eHealth Literacy Instruments: Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research 2021-11, Vol.23 (11), p.e30644-e30644
• Main Authors: Lee, Jiyeon, Lee, Eun-Hyun, Chae, Duckhee
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Consumers; COVID-19; Credibility; Delivery of Health Care; Factor structures; Health education; Health information; Health Literacy; Health status; Humans; Hypotheses; Internet; Literacy; Measurement; Medical personnel; Meta-analysis; Psychometrics; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of Results; Review; Social media; Surveys and Questionnaires; Systematic review; Telemedicine; Validity
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1439-4456; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/30644

The internet is now a major source of health information. With the growth of internet users, eHealth literacy has emerged as a new concept for digital health care. Therefore, health professionals need to consider the eHealth literacy of consumers when providing care utilizing digital health technologies. This study aimed to identify currently available eHealth literacy instruments and evaluate their measurement properties to provide robust evidence to researchers and clinicians who are selecting an eHealth literacy instrument. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of self-reported eHealth literacy instruments by applying the updated COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) methodology. This study included 7 instruments from 41 articles describing 57 psychometric studies, as identified in 4 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo). No eHealth literacy instrument provided evidence for all measurement properties. The eHealth literacy scale (eHEALS) was originally developed with a single-factor structure under the definition of eHealth literacy before the rise of social media and the mobile web. That instrument was evaluated in 18 different languages and 26 countries, involving diverse populations. However, various other factor structures were exhibited: 7 types of two-factor structures, 3 types of three-factor structures, and 1 bifactor structure. The transactional eHealth literacy instrument (TeHLI) was developed to reflect the broader concept of eHealth literacy and was demonstrated to have a sufficient low-quality and very low-quality evidence for content validity (relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility) and sufficient high-quality evidence for structural validity and internal consistency; however, that instrument has rarely been evaluated. The eHealth literacy scale was the most frequently investigated instrument. However, it is strongly recommended that the instrument's content be updated to reflect recent advancements in digital health technologies. In addition, the transactional eHealth literacy instrument needs improvements in content validity and further psychometric studies to increase the credibility of its synthesized evidence.