Loading…
Comparison of ease of intubation in sniffing position and further neck flexion
Optimization of patient's head and neck position for the best laryngeal view is the most important step before laryngoscopy and intubation. The objective of this prospective crossover study was to determine the differences, if any, between the gold standard sniffing position (SP) and the furthe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology clinical pharmacology, 2017-07, Vol.33 (3), p.342-347 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4816-5e9268f40d0636b43ae6a1ecf8c925cec8e5c7a8be7fbb9663e828588e5a93473 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4816-5e9268f40d0636b43ae6a1ecf8c925cec8e5c7a8be7fbb9663e828588e5a93473 |
container_end_page | 347 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 342 |
container_title | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Gudivada, Kiran Kumar Jonnavithula, Nirmala Pasupuleti, Sai Lakshman Apparasu, Chaitanya Prathyusha Ayya, Syama Sundar Ramachandran, Gopinath |
description | Optimization of patient's head and neck position for the best laryngeal view is the most important step before laryngoscopy and intubation. The objective of this prospective crossover study was to determine the differences, if any, between the gold standard sniffing position (SP) and the further head elevation (HE) (neck flexion) with regard to the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy, intubation difficulty, and variables of the I ntubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.
In the "SP" the neck must be flexed on the chest by elevating the head with a cushion under the occiput and extending the head at the atlanto-occipital joint. Our study was carried out to evaluate the glottic view in SP compared to further HE by 1.5 inches during direct laryngoscopy in elective surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group A ("SP" during first laryngoscopy and "HE" during second laryngoscopy) or vice versa in Group B. The effect of patient position on ease of intubation was assessed using a quantitative scale - The intubation difficulty scale (IDS).
There were significant differences with regard to glottic visualization (
= 0.00), number of operators (
= 0.001), laryngeal pressure (
= 0.00), and lifting force (
= 0.00) required for intubation and IDS (
= 0.00), thus favoring further HE position.
We conclude that the HE position is superior to standard SP with regard to ease of intubation as assessed by IDS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_100_16 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_802d8a33fa004e0fa7c5dff2fa44edb5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A504294039</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_802d8a33fa004e0fa7c5dff2fa44edb5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A504294039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4816-5e9268f40d0636b43ae6a1ecf8c925cec8e5c7a8be7fbb9663e828588e5a93473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl2LEzEUDaK4tfoHfJABYfGlNd8zeRFK8WNlcX3Q55DJ3LSp06QmM6L_3ky7Li1IHi6ce87h3puD0EuCl5xg9nYXjT0sP9-t1l81wVgT-QjNKGVkQWuGH6MZVjVeKNKIK_Qs5x3GAtdUPEVXVBGsJGMz9GUd9weTfI6hiq4Ck2GqPgxjawZfUB-qHLxzPmyqQ8z-CJrQVW5MwxZSFcD-qFwPv0vjOXriTJ_hxX2do-8f3n9bf1rc3n28Wa9uF5Y3RC4EKCobx3GHJZMtZwakIWBdYxUVFmwDwtamaaF2baukZNDQRjQFNorxms3Rzcm3i2anD8nvTfqjo_H6CMS00SYN3vagG0y7xjDmDMYcsDO1FZ1z1BnOoWtF8Xp38jqM7R46C2FIpr8wvewEv9Wb-EsLWa5ZFpijN_cGKf4cIQ9677OFvjcB4pg1UZJIjhWd5n59om5MGc0HF4ujneh6JTCnimOmCmv5H1Z5Hey9jQGcL_iF4PpMsAXTD9sc-3H6q3xJpCeiTTHnBO5hTYL1FCp9DJU-D1URvTo_0IPkX4rYX6Uhyac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1961640927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of ease of intubation in sniffing position and further neck flexion</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gudivada, Kiran Kumar ; Jonnavithula, Nirmala ; Pasupuleti, Sai Lakshman ; Apparasu, Chaitanya Prathyusha ; Ayya, Syama Sundar ; Ramachandran, Gopinath</creator><creatorcontrib>Gudivada, Kiran Kumar ; Jonnavithula, Nirmala ; Pasupuleti, Sai Lakshman ; Apparasu, Chaitanya Prathyusha ; Ayya, Syama Sundar ; Ramachandran, Gopinath</creatorcontrib><description>Optimization of patient's head and neck position for the best laryngeal view is the most important step before laryngoscopy and intubation. The objective of this prospective crossover study was to determine the differences, if any, between the gold standard sniffing position (SP) and the further head elevation (HE) (neck flexion) with regard to the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy, intubation difficulty, and variables of the I ntubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.
In the "SP" the neck must be flexed on the chest by elevating the head with a cushion under the occiput and extending the head at the atlanto-occipital joint. Our study was carried out to evaluate the glottic view in SP compared to further HE by 1.5 inches during direct laryngoscopy in elective surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group A ("SP" during first laryngoscopy and "HE" during second laryngoscopy) or vice versa in Group B. The effect of patient position on ease of intubation was assessed using a quantitative scale - The intubation difficulty scale (IDS).
There were significant differences with regard to glottic visualization (
= 0.00), number of operators (
= 0.001), laryngeal pressure (
= 0.00), and lifting force (
= 0.00) required for intubation and IDS (
= 0.00), thus favoring further HE position.
We conclude that the HE position is superior to standard SP with regard to ease of intubation as assessed by IDS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-2730</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_100_16</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29109633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Head elevation (neck flexion) position ; intubation difficulty scale ; Original ; sniffing position</subject><ispartof>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2017-07, Vol.33 (3), p.342-347</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4816-5e9268f40d0636b43ae6a1ecf8c925cec8e5c7a8be7fbb9663e828588e5a93473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4816-5e9268f40d0636b43ae6a1ecf8c925cec8e5c7a8be7fbb9663e828588e5a93473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672506/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5672506/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29109633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gudivada, Kiran Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonnavithula, Nirmala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasupuleti, Sai Lakshman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apparasu, Chaitanya Prathyusha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayya, Syama Sundar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, Gopinath</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of ease of intubation in sniffing position and further neck flexion</title><title>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Optimization of patient's head and neck position for the best laryngeal view is the most important step before laryngoscopy and intubation. The objective of this prospective crossover study was to determine the differences, if any, between the gold standard sniffing position (SP) and the further head elevation (HE) (neck flexion) with regard to the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy, intubation difficulty, and variables of the I ntubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.
In the "SP" the neck must be flexed on the chest by elevating the head with a cushion under the occiput and extending the head at the atlanto-occipital joint. Our study was carried out to evaluate the glottic view in SP compared to further HE by 1.5 inches during direct laryngoscopy in elective surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group A ("SP" during first laryngoscopy and "HE" during second laryngoscopy) or vice versa in Group B. The effect of patient position on ease of intubation was assessed using a quantitative scale - The intubation difficulty scale (IDS).
There were significant differences with regard to glottic visualization (
= 0.00), number of operators (
= 0.001), laryngeal pressure (
= 0.00), and lifting force (
= 0.00) required for intubation and IDS (
= 0.00), thus favoring further HE position.
We conclude that the HE position is superior to standard SP with regard to ease of intubation as assessed by IDS.</description><subject>Head elevation (neck flexion) position</subject><subject>intubation difficulty scale</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>sniffing position</subject><issn>0970-9185</issn><issn>2231-2730</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl2LEzEUDaK4tfoHfJABYfGlNd8zeRFK8WNlcX3Q55DJ3LSp06QmM6L_3ky7Li1IHi6ce87h3puD0EuCl5xg9nYXjT0sP9-t1l81wVgT-QjNKGVkQWuGH6MZVjVeKNKIK_Qs5x3GAtdUPEVXVBGsJGMz9GUd9weTfI6hiq4Ck2GqPgxjawZfUB-qHLxzPmyqQ8z-CJrQVW5MwxZSFcD-qFwPv0vjOXriTJ_hxX2do-8f3n9bf1rc3n28Wa9uF5Y3RC4EKCobx3GHJZMtZwakIWBdYxUVFmwDwtamaaF2baukZNDQRjQFNorxms3Rzcm3i2anD8nvTfqjo_H6CMS00SYN3vagG0y7xjDmDMYcsDO1FZ1z1BnOoWtF8Xp38jqM7R46C2FIpr8wvewEv9Wb-EsLWa5ZFpijN_cGKf4cIQ9677OFvjcB4pg1UZJIjhWd5n59om5MGc0HF4ujneh6JTCnimOmCmv5H1Z5Hey9jQGcL_iF4PpMsAXTD9sc-3H6q3xJpCeiTTHnBO5hTYL1FCp9DJU-D1URvTo_0IPkX4rYX6Uhyac</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Gudivada, Kiran Kumar</creator><creator>Jonnavithula, Nirmala</creator><creator>Pasupuleti, Sai Lakshman</creator><creator>Apparasu, Chaitanya Prathyusha</creator><creator>Ayya, Syama Sundar</creator><creator>Ramachandran, Gopinath</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Comparison of ease of intubation in sniffing position and further neck flexion</title><author>Gudivada, Kiran Kumar ; Jonnavithula, Nirmala ; Pasupuleti, Sai Lakshman ; Apparasu, Chaitanya Prathyusha ; Ayya, Syama Sundar ; Ramachandran, Gopinath</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4816-5e9268f40d0636b43ae6a1ecf8c925cec8e5c7a8be7fbb9663e828588e5a93473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Head elevation (neck flexion) position</topic><topic>intubation difficulty scale</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>sniffing position</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gudivada, Kiran Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonnavithula, Nirmala</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasupuleti, Sai Lakshman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apparasu, Chaitanya Prathyusha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayya, Syama Sundar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, Gopinath</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gudivada, Kiran Kumar</au><au>Jonnavithula, Nirmala</au><au>Pasupuleti, Sai Lakshman</au><au>Apparasu, Chaitanya Prathyusha</au><au>Ayya, Syama Sundar</au><au>Ramachandran, Gopinath</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of ease of intubation in sniffing position and further neck flexion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>342-347</pages><issn>0970-9185</issn><eissn>2231-2730</eissn><abstract>Optimization of patient's head and neck position for the best laryngeal view is the most important step before laryngoscopy and intubation. The objective of this prospective crossover study was to determine the differences, if any, between the gold standard sniffing position (SP) and the further head elevation (HE) (neck flexion) with regard to the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy, intubation difficulty, and variables of the I ntubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.
In the "SP" the neck must be flexed on the chest by elevating the head with a cushion under the occiput and extending the head at the atlanto-occipital joint. Our study was carried out to evaluate the glottic view in SP compared to further HE by 1.5 inches during direct laryngoscopy in elective surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group A ("SP" during first laryngoscopy and "HE" during second laryngoscopy) or vice versa in Group B. The effect of patient position on ease of intubation was assessed using a quantitative scale - The intubation difficulty scale (IDS).
There were significant differences with regard to glottic visualization (
= 0.00), number of operators (
= 0.001), laryngeal pressure (
= 0.00), and lifting force (
= 0.00) required for intubation and IDS (
= 0.00), thus favoring further HE position.
We conclude that the HE position is superior to standard SP with regard to ease of intubation as assessed by IDS.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>29109633</pmid><doi>10.4103/joacp.JOACP_100_16</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0970-9185 |
ispartof | Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology, 2017-07, Vol.33 (3), p.342-347 |
issn | 0970-9185 2231-2730 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_802d8a33fa004e0fa7c5dff2fa44edb5 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); IngentaConnect Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Head elevation (neck flexion) position intubation difficulty scale Original sniffing position |
title | Comparison of ease of intubation in sniffing position and further neck flexion |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A50%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20ease%20of%20intubation%20in%20sniffing%20position%20and%20further%20neck%20flexion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anaesthesiology,%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Gudivada,%20Kiran%20Kumar&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=342-347&rft.issn=0970-9185&rft.eissn=2231-2730&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_100_16&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA504294039%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4816-5e9268f40d0636b43ae6a1ecf8c925cec8e5c7a8be7fbb9663e828588e5a93473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1961640927&rft_id=info:pmid/29109633&rft_galeid=A504294039&rfr_iscdi=true |