Loading…
Motor unit properties do not correlate between MUNIX and needle EMG in remote polio in the biceps brachii muscle
To compare the utility of MUNIX (motor unit number index) with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit (MU) properties in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle in subjects with remote polio. Thirty subjects suffering from remote polio were investigated with MUNIX and needle EMG, all with Macro EMG and 16 o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical neurophysiology practice 2023-01, Vol.8, p.24-31 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2517015f2e54a2f90637d52962d96b382869d3f2ca3ae2e6f38d5302caf588d73 |
container_end_page | 31 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Clinical neurophysiology practice |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Sandberg, A |
description | To compare the utility of MUNIX (motor unit number index) with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit (MU) properties in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle in subjects with remote polio.
Thirty subjects suffering from remote polio were investigated with MUNIX and needle EMG, all with Macro EMG and 16 of these subjects with concentric needle EMG.
Both MUNIX and the needle EMG methods showed abnormal results. Fiber density (FD) was the most sensitive parameter for showing signs of reinnervation. At a group level, the methods showed neurogenic findings, but there was no correlation between the results of the MUNIX and needle EMG investigations.
Both MUNIX and needle EMG are valuable methods for measuring neurogenic involvement in the BB muscle. However, there was a lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG findings. The cause for this missing correlation may be multifactorial as there are several differences between the methods.
The reason for the lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG results is discussed. By combining the needle and surface recorded methods one can obtain more information on the denervation and reinnervation process compared to using just one of the methods alone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.12.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_826fc22e7d374892a4db36b8a00c25ea</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_826fc22e7d374892a4db36b8a00c25ea</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>36632370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2517015f2e54a2f90637d52962d96b382869d3f2ca3ae2e6f38d5302caf588d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFu1DAQhi0EolXpA3BBfgA22OPESS5IVSntSl24UNSb5diTrldZOzhOK96GZ-HJ6u1C1b3YnvH8n3_rJ-Q9ZwVnXH7aFMaPBTCAgkPBGLwix1DKetE2_Pb1i_MROZ2mDWOM12y3viVHQkoBombH5NcqpBDp7F2iYwwjxuRwojZQHxI1IUYcdELaYXpA9HR18215S7W31CPaAenF6pI6TyNuQ8K_f8YwuLBrpHUWOYPjRLuozdo5up0nM-A78qbXw4Sn__YTcvP14sf51eL6--Xy_Ox6YUrgaQFVtsurHrAqNfQtk6K2FbQSbCs70UAjWyt6MFpoBJS9aGwlWK77qmlsLU7Ics-1QW_UGN1Wx98qaKeeGiHeKZ0_mx2pBmRvALC2oi6bFnRpOyG7RjNmoEKdWR_3rOkBx7k7oH1xP8-eaPOsymyvEnn88348z27RGvQp6uFAdXjj3VrdhXvVZidtWWYA3wNMDNMUsX_WcqZ26auNyumrXfqKg8rpZ82Hl48-K_5nLR4BpN6tvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motor unit properties do not correlate between MUNIX and needle EMG in remote polio in the biceps brachii muscle</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><creator>Sandberg, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, A</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the utility of MUNIX (motor unit number index) with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit (MU) properties in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle in subjects with remote polio.
Thirty subjects suffering from remote polio were investigated with MUNIX and needle EMG, all with Macro EMG and 16 of these subjects with concentric needle EMG.
Both MUNIX and the needle EMG methods showed abnormal results. Fiber density (FD) was the most sensitive parameter for showing signs of reinnervation. At a group level, the methods showed neurogenic findings, but there was no correlation between the results of the MUNIX and needle EMG investigations.
Both MUNIX and needle EMG are valuable methods for measuring neurogenic involvement in the BB muscle. However, there was a lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG findings. The cause for this missing correlation may be multifactorial as there are several differences between the methods.
The reason for the lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG results is discussed. By combining the needle and surface recorded methods one can obtain more information on the denervation and reinnervation process compared to using just one of the methods alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2467-981X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2467-981X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cnp.2022.12.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36632370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier</publisher><subject>EMG ; Macro EMG ; MUNIX ; MUSIX ; Remote Polio ; Research Paper</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2023-01, Vol.8, p.24-31</ispartof><rights>2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2517015f2e54a2f90637d52962d96b382869d3f2ca3ae2e6f38d5302caf588d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826944/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9826944/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36632370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-496253$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, A</creatorcontrib><title>Motor unit properties do not correlate between MUNIX and needle EMG in remote polio in the biceps brachii muscle</title><title>Clinical neurophysiology practice</title><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol Pract</addtitle><description>To compare the utility of MUNIX (motor unit number index) with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit (MU) properties in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle in subjects with remote polio.
Thirty subjects suffering from remote polio were investigated with MUNIX and needle EMG, all with Macro EMG and 16 of these subjects with concentric needle EMG.
Both MUNIX and the needle EMG methods showed abnormal results. Fiber density (FD) was the most sensitive parameter for showing signs of reinnervation. At a group level, the methods showed neurogenic findings, but there was no correlation between the results of the MUNIX and needle EMG investigations.
Both MUNIX and needle EMG are valuable methods for measuring neurogenic involvement in the BB muscle. However, there was a lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG findings. The cause for this missing correlation may be multifactorial as there are several differences between the methods.
The reason for the lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG results is discussed. By combining the needle and surface recorded methods one can obtain more information on the denervation and reinnervation process compared to using just one of the methods alone.</description><subject>EMG</subject><subject>Macro EMG</subject><subject>MUNIX</subject><subject>MUSIX</subject><subject>Remote Polio</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><issn>2467-981X</issn><issn>2467-981X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFu1DAQhi0EolXpA3BBfgA22OPESS5IVSntSl24UNSb5diTrldZOzhOK96GZ-HJ6u1C1b3YnvH8n3_rJ-Q9ZwVnXH7aFMaPBTCAgkPBGLwix1DKetE2_Pb1i_MROZ2mDWOM12y3viVHQkoBombH5NcqpBDp7F2iYwwjxuRwojZQHxI1IUYcdELaYXpA9HR18215S7W31CPaAenF6pI6TyNuQ8K_f8YwuLBrpHUWOYPjRLuozdo5up0nM-A78qbXw4Sn__YTcvP14sf51eL6--Xy_Ox6YUrgaQFVtsurHrAqNfQtk6K2FbQSbCs70UAjWyt6MFpoBJS9aGwlWK77qmlsLU7Ics-1QW_UGN1Wx98qaKeeGiHeKZ0_mx2pBmRvALC2oi6bFnRpOyG7RjNmoEKdWR_3rOkBx7k7oH1xP8-eaPOsymyvEnn88348z27RGvQp6uFAdXjj3VrdhXvVZidtWWYA3wNMDNMUsX_WcqZ26auNyumrXfqKg8rpZ82Hl48-K_5nLR4BpN6tvw</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Sandberg, A</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>ACNBI</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>D8T</scope><scope>DF2</scope><scope>ZZAVC</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Motor unit properties do not correlate between MUNIX and needle EMG in remote polio in the biceps brachii muscle</title><author>Sandberg, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2517015f2e54a2f90637d52962d96b382869d3f2ca3ae2e6f38d5302caf588d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>EMG</topic><topic>Macro EMG</topic><topic>MUNIX</topic><topic>MUSIX</topic><topic>Remote Polio</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandberg, A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet full text</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Freely available online</collection><collection>SWEPUB Uppsala universitet</collection><collection>SwePub Articles full text</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandberg, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Motor unit properties do not correlate between MUNIX and needle EMG in remote polio in the biceps brachii muscle</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology practice</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol Pract</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><spage>24</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>24-31</pages><issn>2467-981X</issn><eissn>2467-981X</eissn><abstract>To compare the utility of MUNIX (motor unit number index) with needle EMG in characterizing motor unit (MU) properties in the biceps brachii (BB) muscle in subjects with remote polio.
Thirty subjects suffering from remote polio were investigated with MUNIX and needle EMG, all with Macro EMG and 16 of these subjects with concentric needle EMG.
Both MUNIX and the needle EMG methods showed abnormal results. Fiber density (FD) was the most sensitive parameter for showing signs of reinnervation. At a group level, the methods showed neurogenic findings, but there was no correlation between the results of the MUNIX and needle EMG investigations.
Both MUNIX and needle EMG are valuable methods for measuring neurogenic involvement in the BB muscle. However, there was a lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG findings. The cause for this missing correlation may be multifactorial as there are several differences between the methods.
The reason for the lack of correlation between the MUNIX and needle EMG results is discussed. By combining the needle and surface recorded methods one can obtain more information on the denervation and reinnervation process compared to using just one of the methods alone.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>36632370</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cnp.2022.12.002</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2467-981X |
ispartof | Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2023-01, Vol.8, p.24-31 |
issn | 2467-981X 2467-981X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_826fc22e7d374892a4db36b8a00c25ea |
source | ScienceDirect; PubMed Central (Open Access) |
subjects | EMG Macro EMG MUNIX MUSIX Remote Polio Research Paper |
title | Motor unit properties do not correlate between MUNIX and needle EMG in remote polio in the biceps brachii muscle |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motor%20unit%20properties%20do%20not%20correlate%20between%20MUNIX%20and%20needle%20EMG%20in%20remote%C2%A0polio%20in%20the%20biceps%20brachii%20muscle&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurophysiology%20practice&rft.au=Sandberg,%20A&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=24-31&rft.issn=2467-981X&rft.eissn=2467-981X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cnp.2022.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_doaj_%3E36632370%3C/pubmed_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-2517015f2e54a2f90637d52962d96b382869d3f2ca3ae2e6f38d5302caf588d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36632370&rfr_iscdi=true |