Loading…
Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape
The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in K...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biogeosciences 2023-02, Vol.20 (3), p.545-572 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3 |
container_end_page | 572 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 545 |
container_title | Biogeosciences |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Heiskanen, Lauri Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka Vekuri, Henriikka Räsänen, Aleksi Virtanen, Tarmo Juutinen, Sari Lohila, Annalea Mikola, Juha Aurela, Mika |
description | The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in Kaamanen in northern Finland covered 7 km2 of boreal subarctic landscape with upland forest, open peatland, pine bogs, and lakes. We measured the CO2 and CH4 fluxes with eddy covariance and chambers between June 2017 and June 2019 and studied the C flux responses to varying meteorological conditions. The landscape area was an annual CO2 sink of −45 ± 22 and −33 ± 23 g C m−2 and a CH4 source of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.2 g C m−2 during the first and second study years, respectively. The pine forest had the largest contribution to the landscape-level CO2 sink, −126 ± 21 and −101 ± 19 g C m−2, and the fen to the CH4 emissions, 7.8 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.3 g C m−2, during the first and second study years, respectively. The lakes within the area acted as CO2 and CH4 sources to the atmosphere throughout the measurement period, and a lake located downstream from the fen with organic sediment showed 4-fold fluxes compared to a mineral sediment lake. The annual C balances were affected most by the rainy peak growing season in 2017, the warm summer in 2018, and a heatwave and drought event in July 2018. The rainy period increased ecosystem respiration (ER) in the pine forest due to continuously high soil moisture content, and ER was on a level similar to the following, notably warmer, summer. A corresponding ER response to abundant precipitation was not observed for the fen ecosystem, which is adapted to high water table levels, and thus a higher ER sum was observed during the warm summer 2018. During the heatwave and drought period, similar responses were observed for all terrestrial ecosystems, with decreased gross primary productivity and net CO2 uptake, caused by the unfavourable growing conditions and plant stress due to the soil moisture and vapour pressure deficits. Additionally, the CH4 emissions from the fen decreased during and after the drought. However, the timing and duration of drought effects varied between the fen and forest ecosystems, as C fluxes were affected sooner and had a shorter post-drought recovery time in the fen than forest. The differing CO2 flux response to weather variations showed that terrestrial ecosystems can have a contrasting impact on the land |
doi_str_mv | 10.5194/bg-20-545-2023 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80f02c027cf6474d9268777c442ec505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A735722044</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_80f02c027cf6474d9268777c442ec505</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A735722044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktr3DAQgE1poWnaa8-CnnpwqqclH0PoYyEl0MdZjOWRo8VrbSQZNrf89GqT0iYQdBgx-ubTDEzTvGf0TLFefhqmltNWSVUDFy-aE6Z510pm-peP7q-bNzlvKRWGGnXS3H3HgjHFOU7BwUwS5n1cMmYSPXGQhriQMcRDGJHAMpIdlmtYkPh5PVQoLKRcIymYamFJoRqOFNysUIIj6GK-zQV39zogeR0guePLXLHsYI9vm1ce5ozv_sbT5veXz78uvrWXV183F-eXrZNaltZ1_SCkUB5dr1ChM4axTg-dBzVSbgSF3nk6GA6eSW8EjnIQo-RUdT0aEKfN5sE7RtjafQo7SLc2QrD3iZgmC6l2NqM11FPuKNfOd_Xzseed0Vo7KTk6RVV1fXhw7VO8WevgdhvXtNT2LdeaGSEU0_-pCao0LD6WBG4XsrPnWijNOZWyUmfPUPWMuAsuLuhDzT8p-PikoDIFD2WCNWe7-fnjWblLMeeE_t_gjNrj0thhsrxepbLHpRF_ADN5s48</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2771833517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Heiskanen, Lauri ; Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka ; Vekuri, Henriikka ; Räsänen, Aleksi ; Virtanen, Tarmo ; Juutinen, Sari ; Lohila, Annalea ; Mikola, Juha ; Aurela, Mika</creator><creatorcontrib>Heiskanen, Lauri ; Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka ; Vekuri, Henriikka ; Räsänen, Aleksi ; Virtanen, Tarmo ; Juutinen, Sari ; Lohila, Annalea ; Mikola, Juha ; Aurela, Mika</creatorcontrib><description>The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in Kaamanen in northern Finland covered 7 km2 of boreal subarctic landscape with upland forest, open peatland, pine bogs, and lakes. We measured the CO2 and CH4 fluxes with eddy covariance and chambers between June 2017 and June 2019 and studied the C flux responses to varying meteorological conditions. The landscape area was an annual CO2 sink of −45 ± 22 and −33 ± 23 g C m−2 and a CH4 source of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.2 g C m−2 during the first and second study years, respectively. The pine forest had the largest contribution to the landscape-level CO2 sink, −126 ± 21 and −101 ± 19 g C m−2, and the fen to the CH4 emissions, 7.8 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.3 g C m−2, during the first and second study years, respectively. The lakes within the area acted as CO2 and CH4 sources to the atmosphere throughout the measurement period, and a lake located downstream from the fen with organic sediment showed 4-fold fluxes compared to a mineral sediment lake. The annual C balances were affected most by the rainy peak growing season in 2017, the warm summer in 2018, and a heatwave and drought event in July 2018. The rainy period increased ecosystem respiration (ER) in the pine forest due to continuously high soil moisture content, and ER was on a level similar to the following, notably warmer, summer. A corresponding ER response to abundant precipitation was not observed for the fen ecosystem, which is adapted to high water table levels, and thus a higher ER sum was observed during the warm summer 2018. During the heatwave and drought period, similar responses were observed for all terrestrial ecosystems, with decreased gross primary productivity and net CO2 uptake, caused by the unfavourable growing conditions and plant stress due to the soil moisture and vapour pressure deficits. Additionally, the CH4 emissions from the fen decreased during and after the drought. However, the timing and duration of drought effects varied between the fen and forest ecosystems, as C fluxes were affected sooner and had a shorter post-drought recovery time in the fen than forest. The differing CO2 flux response to weather variations showed that terrestrial ecosystems can have a contrasting impact on the landscape-level C balance in a changing climate, even if they function similarly most of the time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4189</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1726-4170</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1726-4189</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5194/bg-20-545-2023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Katlenburg-Lindau: Copernicus GmbH</publisher><subject>Aquatic ecosystems ; Atmosphere ; Atmospheric carbon dioxide ; Bogs ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide flux ; Climate change ; Coniferous forests ; Drought ; Drought effects ; Ecosystems ; Ecotones ; Eddy covariance ; Emissions ; Environmental aspects ; Fens ; Fluxes ; Forest ecosystems ; Forests ; Groundwater table ; Growing season ; Heat waves ; Ice ; Lake sediments ; Lakes ; Landscape ; Meteorological conditions ; Methane ; Microbalances ; Moisture content ; Moisture effects ; Organic sediments ; Peatlands ; Permafrost ; Plant stress ; Precipitation ; Primary production ; Recovery time ; Remote sensing ; Respiration ; Sediment ; Soil moisture ; Soil moisture content ; Soil stresses ; Summer ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Uptake ; Vapor pressure ; Vapour pressure ; Vegetation ; Water content ; Water table ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Biogeosciences, 2023-02, Vol.20 (3), p.545-572</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Copernicus GmbH</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4603-3532 ; 0000-0002-3629-1837 ; 0000-0001-7857-036X ; 0000-0003-3541-672X ; 0000-0002-7752-1950 ; 0000-0002-4046-7225</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2771833517/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2771833517?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,25752,27923,27924,37011,44589,74897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heiskanen, Lauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vekuri, Henriikka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Aleksi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, Tarmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juutinen, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohila, Annalea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikola, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurela, Mika</creatorcontrib><title>Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape</title><title>Biogeosciences</title><description>The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in Kaamanen in northern Finland covered 7 km2 of boreal subarctic landscape with upland forest, open peatland, pine bogs, and lakes. We measured the CO2 and CH4 fluxes with eddy covariance and chambers between June 2017 and June 2019 and studied the C flux responses to varying meteorological conditions. The landscape area was an annual CO2 sink of −45 ± 22 and −33 ± 23 g C m−2 and a CH4 source of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.2 g C m−2 during the first and second study years, respectively. The pine forest had the largest contribution to the landscape-level CO2 sink, −126 ± 21 and −101 ± 19 g C m−2, and the fen to the CH4 emissions, 7.8 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.3 g C m−2, during the first and second study years, respectively. The lakes within the area acted as CO2 and CH4 sources to the atmosphere throughout the measurement period, and a lake located downstream from the fen with organic sediment showed 4-fold fluxes compared to a mineral sediment lake. The annual C balances were affected most by the rainy peak growing season in 2017, the warm summer in 2018, and a heatwave and drought event in July 2018. The rainy period increased ecosystem respiration (ER) in the pine forest due to continuously high soil moisture content, and ER was on a level similar to the following, notably warmer, summer. A corresponding ER response to abundant precipitation was not observed for the fen ecosystem, which is adapted to high water table levels, and thus a higher ER sum was observed during the warm summer 2018. During the heatwave and drought period, similar responses were observed for all terrestrial ecosystems, with decreased gross primary productivity and net CO2 uptake, caused by the unfavourable growing conditions and plant stress due to the soil moisture and vapour pressure deficits. Additionally, the CH4 emissions from the fen decreased during and after the drought. However, the timing and duration of drought effects varied between the fen and forest ecosystems, as C fluxes were affected sooner and had a shorter post-drought recovery time in the fen than forest. The differing CO2 flux response to weather variations showed that terrestrial ecosystems can have a contrasting impact on the landscape-level C balance in a changing climate, even if they function similarly most of the time.</description><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>Atmospheric carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Bogs</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide flux</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drought effects</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotones</subject><subject>Eddy covariance</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Fens</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Groundwater table</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Heat waves</subject><subject>Ice</subject><subject>Lake sediments</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Meteorological conditions</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Microbalances</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Moisture effects</subject><subject>Organic sediments</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Permafrost</subject><subject>Plant stress</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Recovery time</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Soil moisture content</subject><subject>Soil stresses</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Vapor pressure</subject><subject>Vapour pressure</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water table</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>1726-4189</issn><issn>1726-4170</issn><issn>1726-4189</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktr3DAQgE1poWnaa8-CnnpwqqclH0PoYyEl0MdZjOWRo8VrbSQZNrf89GqT0iYQdBgx-ubTDEzTvGf0TLFefhqmltNWSVUDFy-aE6Z510pm-peP7q-bNzlvKRWGGnXS3H3HgjHFOU7BwUwS5n1cMmYSPXGQhriQMcRDGJHAMpIdlmtYkPh5PVQoLKRcIymYamFJoRqOFNysUIIj6GK-zQV39zogeR0guePLXLHsYI9vm1ce5ozv_sbT5veXz78uvrWXV183F-eXrZNaltZ1_SCkUB5dr1ChM4axTg-dBzVSbgSF3nk6GA6eSW8EjnIQo-RUdT0aEKfN5sE7RtjafQo7SLc2QrD3iZgmC6l2NqM11FPuKNfOd_Xzseed0Vo7KTk6RVV1fXhw7VO8WevgdhvXtNT2LdeaGSEU0_-pCao0LD6WBG4XsrPnWijNOZWyUmfPUPWMuAsuLuhDzT8p-PikoDIFD2WCNWe7-fnjWblLMeeE_t_gjNrj0thhsrxepbLHpRF_ADN5s48</recordid><startdate>20230203</startdate><enddate>20230203</enddate><creator>Heiskanen, Lauri</creator><creator>Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka</creator><creator>Vekuri, Henriikka</creator><creator>Räsänen, Aleksi</creator><creator>Virtanen, Tarmo</creator><creator>Juutinen, Sari</creator><creator>Lohila, Annalea</creator><creator>Mikola, Juha</creator><creator>Aurela, Mika</creator><general>Copernicus GmbH</general><general>Copernicus Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-3532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-1837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7857-036X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-672X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-1950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4046-7225</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230203</creationdate><title>Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape</title><author>Heiskanen, Lauri ; Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka ; Vekuri, Henriikka ; Räsänen, Aleksi ; Virtanen, Tarmo ; Juutinen, Sari ; Lohila, Annalea ; Mikola, Juha ; Aurela, Mika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>Atmospheric carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Bogs</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide flux</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drought effects</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotones</topic><topic>Eddy covariance</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Fens</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Groundwater table</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Heat waves</topic><topic>Ice</topic><topic>Lake sediments</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Meteorological conditions</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Microbalances</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Moisture effects</topic><topic>Organic sediments</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Permafrost</topic><topic>Plant stress</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Recovery time</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Soil moisture content</topic><topic>Soil stresses</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Vapor pressure</topic><topic>Vapour pressure</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water table</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heiskanen, Lauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vekuri, Henriikka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Räsänen, Aleksi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virtanen, Tarmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juutinen, Sari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohila, Annalea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikola, Juha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aurela, Mika</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heiskanen, Lauri</au><au>Tuovinen, Juha-Pekka</au><au>Vekuri, Henriikka</au><au>Räsänen, Aleksi</au><au>Virtanen, Tarmo</au><au>Juutinen, Sari</au><au>Lohila, Annalea</au><au>Mikola, Juha</au><au>Aurela, Mika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape</atitle><jtitle>Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2023-02-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>572</epage><pages>545-572</pages><issn>1726-4189</issn><issn>1726-4170</issn><eissn>1726-4189</eissn><abstract>The subarctic landscape consists of a mosaic of forest, peatland, and aquatic ecosystems and their ecotones. The carbon (C) exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere through carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes varies spatially and temporally among these ecosystems. Our study area in Kaamanen in northern Finland covered 7 km2 of boreal subarctic landscape with upland forest, open peatland, pine bogs, and lakes. We measured the CO2 and CH4 fluxes with eddy covariance and chambers between June 2017 and June 2019 and studied the C flux responses to varying meteorological conditions. The landscape area was an annual CO2 sink of −45 ± 22 and −33 ± 23 g C m−2 and a CH4 source of 3.0 ± 0.2 and 2.7 ± 0.2 g C m−2 during the first and second study years, respectively. The pine forest had the largest contribution to the landscape-level CO2 sink, −126 ± 21 and −101 ± 19 g C m−2, and the fen to the CH4 emissions, 7.8 ± 0.2 and 6.3 ± 0.3 g C m−2, during the first and second study years, respectively. The lakes within the area acted as CO2 and CH4 sources to the atmosphere throughout the measurement period, and a lake located downstream from the fen with organic sediment showed 4-fold fluxes compared to a mineral sediment lake. The annual C balances were affected most by the rainy peak growing season in 2017, the warm summer in 2018, and a heatwave and drought event in July 2018. The rainy period increased ecosystem respiration (ER) in the pine forest due to continuously high soil moisture content, and ER was on a level similar to the following, notably warmer, summer. A corresponding ER response to abundant precipitation was not observed for the fen ecosystem, which is adapted to high water table levels, and thus a higher ER sum was observed during the warm summer 2018. During the heatwave and drought period, similar responses were observed for all terrestrial ecosystems, with decreased gross primary productivity and net CO2 uptake, caused by the unfavourable growing conditions and plant stress due to the soil moisture and vapour pressure deficits. Additionally, the CH4 emissions from the fen decreased during and after the drought. However, the timing and duration of drought effects varied between the fen and forest ecosystems, as C fluxes were affected sooner and had a shorter post-drought recovery time in the fen than forest. The differing CO2 flux response to weather variations showed that terrestrial ecosystems can have a contrasting impact on the landscape-level C balance in a changing climate, even if they function similarly most of the time.</abstract><cop>Katlenburg-Lindau</cop><pub>Copernicus GmbH</pub><doi>10.5194/bg-20-545-2023</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-3532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-1837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7857-036X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-672X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7752-1950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4046-7225</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1726-4189 |
ispartof | Biogeosciences, 2023-02, Vol.20 (3), p.545-572 |
issn | 1726-4189 1726-4170 1726-4189 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_80f02c027cf6474d9268777c442ec505 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Aquatic ecosystems Atmosphere Atmospheric carbon dioxide Bogs Carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide flux Climate change Coniferous forests Drought Drought effects Ecosystems Ecotones Eddy covariance Emissions Environmental aspects Fens Fluxes Forest ecosystems Forests Groundwater table Growing season Heat waves Ice Lake sediments Lakes Landscape Meteorological conditions Methane Microbalances Moisture content Moisture effects Organic sediments Peatlands Permafrost Plant stress Precipitation Primary production Recovery time Remote sensing Respiration Sediment Soil moisture Soil moisture content Soil stresses Summer Terrestrial ecosystems Uptake Vapor pressure Vapour pressure Vegetation Water content Water table Weather |
title | Meteorological responses of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of a subarctic landscape |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A02%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meteorological%20responses%20of%20carbon%20dioxide%20and%20methane%20fluxes%20in%20the%20terrestrial%20and%20aquatic%20ecosystems%20of%20a%20subarctic%20landscape&rft.jtitle=Biogeosciences&rft.au=Heiskanen,%20Lauri&rft.date=2023-02-03&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=572&rft.pages=545-572&rft.issn=1726-4189&rft.eissn=1726-4189&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194/bg-20-545-2023&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA735722044%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-c69b3435fec95e5ec881167b6fa5d02830a9cf0b82af14f83ed4b3d420569e8a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2771833517&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A735722044&rfr_iscdi=true |