Characterizing Management Practices in High- and Average-Performing Smallholder Dairy Farms under Contrasting Environmental Stresses in Tanzania

• Published in: World (Basel) 2022-10, Vol.3 (4), p.821-839
• Main Authors: Shija, Dismas Said, Mwai, Okeyo A., Migwi, Perminus K., Mrode, Raphael, Bebe, Bockline Omedo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agriculture; Animal welfare; Animals; Artificial insemination; Breeding of animals; breeding practices; Cattle; Crop diseases; Dairy cattle; Dairy farming; Dairy farms; Density; Deviance; Diet; Disease management; Farmers; feed cost; Feeds; Grazing; healthcare cost; Housing; Humidity; Livestock; Milk; Performance indicators; positive deviants; Productivity; Research design; Scarcity; Spacing; stressful production environment; Veterinary services; Welfare
• ISSN: 2673-4060; 2673-4060
• DOI: 10.3390/world3040046

This study characterized breeding, housing, feeding and health management practices in positive deviants and typical average performing smallholder dairy farms in Tanzania. The objective was to distinguish management practices that positive deviant farms deploy differently from typical farms to ameliorate local prevalent environmental stresses. In a sample of 794 farms, positive deviants were classified on criteria of consistently outperforming typical farms (p < 0.05) in five production performance indicators: energy balance ≥ 0.35 Mcal NEL/d; disease-incidence density ≤ 12.75 per 100 animal-years at risk; daily milk yield ≥ 6.32 L/cow/day; age at first calving ≤ 1153.28 days; and calving interval ≤ 633.68 days. The study was a two-factor nested research design, with farms nested within the production environment, classified into low- and high-stress. Compared to typical farms, positive deviant farms had larger landholdings, as well as larger herds comprising more high-grade cattle housed in better quality zero-grazing stall units with larger floor spacing per animal. Positive deviants spent more on purchased fodder and water, and sourced professional veterinary services (p < 0.001) more frequently. These results show that management practices distinguishing positive deviants from typical farms were cattle upgrading, provision of larger animal floor spacing and investing more in cattle housing, fodder, watering, and professional veterinary services. These distinguishing practices can be associated with amelioration of feed scarcity, heat load stresses, and disease infections, as well as better animal welfare in positive deviant farms. Nutritional quality of the diet was not analyzed, for which research is recommended to ascertain whether the investments made by positive deviants are in quality of feeds.