain,%20Firasat&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=525&rft.epage=532&rft.pages=525-532&rft.issn=0972-124X&rft.eissn=0975-1580&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jisp.jisp_797_20&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA728923926%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523e-767734a044e28c2712aba5ef1c2a3a21f012a9f0c9fb02c2e5d2344d9326488b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2745731398&rft_id=info:pmid/36582952&rft_galeid=A728923926&rfr_iscdi=true