Electrocardiographic interpretation by emergency medical services professionals in Saudi Arabia: A cross sectional study

• Published in: PloS one 2023-10, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292868-e0292868
• Main Authors: Alalwan, Mohammed Abdullah, Alshammari, Talal, Alawjan, Hassan, Alkhayat, Hassan, Alsaleh, Ahmed, Alamri, Ibrahim, Aldubaikel, Alaa, Alqahtani, Jaber, Alrawashdeh, Ahmad, Alqahtani, Saeed
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Atrial fibrillation; Care and treatment; Contract manufacturing; Diagnosis; Electrocardiogram; Electrocardiography; Emergency medical services; Evaluation; Heart; Heart attack; Medical care; Medicine and Health Sciences; Myocardial ischemia; People and Places; Quality management; Research and Analysis Methods; Tachycardia
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292868

Management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiac arrhythmias in prehospital settings is largely determined by providers of emergency medical services (EMS) who can proficiently interpret the electrocardiography (ECG). The aim of this study was to assess the ECG competency of EMS providers in Saudi Arabia. Between Aug and Sep 2022, we invited all EMS providers working for the Saudi Red Crescent Authority in Makkah, Riyadh, and Sharqiyah regions to complete a cross-sectional survey. The survey was used to assess the ability of EMS providers to interpret 12 ECG strips. Characteristics and ECG competency were summarized using descriptive statistics. Differences in ECG competency across paramedics with lower and higher qualifications were assessed. During the study period, 231 participants completed the survey, and all were included. The overall mean age was 33.4, and most participants were male (94.8%). Nearly half of the participants were paramedics with an associate degree and 46.4% were paramedics with higher degrees. The average rate of correct answers to the 12 ECG strips was 43.3% (95% CI: 35.4%, 51.3%). Atrial flutter, ventricular fibrillation, atrial fibrillation, 3.sup.rd degree heart block, and ventricular tachycardia were identified by 52.8%, 60.2%, 42.0%, 40.7%, and 49.4% of the participants, respectively. The strip with an AMI was identified by 41.1%, while a pathological Q wave and ventricular extrasystole were identified by 19.1% and 24.7%, respectively. Paramedics with higher qualifications were as 28.0%-61.0% more likely to correctly interpret the 12 ECG strips compared to those with an associate degree (p-value across all variables was [less than or equal to] 0.001). While the majority of participants in our region were unable to correctly answer the 12 ECG questionnaire, paramedics with higher qualifications were. Our study indicates that there is a need for evidenced-based ECG curricula targeting different levels of EMS professionals.