Loading…
Modeling land use change and forest carbon stock changes in temperate forests in the United States
Background Forests provide the largest terrestrial sink of carbon (C). However, these C stocks are threatened by forest land conversion. Land use change has global impacts and is a critical component when studying C fluxes, but it is not always fully considered in C accounting despite being a major...
Saved in:
Published in: | Carbon balance and management 2021-07, Vol.16 (1), p.1-16, Article 20 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-b35cc03dcbc89ed7b2c623724a2c2e4fdeaab9f2416ee927bca475c99bce2a1e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-b35cc03dcbc89ed7b2c623724a2c2e4fdeaab9f2416ee927bca475c99bce2a1e3 |
container_end_page | 16 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Carbon balance and management |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Fitts, Lucia A. Russell, Matthew B. Domke, Grant M. Knight, Joseph K. |
description | Background
Forests provide the largest terrestrial sink of carbon (C). However, these C stocks are threatened by forest land conversion. Land use change has global impacts and is a critical component when studying C fluxes, but it is not always fully considered in C accounting despite being a major contributor to emissions. An urgent need exists among decision-makers to identify the likelihood of forest conversion to other land uses and factors affecting C loss. To help address this issue, we conducted our research in California, Colorado, Georgia, New York, Texas, and Wisconsin. The objectives were to (1) model the probability of forest conversion and C stocks dynamics using USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data and (2) create wall-to-wall maps showing estimates of the risk of areas to convert from forest to non-forest. We used two modeling approaches: a machine learning algorithm (random forest) and generalized mixed-effects models. Explanatory variables for the models included ecological attributes, topography, census data, forest disturbances, and forest conditions. Model predictions and Landsat spectral information were used to produce wall-to-wall probability maps of forest change using Google Earth Engine.
Results
During the study period (2000–2017), 3.4% of the analyzed FIA plots transitioned from forest to mixed or non-forested conditions. Results indicate that the change in land use from forests is more likely with increasing human population and housing growth rates. Furthermore, non-public forests showed a higher probability of forest change compared to public forests. Areas closer to cities and coastal areas showed a higher risk of transition to non-forests. Out of the six states analyzed, Colorado had the highest risk of conversion and the largest amount of aboveground C lost. Natural forest disturbances were not a major predictor of land use change.
Conclusions
Land use change is accelerating globally, causing a large increase in C emissions. Our results will help policy-makers prioritize forest management activities and land use planning by providing a quantitative framework that can enhance forest health and productivity. This work will also inform climate change mitigation strategies by understanding the role that land use change plays in C emissions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13021-021-00183-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_802736d5a6c2441eb2d0684da38c847c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_802736d5a6c2441eb2d0684da38c847c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2548029804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-b35cc03dcbc89ed7b2c623724a2c2e4fdeaab9f2416ee927bca475c99bce2a1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERb_4A5wscQ74K3FyQUIVH5WKOLQ9W_Z4spslay-2F6n_Hu9mBfTCYWR75p1n5HkJecPZO8777n3mkgneHIPxXjbdC3LBdcsa1vXs5T_3c3KZ84YxpRmTr8i5VIJ3YhAXxH2LHucprOhsg6f7jBTWNqyQHp5jTJgLBZtcDDSXCD9O5UynQAtud5hswZNwSa6RPoapoKf3pdbyNTkb7Zzx9em8Io-fPz3cfG3uvn-5vfl410DLdWmcbAGY9OCgH9BrJ6ATUgtlBQhUo0dr3TAKxTvEQWgHVukWhsEBCstRXpHbheuj3ZhdmrY2PZloJ3NMxLQyNpUJZjQ9E1p2vrUdCKU4OuHrmpS3sodeaaisDwtrt3db9IChJDs_gz6vhGltVvGX6UWrBtZWwNsTIMWf-7obs4n7FOr_TVXU-UPPVFWJRQUp5pxw_DOBM3Pw2Cwem2McPDZdbZJLU67iakX6i_5P12-kQanZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548029804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling land use change and forest carbon stock changes in temperate forests in the United States</title><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Fitts, Lucia A. ; Russell, Matthew B. ; Domke, Grant M. ; Knight, Joseph K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitts, Lucia A. ; Russell, Matthew B. ; Domke, Grant M. ; Knight, Joseph K.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Forests provide the largest terrestrial sink of carbon (C). However, these C stocks are threatened by forest land conversion. Land use change has global impacts and is a critical component when studying C fluxes, but it is not always fully considered in C accounting despite being a major contributor to emissions. An urgent need exists among decision-makers to identify the likelihood of forest conversion to other land uses and factors affecting C loss. To help address this issue, we conducted our research in California, Colorado, Georgia, New York, Texas, and Wisconsin. The objectives were to (1) model the probability of forest conversion and C stocks dynamics using USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data and (2) create wall-to-wall maps showing estimates of the risk of areas to convert from forest to non-forest. We used two modeling approaches: a machine learning algorithm (random forest) and generalized mixed-effects models. Explanatory variables for the models included ecological attributes, topography, census data, forest disturbances, and forest conditions. Model predictions and Landsat spectral information were used to produce wall-to-wall probability maps of forest change using Google Earth Engine.
Results
During the study period (2000–2017), 3.4% of the analyzed FIA plots transitioned from forest to mixed or non-forested conditions. Results indicate that the change in land use from forests is more likely with increasing human population and housing growth rates. Furthermore, non-public forests showed a higher probability of forest change compared to public forests. Areas closer to cities and coastal areas showed a higher risk of transition to non-forests. Out of the six states analyzed, Colorado had the highest risk of conversion and the largest amount of aboveground C lost. Natural forest disturbances were not a major predictor of land use change.
Conclusions
Land use change is accelerating globally, causing a large increase in C emissions. Our results will help policy-makers prioritize forest management activities and land use planning by providing a quantitative framework that can enhance forest health and productivity. This work will also inform climate change mitigation strategies by understanding the role that land use change plays in C emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1750-0680</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-0680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13021-021-00183-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34216292</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Carbon ; Carbon dynamics ; Climate change ; Climate change mitigation ; Coastal zone ; Conversion ; Critical components ; Decision making ; Decision trees ; Disturbances ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecological effects ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Emissions ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Fluxes ; Forest inventory ; Forest loss drivers ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Growth rate ; Housing ; Human populations ; Land use ; Land use management ; Land use planning ; Landsat ; Landsat satellites ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Modelling ; Remote sensing ; Risk ; Temperate forests ; USDA Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data</subject><ispartof>Carbon balance and management, 2021-07, Vol.16 (1), p.1-16, Article 20</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-b35cc03dcbc89ed7b2c623724a2c2e4fdeaab9f2416ee927bca475c99bce2a1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-b35cc03dcbc89ed7b2c623724a2c2e4fdeaab9f2416ee927bca475c99bce2a1e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3645-8710 ; 0000-0002-7044-9650</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2548029804/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2548029804?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,53769,53771,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitts, Lucia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domke, Grant M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Joseph K.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling land use change and forest carbon stock changes in temperate forests in the United States</title><title>Carbon balance and management</title><addtitle>Carbon Balance Manage</addtitle><description>Background
Forests provide the largest terrestrial sink of carbon (C). However, these C stocks are threatened by forest land conversion. Land use change has global impacts and is a critical component when studying C fluxes, but it is not always fully considered in C accounting despite being a major contributor to emissions. An urgent need exists among decision-makers to identify the likelihood of forest conversion to other land uses and factors affecting C loss. To help address this issue, we conducted our research in California, Colorado, Georgia, New York, Texas, and Wisconsin. The objectives were to (1) model the probability of forest conversion and C stocks dynamics using USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data and (2) create wall-to-wall maps showing estimates of the risk of areas to convert from forest to non-forest. We used two modeling approaches: a machine learning algorithm (random forest) and generalized mixed-effects models. Explanatory variables for the models included ecological attributes, topography, census data, forest disturbances, and forest conditions. Model predictions and Landsat spectral information were used to produce wall-to-wall probability maps of forest change using Google Earth Engine.
Results
During the study period (2000–2017), 3.4% of the analyzed FIA plots transitioned from forest to mixed or non-forested conditions. Results indicate that the change in land use from forests is more likely with increasing human population and housing growth rates. Furthermore, non-public forests showed a higher probability of forest change compared to public forests. Areas closer to cities and coastal areas showed a higher risk of transition to non-forests. Out of the six states analyzed, Colorado had the highest risk of conversion and the largest amount of aboveground C lost. Natural forest disturbances were not a major predictor of land use change.
Conclusions
Land use change is accelerating globally, causing a large increase in C emissions. Our results will help policy-makers prioritize forest management activities and land use planning by providing a quantitative framework that can enhance forest health and productivity. This work will also inform climate change mitigation strategies by understanding the role that land use change plays in C emissions.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dynamics</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate change mitigation</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Critical components</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Disturbances</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forest inventory</subject><subject>Forest loss drivers</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landsat satellites</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>USDA Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data</subject><issn>1750-0680</issn><issn>1750-0680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERb_4A5wscQ74K3FyQUIVH5WKOLQ9W_Z4spslay-2F6n_Hu9mBfTCYWR75p1n5HkJecPZO8777n3mkgneHIPxXjbdC3LBdcsa1vXs5T_3c3KZ84YxpRmTr8i5VIJ3YhAXxH2LHucprOhsg6f7jBTWNqyQHp5jTJgLBZtcDDSXCD9O5UynQAtud5hswZNwSa6RPoapoKf3pdbyNTkb7Zzx9em8Io-fPz3cfG3uvn-5vfl410DLdWmcbAGY9OCgH9BrJ6ATUgtlBQhUo0dr3TAKxTvEQWgHVukWhsEBCstRXpHbheuj3ZhdmrY2PZloJ3NMxLQyNpUJZjQ9E1p2vrUdCKU4OuHrmpS3sodeaaisDwtrt3db9IChJDs_gz6vhGltVvGX6UWrBtZWwNsTIMWf-7obs4n7FOr_TVXU-UPPVFWJRQUp5pxw_DOBM3Pw2Cwem2McPDZdbZJLU67iakX6i_5P12-kQanZ</recordid><startdate>20210703</startdate><enddate>20210703</enddate><creator>Fitts, Lucia A.</creator><creator>Russell, Matthew B.</creator><creator>Domke, Grant M.</creator><creator>Knight, Joseph K.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>BMC</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-8710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7044-9650</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210703</creationdate><title>Modeling land use change and forest carbon stock changes in temperate forests in the United States</title><author>Fitts, Lucia A. ; Russell, Matthew B. ; Domke, Grant M. ; Knight, Joseph K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-b35cc03dcbc89ed7b2c623724a2c2e4fdeaab9f2416ee927bca475c99bce2a1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dynamics</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate change mitigation</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Critical components</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Disturbances</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forest inventory</topic><topic>Forest loss drivers</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landsat satellites</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>USDA Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitts, Lucia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domke, Grant M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Joseph K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Carbon balance and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitts, Lucia A.</au><au>Russell, Matthew B.</au><au>Domke, Grant M.</au><au>Knight, Joseph K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling land use change and forest carbon stock changes in temperate forests in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Carbon balance and management</jtitle><stitle>Carbon Balance Manage</stitle><date>2021-07-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><artnum>20</artnum><issn>1750-0680</issn><eissn>1750-0680</eissn><abstract>Background
Forests provide the largest terrestrial sink of carbon (C). However, these C stocks are threatened by forest land conversion. Land use change has global impacts and is a critical component when studying C fluxes, but it is not always fully considered in C accounting despite being a major contributor to emissions. An urgent need exists among decision-makers to identify the likelihood of forest conversion to other land uses and factors affecting C loss. To help address this issue, we conducted our research in California, Colorado, Georgia, New York, Texas, and Wisconsin. The objectives were to (1) model the probability of forest conversion and C stocks dynamics using USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data and (2) create wall-to-wall maps showing estimates of the risk of areas to convert from forest to non-forest. We used two modeling approaches: a machine learning algorithm (random forest) and generalized mixed-effects models. Explanatory variables for the models included ecological attributes, topography, census data, forest disturbances, and forest conditions. Model predictions and Landsat spectral information were used to produce wall-to-wall probability maps of forest change using Google Earth Engine.
Results
During the study period (2000–2017), 3.4% of the analyzed FIA plots transitioned from forest to mixed or non-forested conditions. Results indicate that the change in land use from forests is more likely with increasing human population and housing growth rates. Furthermore, non-public forests showed a higher probability of forest change compared to public forests. Areas closer to cities and coastal areas showed a higher risk of transition to non-forests. Out of the six states analyzed, Colorado had the highest risk of conversion and the largest amount of aboveground C lost. Natural forest disturbances were not a major predictor of land use change.
Conclusions
Land use change is accelerating globally, causing a large increase in C emissions. Our results will help policy-makers prioritize forest management activities and land use planning by providing a quantitative framework that can enhance forest health and productivity. This work will also inform climate change mitigation strategies by understanding the role that land use change plays in C emissions.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>34216292</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13021-021-00183-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3645-8710</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7044-9650</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1750-0680 |
ispartof | Carbon balance and management, 2021-07, Vol.16 (1), p.1-16, Article 20 |
issn | 1750-0680 1750-0680 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_802736d5a6c2441eb2d0684da38c847c |
source | Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Algorithms Carbon Carbon dynamics Climate change Climate change mitigation Coastal zone Conversion Critical components Decision making Decision trees Disturbances Earth and Environmental Science Ecological effects Ecosystem services Ecosystems Emissions Environment Environmental Management Fluxes Forest inventory Forest loss drivers Forest management Forestry Growth rate Housing Human populations Land use Land use management Land use planning Landsat Landsat satellites Learning algorithms Machine learning Modelling Remote sensing Risk Temperate forests USDA Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data |
title | Modeling land use change and forest carbon stock changes in temperate forests in the United States |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A42%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20land%20use%20change%20and%20forest%20carbon%20stock%20changes%20in%20temperate%20forests%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Carbon%20balance%20and%20management&rft.au=Fitts,%20Lucia%20A.&rft.date=2021-07-03&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.artnum=20&rft.issn=1750-0680&rft.eissn=1750-0680&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13021-021-00183-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2548029804%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-b35cc03dcbc89ed7b2c623724a2c2e4fdeaab9f2416ee927bca475c99bce2a1e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548029804&rft_id=info:pmid/34216292&rfr_iscdi=true |