Loading…
Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making
Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energies (Basel) 2022-08, Vol.15 (16), p.5776 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 5776 |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Saini, Gurtej Singh Erge, Oney Ashok, Pradeepkumar van Oort, Eric |
description | Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a degree of bias, which can result in reactive rather than proactive decisions. This can lead from minor operational inefficiencies all the way to catastrophic health and safety issues. This paper details the steps in structuring unbiased purpose-built sequential decision-making systems. Setting up such systems entails representing the operation as a Markov decision process (MDP). This requires explicitly defining states and action values, defining goal states, building a digital twin to model the process, and appropriately shaping reward functions to measure feedback. The digital twin, in conjunction with the reward function, is utilized for simulating and quantifying the different action sequences. A finite-horizon sequential decision-making system, with discrete state and action space, was set up to advise on hole cleaning during well construction. The state was quantified by the cuttings bed height and the equivalent circulation density values, and the action set was defined using a combination of controllable drilling parameters (including mud density and rheology, drillstring rotation speed, etc.). A non-sparse normalized reward structure was formulated as a function of the state and action values. Hydraulics, cuttings transport, and rig state detection models were integrated to build the hole cleaning digital twin. This system was then used for performance tracking and scenario simulations (with each scenario defined as a finite-horizon action sequence) on real-world oil wells. The different scenarios were compared by monitoring state–action transitions and the evolution of the reward with actions. This paper presents a novel method for setting up well construction operations as long-term finite-horizon sequential decision-making systems, and defines a way to quantify and compare different scenarios. The proper construction of such systems is a crucial step towards automating intelligent decision-making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en15165776 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f98418c26754a6bbe63ec8eeda0d67b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A745598912</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7f98418c26754a6bbe63ec8eeda0d67b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A745598912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1r3DAQhk1poCHNJb_A0FvBqb4lH5dN0wRSWkhCjmIsjTfaeqVUlg_tr68Sl7TSYcTDOw8jpmnOKDnnvCefMFJJldRavWmOad-rjhLN3_73fteczvOe1MM55ZwfN8MDTlO7TXEueXElpNhu1vJ9ghhD3LUQfbtZSjrACy-POS27x_YyxFCwu0o5_K74Fn8uGEuAqb1AF-Ya7b7Cjyp43xyNMM14-reeNPeXn--2V93Nty_X281N5wQhpZNCM-aE1GIQho7aC-96oj1nXiJBRM0NNwiGAOdkGCqSimsFg2fKU8FPmuvV6xPs7VMOB8i_bIJgX0DKOwu5BDeh1WNvBDWOKS0FqGFAxdEZRA_EKz1U14fV9ZRT_ddc7D4tOdbxLdNEMcKMYDV1vqZ2UKUhjqlkcPV6PASXIo6h8o0WUvamp88NH9cGl9M8Zxxfx6TEPu_Q_tsh_wOJK44x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2706202842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Saini, Gurtej Singh ; Erge, Oney ; Ashok, Pradeepkumar ; van Oort, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Saini, Gurtej Singh ; Erge, Oney ; Ashok, Pradeepkumar ; van Oort, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a degree of bias, which can result in reactive rather than proactive decisions. This can lead from minor operational inefficiencies all the way to catastrophic health and safety issues. This paper details the steps in structuring unbiased purpose-built sequential decision-making systems. Setting up such systems entails representing the operation as a Markov decision process (MDP). This requires explicitly defining states and action values, defining goal states, building a digital twin to model the process, and appropriately shaping reward functions to measure feedback. The digital twin, in conjunction with the reward function, is utilized for simulating and quantifying the different action sequences. A finite-horizon sequential decision-making system, with discrete state and action space, was set up to advise on hole cleaning during well construction. The state was quantified by the cuttings bed height and the equivalent circulation density values, and the action set was defined using a combination of controllable drilling parameters (including mud density and rheology, drillstring rotation speed, etc.). A non-sparse normalized reward structure was formulated as a function of the state and action values. Hydraulics, cuttings transport, and rig state detection models were integrated to build the hole cleaning digital twin. This system was then used for performance tracking and scenario simulations (with each scenario defined as a finite-horizon action sequence) on real-world oil wells. The different scenarios were compared by monitoring state–action transitions and the evolution of the reward with actions. This paper presents a novel method for setting up well construction operations as long-term finite-horizon sequential decision-making systems, and defines a way to quantify and compare different scenarios. The proper construction of such systems is a crucial step towards automating intelligent decision-making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en15165776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analysis ; Automation ; Cleaning ; Construction ; Construction accidents & safety ; Decision making ; Design and construction ; digital twinning ; Digital twins ; Drilling ; Drilling muds ; Drillstrings ; Feedback ; Fluid flow ; hole cleaning ; Horizon ; Hydraulics ; Markov decision process ; Markov processes ; Mechanical properties ; Methods ; Planning ; Reinforcement ; reward shaping ; Rheological properties ; Rheology ; Sequences ; sequential decision-making ; Simulation ; well construction ; Wells</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2022-08, Vol.15 (16), p.5776</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7851-2474</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2706202842/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2706202842?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,74998</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saini, Gurtej Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erge, Oney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashok, Pradeepkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oort, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a degree of bias, which can result in reactive rather than proactive decisions. This can lead from minor operational inefficiencies all the way to catastrophic health and safety issues. This paper details the steps in structuring unbiased purpose-built sequential decision-making systems. Setting up such systems entails representing the operation as a Markov decision process (MDP). This requires explicitly defining states and action values, defining goal states, building a digital twin to model the process, and appropriately shaping reward functions to measure feedback. The digital twin, in conjunction with the reward function, is utilized for simulating and quantifying the different action sequences. A finite-horizon sequential decision-making system, with discrete state and action space, was set up to advise on hole cleaning during well construction. The state was quantified by the cuttings bed height and the equivalent circulation density values, and the action set was defined using a combination of controllable drilling parameters (including mud density and rheology, drillstring rotation speed, etc.). A non-sparse normalized reward structure was formulated as a function of the state and action values. Hydraulics, cuttings transport, and rig state detection models were integrated to build the hole cleaning digital twin. This system was then used for performance tracking and scenario simulations (with each scenario defined as a finite-horizon action sequence) on real-world oil wells. The different scenarios were compared by monitoring state–action transitions and the evolution of the reward with actions. This paper presents a novel method for setting up well construction operations as long-term finite-horizon sequential decision-making systems, and defines a way to quantify and compare different scenarios. The proper construction of such systems is a crucial step towards automating intelligent decision-making.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Cleaning</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction accidents & safety</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Design and construction</subject><subject>digital twinning</subject><subject>Digital twins</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Drilling muds</subject><subject>Drillstrings</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>hole cleaning</subject><subject>Horizon</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Markov decision process</subject><subject>Markov processes</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>reward shaping</subject><subject>Rheological properties</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>sequential decision-making</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>well construction</subject><subject>Wells</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1r3DAQhk1poCHNJb_A0FvBqb4lH5dN0wRSWkhCjmIsjTfaeqVUlg_tr68Sl7TSYcTDOw8jpmnOKDnnvCefMFJJldRavWmOad-rjhLN3_73fteczvOe1MM55ZwfN8MDTlO7TXEueXElpNhu1vJ9ghhD3LUQfbtZSjrACy-POS27x_YyxFCwu0o5_K74Fn8uGEuAqb1AF-Ya7b7Cjyp43xyNMM14-reeNPeXn--2V93Nty_X281N5wQhpZNCM-aE1GIQho7aC-96oj1nXiJBRM0NNwiGAOdkGCqSimsFg2fKU8FPmuvV6xPs7VMOB8i_bIJgX0DKOwu5BDeh1WNvBDWOKS0FqGFAxdEZRA_EKz1U14fV9ZRT_ddc7D4tOdbxLdNEMcKMYDV1vqZ2UKUhjqlkcPV6PASXIo6h8o0WUvamp88NH9cGl9M8Zxxfx6TEPu_Q_tsh_wOJK44x</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Saini, Gurtej Singh</creator><creator>Erge, Oney</creator><creator>Ashok, Pradeepkumar</creator><creator>van Oort, Eric</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-2474</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making</title><author>Saini, Gurtej Singh ; Erge, Oney ; Ashok, Pradeepkumar ; van Oort, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Cleaning</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction accidents & safety</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Design and construction</topic><topic>digital twinning</topic><topic>Digital twins</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Drilling muds</topic><topic>Drillstrings</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>hole cleaning</topic><topic>Horizon</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Markov decision process</topic><topic>Markov processes</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>reward shaping</topic><topic>Rheological properties</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>sequential decision-making</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>well construction</topic><topic>Wells</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saini, Gurtej Singh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erge, Oney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashok, Pradeepkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oort, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saini, Gurtej Singh</au><au>Erge, Oney</au><au>Ashok, Pradeepkumar</au><au>van Oort, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>5776</spage><pages>5776-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>Well construction operations require continuous complex decision-making and multi-step action planning. Action selection at every step demands a careful evaluation of the vast action space, while guided by long-term objectives and desired outcomes. Current human-centric decision-making introduces a degree of bias, which can result in reactive rather than proactive decisions. This can lead from minor operational inefficiencies all the way to catastrophic health and safety issues. This paper details the steps in structuring unbiased purpose-built sequential decision-making systems. Setting up such systems entails representing the operation as a Markov decision process (MDP). This requires explicitly defining states and action values, defining goal states, building a digital twin to model the process, and appropriately shaping reward functions to measure feedback. The digital twin, in conjunction with the reward function, is utilized for simulating and quantifying the different action sequences. A finite-horizon sequential decision-making system, with discrete state and action space, was set up to advise on hole cleaning during well construction. The state was quantified by the cuttings bed height and the equivalent circulation density values, and the action set was defined using a combination of controllable drilling parameters (including mud density and rheology, drillstring rotation speed, etc.). A non-sparse normalized reward structure was formulated as a function of the state and action values. Hydraulics, cuttings transport, and rig state detection models were integrated to build the hole cleaning digital twin. This system was then used for performance tracking and scenario simulations (with each scenario defined as a finite-horizon action sequence) on real-world oil wells. The different scenarios were compared by monitoring state–action transitions and the evolution of the reward with actions. This paper presents a novel method for setting up well construction operations as long-term finite-horizon sequential decision-making systems, and defines a way to quantify and compare different scenarios. The proper construction of such systems is a crucial step towards automating intelligent decision-making.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en15165776</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7851-2474</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2022-08, Vol.15 (16), p.5776 |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7f98418c26754a6bbe63ec8eeda0d67b |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Algorithms Analysis Automation Cleaning Construction Construction accidents & safety Decision making Design and construction digital twinning Digital twins Drilling Drilling muds Drillstrings Feedback Fluid flow hole cleaning Horizon Hydraulics Markov decision process Markov processes Mechanical properties Methods Planning Reinforcement reward shaping Rheological properties Rheology Sequences sequential decision-making Simulation well construction Wells |
title | Well Construction Action Planning and Automation through Finite-Horizon Sequential Decision-Making |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Well%20Construction%20Action%20Planning%20and%20Automation%20through%20Finite-Horizon%20Sequential%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Saini,%20Gurtej%20Singh&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=5776&rft.pages=5776-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en15165776&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA745598912%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-54722c4574b481f7d4dc907d32d5e0eee73838ea80a330bb0ee56376abd26d143%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2706202842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A745598912&rfr_iscdi=true |