Loading…

Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer

To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2019-10, Vol.7, p.e7883-e7883, Article e7883
Main Authors: Rodriguez-Perea, Angela, Chirosa Ríos, Luis J, Martinez-Garcia, Dario, Ulloa-Díaz, David, Guede Rojas, Francisco, Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel, Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3
container_end_page e7883
container_issue
container_start_page e7883
container_title PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)
container_volume 7
creator Rodriguez-Perea, Angela
Chirosa Ríos, Luis J
Martinez-Garcia, Dario
Ulloa-Díaz, David
Guede Rojas, Francisco
Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel
Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J
description To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric. Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V = 015 m s , V = 0.30 m  s , V = 0.45 m s ) and two range of movement (R = 25% cm ; R = 50% cm) protocols. All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 < intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m  s and short range of movement (V R ) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m  s and a large range of movement (V R CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m  s and short range of movement (V R ) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction. Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.
doi_str_mv 10.7717/peerj.7883
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7fcab86fcfbb4eb0b83e0a51cfdf3d9b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A603057306</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7fcab86fcfbb4eb0b83e0a51cfdf3d9b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A603057306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rHCEUQIfS0oQ0L_0BZaBQSmC3Oo4f81IIoWkDgUJpn8VxrrtuHN2qE7r_vk42TXdL9UG9Ho94vVX1GqMl55h_2ALEzZILQZ5Vpw1mfCEI7Z4fzE-q85Q2qDTRMCTIy-qEYNbRjtHTyn8DZ1Vvnc27OpjapjBCjlbXyg_z6s56yGWZ4-TvauPgV4h1yhH8Kq_rKVm_qlVtJq-zDV65GhzoHItFr5W3ukSGnVfjrIX4qnphlEtw_jieVT-uP32_-rK4_fr55urydqEZYXmhG9CkNZphirgWuGMK46Yz0PBeMMoY65AyCgMFJFBPOMVEUGQUU7ylrSZn1c3eOwS1kdtoRxV3MigrHwIhrqSK5VkOJDdaFanRpu9b6FEvCCBFsTaDIUPXF9fHvWs79SMMGnyOyh1Jj3e8XctVuJdMNJy2bRG8fxTE8HOClOVokwbnlIcwJdkQ3AhEccsK-vYfdBOmWNI6U6SlhBbwL7VS5QHWm1Du1bNUXjJEEOUEza7lf6jSBxitDh6MLfGjA-8ODqxBubxOwU3zx6Zj8GIP6hhSimCekoGRnKtSPlSlnKuywG8O0_eE_qlB8htV7d68</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334535805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela ; Chirosa Ríos, Luis J ; Martinez-Garcia, Dario ; Ulloa-Díaz, David ; Guede Rojas, Francisco ; Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel ; Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela ; Chirosa Ríos, Luis J ; Martinez-Garcia, Dario ; Ulloa-Díaz, David ; Guede Rojas, Francisco ; Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel ; Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric. Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V = 015 m s , V = 0.30 m  s , V = 0.45 m s ) and two range of movement (R = 25% cm ; R = 50% cm) protocols. All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 &lt; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] &gt; 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m  s and short range of movement (V R ) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m  s and a large range of movement (V R CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m  s and short range of movement (V R ) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction. Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31695965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Body mass index ; Contraction ; Core ; Injuries ; Isokinetic ; Isometric ; Kinesiology ; Laboratories ; Muscle contraction ; Orthopedics ; Reproducibility ; Resistance ; Test ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2019-10, Vol.7, p.e7883-e7883, Article e7883</ispartof><rights>2019 Rodriguez-Perea et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 Rodriguez-Perea et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Rodriguez-Perea et al. 2019 Rodriguez-Perea et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2334535805/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2334535805?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirosa Ríos, Luis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Garcia, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulloa-Díaz, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guede Rojas, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric. Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V = 015 m s , V = 0.30 m  s , V = 0.45 m s ) and two range of movement (R = 25% cm ; R = 50% cm) protocols. All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 &lt; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] &gt; 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m  s and short range of movement (V R ) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m  s and a large range of movement (V R CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m  s and short range of movement (V R ) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction. Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Contraction</subject><subject>Core</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Isokinetic</subject><subject>Isometric</subject><subject>Kinesiology</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Test</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rHCEUQIfS0oQ0L_0BZaBQSmC3Oo4f81IIoWkDgUJpn8VxrrtuHN2qE7r_vk42TXdL9UG9Ho94vVX1GqMl55h_2ALEzZILQZ5Vpw1mfCEI7Z4fzE-q85Q2qDTRMCTIy-qEYNbRjtHTyn8DZ1Vvnc27OpjapjBCjlbXyg_z6s56yGWZ4-TvauPgV4h1yhH8Kq_rKVm_qlVtJq-zDV65GhzoHItFr5W3ukSGnVfjrIX4qnphlEtw_jieVT-uP32_-rK4_fr55urydqEZYXmhG9CkNZphirgWuGMK46Yz0PBeMMoY65AyCgMFJFBPOMVEUGQUU7ylrSZn1c3eOwS1kdtoRxV3MigrHwIhrqSK5VkOJDdaFanRpu9b6FEvCCBFsTaDIUPXF9fHvWs79SMMGnyOyh1Jj3e8XctVuJdMNJy2bRG8fxTE8HOClOVokwbnlIcwJdkQ3AhEccsK-vYfdBOmWNI6U6SlhBbwL7VS5QHWm1Du1bNUXjJEEOUEza7lf6jSBxitDh6MLfGjA-8ODqxBubxOwU3zx6Zj8GIP6hhSimCekoGRnKtSPlSlnKuywG8O0_eE_qlB8htV7d68</recordid><startdate>20191018</startdate><enddate>20191018</enddate><creator>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela</creator><creator>Chirosa Ríos, Luis J</creator><creator>Martinez-Garcia, Dario</creator><creator>Ulloa-Díaz, David</creator><creator>Guede Rojas, Francisco</creator><creator>Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel</creator><creator>Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191018</creationdate><title>Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer</title><author>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela ; Chirosa Ríos, Luis J ; Martinez-Garcia, Dario ; Ulloa-Díaz, David ; Guede Rojas, Francisco ; Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel ; Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Contraction</topic><topic>Core</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Isokinetic</topic><topic>Isometric</topic><topic>Kinesiology</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Test</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirosa Ríos, Luis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Garcia, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulloa-Díaz, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guede Rojas, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela</au><au>Chirosa Ríos, Luis J</au><au>Martinez-Garcia, Dario</au><au>Ulloa-Díaz, David</au><au>Guede Rojas, Francisco</au><au>Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel</au><au>Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2019-10-18</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>e7883</spage><epage>e7883</epage><pages>e7883-e7883</pages><artnum>e7883</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric. Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V = 015 m s , V = 0.30 m  s , V = 0.45 m s ) and two range of movement (R = 25% cm ; R = 50% cm) protocols. All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 &lt; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] &gt; 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m  s and short range of movement (V R ) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m  s and a large range of movement (V R CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m  s and short range of movement (V R ) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction. Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>31695965</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.7883</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2167-8359
ispartof PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2019-10, Vol.7, p.e7883-e7883, Article e7883
issn 2167-8359
2167-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7fcab86fcfbb4eb0b83e0a51cfdf3d9b
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Back pain
Body mass index
Contraction
Core
Injuries
Isokinetic
Isometric
Kinesiology
Laboratories
Muscle contraction
Orthopedics
Reproducibility
Resistance
Test
Velocity
title Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A37%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20isometric%20and%20isokinetic%20trunk%20flexor%20strength%20using%20a%20functional%20electromechanical%20dynamometer&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Rodriguez-Perea,%20Angela&rft.date=2019-10-18&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=e7883&rft.epage=e7883&rft.pages=e7883-e7883&rft.artnum=e7883&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.7883&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA603057306%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334535805&rft_id=info:pmid/31695965&rft_galeid=A603057306&rfr_iscdi=true