Loading…

Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape

The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in K...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeosciences 2023-02, Vol.20 (3), p.545-572
Main Authors: Heiskanen, Lauri, Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka, Vekuri, Henriikka, Räsänen, Aleksi, Virtanen, Tarmo, Juutinen, Sari, Lohila, Annalea, Mikola, Juha, Aurela, Mika
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3
container_end_page 572
container_issue 3
container_start_page 545
container_title Biogeosciences
container_volume 20
creator Heiskanen, Lauri
Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka
Vekuri, Henriikka
Räsänen, Aleksi
Virtanen, Tarmo
Juutinen, Sari
Lohila, Annalea
Mikola, Juha
Aurela, Mika
description The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in Kaamanen in northern Finland covered 7 km2 of boreal subarctic landscape with upland forest, open peatland, pine bogs, and lakes. We measured the CO2 and CH4 fluxes with eddy covariance and chambers between June 2017 and June 2019 and studied the C flux responses to varying meteorological conditions. The landscape area was an annual CO2 sink of −45 ± 22 and −33 ± 23 g C m−2 and a CH4 source of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.2 g C m−2 during the first and second study years, respectively. The pine forest had the largest contribution to the landscape-level CO2 sink, −126 ± 21 and −101 ± 19 g C m−2, and the fen to the CH4 emissions, 7.8 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.3 g C m−2, during the first and second study years, respectively. The lakes within the area acted as CO2 and CH4 sources to the atmosphere throughout the measurement period, and a lake located downstream from the fen with organic sediment showed 4-fold fluxes compared to a mineral sediment lake. The annual C balances were affected most by the rainy peak growing season in 2017, the warm summer in 2018, and a heatwave and drought event in July 2018. The rainy period increased ecosystem respiration (ER) in the pine forest due to continuously high soil moisture content, and ER was on a level similar to the following, notably warmer, summer. A corresponding ER response to abundant precipitation was not observed for the fen ecosystem, which is adapted to high water table levels, and thus a higher ER sum was observed during the warm summer 2018. During the heatwave and drought period, similar responses were observed for all terrestrial ecosystems, with decreased gross primary productivity and net CO2 uptake, caused by the unfavourable growing conditions and plant stress due to the soil moisture and vapour pressure deficits. Additionally, the CH4 emissions from the fen decreased during and after the drought. However, the timing and duration of drought effects varied between the fen and forest ecosystems, as C fluxes were affected sooner and had a shorter post-drought recovery time in the fen than forest. The differing CO2 flux response to weather variations showed that terrestrial ecosystems can have a contrasting impact on the land
doi_str_mv 10.5194/bg-20-545-2023
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80f02c027cf6474d9268777c442ec505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A735722044</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_80f02c027cf6474d9268777c442ec505</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A735722044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktr3DAQgE1poWnaa8-CnnpwqqclH0PoYyEl0MdZjOWRo8VrbSQZNrf89GqT0iYQdBgx-ubTDEzTvGf0TLFefhqmltNWSVUDFy-aE6Z510pm-peP7q-bNzlvKRWGGnXS3H3HgjHFOU7BwUwS5n1cMmYSPXGQhriQMcRDGJHAMpIdlmtYkPh5PVQoLKRcIymYamFJoRqOFNysUIIj6GK-zQV39zogeR0guePLXLHsYI9vm1ce5ozv_sbT5veXz78uvrWXV183F-eXrZNaltZ1_SCkUB5dr1ChM4axTg-dBzVSbgSF3nk6GA6eSW8EjnIQo-RUdT0aEKfN5sE7RtjafQo7SLc2QrD3iZgmC6l2NqM11FPuKNfOd_Xzseed0Vo7KTk6RVV1fXhw7VO8WevgdhvXtNT2LdeaGSEU0_-pCao0LD6WBG4XsrPnWijNOZWyUmfPUPWMuAsuLuhDzT8p-PikoDIFD2WCNWe7-fnjWblLMeeE_t_gjNrj0thhsrxepbLHpRF_ADN5s48</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771833517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Heiskanen, Lauri ; Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka ; Vekuri, Henriikka ; Räsänen, Aleksi ; Virtanen, Tarmo ; Juutinen, Sari ; Lohila, Annalea ; Mikola, Juha ; Aurela, Mika</creator><creatorcontrib>Heiskanen, Lauri ; Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka ; Vekuri, Henriikka ; Räsänen, Aleksi ; Virtanen, Tarmo ; Juutinen, Sari ; Lohila, Annalea ; Mikola, Juha ; Aurela, Mika</creatorcontrib><description>The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in Kaamanen in northern Finland covered 7 km2 of boreal subarctic landscape with upland forest, open peatland, pine bogs, and lakes. We measured the CO2 and CH4 fluxes with eddy covariance and chambers between June 2017 and June 2019 and studied the C flux responses to varying meteorological conditions. The landscape area was an annual CO2 sink of −45 ± 22 and −33 ± 23 g C m−2 and a CH4 source of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.2 g C m−2 during the first and second study years, respectively. The pine forest had the largest contribution to the landscape-level CO2 sink, −126 ± 21 and −101 ± 19 g C m−2, and the fen to the CH4 emissions, 7.8 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.3 g C m−2, during the first and second study years, respectively. The lakes within the area acted as CO2 and CH4 sources to the atmosphere throughout the measurement period, and a lake located downstream from the fen with organic sediment showed 4-fold fluxes compared to a mineral sediment lake. The annual C balances were affected most by the rainy peak growing season in 2017, the warm summer in 2018, and a heatwave and drought event in July 2018. The rainy period increased ecosystem respiration (ER) in the pine forest due to continuously high soil moisture content, and ER was on a level similar to the following, notably warmer, summer. A corresponding ER response to abundant precipitation was not observed for the fen ecosystem, which is adapted to high water table levels, and thus a higher ER sum was observed during the warm summer 2018. During the heatwave and drought period, similar responses were observed for all terrestrial ecosystems, with decreased gross primary productivity and net CO2 uptake, caused by the unfavourable growing conditions and plant stress due to the soil moisture and vapour pressure deficits. Additionally, the CH4 emissions from the fen decreased during and after the drought. However, the timing and duration of drought effects varied between the fen and forest ecosystems, as C fluxes were affected sooner and had a shorter post-drought recovery time in the fen than forest. The differing CO2 flux response to weather variations showed that terrestrial ecosystems can have a contrasting impact on the landscape-level C balance in a changing climate, even if they function similarly most of the time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4189</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1726-4189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/bg-20-545-2023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Atmosphere ; Atmospheric carbon dioxide ; Bogs ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide flux ; Climate change ; Coniferous forests ; Drought ; Drought effects ; Ecosystems ; Ecotones ; Eddy covariance ; Emissions ; Environmental aspects ; Fens ; Fluxes ; Forest ecosystems ; Forests ; Groundwater table ; Growing season ; Heat waves ; Ice ; Lake sediments ; Lakes ; Landscape ; Meteorological conditions ; Methane ; Microbalances ; Moisture content ; Moisture effects ; Organic sediments ; Peatlands ; Permafrost ; Plant stress ; Precipitation ; Primary production ; Recovery time ; Remote sensing ; Respiration ; Sediment ; Soil moisture ; Soil moisture content ; Soil stresses ; Summer ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Uptake ; Vapor pressure ; Vapour pressure ; Vegetation ; Water content ; Water table ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Biogeosciences, 2023-02, Vol.20 (3), p.545-572</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Copernicus GmbH</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4603-3532 ; 0000-0002-3629-1837 ; 0000-0001-7857-036X ; 0000-0003-3541-672X ; 0000-0002-7752-1950 ; 0000-0002-4046-7225</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2771833517/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2771833517?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,74897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heiskanen, Lauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vekuri, Henriikka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Aleksi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, Tarmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juutinen, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohila, Annalea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikola, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurela, Mika</creatorcontrib><title>Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape</title><title>Biogeosciences</title><description>The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in Kaamanen in northern Finland covered 7 km2 of boreal subarctic landscape with upland forest, open peatland, pine bogs, and lakes. We measured the CO2 and CH4 fluxes with eddy covariance and chambers between June 2017 and June 2019 and studied the C flux responses to varying meteorological conditions. The landscape area was an annual CO2 sink of −45 ± 22 and −33 ± 23 g C m−2 and a CH4 source of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.2 g C m−2 during the first and second study years, respectively. The pine forest had the largest contribution to the landscape-level CO2 sink, −126 ± 21 and −101 ± 19 g C m−2, and the fen to the CH4 emissions, 7.8 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.3 g C m−2, during the first and second study years, respectively. The lakes within the area acted as CO2 and CH4 sources to the atmosphere throughout the measurement period, and a lake located downstream from the fen with organic sediment showed 4-fold fluxes compared to a mineral sediment lake. The annual C balances were affected most by the rainy peak growing season in 2017, the warm summer in 2018, and a heatwave and drought event in July 2018. The rainy period increased ecosystem respiration (ER) in the pine forest due to continuously high soil moisture content, and ER was on a level similar to the following, notably warmer, summer. A corresponding ER response to abundant precipitation was not observed for the fen ecosystem, which is adapted to high water table levels, and thus a higher ER sum was observed during the warm summer 2018. During the heatwave and drought period, similar responses were observed for all terrestrial ecosystems, with decreased gross primary productivity and net CO2 uptake, caused by the unfavourable growing conditions and plant stress due to the soil moisture and vapour pressure deficits. Additionally, the CH4 emissions from the fen decreased during and after the drought. However, the timing and duration of drought effects varied between the fen and forest ecosystems, as C fluxes were affected sooner and had a shorter post-drought recovery time in the fen than forest. The differing CO2 flux response to weather variations showed that terrestrial ecosystems can have a contrasting impact on the landscape-level C balance in a changing climate, even if they function similarly most of the time.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Bogs</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide flux</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought effects</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotones</subject><subject>Eddy covariance</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Fens</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Groundwater table</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Heat waves</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Lake sediments</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Meteorological conditions</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Microbalances</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Organic sediments</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Permafrost</subject><subject>Plant stress</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Recovery time</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil moisture content</subject><subject>Soil stresses</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><subject>Vapour pressure</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water table</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>1726-4189</issn><issn>1726-4170</issn><issn>1726-4189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktr3DAQgE1poWnaa8-CnnpwqqclH0PoYyEl0MdZjOWRo8VrbSQZNrf89GqT0iYQdBgx-ubTDEzTvGf0TLFefhqmltNWSVUDFy-aE6Z510pm-peP7q-bNzlvKRWGGnXS3H3HgjHFOU7BwUwS5n1cMmYSPXGQhriQMcRDGJHAMpIdlmtYkPh5PVQoLKRcIymYamFJoRqOFNysUIIj6GK-zQV39zogeR0guePLXLHsYI9vm1ce5ozv_sbT5veXz78uvrWXV183F-eXrZNaltZ1_SCkUB5dr1ChM4axTg-dBzVSbgSF3nk6GA6eSW8EjnIQo-RUdT0aEKfN5sE7RtjafQo7SLc2QrD3iZgmC6l2NqM11FPuKNfOd_Xzseed0Vo7KTk6RVV1fXhw7VO8WevgdhvXtNT2LdeaGSEU0_-pCao0LD6WBG4XsrPnWijNOZWyUmfPUPWMuAsuLuhDzT8p-PikoDIFD2WCNWe7-fnjWblLMeeE_t_gjNrj0thhsrxepbLHpRF_ADN5s48</recordid><startdate>20230203</startdate><enddate>20230203</enddate><creator>Heiskanen, Lauri</creator><creator>Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka</creator><creator>Vekuri, Henriikka</creator><creator>Räsänen, Aleksi</creator><creator>Virtanen, Tarmo</creator><creator>Juutinen, Sari</creator><creator>Lohila, Annalea</creator><creator>Mikola, Juha</creator><creator>Aurela, Mika</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-3532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-1837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7857-036X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-672X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-1950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4046-7225</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230203</creationdate><title>Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape</title><author>Heiskanen, Lauri ; Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka ; Vekuri, Henriikka ; Räsänen, Aleksi ; Virtanen, Tarmo ; Juutinen, Sari ; Lohila, Annalea ; Mikola, Juha ; Aurela, Mika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Bogs</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide flux</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought effects</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotones</topic><topic>Eddy covariance</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Fens</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Groundwater table</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Heat waves</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Lake sediments</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Meteorological conditions</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Microbalances</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Organic sediments</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Permafrost</topic><topic>Plant stress</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Recovery time</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil moisture content</topic><topic>Soil stresses</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><topic>Vapour pressure</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water table</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heiskanen, Lauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vekuri, Henriikka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Aleksi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, Tarmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juutinen, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohila, Annalea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikola, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurela, Mika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heiskanen, Lauri</au><au>Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka</au><au>Vekuri, Henriikka</au><au>Räsänen, Aleksi</au><au>Virtanen, Tarmo</au><au>Juutinen, Sari</au><au>Lohila, Annalea</au><au>Mikola, Juha</au><au>Aurela, Mika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape</atitle><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2023-02-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>572</epage><pages>545-572</pages><issn>1726-4189</issn><issn>1726-4170</issn><eissn>1726-4189</eissn><abstract>The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in Kaamanen in northern Finland covered 7 km2 of boreal subarctic landscape with upland forest, open peatland, pine bogs, and lakes. We measured the CO2 and CH4 fluxes with eddy covariance and chambers between June 2017 and June 2019 and studied the C flux responses to varying meteorological conditions. The landscape area was an annual CO2 sink of −45 ± 22 and −33 ± 23 g C m−2 and a CH4 source of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.2 g C m−2 during the first and second study years, respectively. The pine forest had the largest contribution to the landscape-level CO2 sink, −126 ± 21 and −101 ± 19 g C m−2, and the fen to the CH4 emissions, 7.8 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.3 g C m−2, during the first and second study years, respectively. The lakes within the area acted as CO2 and CH4 sources to the atmosphere throughout the measurement period, and a lake located downstream from the fen with organic sediment showed 4-fold fluxes compared to a mineral sediment lake. The annual C balances were affected most by the rainy peak growing season in 2017, the warm summer in 2018, and a heatwave and drought event in July 2018. The rainy period increased ecosystem respiration (ER) in the pine forest due to continuously high soil moisture content, and ER was on a level similar to the following, notably warmer, summer. A corresponding ER response to abundant precipitation was not observed for the fen ecosystem, which is adapted to high water table levels, and thus a higher ER sum was observed during the warm summer 2018. During the heatwave and drought period, similar responses were observed for all terrestrial ecosystems, with decreased gross primary productivity and net CO2 uptake, caused by the unfavourable growing conditions and plant stress due to the soil moisture and vapour pressure deficits. Additionally, the CH4 emissions from the fen decreased during and after the drought. However, the timing and duration of drought effects varied between the fen and forest ecosystems, as C fluxes were affected sooner and had a shorter post-drought recovery time in the fen than forest. The differing CO2 flux response to weather variations showed that terrestrial ecosystems can have a contrasting impact on the landscape-level C balance in a changing climate, even if they function similarly most of the time.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/bg-20-545-2023</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-3532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-1837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7857-036X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-672X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-1950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4046-7225</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1726-4189
ispartof Biogeosciences, 2023-02, Vol.20 (3), p.545-572
issn 1726-4189
1726-4170
1726-4189
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80f02c027cf6474d9268777c442ec505
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Aquatic ecosystems
Atmosphere
Atmospheric carbon dioxide
Bogs
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide flux
Climate change
Coniferous forests
Drought
Drought effects
Ecosystems
Ecotones
Eddy covariance
Emissions
Environmental aspects
Fens
Fluxes
Forest ecosystems
Forests
Groundwater table
Growing season
Heat waves
Ice
Lake sediments
Lakes
Landscape
Meteorological conditions
Methane
Microbalances
Moisture content
Moisture effects
Organic sediments
Peatlands
Permafrost
Plant stress
Precipitation
Primary production
Recovery time
Remote sensing
Respiration
Sediment
Soil moisture
Soil moisture content
Soil stresses
Summer
Terrestrial ecosystems
Uptake
Vapor pressure
Vapour pressure
Vegetation
Water content
Water table
Weather
title Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A02%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meteorological%20responses%20of%20carbon%20dioxide%20and%20methane%20fluxes%20in%20the%20terrestrial%20and%20aquatic%20ecosystems%20of%20a%20subarctic%20landscape&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Heiskanen,%20Lauri&rft.date=2023-02-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=572&rft.pages=545-572&rft.issn=1726-4189&rft.eissn=1726-4189&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/bg-20-545-2023&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA735722044%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771833517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A735722044&rfr_iscdi=true