Loading…

Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making

Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies (Basel) 2022-08, Vol.15 (16), p.5776
Main Authors: Saini, Gurtej Singh, Erge, Oney, Ashok, Pradeepkumar, van Oort, Eric
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143
container_end_page
container_issue 16
container_start_page 5776
container_title Energies (Basel)
container_volume 15
creator Saini, Gurtej Singh
Erge, Oney
Ashok, Pradeepkumar
van Oort, Eric
description Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a degree of bias, which can result in reactive rather than proactive decisions. This can lead from minor operational inefficiencies all the way to catastrophic health and safety issues. This paper details the steps in structuring unbiased purpose-built sequential decision-making systems. Setting up such systems entails representing the operation as a Markov decision process (MDP). This requires explicitly defining states and action values, defining goal states, building a digital twin to model the process, and appropriately shaping reward functions to measure feedback. The digital twin, in conjunction with the reward function, is utilized for simulating and quantifying the different action sequences. A finite-horizon sequential decision-making system, with discrete state and action space, was set up to advise on hole cleaning during well construction. The state was quantified by the cuttings bed height and the equivalent circulation density values, and the action set was defined using a combination of controllable drilling parameters (including mud density and rheology, drillstring rotation speed, etc.). A non-sparse normalized reward structure was formulated as a function of the state and action values. Hydraulics, cuttings transport, and rig state detection models were integrated to build the hole cleaning digital twin. This system was then used for performance tracking and scenario simulations (with each scenario defined as a finite-horizon action sequence) on real-world oil wells. The different scenarios were compared by monitoring state–action transitions and the evolution of the reward with actions. This paper presents a novel method for setting up well construction operations as long-term finite-horizon sequential decision-making systems, and defines a way to quantify and compare different scenarios. The proper construction of such systems is a crucial step towards automating intelligent decision-making.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/en15165776
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f98418c26754a6bbe63ec8eeda0d67b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A745598912</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7f98418c26754a6bbe63ec8eeda0d67b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A745598912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1r3DAQhk1poCHNJb_A0FvBqb4lH5dN0wRSWkhCjmIsjTfaeqVUlg_tr68Sl7TSYcTDOw8jpmnOKDnnvCefMFJJldRavWmOad-rjhLN3_73fteczvOe1MM55ZwfN8MDTlO7TXEueXElpNhu1vJ9ghhD3LUQfbtZSjrACy-POS27x_YyxFCwu0o5_K74Fn8uGEuAqb1AF-Ya7b7Cjyp43xyNMM14-reeNPeXn--2V93Nty_X281N5wQhpZNCM-aE1GIQho7aC-96oj1nXiJBRM0NNwiGAOdkGCqSimsFg2fKU8FPmuvV6xPs7VMOB8i_bIJgX0DKOwu5BDeh1WNvBDWOKS0FqGFAxdEZRA_EKz1U14fV9ZRT_ddc7D4tOdbxLdNEMcKMYDV1vqZ2UKUhjqlkcPV6PASXIo6h8o0WUvamp88NH9cGl9M8Zxxfx6TEPu_Q_tsh_wOJK44x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2706202842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Saini, Gurtej Singh ; Erge, Oney ; Ashok, Pradeepkumar ; van Oort, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Saini, Gurtej Singh ; Erge, Oney ; Ashok, Pradeepkumar ; van Oort, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a degree of bias, which can result in reactive rather than proactive decisions. This can lead from minor operational inefficiencies all the way to catastrophic health and safety issues. This paper details the steps in structuring unbiased purpose-built sequential decision-making systems. Setting up such systems entails representing the operation as a Markov decision process (MDP). This requires explicitly defining states and action values, defining goal states, building a digital twin to model the process, and appropriately shaping reward functions to measure feedback. The digital twin, in conjunction with the reward function, is utilized for simulating and quantifying the different action sequences. A finite-horizon sequential decision-making system, with discrete state and action space, was set up to advise on hole cleaning during well construction. The state was quantified by the cuttings bed height and the equivalent circulation density values, and the action set was defined using a combination of controllable drilling parameters (including mud density and rheology, drillstring rotation speed, etc.). A non-sparse normalized reward structure was formulated as a function of the state and action values. Hydraulics, cuttings transport, and rig state detection models were integrated to build the hole cleaning digital twin. This system was then used for performance tracking and scenario simulations (with each scenario defined as a finite-horizon action sequence) on real-world oil wells. The different scenarios were compared by monitoring state–action transitions and the evolution of the reward with actions. This paper presents a novel method for setting up well construction operations as long-term finite-horizon sequential decision-making systems, and defines a way to quantify and compare different scenarios. The proper construction of such systems is a crucial step towards automating intelligent decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en15165776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis ; Automation ; Cleaning ; Construction ; Construction accidents &amp; safety ; Decision making ; Design and construction ; digital twinning ; Digital twins ; Drilling ; Drilling muds ; Drillstrings ; Feedback ; Fluid flow ; hole cleaning ; Horizon ; Hydraulics ; Markov decision process ; Markov processes ; Mechanical properties ; Methods ; Planning ; Reinforcement ; reward shaping ; Rheological properties ; Rheology ; Sequences ; sequential decision-making ; Simulation ; well construction ; Wells</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2022-08, Vol.15 (16), p.5776</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7851-2474</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2706202842/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2706202842?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saini, Gurtej Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erge, Oney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashok, Pradeepkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oort, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a degree of bias, which can result in reactive rather than proactive decisions. This can lead from minor operational inefficiencies all the way to catastrophic health and safety issues. This paper details the steps in structuring unbiased purpose-built sequential decision-making systems. Setting up such systems entails representing the operation as a Markov decision process (MDP). This requires explicitly defining states and action values, defining goal states, building a digital twin to model the process, and appropriately shaping reward functions to measure feedback. The digital twin, in conjunction with the reward function, is utilized for simulating and quantifying the different action sequences. A finite-horizon sequential decision-making system, with discrete state and action space, was set up to advise on hole cleaning during well construction. The state was quantified by the cuttings bed height and the equivalent circulation density values, and the action set was defined using a combination of controllable drilling parameters (including mud density and rheology, drillstring rotation speed, etc.). A non-sparse normalized reward structure was formulated as a function of the state and action values. Hydraulics, cuttings transport, and rig state detection models were integrated to build the hole cleaning digital twin. This system was then used for performance tracking and scenario simulations (with each scenario defined as a finite-horizon action sequence) on real-world oil wells. The different scenarios were compared by monitoring state–action transitions and the evolution of the reward with actions. This paper presents a novel method for setting up well construction operations as long-term finite-horizon sequential decision-making systems, and defines a way to quantify and compare different scenarios. The proper construction of such systems is a crucial step towards automating intelligent decision-making.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction accidents &amp; safety</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design and construction</subject><subject>digital twinning</subject><subject>Digital twins</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Drilling muds</subject><subject>Drillstrings</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>hole cleaning</subject><subject>Horizon</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Markov decision process</subject><subject>Markov processes</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>reward shaping</subject><subject>Rheological properties</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>sequential decision-making</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>well construction</subject><subject>Wells</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1r3DAQhk1poCHNJb_A0FvBqb4lH5dN0wRSWkhCjmIsjTfaeqVUlg_tr68Sl7TSYcTDOw8jpmnOKDnnvCefMFJJldRavWmOad-rjhLN3_73fteczvOe1MM55ZwfN8MDTlO7TXEueXElpNhu1vJ9ghhD3LUQfbtZSjrACy-POS27x_YyxFCwu0o5_K74Fn8uGEuAqb1AF-Ya7b7Cjyp43xyNMM14-reeNPeXn--2V93Nty_X281N5wQhpZNCM-aE1GIQho7aC-96oj1nXiJBRM0NNwiGAOdkGCqSimsFg2fKU8FPmuvV6xPs7VMOB8i_bIJgX0DKOwu5BDeh1WNvBDWOKS0FqGFAxdEZRA_EKz1U14fV9ZRT_ddc7D4tOdbxLdNEMcKMYDV1vqZ2UKUhjqlkcPV6PASXIo6h8o0WUvamp88NH9cGl9M8Zxxfx6TEPu_Q_tsh_wOJK44x</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Saini, Gurtej Singh</creator><creator>Erge, Oney</creator><creator>Ashok, Pradeepkumar</creator><creator>van Oort, Eric</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-2474</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making</title><author>Saini, Gurtej Singh ; Erge, Oney ; Ashok, Pradeepkumar ; van Oort, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction accidents &amp; safety</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design and construction</topic><topic>digital twinning</topic><topic>Digital twins</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Drilling muds</topic><topic>Drillstrings</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>hole cleaning</topic><topic>Horizon</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Markov decision process</topic><topic>Markov processes</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>reward shaping</topic><topic>Rheological properties</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>sequential decision-making</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>well construction</topic><topic>Wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saini, Gurtej Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erge, Oney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashok, Pradeepkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oort, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saini, Gurtej Singh</au><au>Erge, Oney</au><au>Ashok, Pradeepkumar</au><au>van Oort, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>5776</spage><pages>5776-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a degree of bias, which can result in reactive rather than proactive decisions. This can lead from minor operational inefficiencies all the way to catastrophic health and safety issues. This paper details the steps in structuring unbiased purpose-built sequential decision-making systems. Setting up such systems entails representing the operation as a Markov decision process (MDP). This requires explicitly defining states and action values, defining goal states, building a digital twin to model the process, and appropriately shaping reward functions to measure feedback. The digital twin, in conjunction with the reward function, is utilized for simulating and quantifying the different action sequences. A finite-horizon sequential decision-making system, with discrete state and action space, was set up to advise on hole cleaning during well construction. The state was quantified by the cuttings bed height and the equivalent circulation density values, and the action set was defined using a combination of controllable drilling parameters (including mud density and rheology, drillstring rotation speed, etc.). A non-sparse normalized reward structure was formulated as a function of the state and action values. Hydraulics, cuttings transport, and rig state detection models were integrated to build the hole cleaning digital twin. This system was then used for performance tracking and scenario simulations (with each scenario defined as a finite-horizon action sequence) on real-world oil wells. The different scenarios were compared by monitoring state–action transitions and the evolution of the reward with actions. This paper presents a novel method for setting up well construction operations as long-term finite-horizon sequential decision-making systems, and defines a way to quantify and compare different scenarios. The proper construction of such systems is a crucial step towards automating intelligent decision-making.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en15165776</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-2474</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1073
ispartof Energies (Basel), 2022-08, Vol.15 (16), p.5776
issn 1996-1073
1996-1073
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f98418c26754a6bbe63ec8eeda0d67b
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Algorithms
Analysis
Automation
Cleaning
Construction
Construction accidents & safety
Decision making
Design and construction
digital twinning
Digital twins
Drilling
Drilling muds
Drillstrings
Feedback
Fluid flow
hole cleaning
Horizon
Hydraulics
Markov decision process
Markov processes
Mechanical properties
Methods
Planning
Reinforcement
reward shaping
Rheological properties
Rheology
Sequences
sequential decision-making
Simulation
well construction
Wells
title Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Well%20Construction%20Action%20Planning%20and%20Automation%20through%20Finite-Horizon%20Sequential%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Saini,%20Gurtej%20Singh&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=5776&rft.pages=5776-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en15165776&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA745598912%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2706202842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A745598912&rfr_iscdi=true