A Miniaturized Electrostatic Precipitator Respirator Effectively Removes Ambient SARS-CoV-2 Bioaerosols

• Published in: Viruses 2022-04, Vol.14 (4), p.765
• Main Authors: Redmann, Rachel K, Beddingfield, Brandon J, Spencer, Skye, Chirichella, Nicole R, Henley, Julian L, Hager, Wes, Roy, Chad J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aerosols; Air flow; bioaerosols; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - prevention & control; Design; Efficiency; electrostatic precipitation; Environmental chambers; Humans; Inhalation; Masks; Pandemics; Respiration; Respirators; respiratory protection; Ribonucleic acid; RNA; RNA, Viral; SARS-CoV-2; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Static Electricity; Ventilators, Mechanical
• ISSN: 1999-4915; 1999-4915
• DOI: 10.3390/v14040765

The inhalation of ambient SARS-CoV-2-containing bioaerosols leads to infection and pandemic airborne transmission in susceptible populations. Filter-based respirators effectively reduce exposure but complicate normal respiration through breathing zone pressure differentials; therefore, they are impractical for long-term use. We tested the comparative effectiveness of a prototyped miniaturized electrostatic precipitator (mEP) on a filter-based respirator (N95) via the removal of viral bioaerosols from a simulated, inspired air stream. : Each respirator was tested within a 16 L environmental chamber housed within a Class III biological safety cabinet within biosafety level 3 containment. SARS-CoV-2-containing bioaerosols were generated in the chamber, drawn by a vacuum through each respirator, and physical particle removal and viral genomic RNA were measured distal to the breathing zone of each device. The mEP respirator removed particles (96.5 ± 0.4%), approximating efficiencies of the N95 (96.9 ± 0.6%). The mEP respirator similarly decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA (99.792%) when compared to N95 removal (99.942%), as a function of particle removal from the airstream distal to the breathing zone of each respirator. The mEP respirator approximated the performance of a filter-based N95 respirator for particle removal and viral RNA as a constituent of the SARS-CoV-2 bioaerosols generated for this evaluation. In practice, the mEP respirator could provide equivalent protection from ambient infectious bioaerosols as the N95 respirator without undue pressure drop to the wearer, thereby facilitating its long-term use in an unobstructed breathing configuration.