Loading…

Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning

BACKGROUND:Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2015-02, Vol.3 (2), p.e307-e307
Main Authors: Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A, Howell, Lori K, Boutros, Shadi, Scott, Michelle A, Urata, Mark M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4264-d72c17a2eb880fc17a11bae2cc131ec3196d04694ed034af291f8354e238ae403
container_end_page e307
container_issue 2
container_start_page e307
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
container_volume 3
creator Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A
Howell, Lori K
Boutros, Shadi
Scott, Michelle A
Urata, Mark M
description BACKGROUND:Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is an accurate and reproducible method of surgical correction of the dentofacial skeleton in cleft and noncleft patients, albeit considerably time-consuming. With the advent of computed tomography scanning, 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have gained a foothold in orthognathic surgery with VSP rapidly replacing traditional model surgery in many parts of the country and the world. What has yet to be determined is whether the application and feasibility of virtual model surgery is at a point where it will eliminate the need for traditional model surgery in both the private and academic setting. METHODS:Traditional model surgery was compared with VSP splint fabrication to determine the feasibility of use and accuracy of application in orthognathic surgery within our institution. RESULTS:VSP was found to generate acrylic splints of equal quality to model surgery splints in a fraction of the time. Drawbacks of VSP splint fabrication are the increased cost of production and certain limitations as it relates to complex craniofacial patients. CONCLUSIONS:It is our opinion that virtual model surgery will displace and replace traditional model surgery as it will become cost and time effective in both the private and academic setting for practitioners providing orthognathic surgical care in cleft and noncleft patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_814bdb87a1bb4d0aa49cb0bce132f7e5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_814bdb87a1bb4d0aa49cb0bce132f7e5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1661989032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4264-d72c17a2eb880fc17a11bae2cc131ec3196d04694ed034af291f8354e238ae403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoMottT-A5G59GZrvmYm44UgW20LlRVawbuQjzMzqdlJTTIt_fdmu23ZKpibhOQ5zwnnRegtwUcEd-2Hk9XPI7y7iOAv0D4lTbdo65a_3DnvocOUrjaQEJy09Wu0R-u2xoI3-2i9nGOEKVcXWeU5VaGvLuY4OKN89d2raXLTUPUhVquYxzBMKo_O3CMQ7z5Wl1FZl12YCv4NCmFTdQMxFRM7_tf0Br3qlU9w-LAfoB9fv1wuTxfnq5Oz5efzheG04QvbUkNaRUELgfvNkRCtgBpDGAHDSNdYzJuOg8WMq552pBes5kCZUMAxO0BnW68N6kpeR7dW8U4G5eT9RYiDVDE740EKwrXVorTQmlusFO-MxtoAYbRvoS6uT1vX9azXYE0ZVlT-mfT5y-RGOYQbyVmNGWFF8P5BEMPvGVKWa5cM-DITCHOSpGlIJzrMaEH5FjUxpBShf2pDsNwEL0vw8u_gS9m73S8-FT3GXACxBW6DzyWeX36-hShHUD6P_3f_AVnYu_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1661989032</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A ; Howell, Lori K ; Boutros, Shadi ; Scott, Michelle A ; Urata, Mark M</creator><creatorcontrib>Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A ; Howell, Lori K ; Boutros, Shadi ; Scott, Michelle A ; Urata, Mark M</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is an accurate and reproducible method of surgical correction of the dentofacial skeleton in cleft and noncleft patients, albeit considerably time-consuming. With the advent of computed tomography scanning, 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have gained a foothold in orthognathic surgery with VSP rapidly replacing traditional model surgery in many parts of the country and the world. What has yet to be determined is whether the application and feasibility of virtual model surgery is at a point where it will eliminate the need for traditional model surgery in both the private and academic setting. METHODS:Traditional model surgery was compared with VSP splint fabrication to determine the feasibility of use and accuracy of application in orthognathic surgery within our institution. RESULTS:VSP was found to generate acrylic splints of equal quality to model surgery splints in a fraction of the time. Drawbacks of VSP splint fabrication are the increased cost of production and certain limitations as it relates to complex craniofacial patients. CONCLUSIONS:It is our opinion that virtual model surgery will displace and replace traditional model surgery as it will become cost and time effective in both the private and academic setting for practitioners providing orthognathic surgical care in cleft and noncleft patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-7574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-7574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25750846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2015-02, Vol.3 (2), p.e307-e307</ispartof><rights>2015 American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4264-d72c17a2eb880fc17a11bae2cc131ec3196d04694ed034af291f8354e238ae403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350313/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4350313/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25750846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Lori K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutros, Shadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Michelle A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urata, Mark M</creatorcontrib><title>Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is an accurate and reproducible method of surgical correction of the dentofacial skeleton in cleft and noncleft patients, albeit considerably time-consuming. With the advent of computed tomography scanning, 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have gained a foothold in orthognathic surgery with VSP rapidly replacing traditional model surgery in many parts of the country and the world. What has yet to be determined is whether the application and feasibility of virtual model surgery is at a point where it will eliminate the need for traditional model surgery in both the private and academic setting. METHODS:Traditional model surgery was compared with VSP splint fabrication to determine the feasibility of use and accuracy of application in orthognathic surgery within our institution. RESULTS:VSP was found to generate acrylic splints of equal quality to model surgery splints in a fraction of the time. Drawbacks of VSP splint fabrication are the increased cost of production and certain limitations as it relates to complex craniofacial patients. CONCLUSIONS:It is our opinion that virtual model surgery will displace and replace traditional model surgery as it will become cost and time effective in both the private and academic setting for practitioners providing orthognathic surgical care in cleft and noncleft patients.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2169-7574</issn><issn>2169-7574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoMottT-A5G59GZrvmYm44UgW20LlRVawbuQjzMzqdlJTTIt_fdmu23ZKpibhOQ5zwnnRegtwUcEd-2Hk9XPI7y7iOAv0D4lTbdo65a_3DnvocOUrjaQEJy09Wu0R-u2xoI3-2i9nGOEKVcXWeU5VaGvLuY4OKN89d2raXLTUPUhVquYxzBMKo_O3CMQ7z5Wl1FZl12YCv4NCmFTdQMxFRM7_tf0Br3qlU9w-LAfoB9fv1wuTxfnq5Oz5efzheG04QvbUkNaRUELgfvNkRCtgBpDGAHDSNdYzJuOg8WMq552pBes5kCZUMAxO0BnW68N6kpeR7dW8U4G5eT9RYiDVDE740EKwrXVorTQmlusFO-MxtoAYbRvoS6uT1vX9azXYE0ZVlT-mfT5y-RGOYQbyVmNGWFF8P5BEMPvGVKWa5cM-DITCHOSpGlIJzrMaEH5FjUxpBShf2pDsNwEL0vw8u_gS9m73S8-FT3GXACxBW6DzyWeX36-hShHUD6P_3f_AVnYu_s</recordid><startdate>201502</startdate><enddate>201502</enddate><creator>Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A</creator><creator>Howell, Lori K</creator><creator>Boutros, Shadi</creator><creator>Scott, Michelle A</creator><creator>Urata, Mark M</creator><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Health</general><general>Wolters Kluwer</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201502</creationdate><title>Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning</title><author>Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A ; Howell, Lori K ; Boutros, Shadi ; Scott, Michelle A ; Urata, Mark M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4264-d72c17a2eb880fc17a11bae2cc131ec3196d04694ed034af291f8354e238ae403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Lori K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutros, Shadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Michelle A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urata, Mark M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A</au><au>Howell, Lori K</au><au>Boutros, Shadi</au><au>Scott, Michelle A</au><au>Urata, Mark M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open</addtitle><date>2015-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e307</spage><epage>e307</epage><pages>e307-e307</pages><issn>2169-7574</issn><eissn>2169-7574</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:Orthognathic surgery has traditionally been performed using stone model surgery. This involves translating desired clinical movements of the maxilla and mandible into stone models that are then cut and repositioned into class I occlusion from which a splint is generated. Model surgery is an accurate and reproducible method of surgical correction of the dentofacial skeleton in cleft and noncleft patients, albeit considerably time-consuming. With the advent of computed tomography scanning, 3D imaging and virtual surgical planning (VSP) have gained a foothold in orthognathic surgery with VSP rapidly replacing traditional model surgery in many parts of the country and the world. What has yet to be determined is whether the application and feasibility of virtual model surgery is at a point where it will eliminate the need for traditional model surgery in both the private and academic setting. METHODS:Traditional model surgery was compared with VSP splint fabrication to determine the feasibility of use and accuracy of application in orthognathic surgery within our institution. RESULTS:VSP was found to generate acrylic splints of equal quality to model surgery splints in a fraction of the time. Drawbacks of VSP splint fabrication are the increased cost of production and certain limitations as it relates to complex craniofacial patients. CONCLUSIONS:It is our opinion that virtual model surgery will displace and replace traditional model surgery as it will become cost and time effective in both the private and academic setting for practitioners providing orthognathic surgical care in cleft and noncleft patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>25750846</pmid><doi>10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-7574
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2015-02, Vol.3 (2), p.e307-e307
issn 2169-7574
2169-7574
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_814bdb87a1bb4d0aa49cb0bce132f7e5
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Current Status of Surgical Planning for Orthognathic Surgery: Traditional Methods versus 3D Surgical Planning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A41%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Current%20Status%20of%20Surgical%20Planning%20for%20Orthognathic%20Surgery:%20Traditional%20Methods%20versus%203D%20Surgical%20Planning&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery.%20Global%20open&rft.au=Hammoudeh,%20Jeffrey%20A&rft.date=2015-02&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e307&rft.epage=e307&rft.pages=e307-e307&rft.issn=2169-7574&rft.eissn=2169-7574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000184&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1661989032%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4264-d72c17a2eb880fc17a11bae2cc131ec3196d04694ed034af291f8354e238ae403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1661989032&rft_id=info:pmid/25750846&rfr_iscdi=true