Loading…
Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer
To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of me...
Saved in:
Published in: | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2019-10, Vol.7, p.e7883-e7883, Article e7883 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3 |
container_end_page | e7883 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e7883 |
container_title | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Rodriguez-Perea, Angela Chirosa Ríos, Luis J Martinez-Garcia, Dario Ulloa-Díaz, David Guede Rojas, Francisco Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J |
description | To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric.
Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V
= 015 m s
, V
= 0.30 m s
, V
= 0.45 m s
) and two range of movement (R
= 25% cm ; R
= 50% cm) protocols.
All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 < intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m s
and short range of movement (V
R
) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m s
and a large range of movement (V
R
CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m s
and short range of movement (V
R
) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction.
Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7717/peerj.7883 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7fcab86fcfbb4eb0b83e0a51cfdf3d9b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A603057306</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_7fcab86fcfbb4eb0b83e0a51cfdf3d9b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A603057306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rHCEUQIfS0oQ0L_0BZaBQSmC3Oo4f81IIoWkDgUJpn8VxrrtuHN2qE7r_vk42TXdL9UG9Ho94vVX1GqMl55h_2ALEzZILQZ5Vpw1mfCEI7Z4fzE-q85Q2qDTRMCTIy-qEYNbRjtHTyn8DZ1Vvnc27OpjapjBCjlbXyg_z6s56yGWZ4-TvauPgV4h1yhH8Kq_rKVm_qlVtJq-zDV65GhzoHItFr5W3ukSGnVfjrIX4qnphlEtw_jieVT-uP32_-rK4_fr55urydqEZYXmhG9CkNZphirgWuGMK46Yz0PBeMMoY65AyCgMFJFBPOMVEUGQUU7ylrSZn1c3eOwS1kdtoRxV3MigrHwIhrqSK5VkOJDdaFanRpu9b6FEvCCBFsTaDIUPXF9fHvWs79SMMGnyOyh1Jj3e8XctVuJdMNJy2bRG8fxTE8HOClOVokwbnlIcwJdkQ3AhEccsK-vYfdBOmWNI6U6SlhBbwL7VS5QHWm1Du1bNUXjJEEOUEza7lf6jSBxitDh6MLfGjA-8ODqxBubxOwU3zx6Zj8GIP6hhSimCekoGRnKtSPlSlnKuywG8O0_eE_qlB8htV7d68</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334535805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela ; Chirosa Ríos, Luis J ; Martinez-Garcia, Dario ; Ulloa-Díaz, David ; Guede Rojas, Francisco ; Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel ; Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela ; Chirosa Ríos, Luis J ; Martinez-Garcia, Dario ; Ulloa-Díaz, David ; Guede Rojas, Francisco ; Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel ; Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric.
Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V
= 015 m s
, V
= 0.30 m s
, V
= 0.45 m s
) and two range of movement (R
= 25% cm ; R
= 50% cm) protocols.
All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 < intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m s
and short range of movement (V
R
) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m s
and a large range of movement (V
R
CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m s
and short range of movement (V
R
) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction.
Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31695965</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Body mass index ; Contraction ; Core ; Injuries ; Isokinetic ; Isometric ; Kinesiology ; Laboratories ; Muscle contraction ; Orthopedics ; Reproducibility ; Resistance ; Test ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2019-10, Vol.7, p.e7883-e7883, Article e7883</ispartof><rights>2019 Rodriguez-Perea et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2019 Rodriguez-Perea et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2019 Rodriguez-Perea et al. 2019 Rodriguez-Perea et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2334535805/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2334535805?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31695965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirosa Ríos, Luis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Garcia, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulloa-Díaz, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guede Rojas, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric.
Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V
= 015 m s
, V
= 0.30 m s
, V
= 0.45 m s
) and two range of movement (R
= 25% cm ; R
= 50% cm) protocols.
All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 < intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m s
and short range of movement (V
R
) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m s
and a large range of movement (V
R
CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m s
and short range of movement (V
R
) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction.
Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Contraction</subject><subject>Core</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Isokinetic</subject><subject>Isometric</subject><subject>Kinesiology</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Muscle contraction</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>Test</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rHCEUQIfS0oQ0L_0BZaBQSmC3Oo4f81IIoWkDgUJpn8VxrrtuHN2qE7r_vk42TXdL9UG9Ho94vVX1GqMl55h_2ALEzZILQZ5Vpw1mfCEI7Z4fzE-q85Q2qDTRMCTIy-qEYNbRjtHTyn8DZ1Vvnc27OpjapjBCjlbXyg_z6s56yGWZ4-TvauPgV4h1yhH8Kq_rKVm_qlVtJq-zDV65GhzoHItFr5W3ukSGnVfjrIX4qnphlEtw_jieVT-uP32_-rK4_fr55urydqEZYXmhG9CkNZphirgWuGMK46Yz0PBeMMoY65AyCgMFJFBPOMVEUGQUU7ylrSZn1c3eOwS1kdtoRxV3MigrHwIhrqSK5VkOJDdaFanRpu9b6FEvCCBFsTaDIUPXF9fHvWs79SMMGnyOyh1Jj3e8XctVuJdMNJy2bRG8fxTE8HOClOVokwbnlIcwJdkQ3AhEccsK-vYfdBOmWNI6U6SlhBbwL7VS5QHWm1Du1bNUXjJEEOUEza7lf6jSBxitDh6MLfGjA-8ODqxBubxOwU3zx6Zj8GIP6hhSimCekoGRnKtSPlSlnKuywG8O0_eE_qlB8htV7d68</recordid><startdate>20191018</startdate><enddate>20191018</enddate><creator>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela</creator><creator>Chirosa Ríos, Luis J</creator><creator>Martinez-Garcia, Dario</creator><creator>Ulloa-Díaz, David</creator><creator>Guede Rojas, Francisco</creator><creator>Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel</creator><creator>Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191018</creationdate><title>Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer</title><author>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela ; Chirosa Ríos, Luis J ; Martinez-Garcia, Dario ; Ulloa-Díaz, David ; Guede Rojas, Francisco ; Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel ; Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Contraction</topic><topic>Core</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Isokinetic</topic><topic>Isometric</topic><topic>Kinesiology</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Muscle contraction</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>Test</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirosa Ríos, Luis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Garcia, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulloa-Díaz, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guede Rojas, Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodriguez-Perea, Angela</au><au>Chirosa Ríos, Luis J</au><au>Martinez-Garcia, Dario</au><au>Ulloa-Díaz, David</au><au>Guede Rojas, Francisco</au><au>Jerez-Mayorga, Daniel</au><au>Chirosa Rios, Ignacio J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2019-10-18</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>e7883</spage><epage>e7883</epage><pages>e7883-e7883</pages><artnum>e7883</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>To determine the absolute and relative reliability of functional trunk tests, using a functional electromechanical dynamometer to evaluate the isokinetic strength of trunk flexors and to determine the most reliable assessment condition, in order to compare the absolute and relative reliability of mean force and peak force of trunk flexors and to determine which isokinetic condition of evaluation is best related to the maximum isometric.
Test-retest of thirty-seven physically active male student volunteers who performed the different protocols, isometric contraction and the combination of three velocities (V
= 015 m s
, V
= 0.30 m s
, V
= 0.45 m s
) and two range of movement (R
= 25% cm ; R
= 50% cm) protocols.
All protocols to evaluate trunk flexors showed an absolute reliability provided a stable repeatability for isometric and dynamic protocols with a coefficient of variation (CV) being below 10% and a high or very high relative reliability (0.69 < intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.86). The more reliable strength manifestation (CV = 6.82%) to evaluate the concentric contraction of trunk flexors was mean force, with 0.15 m s
and short range of movement (V
R
) condition. The most reliable strength manifestation to evaluate the eccentric contraction of trunk flexors was peak force, with 0.15 m s
and a large range of movement (V
R
CV = 5.07%), and the most reliable way to evaluate isometric trunk flexors was by peak force (CV = 7.72%). The mean force of eccentric trunk flexor strength with 0.45 m s
and short range of movement (V
R
) condition (r = 0.73) was best related to the maximum isometric contraction.
Functional electromechanical dynamometry is a reliable evaluation system for assessment of trunk flexor strength.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>31695965</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.7883</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-8359 |
ispartof | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2019-10, Vol.7, p.e7883-e7883, Article e7883 |
issn | 2167-8359 2167-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7fcab86fcfbb4eb0b83e0a51cfdf3d9b |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Back pain Body mass index Contraction Core Injuries Isokinetic Isometric Kinesiology Laboratories Muscle contraction Orthopedics Reproducibility Resistance Test Velocity |
title | Reliability of isometric and isokinetic trunk flexor strength using a functional electromechanical dynamometer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T12%3A37%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20isometric%20and%20isokinetic%20trunk%20flexor%20strength%20using%20a%20functional%20electromechanical%20dynamometer&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Rodriguez-Perea,%20Angela&rft.date=2019-10-18&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=e7883&rft.epage=e7883&rft.pages=e7883-e7883&rft.artnum=e7883&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.7883&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA603057306%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c636t-c2ec34fc61507c8196a1129fe27b86566690afa1e5e080b37513850fa6a7454c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334535805&rft_id=info:pmid/31695965&rft_galeid=A603057306&rfr_iscdi=true |