Loading…
“We need more data”! The politics of scientific information for water governance in the context of hydraulic fracturing
Proposed and actual developments of hydraulic fracturing, as a high-volume water user, have proven contentious in recent years. However, one point of agreement has emerged amongst all actors with regards to water use and hydraulic fracturing: we need more data. This consensus fits with a longstandin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water alternatives 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.142-162 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 162 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 142 |
container_title | Water alternatives |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Michele-Lee, Moore Karena Shaw and Heather Castleden |
description | Proposed and actual developments of hydraulic fracturing, as a high-volume water user, have proven contentious in recent years. However, one point of agreement has emerged amongst all actors with regards to water use and hydraulic fracturing: we need more data. This consensus fits with a longstanding reification of the role of data in water governance, and yet we argue it hides a politically contested terrain. Based on a literature review, an empirical Delphi study and a workshop with a diverse array of participants from across Canada, we explore the data needs related to water governance and hydraulic fracturing. We then investigate three areas of deficiency that point to a lack of trust and oversight as well as the exclusion of community and Indigenous knowledge. We argue that in an era of neoliberal approaches to water governance, issues of trust, accountability and transparency all link back to a diminished role for data management within existing water governance arrangements. The challenge is that simply collecting more data will not help decision-makers navigate the complexity of water governance. Our findings suggest a growing call by participants for greater engagement by governments in data collection and knowledge management, new funding mechanisms for data collection and re-thinking how and what to monitor if including multiple ways of knowing and values. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f643228da4c4445a7a1934f0103c956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7f643228da4c4445a7a1934f0103c956</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2002208210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d249t-c7c84bdab6f6095eaff26fcf34241b33c4720a689bcde9177d23471398c980f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj81KAzEUhQdRsFbfIeK6kEkyyWQpxZ9CwU3F5XAnP23KNKmZjFrc-CD6cn0So3Xh6h4u5_vgHBWjUvJqgktRHf_Lp8VZ368x5lzielS87z8-nwzyxmi0CdEgDQn2H1-XaLEyaBs6l5zqUbCoV8745KxTyHkb4gaSCx7lhF4hmYiW4cVED16ZXEAp4yr4ZN7SD73a6QhDl2EbQaUhOr88L04sdL25-Lvj4vH2ZjG9n8wf7mbT6_lEEybTRAlVs1ZDyy3HsjJgLeFWWcoIK1tKFRMEA69lq7SRpRCaUCZKKmsla2wxHRezg1cHWDfb6DYQd00A1_w-Qlw2EPPMzjTCckYJqTUwxRirQEApKbO4xFTJimfX1cG1jeF5MH1q1mHIq7u-IRgTgmuSq99TdnXj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002208210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“We need more data”! The politics of scientific information for water governance in the context of hydraulic fracturing</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Michele-Lee, Moore ; Karena Shaw and Heather Castleden</creator><creatorcontrib>Michele-Lee, Moore ; Karena Shaw and Heather Castleden</creatorcontrib><description>Proposed and actual developments of hydraulic fracturing, as a high-volume water user, have proven contentious in recent years. However, one point of agreement has emerged amongst all actors with regards to water use and hydraulic fracturing: we need more data. This consensus fits with a longstanding reification of the role of data in water governance, and yet we argue it hides a politically contested terrain. Based on a literature review, an empirical Delphi study and a workshop with a diverse array of participants from across Canada, we explore the data needs related to water governance and hydraulic fracturing. We then investigate three areas of deficiency that point to a lack of trust and oversight as well as the exclusion of community and Indigenous knowledge. We argue that in an era of neoliberal approaches to water governance, issues of trust, accountability and transparency all link back to a diminished role for data management within existing water governance arrangements. The challenge is that simply collecting more data will not help decision-makers navigate the complexity of water governance. Our findings suggest a growing call by participants for greater engagement by governments in data collection and knowledge management, new funding mechanisms for data collection and re-thinking how and what to monitor if including multiple ways of knowing and values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1965-0175</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1965-0175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Montpellier: Water Alternatives Association</publisher><subject>accountability ; Canada ; Data ; Data collection ; Data management ; Governance ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Indigenous knowledge ; Indigenous peoples ; Indigenous Peoples' knowledge ; Knowledge management ; Literature reviews ; neoliberalism ; science policy ; Transparency (optical) ; Two-Eyed Seeing ; Water consumption ; Water governance ; Water use</subject><ispartof>Water alternatives, 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.142-162</ispartof><rights>Copyright Water Alternatives Association Feb 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2002208210?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michele-Lee, Moore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karena Shaw and Heather Castleden</creatorcontrib><title>“We need more data”! The politics of scientific information for water governance in the context of hydraulic fracturing</title><title>Water alternatives</title><description>Proposed and actual developments of hydraulic fracturing, as a high-volume water user, have proven contentious in recent years. However, one point of agreement has emerged amongst all actors with regards to water use and hydraulic fracturing: we need more data. This consensus fits with a longstanding reification of the role of data in water governance, and yet we argue it hides a politically contested terrain. Based on a literature review, an empirical Delphi study and a workshop with a diverse array of participants from across Canada, we explore the data needs related to water governance and hydraulic fracturing. We then investigate three areas of deficiency that point to a lack of trust and oversight as well as the exclusion of community and Indigenous knowledge. We argue that in an era of neoliberal approaches to water governance, issues of trust, accountability and transparency all link back to a diminished role for data management within existing water governance arrangements. The challenge is that simply collecting more data will not help decision-makers navigate the complexity of water governance. Our findings suggest a growing call by participants for greater engagement by governments in data collection and knowledge management, new funding mechanisms for data collection and re-thinking how and what to monitor if including multiple ways of knowing and values.</description><subject>accountability</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data management</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Indigenous knowledge</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Indigenous Peoples' knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>neoliberalism</subject><subject>science policy</subject><subject>Transparency (optical)</subject><subject>Two-Eyed Seeing</subject><subject>Water consumption</subject><subject>Water governance</subject><subject>Water use</subject><issn>1965-0175</issn><issn>1965-0175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj81KAzEUhQdRsFbfIeK6kEkyyWQpxZ9CwU3F5XAnP23KNKmZjFrc-CD6cn0So3Xh6h4u5_vgHBWjUvJqgktRHf_Lp8VZ368x5lzielS87z8-nwzyxmi0CdEgDQn2H1-XaLEyaBs6l5zqUbCoV8745KxTyHkb4gaSCx7lhF4hmYiW4cVED16ZXEAp4yr4ZN7SD73a6QhDl2EbQaUhOr88L04sdL25-Lvj4vH2ZjG9n8wf7mbT6_lEEybTRAlVs1ZDyy3HsjJgLeFWWcoIK1tKFRMEA69lq7SRpRCaUCZKKmsla2wxHRezg1cHWDfb6DYQd00A1_w-Qlw2EPPMzjTCckYJqTUwxRirQEApKbO4xFTJimfX1cG1jeF5MH1q1mHIq7u-IRgTgmuSq99TdnXj</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Michele-Lee, Moore</creator><creator>Karena Shaw and Heather Castleden</creator><general>Water Alternatives Association</general><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>“We need more data”! The politics of scientific information for water governance in the context of hydraulic fracturing</title><author>Michele-Lee, Moore ; Karena Shaw and Heather Castleden</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d249t-c7c84bdab6f6095eaff26fcf34241b33c4720a689bcde9177d23471398c980f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>accountability</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data management</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Indigenous knowledge</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Indigenous Peoples' knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>neoliberalism</topic><topic>science policy</topic><topic>Transparency (optical)</topic><topic>Two-Eyed Seeing</topic><topic>Water consumption</topic><topic>Water governance</topic><topic>Water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michele-Lee, Moore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karena Shaw and Heather Castleden</creatorcontrib><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Water alternatives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michele-Lee, Moore</au><au>Karena Shaw and Heather Castleden</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“We need more data”! The politics of scientific information for water governance in the context of hydraulic fracturing</atitle><jtitle>Water alternatives</jtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>142-162</pages><issn>1965-0175</issn><eissn>1965-0175</eissn><abstract>Proposed and actual developments of hydraulic fracturing, as a high-volume water user, have proven contentious in recent years. However, one point of agreement has emerged amongst all actors with regards to water use and hydraulic fracturing: we need more data. This consensus fits with a longstanding reification of the role of data in water governance, and yet we argue it hides a politically contested terrain. Based on a literature review, an empirical Delphi study and a workshop with a diverse array of participants from across Canada, we explore the data needs related to water governance and hydraulic fracturing. We then investigate three areas of deficiency that point to a lack of trust and oversight as well as the exclusion of community and Indigenous knowledge. We argue that in an era of neoliberal approaches to water governance, issues of trust, accountability and transparency all link back to a diminished role for data management within existing water governance arrangements. The challenge is that simply collecting more data will not help decision-makers navigate the complexity of water governance. Our findings suggest a growing call by participants for greater engagement by governments in data collection and knowledge management, new funding mechanisms for data collection and re-thinking how and what to monitor if including multiple ways of knowing and values.</abstract><cop>Montpellier</cop><pub>Water Alternatives Association</pub><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1965-0175 |
ispartof | Water alternatives, 2018-02, Vol.11 (1), p.142-162 |
issn | 1965-0175 1965-0175 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f643228da4c4445a7a1934f0103c956 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | accountability Canada Data Data collection Data management Governance Hydraulic fracturing Indigenous knowledge Indigenous peoples Indigenous Peoples' knowledge Knowledge management Literature reviews neoliberalism science policy Transparency (optical) Two-Eyed Seeing Water consumption Water governance Water use |
title | “We need more data”! The politics of scientific information for water governance in the context of hydraulic fracturing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A04%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CWe%20need%20more%20data%E2%80%9D!%20The%20politics%20of%20scientific%20information%20for%20water%20governance%20in%20the%20context%20of%20hydraulic%20fracturing&rft.jtitle=Water%20alternatives&rft.au=Michele-Lee,%20Moore&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=142-162&rft.issn=1965-0175&rft.eissn=1965-0175&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2002208210%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d249t-c7c84bdab6f6095eaff26fcf34241b33c4720a689bcde9177d23471398c980f03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002208210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |