Loading…
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae and their antibiotic resistance in patients with community-acquired pneumonia from southwest Iran
This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in sputum of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using culture and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) methods and to survey the antibiotic resistance patterns of aforesaid isolate...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC microbiology 2021-12, Vol.21 (1), p.343-343, Article 343 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-e5a4f83e13810f90ef37136847f676be76fbc7461838959158486a7cf85dc3413 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-e5a4f83e13810f90ef37136847f676be76fbc7461838959158486a7cf85dc3413 |
container_end_page | 343 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 343 |
container_title | BMC microbiology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Farajzadeh Sheikh, Ahmad Rahimi, Robab Meghdadi, Hossein Alami, Ameneh Saki, Morteza |
description | This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in sputum of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using culture and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) methods and to survey the antibiotic resistance patterns of aforesaid isolates.
In total, 23.9 % (n = 22/92) of sputum samples showed positive results in the culture method. S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were isolated from 15 (16.3 %) and 7 (7.6%) samples, respectively. Using M-PCR, 44 (47.8 %) samples were positive for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Of these, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were detected in 33 (35.8%) and 11 (11.9%) of the sputum samples, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of PCR in detection of S. pneumoniae in comparison with culture method were 100, 76.6, and 83.6%, respectively. While, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of PCR in detection of H. influenzae in comparison with culture method were 100, 95.3, and 95.8%, respectively. Out of 11 isolates of H. influenzae, two strains confirmed as H. influenzae type b (Hib) and 3 isolates were type f. However, 6 isolates were non-typable. The co-trimoxazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate were the less effective antibiotics against S. pneumonia and H. influenzae, respectively. Ceftriaxone with 13.3% resistance rates was the most effective antibiotic against S. pneumoniae, while, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, and gentamicin with resistance rates of 28.6% for each one were the most effective chemicals against H. influenzae isolates.
In this study, the prevalence of S. pneumoniae was more than H. influenzae using culture and M-PCR methods. The M-PCR provided better efficiency in detecting the bacterial agents in CAP patients compared to culture method. This method can improve the early detection of pathogens contributed to CAP. The drug resistant S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae indicated the need to develop a codified monitoring program to prevent further spread of these strains. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12866-021-02408-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80681719ec2848548e16ddbb4d8337ac</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A693658907</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_80681719ec2848548e16ddbb4d8337ac</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A693658907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-e5a4f83e13810f90ef37136847f676be76fbc7461838959158486a7cf85dc3413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJS5wSLFjx3YuSFUFdKUiJApny3Emu64SO7WdtssD8lx4u0vbRSiOPPJ881sz_oviNcHHhEj-IZJKcl7iiuSfYVmKJ8UhYYKUFZH46aP4oHgR4yXGREgqnhcHlDWYY1kfFr-_zkOy0wC3aPLDeoSgIyCz0tahANok6x3qIME28j26SAGm5I03Zo5ocjCP3lkNSLsOnWkY_bSyQ05Z1w8zuF-7VFqBDTlKtrU-WZPlo41JOwMZRZNOFlyK6MamFTJ-HGdn07rU5mq2AbqHm1Af_Iiin9PqBmJCi6Ddy-JZr4cIr3b7UfHz86cfp2fl-bcvi9OT89LUjUgl1Jr1kgKhkuC-wdBTQSiXTPRc8BYE71sjGCeSyqZuSC2Z5FqYXtadoYzQo2Kx1e28vlRTsKMOa-W1VXcHPiyVDrm5AZTEXBJBGjBVVqmZBMK7rm1ZJykV2mStj1utaW5H6EzuPuhhT3Q_4-xKLf21klxgTHEWeLcTCP5qzqNQo40GhkE78HNUFSeY5cVoRt_-g176Obg8qg1Fqtwu5w_UUucG8vv5fK_ZiKoT3lBeywaLTB3_h8pfB6M13kFv8_lewfu9gswkuE1LPceoFhff99lqy5rgYwzQ38-DYLVxvdq6XmXXqzvXq03Rm8eTvC_5a3P6B3s4APM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2611238966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiplex polymerase chain reaction detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae and their antibiotic resistance in patients with community-acquired pneumonia from southwest Iran</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Farajzadeh Sheikh, Ahmad ; Rahimi, Robab ; Meghdadi, Hossein ; Alami, Ameneh ; Saki, Morteza</creator><creatorcontrib>Farajzadeh Sheikh, Ahmad ; Rahimi, Robab ; Meghdadi, Hossein ; Alami, Ameneh ; Saki, Morteza</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in sputum of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using culture and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) methods and to survey the antibiotic resistance patterns of aforesaid isolates.
In total, 23.9 % (n = 22/92) of sputum samples showed positive results in the culture method. S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were isolated from 15 (16.3 %) and 7 (7.6%) samples, respectively. Using M-PCR, 44 (47.8 %) samples were positive for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Of these, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were detected in 33 (35.8%) and 11 (11.9%) of the sputum samples, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of PCR in detection of S. pneumoniae in comparison with culture method were 100, 76.6, and 83.6%, respectively. While, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of PCR in detection of H. influenzae in comparison with culture method were 100, 95.3, and 95.8%, respectively. Out of 11 isolates of H. influenzae, two strains confirmed as H. influenzae type b (Hib) and 3 isolates were type f. However, 6 isolates were non-typable. The co-trimoxazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate were the less effective antibiotics against S. pneumonia and H. influenzae, respectively. Ceftriaxone with 13.3% resistance rates was the most effective antibiotic against S. pneumoniae, while, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, and gentamicin with resistance rates of 28.6% for each one were the most effective chemicals against H. influenzae isolates.
In this study, the prevalence of S. pneumoniae was more than H. influenzae using culture and M-PCR methods. The M-PCR provided better efficiency in detecting the bacterial agents in CAP patients compared to culture method. This method can improve the early detection of pathogens contributed to CAP. The drug resistant S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae indicated the need to develop a codified monitoring program to prevent further spread of these strains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2180</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02408-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34906085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Amoxicillin ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology ; Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotic resistance ; Antibiotics ; CAP ; Care and treatment ; Ceftriaxone ; Clarithromycin ; Codification ; Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis ; Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology ; Community-acquired pneumonia ; Control ; Cotrimoxazole ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; DNA polymerase ; Dosage and administration ; Drug resistance ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Genes ; Gentamicin ; Haemophilus influenzae ; Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects ; Haemophilus influenzae - genetics ; Haemophilus influenzae - isolation & purification ; Hemophilus infections ; Humans ; Identification and classification ; Iran ; Laboratories ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques ; Morphology ; Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Multiplexing ; Pathogens ; Patients ; Pneumonia ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - microbiology ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Prevention ; Risk factors ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sputum ; Sputum - microbiology ; Strains (organisms) ; Streptococcus infections ; Streptococcus pneumoniae ; Streptococcus pneumoniae - drug effects ; Streptococcus pneumoniae - genetics ; Streptococcus pneumoniae - isolation & purification ; Testing</subject><ispartof>BMC microbiology, 2021-12, Vol.21 (1), p.343-343, Article 343</ispartof><rights>2021. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-e5a4f83e13810f90ef37136847f676be76fbc7461838959158486a7cf85dc3413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-e5a4f83e13810f90ef37136847f676be76fbc7461838959158486a7cf85dc3413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8670030/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2611238966?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34906085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farajzadeh Sheikh, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Robab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meghdadi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alami, Ameneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saki, Morteza</creatorcontrib><title>Multiplex polymerase chain reaction detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae and their antibiotic resistance in patients with community-acquired pneumonia from southwest Iran</title><title>BMC microbiology</title><addtitle>BMC Microbiol</addtitle><description>This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in sputum of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using culture and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) methods and to survey the antibiotic resistance patterns of aforesaid isolates.
In total, 23.9 % (n = 22/92) of sputum samples showed positive results in the culture method. S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were isolated from 15 (16.3 %) and 7 (7.6%) samples, respectively. Using M-PCR, 44 (47.8 %) samples were positive for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Of these, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were detected in 33 (35.8%) and 11 (11.9%) of the sputum samples, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of PCR in detection of S. pneumoniae in comparison with culture method were 100, 76.6, and 83.6%, respectively. While, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of PCR in detection of H. influenzae in comparison with culture method were 100, 95.3, and 95.8%, respectively. Out of 11 isolates of H. influenzae, two strains confirmed as H. influenzae type b (Hib) and 3 isolates were type f. However, 6 isolates were non-typable. The co-trimoxazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate were the less effective antibiotics against S. pneumonia and H. influenzae, respectively. Ceftriaxone with 13.3% resistance rates was the most effective antibiotic against S. pneumoniae, while, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, and gentamicin with resistance rates of 28.6% for each one were the most effective chemicals against H. influenzae isolates.
In this study, the prevalence of S. pneumoniae was more than H. influenzae using culture and M-PCR methods. The M-PCR provided better efficiency in detecting the bacterial agents in CAP patients compared to culture method. This method can improve the early detection of pathogens contributed to CAP. The drug resistant S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae indicated the need to develop a codified monitoring program to prevent further spread of these strains.</description><subject>Amoxicillin</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotic resistance</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>CAP</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone</subject><subject>Clarithromycin</subject><subject>Codification</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Community-acquired pneumonia</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cotrimoxazole</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>DNA polymerase</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Gentamicin</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae - genetics</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Hemophilus infections</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Multiplexing</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - microbiology</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sputum</subject><subject>Sputum - microbiology</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Streptococcus infections</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae - drug effects</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae - genetics</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>1471-2180</issn><issn>1471-2180</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAhyQJS5wSLFjx3YuSFUFdKUiJApny3Emu64SO7WdtssD8lx4u0vbRSiOPPJ881sz_oviNcHHhEj-IZJKcl7iiuSfYVmKJ8UhYYKUFZH46aP4oHgR4yXGREgqnhcHlDWYY1kfFr-_zkOy0wC3aPLDeoSgIyCz0tahANok6x3qIME28j26SAGm5I03Zo5ocjCP3lkNSLsOnWkY_bSyQ05Z1w8zuF-7VFqBDTlKtrU-WZPlo41JOwMZRZNOFlyK6MamFTJ-HGdn07rU5mq2AbqHm1Af_Iiin9PqBmJCi6Ddy-JZr4cIr3b7UfHz86cfp2fl-bcvi9OT89LUjUgl1Jr1kgKhkuC-wdBTQSiXTPRc8BYE71sjGCeSyqZuSC2Z5FqYXtadoYzQo2Kx1e28vlRTsKMOa-W1VXcHPiyVDrm5AZTEXBJBGjBVVqmZBMK7rm1ZJykV2mStj1utaW5H6EzuPuhhT3Q_4-xKLf21klxgTHEWeLcTCP5qzqNQo40GhkE78HNUFSeY5cVoRt_-g176Obg8qg1Fqtwu5w_UUucG8vv5fK_ZiKoT3lBeywaLTB3_h8pfB6M13kFv8_lewfu9gswkuE1LPceoFhff99lqy5rgYwzQ38-DYLVxvdq6XmXXqzvXq03Rm8eTvC_5a3P6B3s4APM</recordid><startdate>20211214</startdate><enddate>20211214</enddate><creator>Farajzadeh Sheikh, Ahmad</creator><creator>Rahimi, Robab</creator><creator>Meghdadi, Hossein</creator><creator>Alami, Ameneh</creator><creator>Saki, Morteza</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211214</creationdate><title>Multiplex polymerase chain reaction detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae and their antibiotic resistance in patients with community-acquired pneumonia from southwest Iran</title><author>Farajzadeh Sheikh, Ahmad ; Rahimi, Robab ; Meghdadi, Hossein ; Alami, Ameneh ; Saki, Morteza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-e5a4f83e13810f90ef37136847f676be76fbc7461838959158486a7cf85dc3413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amoxicillin</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotic resistance</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>CAP</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone</topic><topic>Clarithromycin</topic><topic>Codification</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Community-acquired pneumonia</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cotrimoxazole</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>DNA polymerase</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Gentamicin</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae - genetics</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Hemophilus infections</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Molecular Diagnostic Techniques</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Multiplexing</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - microbiology</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sputum</topic><topic>Sputum - microbiology</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Streptococcus infections</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae - drug effects</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae - genetics</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farajzadeh Sheikh, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Robab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meghdadi, Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alami, Ameneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saki, Morteza</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)</collection><jtitle>BMC microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farajzadeh Sheikh, Ahmad</au><au>Rahimi, Robab</au><au>Meghdadi, Hossein</au><au>Alami, Ameneh</au><au>Saki, Morteza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiplex polymerase chain reaction detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae and their antibiotic resistance in patients with community-acquired pneumonia from southwest Iran</atitle><jtitle>BMC microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Microbiol</addtitle><date>2021-12-14</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>343-343</pages><artnum>343</artnum><issn>1471-2180</issn><eissn>1471-2180</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in sputum of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using culture and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) methods and to survey the antibiotic resistance patterns of aforesaid isolates.
In total, 23.9 % (n = 22/92) of sputum samples showed positive results in the culture method. S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were isolated from 15 (16.3 %) and 7 (7.6%) samples, respectively. Using M-PCR, 44 (47.8 %) samples were positive for S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Of these, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae were detected in 33 (35.8%) and 11 (11.9%) of the sputum samples, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of PCR in detection of S. pneumoniae in comparison with culture method were 100, 76.6, and 83.6%, respectively. While, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of PCR in detection of H. influenzae in comparison with culture method were 100, 95.3, and 95.8%, respectively. Out of 11 isolates of H. influenzae, two strains confirmed as H. influenzae type b (Hib) and 3 isolates were type f. However, 6 isolates were non-typable. The co-trimoxazole and amoxicillin/clavulanate were the less effective antibiotics against S. pneumonia and H. influenzae, respectively. Ceftriaxone with 13.3% resistance rates was the most effective antibiotic against S. pneumoniae, while, clarithromycin, ceftriaxone, and gentamicin with resistance rates of 28.6% for each one were the most effective chemicals against H. influenzae isolates.
In this study, the prevalence of S. pneumoniae was more than H. influenzae using culture and M-PCR methods. The M-PCR provided better efficiency in detecting the bacterial agents in CAP patients compared to culture method. This method can improve the early detection of pathogens contributed to CAP. The drug resistant S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae indicated the need to develop a codified monitoring program to prevent further spread of these strains.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>34906085</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12866-021-02408-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2180 |
ispartof | BMC microbiology, 2021-12, Vol.21 (1), p.343-343, Article 343 |
issn | 1471-2180 1471-2180 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80681719ec2848548e16ddbb4d8337ac |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Amoxicillin Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology Antibacterial agents Antibiotic resistance Antibiotics CAP Care and treatment Ceftriaxone Clarithromycin Codification Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology Community-acquired pneumonia Control Cotrimoxazole Cross-Sectional Studies DNA polymerase Dosage and administration Drug resistance Drug resistance in microorganisms Drug Resistance, Bacterial Genes Gentamicin Haemophilus influenzae Haemophilus influenzae - drug effects Haemophilus influenzae - genetics Haemophilus influenzae - isolation & purification Hemophilus infections Humans Identification and classification Iran Laboratories Microbial Sensitivity Tests Molecular Diagnostic Techniques Morphology Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Multiplexing Pathogens Patients Pneumonia Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis Pneumonia, Bacterial - microbiology Polymerase chain reaction Prevention Risk factors Sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity Sputum Sputum - microbiology Strains (organisms) Streptococcus infections Streptococcus pneumoniae Streptococcus pneumoniae - drug effects Streptococcus pneumoniae - genetics Streptococcus pneumoniae - isolation & purification Testing |
title | Multiplex polymerase chain reaction detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae and their antibiotic resistance in patients with community-acquired pneumonia from southwest Iran |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A33%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiplex%20polymerase%20chain%20reaction%20detection%20of%20Streptococcus%20pneumoniae%20and%20Haemophilus%20influenzae%20and%20their%20antibiotic%20resistance%20in%20patients%20with%20community-acquired%20pneumonia%20from%20southwest%20Iran&rft.jtitle=BMC%20microbiology&rft.au=Farajzadeh%20Sheikh,%20Ahmad&rft.date=2021-12-14&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=343-343&rft.artnum=343&rft.issn=1471-2180&rft.eissn=1471-2180&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12866-021-02408-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA693658907%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c597t-e5a4f83e13810f90ef37136847f676be76fbc7461838959158486a7cf85dc3413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2611238966&rft_id=info:pmid/34906085&rft_galeid=A693658907&rfr_iscdi=true |