The progression-free survival ratio as outcome measure in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients: Current and future perspectives

• Published in: Gynecologic oncology reports 2022-08, Vol.42, p.101035-101035, Article 101035
• Main Authors: van de Kruis, Nienke, van der Ploeg, Phyllis, Wilting, Jody H.C., Caroline Vos, M., Thijs, Anna M.J., de Hullu, Joanne, Ottevanger, Petronella B., Lok, Christianne, Piek, Jurgen M.J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Growth-modulation index; Ovarian cancer; Ovarian carcinoma; Progression-free survival ratio; Research Report; Time to progression ratio
• ISSN: 2352-5789; 2352-5789
• DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101035

ObjectiveClinical efficacy of cytostatic anticancer agents can be determined with the progression-free survival (PFS) ratio. This outcome measure compares PFS achieved by a new treatment (PFS2) to the PFS of the most recent treatment on which the patient has experienced progression (PFS1). Clinical benefit has been defined as a PFS-ratio (PFS2/PFS1) > 1.3. However, in order to demonstrate significant benefit, trial designs require an assumption on the proportion of patients who reach this ratio during palliative options. For ovarian carcinoma, data is lacking to support this assumption. Therefore in this study, we assess the PFS-ratio in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients treated with current palliative options. MethodsWe included 67 patients with recurrent high-grade serous (HGSC, 73.1%) or low-grade (LGOC, 26.9%) ovarian carcinoma. We determined the median PFS-ratio and investigated the association with clinicopathological characteristics. ResultsOverall, we observed a median PFS-ratio of 0.69. The proportion of patients with a PFS-ratio > 1.3 was 22.4%. For HGSC patients, the median PFS-ratio was significantly lower than for LGOC patients (respectively, 0.58 and 1.26, p = 0.007). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the LGOC subtype and CA125 tumor marker concentration were independent factors related to a PFS-ratio > 1.3. ConclusionsAlthough the PFS-ratio represents a meaningful outcome measure in studies investigating cytostatic anticancer agents, we conclude that it is influenced by tumor histology and biological behavior. In future research, these factors should be taken into account when determining thresholds for clinical benefit in trial designs.