Loading…
Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations
Background and aims. Anterior esthetic restoration is challenging in pediatric dentistry, due to limited durability and poor retention of the restoration.This study assessed the effect of air abrasion on tensile failure load of composite class III restorations using different preparation techniques....
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects dental clinics, dental prospects, 2014-01, Vol.8 (2), p.89-94 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 94 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Asl Aminabadi, Naser Najafpour, Ebrahim Erfanparast, Leila Samiei, Mohammad Haghifar, Monireh Sighari Deljavan, Alireza Jamali, Zahra Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh Shokravi, Marzieh |
description | Background and aims. Anterior esthetic restoration is challenging in pediatric dentistry, due to limited durability and poor retention of the restoration.This study assessed the effect of air abrasion on tensile failure load of composite class III restorations using different preparation techniques. Materials and methods. 100 extracted human anterior primary teeth were divided, based on the preparation methods, into four groups each consisting of 25 subjects : conventional (A), labial surface bevel (B), conventional + air abrasion (C), and labial surface bevel + air abrasion (D). After restoring cavities, tensile failure load of samples was measured in Newton by Universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm per minute. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests using SPSS software. Results. There were statistically significant differences between groups A and C (P = 0.003), groups A and B (P & 0.001), groups A and D (P & 0.001), groups B and C (P = 0.028), groups B and D (P = 0.027), and also groups C and D (P& 0.001). Group D demonstrated the highest mean tensile failure load. Conclusion. Labial surface bevel treated by air abrasion showed significantly more retention of composite restoration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5681/joddd.2014.016 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80c19cc9ac664771b109ec57783da7f6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_80c19cc9ac664771b109ec57783da7f6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1551611731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d2051-d69de6f925f0eb63523e4d58258bd457df2f70e3c28f273d8e99fc3662be1a5a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtv1DAUhSMEolXpliWyxIYFGfyI7YQF0ijiEamICg2IXXRjX7ceZeLBzlTiT_CbcSelonhjy-ecz_f6FsVzRldS1ezNNlhrV5yyakWZelScckrrkjNWP74_0x8nxXlKW5qXkFIr_rQ44ZI2gkp-WvxuR0iJdF1HvmKaQ4TZh4kER9bTjNGHSC6j30H8RTaI8_Vb0k3ku59jyP4Zp6O7Dbs9RJ-WYBumm0WA8TX5HKx3Hi2ByZK1jyUMEdJtahMR5ixcRszp47vpWfHEwZjw_G4_K759eL9pP5UXXz527fqitJxKVlrVWFSu4dJRHJSQXGBlZc1lPdhKauu40xSF4bXjWtgam8YZoRQfkIEEcVZ0C9cG2Pb7pcM-gO-PFyFe9RBnb0bsa2pYY0wDRqlKazYw2qCRWtfCgnYqs94trP1h2KE1ufcI4wPoQ2Xy1_1VuOkrxmnDWAa8ugPE8POQp9DvfDI4jjBhOKSeSckUY1rcWl_-Z92GQ8wfnV2KK6WFVDy7Xvxb0X0pf8cu_gAYFLGG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1626673562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Asl Aminabadi, Naser ; Najafpour, Ebrahim ; Erfanparast, Leila ; Samiei, Mohammad ; Haghifar, Monireh ; Sighari Deljavan, Alireza ; Jamali, Zahra ; Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh ; Shokravi, Marzieh</creator><creatorcontrib>Asl Aminabadi, Naser ; Najafpour, Ebrahim ; Erfanparast, Leila ; Samiei, Mohammad ; Haghifar, Monireh ; Sighari Deljavan, Alireza ; Jamali, Zahra ; Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh ; Shokravi, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><description>Background and aims. Anterior esthetic restoration is challenging in pediatric dentistry, due to limited durability and poor retention of the restoration.This study assessed the effect of air abrasion on tensile failure load of composite class III restorations using different preparation techniques. Materials and methods. 100 extracted human anterior primary teeth were divided, based on the preparation methods, into four groups each consisting of 25 subjects : conventional (A), labial surface bevel (B), conventional + air abrasion (C), and labial surface bevel + air abrasion (D). After restoring cavities, tensile failure load of samples was measured in Newton by Universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm per minute. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests using SPSS software. Results. There were statistically significant differences between groups A and C (P = 0.003), groups A and B (P & 0.001), groups A and D (P & 0.001), groups B and C (P = 0.028), groups B and D (P = 0.027), and also groups C and D (P& 0.001). Group D demonstrated the highest mean tensile failure load. Conclusion. Labial surface bevel treated by air abrasion showed significantly more retention of composite restoration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2008-210X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2008-2118</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2008-210X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5681/joddd.2014.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25093052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Iran: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</publisher><subject>Acids ; air abrasion ; Anterior primary teeth ; Atoms & subatomic particles ; Bond strength ; composite restoration ; Dentin ; Dentistry ; Enamel ; Etching ; Original ; Pediatrics ; Retention ; surface treatment ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2014-01, Vol.8 (2), p.89-94</ispartof><rights>Copyright Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Spring 2014</rights><rights>2014 The Authors; Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1626673562/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1626673562?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,44569,53770,53772,74873</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25093052$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Asl Aminabadi, Naser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najafpour, Ebrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erfanparast, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samiei, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghifar, Monireh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sighari Deljavan, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamali, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokravi, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><title>Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations</title><title>Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects</title><addtitle>J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects</addtitle><description>Background and aims. Anterior esthetic restoration is challenging in pediatric dentistry, due to limited durability and poor retention of the restoration.This study assessed the effect of air abrasion on tensile failure load of composite class III restorations using different preparation techniques. Materials and methods. 100 extracted human anterior primary teeth were divided, based on the preparation methods, into four groups each consisting of 25 subjects : conventional (A), labial surface bevel (B), conventional + air abrasion (C), and labial surface bevel + air abrasion (D). After restoring cavities, tensile failure load of samples was measured in Newton by Universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm per minute. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests using SPSS software. Results. There were statistically significant differences between groups A and C (P = 0.003), groups A and B (P & 0.001), groups A and D (P & 0.001), groups B and C (P = 0.028), groups B and D (P = 0.027), and also groups C and D (P& 0.001). Group D demonstrated the highest mean tensile failure load. Conclusion. Labial surface bevel treated by air abrasion showed significantly more retention of composite restoration.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>air abrasion</subject><subject>Anterior primary teeth</subject><subject>Atoms & subatomic particles</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>composite restoration</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Enamel</subject><subject>Etching</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>surface treatment</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>2008-210X</issn><issn>2008-2118</issn><issn>2008-210X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtv1DAUhSMEolXpliWyxIYFGfyI7YQF0ijiEamICg2IXXRjX7ceZeLBzlTiT_CbcSelonhjy-ecz_f6FsVzRldS1ezNNlhrV5yyakWZelScckrrkjNWP74_0x8nxXlKW5qXkFIr_rQ44ZI2gkp-WvxuR0iJdF1HvmKaQ4TZh4kER9bTjNGHSC6j30H8RTaI8_Vb0k3ku59jyP4Zp6O7Dbs9RJ-WYBumm0WA8TX5HKx3Hi2ByZK1jyUMEdJtahMR5ixcRszp47vpWfHEwZjw_G4_K759eL9pP5UXXz527fqitJxKVlrVWFSu4dJRHJSQXGBlZc1lPdhKauu40xSF4bXjWtgam8YZoRQfkIEEcVZ0C9cG2Pb7pcM-gO-PFyFe9RBnb0bsa2pYY0wDRqlKazYw2qCRWtfCgnYqs94trP1h2KE1ufcI4wPoQ2Xy1_1VuOkrxmnDWAa8ugPE8POQp9DvfDI4jjBhOKSeSckUY1rcWl_-Z92GQ8wfnV2KK6WFVDy7Xvxb0X0pf8cu_gAYFLGG</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Asl Aminabadi, Naser</creator><creator>Najafpour, Ebrahim</creator><creator>Erfanparast, Leila</creator><creator>Samiei, Mohammad</creator><creator>Haghifar, Monireh</creator><creator>Sighari Deljavan, Alireza</creator><creator>Jamali, Zahra</creator><creator>Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh</creator><creator>Shokravi, Marzieh</creator><general>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations</title><author>Asl Aminabadi, Naser ; Najafpour, Ebrahim ; Erfanparast, Leila ; Samiei, Mohammad ; Haghifar, Monireh ; Sighari Deljavan, Alireza ; Jamali, Zahra ; Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh ; Shokravi, Marzieh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d2051-d69de6f925f0eb63523e4d58258bd457df2f70e3c28f273d8e99fc3662be1a5a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>air abrasion</topic><topic>Anterior primary teeth</topic><topic>Atoms & subatomic particles</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>composite restoration</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Enamel</topic><topic>Etching</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>surface treatment</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Asl Aminabadi, Naser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najafpour, Ebrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erfanparast, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samiei, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haghifar, Monireh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sighari Deljavan, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamali, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shokravi, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Asl Aminabadi, Naser</au><au>Najafpour, Ebrahim</au><au>Erfanparast, Leila</au><au>Samiei, Mohammad</au><au>Haghifar, Monireh</au><au>Sighari Deljavan, Alireza</au><au>Jamali, Zahra</au><au>Pournaghi Azar, Fatemeh</au><au>Shokravi, Marzieh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>89-94</pages><issn>2008-210X</issn><eissn>2008-2118</eissn><eissn>2008-210X</eissn><abstract>Background and aims. Anterior esthetic restoration is challenging in pediatric dentistry, due to limited durability and poor retention of the restoration.This study assessed the effect of air abrasion on tensile failure load of composite class III restorations using different preparation techniques. Materials and methods. 100 extracted human anterior primary teeth were divided, based on the preparation methods, into four groups each consisting of 25 subjects : conventional (A), labial surface bevel (B), conventional + air abrasion (C), and labial surface bevel + air abrasion (D). After restoring cavities, tensile failure load of samples was measured in Newton by Universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm per minute. The data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests using SPSS software. Results. There were statistically significant differences between groups A and C (P = 0.003), groups A and B (P & 0.001), groups A and D (P & 0.001), groups B and C (P = 0.028), groups B and D (P = 0.027), and also groups C and D (P& 0.001). Group D demonstrated the highest mean tensile failure load. Conclusion. Labial surface bevel treated by air abrasion showed significantly more retention of composite restoration.</abstract><cop>Iran</cop><pub>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</pub><pmid>25093052</pmid><doi>10.5681/joddd.2014.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2008-210X |
ispartof | Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2014-01, Vol.8 (2), p.89-94 |
issn | 2008-210X 2008-2118 2008-210X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80c19cc9ac664771b109ec57783da7f6 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Acids air abrasion Anterior primary teeth Atoms & subatomic particles Bond strength composite restoration Dentin Dentistry Enamel Etching Original Pediatrics Retention surface treatment Teeth |
title | Class III Restoration of Anterior Primary Teeth: In Vitro Retention Comparison of Conventional, Modified and Air-abrasion Treated Preparations |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T07%3A33%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Class%20III%20Restoration%20of%20Anterior%20Primary%20Teeth:%20In%20Vitro%20Retention%20Comparison%20of%20Conventional,%20Modified%20and%20Air-abrasion%20Treated%20Preparations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20research,%20dental%20clinics,%20dental%20prospects&rft.au=Asl%20Aminabadi,%20Naser&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=89-94&rft.issn=2008-210X&rft.eissn=2008-2118&rft_id=info:doi/10.5681/joddd.2014.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1551611731%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d2051-d69de6f925f0eb63523e4d58258bd457df2f70e3c28f273d8e99fc3662be1a5a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1626673562&rft_id=info:pmid/25093052&rfr_iscdi=true |